2538.pdf
Media
- extracted text
-
J ■■ <-'A' ^W"
IS®
:Cr
■RfWtei' A ■' ■■ ; '-.CM M
mW^-.
; '
t
.
-T-..-,
tW—
■■
■
\
■■
' M B-CyA
■
■■,
r;
A-'C
CMM
.
■ -;■ ■..■
..
■
KEL!:7>V<' SHILPA’ i
,. KEMPcGO’.'.':.A NfiGAR-j
:A;M'
c ; - A--.
"■ : ■ •■..
'
■
.............
c:
!
r.
;i
■;
.
S§Fi»
■.
. . ..... A’BANGALORE-SSCOn
..
|!i•
DES Nc/ 1 OF <986 '
T
'
V.'
rsif
•
.
il
1 uc
f'
•.-■ ■
S A aAC a .
<■:-
•■-■
■'•"■a
■:,
I
,:./T ' •
AM
17 o.
1
GQV £N; M t: .7 ' ?,!' K. A RN AT AKA
««.>
'
7 I CM
■:
■ ®
fI
>«'*
I9
A CASE STUDY REPORT
;
ON
iO
£ 7-.ii.
m-A S'c
blARKEWG OF FARM FORESTRY
PROfefcE CA EUCALYPTUS AND CASUARINA
5N BANGALORE AND KOLAR DISTRICTS
JW'
| Tret.:?-'-' \c v.l CM
j
* IlW'" i';*: !'■•”, ■ U-™ . ........ .
I r^.......... ■COM.O
am
0^ *-
,'....,
. t i
i
1*
Ki>
'.
r
A1'/ :
rs
r’i* j. ri.•“"'ro^c
r'
'f
1
A^c /" 7X3^
4
-
1 . The 1 .. .^ar t e. :. *
- ine •:.o
j u r;«
r In-
afpoissx- cion
Mice lyptu.- ,
c
'-DD
2-bC ui.ucr the
ForGstry prorr.jmmc
-xut] Sc:.(.\,.c h ..Vl cakt n up a missive
' * jrc!-.vin/;
/ • . .n
ill. wood species like
. r ma mi ? ur
i
2. Tht state, accor -iin- to the Forest Dcrdrtment is facing
shortore of firewood ano its cknand ty 2000 AD would be
lsr;\' i'~nou3h
the exist in shortfall in firewood
...
ry prograatie launched
has cr at d^an Rareness ^n‘7 the farmings
t;r
comrunity due to S'-.
s • .rol incentives oifejed by the Government.
3. "he impact of this
— t-::
ft -.'urac on Land -js ? in Bangalore and
Kolar districts was studied and d short r<view report
was published by this Di re-toratc in th- yeor 1384
(Publication Do.BLS 4 cf 1984).
4
J
I
I
f
As a
re jel to this case study^it was considered useful
to cxplo re into the marketing aspects
oft he woe d p ro du c e
of the t w c
•■-•.... v.zt? i_.v i ■- t ypt1.:and darurina* An attempt
■ has b •■
- n ' is study report to analyse the same .
5. The study m: ng a
o
I
inirestructur
o - thi.: st u ■
attempted.
i
::r -■‘■c-is of the field data collected
3 arc only indicative of the
’.rc collaborate t'.e findings
r - a - r.t ilcd sample survey should be
—■
6. Under tl:c ..ruidanc- o - •- ri
rarcanian, Joint Director
of the -'pricultur
■ atiiiios -in.- of rMs Directorate,
this study report has been prepared ty Sri ?!. Vyr amndi^owda,
Deputy Direct-r.
Place: Bang? 1 o re.
Dat-. : ZiSbi
4. .
’tli
x
_
-•■
‘'0/(d.' \
DI - ?3nR
----- -
_
■ C
.
N T Z J T c
I nt rodu ct ion
1
II.
Oc je ct i vt- of t he Stu dy
2
III.
Selection of Villages
2
IV.
Method of Collection of Field Data
■7
I.
V.
PxcirtLS made in Social forestry Cultivation
between the two periods of Study
VI.
Distribution of area coverage under
Du ca lyptu s and Casu r i na
5
VII.
Extent of marketable bnjrpius generated
VIJI.
Extent of Wood Produ ced from
1st April 1994 to 31st July 1935
IX.
Markefir„r and Con sum pt. ion of Wood produced
between April 1934 and July 1935
16
X.
Self Consur-ption and its uses
19
XI.
Market Ing facilities
21
XII.
Market JMsposala and ‘its uses
22
XIII.
Summary ar d
24
r
r~y
I-K&/
■I
J
-
■
A CASS STUDY REPORT ( * KA -KEriNG OF ?ARM IJ-RESW
OY EUCALYPTUS AN D CA: IH.GALKOLAh PlSTRICTE
- i
i
I. Introduction:
1. 1
In the year 1983, a bri-f study was undertaken by the
Directorate of Eoolcgics and Statistics to explore the
type of land put to use by the agricultural households
in Kolar end Bangalore districts under the Social
Forestry Programme vigorously propogated by the Govern
ment. The findings of t Ee study has teen published by
Directorate of Economics and Statistics in a short
review report in the year 1934 (publication No. BES 4
of 1984).
1.2
The main findings of this study revealed in the five
villages selected for the study in each of Kolar and
Bangalore districts are as follows. Out of a total of
367 agricultural households in Kolar, as cany as 67
(18.5?-) and cut of a total of 545 agricultural house
holds in Bangalore, as many as 94 (17.7 percent) had
attempted farm forestry cultivation of raising species
of Eucalyptus and vo.surina. The extent of area coverage
under Farm .■''res' ry l-y these 67 house holds in Kolar was
102.1 hectares w’lerc as in Bangalore, 94 house holds
who have mis i -arm forestry had covered an area of 140.1
hectares of land.
1.3
In ter;r- of
of land possessed by these agricultural hour-; /'Yds, it constituted 43.8 percent in
Kolar nd 51«2 pecoent in Bangalore. The main type of
land pu" to vse for raising farm forestry was agricul
tural 1 : i, : ich accounted 63 percent in Kolar and
50/* i n B ar.
xngal 1 rc. The economic status of‘these 67 house
h Ids ir. Tolar eamprised of smd. 1 ard marginal farmers
to the extent :f 43.3 percent while- its status of the
94 house holds in Bangalore district comprised of as
much as 59.6 percent. A pertinent fitting of this
study was, of t he total of 161 house holds in both
Kolar and Bangalore districts taken together in the
10 selected vj ..la cs as many as 48 households or
around 30 percent ha put their entire agricultural
2
lend possessed to raise farm forestry cultivablen of Eucalyptus
and Casurina.
1.4.
Impressive impact of the farm forestry programme, vigorously
motivated by the Government for growing these two species
and over—whelmingly felt in Kolar and Eangslore districts^
necessarily needs to be backed up by adequate marketing
facilities and support for the farm forestry produce to be
put bo economic use. hencc^it was considered interesting
ti undertake a follow Up study., as a secuel to the earlier
study on land u se^t o investigate into the more important
aspects of narketing of the farm forestry produce of
Eucalyptus and . Casurina by a repeat study a ttempted in the
same sot of five villages selected earlier in each of
s:
N«
I
c
. . 3-
Kolar and Bangalore Districts.
IT.
OBJECTIVFS OF TEE STUDY;
IV
Under the mbit of the study attempted the following main
aspects have teen analysed.
- 4..
1) Extent of marketable surnlus generated in the cultiva-tion of Eucalyptus and Casurina.
• i-
.
2) Proportion of the produce put to use for own co n sumpbicn.
4.
3) For what purpose the marketable surplus sold is put
to use.
4) What are the local uses of self consumed produce of
Eucalyptus and Casurina.
5) Markets and arran ments available at the village
level for the sale of produce of Wood grown by the
cult ivato rs.
III.
SELECTION OF VILLAGES:
3.1
As stated in the earlier paragraph^the attempted study being
a follow up, of t he earlier one, the same set of below
mentioned villages have been selected with a view to assess
the scale of economic benefits derived out of the marketing
of the produce in relation to the type of land put to
.
use under ^arm forestry.
V'
5.
L
I
3
-\ibl.e
si. ;
NO .
:
Names of villcg^s repeat selected
Saagalore Di strict:
i
Kolar District;
T alu k
V i 1 fag e
I
T al□k:
1
Anekal
Bangalore
Sou t h
Vanalenah al1i
K a i ko nd ar ah al 1 i
3. Devanahalli
it
4.
5. Hosakote
Anne shwa r a h al1i
Settigere
Cho k k an ah al 1 i
2.
a
/i11age
3.2
•
I
Bangarpet
J akk a ra s akoppa
Kolar
C h ad am ana h al 1 i
Vanarasi
Malur
Ch i ck sab b e r a ha 11 i
<1
Upparahal1i
In these 10 selected villages^the required field data
has been collected by enquiry jfrom
-iuui ulx
all Lnc
the cultivators
cultivator
who. have fgrown either
■ ‘ ’
of this two species of Eucalyptus
and Basurina or both of them
the end of July 1935.
------- till
----------------
iV.
MKiHO
4.1.
Suited to the objective of this sr;udy, a proforma eliciting
the required information from the responden iycultivators
was designed. On the dqy of visit by the Investigator, all
the cultivators Aohwe grown either of or both the species
o
ft eld oa : a
i-ucaly-' us and Casurina were interviewed and field data
elicited in \;e prescribed format.
4.2.
.I,
Ike hea' -S
concerned
co nc emod household
housohold
eliciti- g the rocui-ed
retired field
fl old data.
the informant for
The
harvested
the field data was collected covering
31 * . W3-S4
and for
detailed informa1923-84 and
for detailed
• rl: table surplus?r4el f cc nsumpt io n parti culars,
a;.-.a
I
H
thC Peri
-ie''
'ta covering the period from 1-4-1984 to
5K-1935 he; been considered. The field data obtained in
the prescribed formats is analysed and the findings are
discussed in ths parns to follow:
eing
C S3
ing
V.
5.1
J2_SG CI AL_^0RE3 ?RY J^UIVaXLULB EK.J.EN_ TTI E_TWO
PERIODS OF STUDY:
^hen the first study was conducted in 1982-33 the extent of
land cultivated in th
selected five villages of BatjgJiLore and
Kolar districts were 140.1 and 102.1 hectares respectively
and the corresponding no. of agricultural hois e holds raising
I
•
4
these two species were 94 in Bangalore and 6c in Kolar
districts respectivcly.
5.2.
In the current study undertaken in 1985-86^ after a lapse
of 3 years in the same set of five villages selected ±cr
the study, present that the extent of land cultivated under
Social Forestry has reduced to 112.5 hectare ob by 19.7
percent in Bangalore, while in Kolar district it has incre
ased to 116.3 hectares or by 13.8 percent. The no. of
agricultural house holds who have raised these two species
has also reduced by 6 to 88 in Bangalore while in Kolar
it has increased by ^7 to 77.
5.3.
In Table II A and II B it may Le seen that in Chokkanahalli (Hosakote Taluk) village there is drastic reduction
by 88.3 percent in the extent of area covered at 43.7
hectares in 198 2-33 to 5.1 h-. ctares Un 1985-86. The no.
c
of house holds has also reduced correspondingly from
16 in 1982-83 to 5 in 1984-85. rhis sliding down impact
has been ascertained by enquiry to be due t o the acquisition
of these lands by both Government agency and Industrialist^
for non agricultural purposes. Such trends are however not
found in the other four villages of Bangalore District.
5.4.
In Kolar District in two villages Jakkarasakoppa (Bangarpet
Taluk) and Upparahalli (Maddur Taluk) there has been more
\
5.5-
than 50$ increase in extent of area coverage, while in
one village ^aranasi (Kolar taluk) status-quo has been
V
maintalnede
6
It nay be seen on general comparison that there has been
a positive impact of motivation ano ng th., cultivators to
a
v
raise farm forestry, over the progress of three years
6
period.
_8h
cv
1 J=
1
r
Ut-
/
h<-
... c-.
WLE - 21-5.
Area under .social forestry during 1982-83
and 1985-86.
/Ar, a in hectares')
Bangalc rc district:
SI.
No.
Impact of social forestry during
7'illagc:
~ ~ "'1982-73 ‘
No.h.h
1
c-~
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
esa
'■
Area
77)85^86
No.h.h
No . h. h
Pcrccntagc-
Area
_________
2
/
An neswarahalli
Vanakar.ahalli
Kaikondahalli
Chokkanahalli
Set tigere '
20
38.0
18
24
28
16
26,5
27
28
6
94
TOTAL
28.7
43.7
3.2
i4d7T
40.3
32.8
6.1
23 .8
28.8
✓
5.1
-83.3
10
89'
5.5
11275
71 .9
-T9~.7
Table IT B,
Kolar districts
Area under Social Forestry during 1932-83
and 1985-86
(Area in hectares)
SI.
No.
In.pactof social forestry during
1982-83
1931^86
Percentage
No.h.h
Fo.h7h ' Area
Area
Village:
t ion
1. J akkarasalcoppa
s
ot
2. Chikkasubbena~
pet
halli
3. Vanarasi
4. Chaduaanahal11
5. Upparahalli
Total
‘C
)
7.5
15
11.9
58.10
13
14.4
14
10.9
10
15.7
10.9
9.9
10
22
53.0
22
52.8
11
16.3
16
25.0
-0.4
53.4
67
102.1
77
116.3
13.8
I£Jl_OF__A£gA_?lOVERAGE 15NDSR BUCALYlTtlS AND CASURINA
v1 •
6.
11
in taele III is prer-'-nted the land use with the break up of
area coverage, under D. cal/ytus and Casurina in the five selected
villat. <-s each in bangalore end Kolar Districts.
In Bangalore x-istricken the selected five villages as tnary as
88 cultivators who have been enumerated^havo raised Social forestry
cultivation and they have possessed a total of 391.61 hectares of
land. Out of which 279. 14 hectares or 71.3 percent i s b rcught
under cultivation. The area brought with social forestry is 112.47
hectares distributed at 50.67 hectares under Eucalyptus and 61.80
hectares under Casurina.
proportion.
^he di stributi-T. is aore or less equal in
m terms of pc.centag. to.tot.--. lc- . -assessed it
•
_
•
TABLE - in
Si. District
No. Name of village
Extent of area under social forestry in the select
d villages
No. of Total
Total net % to Area
7» to
Aiea under
h.h.
total put
area
area un
total Eucaraising posse
% of
der culArea
% of proarea Under area
lipsocial
produ
tivatio
n
dues reser
pcss- soci- posse
ss ed '
u n1 or
tus
ce
re
fores
ved
for
(hects)
essed al
ssed
cssuarea
try
(hts)
served
sale
fore
rina
(hts)
for
stry
(hts)
sale
(hts)
3
4
5
6
' ' 10”
7
8
9
11
12
1
2
BA NGAL'ORB'DI S T:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Anneswarahalli
Vanakanahalli
Kaikondahalli
Chokkanahalli
Settigere
13
27
28
5
10
Tot al;
158.70
86.99
102.43
118.4
54.18
73.64
22.19
17.10
15.80
88
21.30
39K6T
"27Sr.‘U
74.4
62.3
71.9
77.1
74.2
7173"
1. Jakkarasakoppa
1.
15
2. Chikkasubtenahalli14
3. Vanarasi
10
4. Chadumanahalli
22
5. Upparahalli
16
44.57
29.51
47.59
101.74
44.81
32.72
13.78
36.68
48.95
19.85
73.6
57.0
77.1
48.3
i 44.3
11.85 26.4
15.73 93.0
10.91 22.9
52.79 52.7
24.96 55.7
11.85
14. 15
10.91
51 .44
23.17
99
99
99
Total:
26S.22
151.98
56.6
116.24 43.4
111.52
99
4 0.28 25.4
32.81 37.7
28.79 28.1
5.09 22.9
5.50 25.8
Ti2747~2877
35.42
3.34
1.02
5.09
4.90
95
95
95
95
95
50767
95
4 .86
29.17
27.17
95
95
95
0.60
"61.80
95
1.58
95
1.35
1.77
95
95
4.72
95
95
KOLAR DISTRICT:
77
IIKS/-.
re p
■ IT
9
o
< St PT
M
c-t-
I--'
99
99
:
I
$
:
constituted 28.7 F’.-:ccnt and to net cultivated area it constitutes
■.0.3 percent. *tacng '.he five villages,
the extent of area
coverssr^ndcr tucalyp^us in Anneswarahalli (I'tvanahalli taluk) is
highest -nd under Cr.urina highest extent io covered in Vanakanahal J**
(Anekal taluk), it Ins been ascertained frora these 28 ojl.ti vaters
that 95 percent uf the produce of Eucalyptus as well ojs casurina
were reserved
or sale.
6.3. in Kolar 'District, in tre fife villa ges selected, as many as
77 cu It i vatc fr. who have been enutne -ated,
have raised social forestry
cultivcticn "nd together possessed 268,22 hectares of land,out of
which 15'>93 h -ctares or 56.6 percent, is brought under the plough.
The area put to social forestry is 116,24 hectares distributed at
111.52 hectares
under Eucalyptus and 4.72 hectares under
Casurina. It is interesting to note that t he distribute n between
Eucalyptus and Basurina is such th at the proportion of area coverage
•ird cr Casurina i s practically negligible. In terms of percentage,
to total land possessed the extent of Social Forestry Coverage
constituted 45.4 percent and as such as 76.5 percent to the net
area sown.
6.4. On er .uiry fror.
f„1.1 er" 165 cultivators comprising 88 in Banga
th
lore and 77 in r 1? r wa hnve taken to social Forestry of growing
the two species -f
-us and Casurina that 95 p crcent of the
v.’ocd produce in Bar?.:-lor • is marketable surplus and reserved for
sale-.,while
' the produce is rendered as mar
ketable surpl: s '’.nd
c red f r snie^vilJentlv it
be surnised
that these t*" r ‘
• • "c
-' 'own for TQCTketir?g th* n for ow consumption
"II.
■ "
Ga
'TD:
7.1.
In the earlier paragraph the ext.9nt;ZT>f area coverage
’ r Eucalypr- s an., "asurina is analysecT. The objective
of t he study beinr focussed on m arketing of Wood produced-, the
filld data collected as analysed in the folic ;?i ng paragraphs to
cover in its ambit, th: objectives enunciated under the study.
7.2.
The field data on wood produced and their related data on
its marketip^ having been collected on cn.^uiiy by interviewing the
head of t
household concerned. The field dota so collected and
analysed is therefore bound to b c- subjective err. hence the findings
adduced may n>t be strictly applicable for .rr 'mg fin: conclusions. /
However, care has been taken to see that the f io Id data collected
:
8
:
does indicate the general trend-obtaining and is not far remoVv^
from reality. With these limitations cf the field data, analysis
of the s2T?e has been attempted to tabulate them for deducing
c
c
o
f in dings.
7.3. In Table IV is presented the quantity of wood produced and
disposed in the Five selected villages in Bangalore District cover •'
ing thc-hirvost made between 1980-81 and 1985-84. Srlient aspects
of the sane is extracted and presented below in the subjoined
c
t
cr«
i
Kt-
co
I
table IV A.
^o
cn
TABL5-IV-A
£
Quantity of wood produced and marketed from 1980-81 to i933~84
in bangalore District-^
Year:
°p
Eucalyptus
!
Casu rina
No.of Quantity oiTWood (in plo.of Quantity’ of Wood (in
tonnes)
tcnnes)
percen-j Hou se Pro du- Sold percen
House Pro
Sold
tage sold
ced
tags
; holds
holds duced
to produ
sold to’
ced
produced
----------
1980- 81
1981- 82
1982- 83
1983- 84
Total
3
2
2
7
128.0
27.5
70.0
225.5
128.0
27.5
70.0
225 >5
e
o
A
Cn
M
I
M
Hl
-8
'U.
c
100%
d
1
1
100%
100%
100%
o
co
■
2
4.0
4.0
151.0
151.0
155.0
100%
100%
•u
<u
o
3
*u
o
i
i
>4
155.0
100%
ft
i
*3
o
’o
7.4. It
It can
can be
b e seen
seen from the above table that for t he four years
taken together in the seUoted villages of Bangalore District?.
a*
i
7 cultivators have harvested the wood produce of Eucalyptus with
a total wood production of 225-5 tonnes and the entire produce
is sold as marketable surplus. While during the same four years
only 2 cultivators have harvested wood produce of 156.0 tonnes of
casurina in Bangalore District and the entire produce is again
sold as marketable surplus*
u>
o
w
c
Q
pq
7.5. It may be seen in the Table IV that in the year 1980-81
Eucalyptus wood produce of 128 tonnes was harvested from / .73
hectares of area of 3 cultivators.
On an average the word produce
per hectare work-out to 16.6 tonnes.
In the year i98---33j
Eucalyptu s w ood produce of 2 cultivators from a total area of 2.7^
■u»
b.’
jc-
o
c
3
CL
-a
<r®*>
o
in
o
c
(I)
l_l.
C'
'/
I O j o
O
I
b apt .
d H*
I
_XJ------- TABLE-Ig
cn
o
Q
I
I
No .of
h. h.
Total
Qu entity
area
harves
harves
ted
ted
?
3
6
5
<
CL
o
9
t
...... ........
9 «
Quan Quantity
tity
self
sold
consu-
’_____ wed
1
4CU
cn
Wood produced and sold from 1930-81 to 1983-84
bi . t: Bangalore
81. Name of
No. Vi 11 '• ' e:
3 1
| (!) *XJ H) Q j
. CL H ‘ • o I
.I
O tt.H
.
j
Cb O I ;
|
Value
per
tonne
(Rs.)
An ou nt
reali
sed
Rs.
(in tonnes)
Purpose for which used
___________________
8~
9
250/-
12000
7
TO
Eucaliptus (1980-81)
1. Anneswarahalli
1
2.43
48
2. Chokkanaha1 li
2
5.30
80 «
_______ tY ty.l^___ _
“3
IS 121128
48
7 .5
..20..P____ _
1.62
........ J^lal ___
2
2,_IP__ _27.,5_
1. Vanakanahalli
2
1.67
0.61
1 .03
20000
-do-
Z200/-
1500
-do-
___ 2CL0___ 200//-
4000
__ rdor__
-
80
Z
y-g
250/-
_
Lucaliptus (1982-83
1. Anneswarahalli 1
2. Chokk .nahalli 1
-
‘
27.5
Bucalif)tus Tigg3-84)
2. Kaikondanahalli 1
64.0
-
64.0
300/-
19200
-do-
6.0
-
6.0
300/-
1800
"21000
-do-
ZZOT 3. LoloZlZlZZllZzoroZZ
1
0.20
2. Vanakanahalli
1
5.54
NKS/-.
ygOoo
5500
total
1. Vaneknahal 1 i
Sold to Harihara Polyfibre through local
agents
used as a raw
material
Pasurina (1932-83-84)
4.0
4.0
400/-
151.0
151.0
413/-
1600
63633
.. .
Sold to Bangalore City
a&d use-d as building
calav. ’> and a s fuel
-do-
t
-10 -
- 15>hectares hcr-feated, hPs yielded- 27.5. t.nnr'es vr.it’n ?n average
production of 10.2 tonnc-s nor hect-’re. In the year -19^5^,34.^
Facelpiius wood production of 3 cultivators’fram a. total area of
j wi th
2.2fe hectares harvested has yielded. 70.0 tonnes '
an average, nroductim of 50.7 tonnes nrr hectare. The total
Fculaptus wood production for th^ four year period from. 1930-31
to 1985-34 at 225-5 tonnes from a total area of 12-71 hectares
harvested by 7 cultivator in the selected villages in- .
Bany lore has yielded an average 17.7 tonnes per hectare.
7*6 Similarly it cm be seen that only 2 cultivators have harvested casurin? from an area of 7-74 hectares to yield a
total of 155*00 tonnes of wo^d produce, the entire ouanti5y
rendering marketable surplus and sold. The average yield has
brrn 20 tonnes per hectare.
7*7 The total oua&tity of 225*5 tonnes, of Fucaptus. wood
produced havin^ bem rendered to be sold, as marketable surplus_has
fetched a. total, of Rs.585OO/- with, an average return of Rs.26O/per tonne^ In terms of economic benefit derived the return may br
considered to be impressive. Similarly. for. a total .quantity of
156*00 tonnes of Casurinr wood produced, the whole quantity
havinr hoen rendered marketable surplus- for sale has fetched a _
total value of Rs. 62563/.-, with, an average return
Rs*402/- per
tonne. The economic benefits derived is again found tobe
impressive for practically no innu* cost*
It is ascertPlned on enouirv from, the jcultivPtors 7.8
concerned that for Fucelpptus wood uroduced, ready merket exists
in Harihara Poly fibre Industry, through their local agents,while
for casurina wood produced market exists in Bangalore City for
consumption ?s building material and fuel*
In ¥able V is presented thB Quantity of wood produces
7.9
and disposed in the selected villages of Kolar district covering
the harvest of Eucalyptus and Casurina made, by the cultivators
concerned between 1980-81 and 1933-34. Salient aspects of the
wool production is extracted and presanter1 in the subjeoined
table V-A.
-19
191
19^
19^
t
7.1
'tak-
rff. —
cui
tot
rent
on
set
7.1
Euc<
frofc
worfr
to-<^
• 8.7(
per
was
yieJi
.prbc
hect
whil
is f
11
Tab]? V A
Quantity '-
wood produced and marketed i rom 191 -8± t o 11 ~
in Kolar district
Ye-ar
Euc a 1y pt u s
bl? .of Qu^nri-y of wood
house
( in J. on nos)
ho J s Tro-ScTTd Percehcured
tage
sold to
produ -ed
Casurina
NoToF
.house
hold
njuaTrTrt y"oF“ woo3
(in tonnes)
_
Percen
Sr.
j
ci
Pro
tage
cl weed
sold to
1930-81
ns
t)r
rr
ts
le
i
1981- 82
4
64.0
e0
1982- 83
9
243 .0
243.0
100%
100%
1983- 84
3
28.0
28.0
lor^
T ota 1
16
335 <0
3’ 5.0
10C&
7.10
It can be seen from the above table that for the four years
taken to-gether in f..c .selected-villages of Kolar district^ 16
.'“tod i : % vnod produce of Eucalyptus with a
ar."' the entire quantity produced is
rendered market ' bin st -• * ns for sale. No cultivator has reported
•’’•'rina during this four year oeriod in the
on enquiry harvest of
district.
selected tillages ■"
cultivators h^.ve I ' 338
total output
It mav in seen from Table V that in the year 1981-82,
7.11
64 tonnes was harvested by 4 cultivators
Eucalyptus wood produce <■
from an area of 3X -- hectares. The wood produced on an average
.c-rU.-t.tCJVfc-.
works out to 1 '.6 tonne’s/ I’' t 'r year 1982-83, 9 cultivators have
to-got her harvested 2-'.o tonnes of Eucalyptus wood from an area of
8.76 hectares. The average yield of v/ood produced is 27.7 tonnes
p r hectare. While in the year 1983-84T 28 tonnes of Eucalyptus wood
was harvested by 3 cultivators from an area of 2.24 hectares^
yielding on an average 12.5 tonnes per nectare. The total wood
production of 33.5 to'.nes by 16 cultivators from an area of 14.44
hectares^has yielded an overall average of 23.2 tonnes per beet?
,
while on compare inq with- the overall iv^rage production in Boog^lore,
is found to be more than onn a nr! a quarter times.
. .12 ,
I? 73 6
: 12 :
i
V
Table
Wood produce^ and sold frox 1930-81 to 1983-84 (Eucalyptus)
Kolar district
No .of
house
hold
SI. Naae of the
No. village
2
1
To t al
Quantity Quantity
eren
bar- '
vested
produced self
consumed
3 ’ •
5
4.
Aniount Purpose for which
Quan- Vale
retity per
used
sold tonnes alised
8
7
6
9
10
Sold to Harihara
Polyfibre through
Local agents and
used as Industrial
raw material
Eccalyptuu (1981-82)
1. Chikkesubba
nehalli
2
1.82
40
40
250
10,000
2. Cha fluaanahalll
2
1 .62
...2±
24
240
5,760
<
3,44
„ 9.4
9
8.76
1. Chikkasubbenaballi
1
0.28
2. Van'rrsi
2
3
i
"! '
1, ChlkkasubLcnohall!
-___J64_______L5.J6O__
G akyP * u s (1982-83 )
272
66,096
~do-
8
245
1985-84
8
300
2,400
-do-
K96
20
20
210
4,200
2.24
23
28
6 ,600
1
{
j
3
Q
3
-•••
5
o
O
0
0
0
#r»
cb
ZT
-
O
/—
.
F-i
A
fl»
c-b
f-b
O
*-h *O
O
O
f-i
c<*
0)
23
CL
H*
□
rfH*
3
O
O
n
o
l-»’
H-
J-**
CO
Q>
<
.«
Ci)
17
Q
Q
CO
O'
n
cn
C
CJ
□
(1>
□
*xj
H
Q
•TJ
CD
:.r
13
7.12
Tiv whole quantity of 335 tonnes of Eucalyptus wood produced
having bevn rendered to be sold as marketable surplus^ has fetched
a total value of Rs.88456-^at rates ranging between Rs.210 to
Rs.300 per tonne. The avc. ;ge return per tonne works out/*Rs.264,
i
more or less comparative to Rs.260/- obtained in Bangalore district.
The economic benefits derived by the motivation extended by the
Government seem to be imnressive order the basic
cost being
rr ?c t ic a Uy n egl igible .
I
7,13
From the enquiry made with these 23 cultivators in Bangalore
and Kolar districts taken to-gether who have marketed the Eucalyptus
and Casurina wood r-roiv
i^it is ascertained that the marketable
surplus generated is cent percent. In otherwords the wood produced
between the p.riod 1980-Cl to 1983-84 has net been used for own
consumption. It is ascertained that only branches during the growing
periods of these yjoed species were used as fuel for own use^ having
secured the economic value of the wood produced and ready market
available for its disposal at the village site itself.
7.14
•As th^
th col? -'■o4- * ' - -f field data on wood produced and marketed
As
is through ora<'ncvi.r'r . oom the cultivators as stated earlier,
it is be---’
■ rant of subjectivity. Besides data
r
collected -f-r t.
' r from 1980-81 to 1983-84 are bound to
contain J:
I*
■ " pronounced scale due to distance of
time. Kt ?nio;..s in ' ' •■.•..an~\\rsis of field data is divided into
two peri "is, viz., ~ :: t5*
and for t ’ - ri ’
It is C'
ncrlod cr.^
7■ '
. 7 t' I*.'■ j.d i’ta collected during the latter
r”? ... -n is nz inter check, as well as more reliable
or an?-. ; .-..3 on
to tcI:
attempted.
VIII. EXIF T
~irst period from 1980-81 to 1983-84
ctov 1st April 1984 to 31st July 1985.
.-iw :v?
’.s'.s of t’v
.
-. I' v.ccs . Accordingly, in the paragraphs
Sield/for the second period has been
data
• 'T'-F’JFTD FRO?4 1SI APRIL 1984 to 31ST X’LY 1085.
5.1
In Table VI the det'Ils of wood produced and marketed during
the second period cov ringl6 months from April 84 to July 85 is
presented<In the subjoined Tabic VI A
- -
the extent of
wood production Dangrlorc /’istriet
*•
for these 16
months covering from April 84 to Julv-Sb is given.
c . . . .13.
-14
.Table-VI^A..
Quantity of wood produced between April 84 and July 85 in
Bangalore "district.
SI.
No.
No. of
ho vise
hole's
village
1. Anneswarhalli
2 . Sett igere
3. Chokkanrhalli
4. Ka ik o n a m
halli
Total
Area
harvested
(in hects)
Quantity of wood
produced (in
tonnes)
nvcn iyptus CasuiIna
1
2
31.38
0.40
2.00
3.35
1040
10
80
17
37.13
1080
13
1
58
58
8.2
It can be seen from Table VI A that between April 84 and
July 85 in the selected villages of Bangalore^37.18 hectares cover
ing bot-h Eucalyptus and Casurina . of 17 cult ivat ors^ has been har
vested for wood produce and the total output obtained in terms of
wood production was 1138 tonneSjComp rising 1080 tonnes of
Eucalyptus and 58 tonnes of Casurina. The average production of
wood harvested works out to 30.6 tonnes. Of the 17 cultivators^
15 have harvested a total area of 33.78 hectares of Eucalyptus
with an out put of 1080 tonnes^,yielding on an average 32 tonnes
of wood perhectare. While 2 cultivators have harvested an area
of 3.35 hectares of casurina with an output of 58 tonnes?yielding
an average of 17 tonnes of wood produce per hectare.
1
1
1
—f
1 co
- 0
•c
co
■4
i
>
ft _ I
<0 o
H w
•u
c
CD
‘In the sub-joined Tabic VI B the status obtaining in
8.3
Kolar district on wood production between April 1284 and July
1985 is prose nt od •
•o
(J
o
■o
o
Q
T5
r>
Table VI B
Quantity of wood pm’action between April 84 and July 85 in
kol^r district.
~ 0
Sl.llo. Village
m
co
o
No .of
HH
1. Chikkasubba nahalli
1
4
2. Vanarasi
3. Cha' daman*hall i 12+2
4. Uppar a ha 11 i 2
Total
21
Quantity of wood proh■'vestcd
_ ducedfin tonnes)^_____
. hectares ) -.ucaTynTFs
Casurma_
20.0
0.65
46.0
2.77
360.5
19.85i16.2O
.
240,0
6.43_____
45. °5
429.0
429.0
'J
: i
Ih-
Isl ■'81
O
(n
p.
;O
. <£»
i >■ ? .
jail
<
H’
I
- i5 -
Tabic VI__ "
i
Wo ?d produced and sold from 1-4-84 to 31-7-1985
SI.
No.
Name of village
1
2
No. of
h use
hold
Total Total
quanti
area
ty prohar
vested duced
(in
(in
hocts) tonnes)
% ago
T ot a 1
quantity
self
c onsurned
(tonnes)
6
5
,
?• ■> :]£21 ■i c distr i~t
;•/
IvptU-'-.
74
T of a 1
quant i-.
ty s-’ld
1oc^lly
(tonnes)
% age
8
9
Total % Tge
quan
tity
sold
for
out
side
(tonnes).
11
10
Rate
per
t once
250/-.
200/-.
1. Annasworiha11i
2. Sr. ttigcre
3. .'Tn ok k a na ho 11 i
13
1
1
31.380.40
2 .00
1040 •
10
30
39.0
3.9
2.5
8.3
1001.0 96.1
10.0 100-.C
27.5 91.7
T >t3l
15
33.78
1080
41.5
3.8
1038.5
12
250/-.
?■ .2
Ca serin?
1 . Kaik jndanahalli
2
3.35
58
7
51
88
20.0
43.7
100
95
340/-.
Eucalyptus
j. tr 'c L
i
__ _ _
1. • i-kk subbomhnlli
V i m') s i
3. •Jh.-jdrumin-iMlli
•1. Kpir'ihalli
r .til
1 .
a
i a ?! a 1 L i
1
4
12
345.0
240.0
300/-•
182/-.
20?/-.
96
100_ 200/-.
2.7
648.7
97 .3
4.0
410
96
20.0
46.0
360.5
240.0
2.3
15.5
f .0
4.0
2
0.65
2.77
19.85
6.48
19
29.75
2
16.20
17?8
666.5
Casur ina
429”
19
3
- 16 From the obove table it can be seen that a total of 21 cultivanrs h-vc harvested,from an area of 45.95 hccta rosewood produce
of 1095.5 tonnes comprising 666.5 tonnes of Eucalyptus and 429.0
tnnn-'S of Casurino. The average output works out to 23.8 tonnes
p-r hectare. Of the 21 cultivotors, 1? have harvested from an
area of 29.75 hectares of Eucalypti'S^wnnd produce of 666.5
tonnes, yielding on an average 22.4 tonnes per hectare^while 2
cultivators have obtained an output of 429.0
tonnes of Casurino
wa-d produce from 16.20 hectares of area harvested, yielding 26.5
tonnes por hectare.
Th' field cinta
collected for the foregoing analysis covering the p riod April<74
tn July 85 can be seen fo afford consistency with that analysed
for the p riod from 1980-81 tn 1983-84 vide Table IV to establish
9.3
dis
. Euc
48.!
W00(
credibility of the inferences drawn from this study.
salt
IX 1ARKFT ITS AX’D C01-EL1/PT I9.\! OF VI~'OP PRODUCED 3ET’lVEhNi__
9.4
9.1
In the earlier paragraph the quantity of wood production
has been analysed separately for the- four year period 19o0-81
wb s
to 1983-84 and from April 84 tn July 85. In the Table VI details
of the marketing and consumption of wood produced is furnished.
tonr
fete
(3‘..
Further analysis of the same are attempted in'the paragraphs to
1 ’9.5
follow.
In Table VI C is extracted particulars of the pattern of
9.2
marketing and consumption of wood produced from April 84 to
wood
was
sale
July 85 is Bangalore district.
per
i
Tao].- VI C
Mirketing a' nd consumot
____ l>n pattern of wood production between
“!^-'~p-»n^anah
lore dist r ict.
April 19837
July"
985
,
SI.
Mo.
Village
No. o f
HH
-
—— - —» —» —
<
1
■ ■ ■«•••>• J-J •
9.6
Only
■’*'
Quantity produced, marketed ond consumed
( iri tonnes)
- ---- -- -- -
"SoTt--------F/Q" r.edTy sole___
c nsumed Locally Ojtslde Kstc yjer
n^rke
wood
9^7
1. Ainneswarahalli
13
2. Scttigere
3. Ch kkenohalli
1
1
Sub total
15
EucAlypus _
1040.0 3 9.0
(3.9%)
10.0
2.5
30.0
{8.3%)
1001.0
(96.1%)
10.0
27 .5
_____ (91.7%)
250/-.
41,5
1038.5
(-6.2%)
,250/- .
1080.0
(3>8%>
200/-.
250/-•
marke=
July
17
Ctsurina
4 4< r i. k od a na ha 111
2
58.0
7.0
(12%)
51.0
(8^)
34C
Grana total
17
11X .0
48.5
(4.3#)
1089.5
(95.7%)
254/-
N^te : Figures in bracket indicate percentage to
corresponding w^^d production.
i no
.5
a
•
34
sh
y.3
From the above table it can be
oen th^t in Bangalore
oisti ict^ against a total wo?:] product! n of 1138.0 tonnes of bo h
Fucaplyptus and Casurina
’*
of the 17 cultivators^hardiy,
48.5 l nnes( 4.o%) has been self consumed^with the balance of
wood produce at 1089.5 tonnes marketed outside the village for
sale^ fetching an average sale price of Ps. 254/-. per tonne.
The total wood produce of Eucalyptus of the 15 cultivators
was 1080.0 tonne. C~
Of this quantity produced^hardly 41,5 tonnes
(3.8%) has boon self
If consumed^ leaving the balance of 1033,5
9.4
Is •
tonnes as marketable- surplus for sale outside the village
sale price of Rs. 250/-. per tonne/
fetching an ^v rag
0
9,5
Hardly 2 cultivators,
wood produce of casurina
the total of 17, whose harvested
- 58.0 tonnes, Only 7.0 tonnes (21;*)
was self c nsumed lewi »g th balance of 51.0 tonnes marketed for
sale outise th: village^fetching
village^f:tching an average sale price of Rs.340/-.
per tonne.
: wc- e n
9.6
0 nly
joed
IF71L
Te ‘per
nnc'(f.s)
It may be n^tod th-t the marketing of wood produce has been
outside the village on the demand that existed and no local
n : eported . Agencies
■“
available for meeting
market demands outside vil'^ocs and the type: of us^-/scJf consumed
wood produces is ’2/ .ussed in the oaragranhs to f-llow.
market consumption lac
9<7
in Table VI D is
xtrcted particulars of the pTttern of
marketing and consumption of wood produced from ^oril 1984 to
2507 - •
July 1985 in Kol^r istrict.
200/-.
250/-.
. .17 .
250/.
( 0 V_o_._)__
r
- in _TAble VI D
Marketing and cnnsumption pattern of wood production between
PioriT” 1584 a7.B Juiv .19jn Kolar district ,
SI.
Vi llage-
i'h . of
HH
No.
iiikk- .subbenahal 1 i 1
2a Vanarasi
4
^-16.0
12
360.5
4• Upparaha 11i
2
240.0
19
■ d
d
rk c t ed by s ?■ 1 e ~
_ ____
Hatc p:
•consumed Loca Tvt
side
t onne (plly
Euca I voru
20.0 ~ 300/-.
20,0
(100%)
3, Cha rin manahalli
Sub- total
n
Quantity produced, mark ted and consumed
( in tonnes)
Produce'd
1.
. g
656«5
oe IT
X
1(
d
2 3
43,7
(- ')
(95%)
■182/-.- - ■
15.5
(4%)
345 .0
200/-,
240,0
(100%)
200/-.
648.7
(9^ .3%)
211/-.
17 r8
(2 .7%)
ir-
O
. b\
ci
cc
ct
_ as
(avg.J
IT.
Casurlna
5. Cha dumana ha11i
Grand total
2
21
429.0
1095.5
19.0
(4 ,;O
410,0
(96%)
350/-,
36.8
(3.4%)
1058.7
(96.6%)
265/(avg.
1C
. w:
=>
ar
le
■
Note: Figures in bracket indicate percentage to the corres
ponding wood production.
9.8
-
I
li
of
It can be see’n from the above table that in t he selected
villages of Kolar district, 21 cultivators who have harvested a
total of 1095.5 tonnes of wood produce of the Eucalyptus and
Casurina to-gether^ have used for self cansumpti^n^hardly 36.8
tonnes (3.4%) while, the balance of 1058.7 tonnes have bee.n marketed
■ bv sale outni
the village^ fetching an average sale price of
Rs. 265/-. per tonne.
Of the total wood production, Eucalyptus has contributed
666.5 bonnes. The quantity self consumed is hardly 17 .3 tonnes
(2.7%), the balance of 648.7 tonnes having been marketed as
surplus nutside the villagc^fetching an average sale price of
Rs. 211/-. p'r tonne. The wood production of Casurina was 429.0
tonnes, of which, hardly 19.0 tonne (4%/)is consumed for own u se
by the cultivators, leaving the major share of wood produce at
n sale on' side the
village. Such mari<ct sales has fetched an ?v r^nr s''lc nrice of
Rs. 350/-. per tonne.
1
10
15
fo
co
do
as
9.9
410.0 tonnes ( 96jC' ) as surplus^ f^r marketing
th
as
is
10
■ " cu
pr
to*
is
ma*
f
19
9.10
No local marketing of wood production was reported ^due to
nil demand^while agents at village sites were available
disposal of the marketable surplus on sale. More o.t.ils
nsumad
J
10
discussed in the paragraohs to follow.
aTc f
onne (1
x• SFU;
ITS USES:__
10.1 We have analysed in the earlier paragraph that in Bangalore
300/-
district 3.8 percent of Eucalyputs and 12 per cent of c asurina
in Kolar districtj2.7 percent of Eucaly^s and 4 per cent >f
Casurina wood production respectively have been self consumed
18'27-i
200/-
by the cultivators. These species of wood pulp crop are grown by
cultivators for deriving economic benefits through sale. Home
consumption as fuel and other needs like poles for roof constructions, building material, for fuel etc., are nractically nc%Ligible
200/~
211/-!
as their produce bears immense economic importance through ready
—I
market.
-■
I
10.2
350/-I
wood produce of Eucalyptus and casurina in Bangalore and Kolar is
analysed. Normally cultivators use the branches, dead^eoves and
left over after marketing/o meet their domestic fuel needs and
265/-|
(svgl
70S-
In the Table Vll the type of usage to which self consumed,
the self consumed wood produce is used to meet their Farm needs,
like agricultural ■implements, building material for construction
i
of sheds etc,,
2d
j
10.3
a’
It can be seen from Table VII th^t in Bangalore^among the
15 cultivators ( vide Table VI) 6 cultivators who were interviews
for self-consumption data on wood produce of Eucalyptus*have
consumed a total quantity of 41.5 tonnes of Eucalyputuswood for
8
Arketc
domestic use. Of this quantitv,5.0 tonnes (12%) has been used
as building material, and the rest of 36.5 tonnes (88%) is used
as fuel. .’Jhile 7 tonnes of Casurina self consumed by 2 cultivators
: G- d
*i '.S’ .
I
is put to
^elusive
use as fuel in the house.
ex
!
10.4 Similarly in Kolar dis trict^ among the 19 c Itiv^tors, 11
Itivators who w-re interviewed for self consumption d^ta on wood
C’
of
29.0
produce of Eucalyptus^ have consumed for use in the home front a
total quantity of 17.8 tonnes. Of this quantity. 1.45 tonnes(8%)
u se
is used for farm implements, 2.75 tonnes. (16%) os building
material and the rest of J3.6O £>onnes (76/i) as domestic fuel.
at
e the
c Of
..20.-
I
20
Annexure - Table VIT
Uses of Eucaliptus and Casurina, Self consumed by the grower from 1,4.85 to
31.7.85.
No.of
HH
District
village
SI.
No.
Total
quantity
R avz
self con
materials
sumed (tonn
es)
Used as ( in tonnes )
%
Agl.
implements
Building
material
%
%
Fuel
0/
/O
IW '"I *111 IIKII^***^*1**
Bangalore District:
1. Anneswarahalli
5
39.0
2. Chokkanahalli
1
2.5
6
■41.5
l
Tot a 1
12 .0 3'1.0 87 .0
5 .0
2.5 100
12.0
5 .0
36.5 88.0
Casurina■_
7.0 100
7.0
2
Kai kondanahalli
Eucaliptus.
Kolar district. : „
1.20 52 0
1. Vanarasi
3
2,30
0.35
15.0
0.75
33.0
2. Chadumanahalli
8
15.50
1.10
7 .0
2 .00
l^.O 12.40 30,0
T ot a 1
11
17.80
1.45
8.1
2 .75
15.5 13.60 76.4
4.0
21.0
4.0
21.0 11.0 58.0
Casurina.
17.0
2
1. Chadumanahalli
J
»
o
o
a* oa 3 o
3
d*
^r*
p.
o
zr
cu
¥
5
T
W’
O
r*
0
2
H‘ 5 □ o zr □ 5
«<:
IT
cd
cr 2
<T>
ra
V)
c
3
O
.d
I
21
-
’I
-
2 cultivators who have consumed
I
19.0 tonnes of
Casurina wood oroduce«hav< put to use,
k
tonnes (21%) for farm implement a not her 4.0 tonnes (21/->;
-s building
material and the rest 11.0 tonnes (58%) as domestic fuel. It may be
noted from the pattern of self consumed wood produce of Eucalyptus
and Casurina, domestic fuel usage is more prevalent than of other
..
uses
‘’
•.
•
XI. M'XRK.CTI^ F'XCILIT IF7 .
11 .1
In Table VI the nr auction and disposal of wood produce of
Eucalyptus and casurine was analysed. <Ve have seen that from the
sample villages enumerated both in Bangalore and Kolar districts
more than 95% of the wood produce was sold for deriving economic
P
benefits. Vithout ad-quate- marketing facilities such efforts
would not be possible and raising of those two species on their
agricultural holdings would be proposition involving high risk
when domestic consumption is too low.
! -
11.2 It has bo:n ascertained on eqquiry, that the cultivator at
the village level do not face any problem for marketing their
i
wood produce. Th" re are
number of middle non who act as agents
on behalf of big saw mill owners and wood depots^who purchase
i
the v/ood produce ready for sale on the village site itself.
»
-
in large qua nt it io- s has generated adequate nnrkct
demand for
wo^d produce of Eucalyptus and purchase of these at the village
site by local agents has provided the infrastrudural base for
I
i
marketing facilities. In bangalore and Kolnr there are number of
i
agencies who pay money in advanc? even about a year
harvest of the wood produce and b ak the contract to meet/demands
II
I
* i
’ *1
4
.
-
i
I!"
3
Consumption of w od pulp as raw material by Harihara Poly Fibres
of wood pulp industries* Th- so agcnts/aqonc ies have their
infrastructural outwork t transr-u.-t these v/oed oulp produce to
the consumer centres. Suer, marketing •>?ilitics available at the
doorstops of the cultivators naturally motivate them to raise these
wood species even on their agricuItur1 farm land holdings. The
demands for wood pulp produce being presently on a high scale7
marketing facilities practically r“acn he do'^r stops ~f the
cnitivatorSjwithout their having to -xert on this aspect which is
one of the most imoortant one.
<7-/25 38
. .20 ,
“22
X J I. MV i :et
12.1
d ISPCSA l 3 A -:d
ITS USES.
As ^mlyscd in Table VI. in Snngalorc district 96.2 percent
•
?f W'?^d produce of Eucalyptus And 88 percent of casurina produce
ar.,
.
in koi )r district^ 97 .o per cent of Eucalyptus produce a nd ?6
percent of casurina produce arc disposed off for sale outside the
village. Marketing supoort And facilities availoblo at the village
site vns highlighted in pira X.
i
<
In T.?nle
ty . of ases
ascs to which the quantity disposed
1.-.in
J0010 VIII the ty
n• * 1 y3ocK In Batag^lore
33 nqn ] "• ro district
d ist ric t a* nog 15 cultivators who
off io
id a
analysed.
OJ
I
hove harvested 1080.0 tonn s of Eucalyotus wood produce, 14 of
them have together sold a quantity of 1058,5 tonnes (96.2 percent). As many as 13 among th'ose^have sold their entire wood production of
Eucalyptus.
It can be seen in the Table VIII that the whole quantit-
of 1038.5 tonnes of Eucalyptus wood produce marketed outxside the
village site has been ascertained to be used
as industrial raw
m l r i^ 1 by FMr i n-^r ?
ly Fibres •
1".3 Similarly of 2 cultivators who have harvested 58 tonnes of
Cosurina wo d produce, one of them has marketed his entire produce
F-r
: -
•U‘
of 57 tonnes (88%) for sale to be used .as fuel, 7It is also ascertain;.
*'
:
h
that Cosurina wood is initially Dut to use as rafters and calavadi
+
C
material in building construction activities which fetches returns
t
c
sucsequcnc^y disposed off as fuel etc. When its service
ability in the use of rafters and calavadi material deolets ?aircct
disposal of wood produce as
as fuel
being resulted
resulted to,’ depend:
fuel is
is also
also being
on the demands arising.
12.4
In Kol.ar district vide Table VIII; among the. 19 cultivators
who have harvested 666.5 tonnes of Eucalyptus wood produce, 18
y
O’
c
Z3-
w
<v
O
T5
C
<V
of t..ose as many as 12 of them have sold their entire wood produce
siI
amour-mg to 365.0 tonnes. As much as ^7% of the wood sold is used
•as industrial raw mat ria] by Harihara Poly Fibres and a small
S3
of tnem have to-goth. r S'ld a quantity of 648.7 tonnes (97.3%)7
puantity of 19 tonnes oi 3 per cent of wood sold is disposed as
fuel»
12.5
Similarly vide Table VIII among the 2 cultivators who have
harvested 429 tonnes of Casurin? w-oc’, both of them have together
sold a .total, quantity.of 410 tonnes’ (96^) outside the village site
ewhich hns been disposed of an fuel.
3
3
. o
5
Q
tn
n
zr
r-t
J
V»
>;d
cd
7.' O
Cl \3
if)
C
CL
CD
c>
>0
Q
co
o
C
CL
Q
o
'g o_
H
O')
o
'-J
O
3.
rt
<2
<
• HO
Q
I
.□
(n
gj
n
<
Q
H
Q-
Ci
Q.
O
C
•-h
n
zr
s o
?.>
Q
c
CJ
D
H-
H-
o
o
‘J
H-
o
C
o
cn
o
<o
zr
04
Q
Q
3
r+
Q
CL
•"h
ISBK
TABLr yni
-23ilsc 21—cUgjlyptus and Cagurina. sold cut side the village from 1-4-84 to 31.7.85
SI.
No.
Nnmo of village
CFJTo?
house
hold
1
2
3
Total
quantity
sold
4
wersT
7q ago
Ind .raw
material
5
As
build
ing
6
7
% ige
8
As ag7
imple
ment
9
/o igc TTlC T’ioT
10
T 'go
1
11
^9^111111-95
Banna Inrc disti lct_._
1. Annesw?raha 11 i
2 . Chokkc nahalli
3. Scttigere-
12
1
1
1001 .-0
27.5
10.0
1001,0
27 .5
10.0
100
T ot a 1
14
1038.5
1038.5
100
ICO
100
Ca s a r I na,_ _
1 . Kaikondinahalli
1
51
' 5K0
..Kolar district.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Chikkesubb ’’nahalli
Vanarasi
Chaduma na ha 11 i
Uoparahalj i
*4 00
Bucalypt» j s
1
I
20.0
43.7
345,0
240.0
20.0
39.7
345.0
2.25,0
I ota 1
18
648.7
629.7 _j__ 2?. _
1. Chadum-noha 11 i
2
4.1.0
4
11
100
90
100
94
CAJ&XJVCI jVi
4
■*
4.0
10
15.0
6
lj.0
3_.
410
100
24
xiii Sloppy
13.1
Fi:rir^s.
In the repeat selected five villages in Bangalore district
as many as 88 cultivators have grown in 1385-86 Eucalyptus on an
area of 50.67 hectare and casurina en an area of 6L80 hectare^
c
which to-gethcr comprised 28.7 p-r cent of the land possessed by
<
these- cultivators. Similar.y in the repeat selected five villages
in’ Kolar district a$ many s 77 cultivators hove grown Eucalyptus
on as area of 111.52 hect ^es and Casurina on an area of 4,/2
hect a ?: es^ whic h together comprised ^3.4 per cent of the land possessc:by those cultivators.
1
13,2 Villige^ise observation present th^t there has been a gradual
increased impact in the- cultivation of social forestry^particularly
I
t
of Eucalyptus cultivation^for which ready market exists.
<■
13.3 Between April 84 and July '85, around 96.2 percent of Eucalypti^
produced in Bangalore district and 97.5 per cent of Eucalyputs prodj
in Kol^r district has been marketed. Similarly in respect of Casuriii
around 88 p r cent in Bangalore and 96 p'r cent in Kolar district
has been marketed.
I
13.4 Less than 5 per cent of wood produce of Eucalyptus and Casuri
has been put to self use by the Cultivat ors^establishing t hat the
1
I
cultivation of these tw species of wood are mainly grown for
® <'-r'
marketing^as the economic benefits derived is quite substantial for
nE
the innut costs and also due to heavy marketing demands.
e
• .
■
13.5 The entire quantity of Eucalyptus sold in Bangalore district .
and 97 per cent of the quantity sold in Kolar district was consumed;
as industrial raw material by
Harihar Poly Fibres and hardly
I
3 per cent s^ld in K^lar district^has been used as fuel*
13.6 In respect of Casurina th--* entire clr ntity’ ’ / sold both
in Bangalore and
.•lar districts has been ultimately used as fuel
although they arc initially u d ^s calavadics in buidlding
construct ionSp f or v.'iich good market cxistr in the urban agqlnmcrati
of Bangalore.
!
t
■
25
»ct
by
The pattern nf self consumed wood produce- f Ru c a 1'' pt us a nd
has b^ c n for agricultural u .mplc-m-nt s , as building material
C i.our in'
and also as fuel in both Bangalore and Kolar district. Self consum'd
ages
quantity of wood produce is however less than 5 percent of the total
13.7
an
s*
S'-sSC'SS
wood produced.
13.8
Adequate marketing facilities are available through several
local agencies that have grown up for purchasing the wood produced
by the cultivators at the village site itself. This has indirectly
radual
built the required infrastructure for marketing support. There are
r
no government or factory agencies for the promotion and control
of the sale of the wood produced. Market demands for industrial use
J
^*pr3dl
r . t
Cnsurid
i t he I
-r
laf foJ
being heavy and the net work of lecal
agents ready to absorb the
stock of wood produce of these tv/o species marketed. Contact between
the actual growers viz., the cultivators and the consumer seldom
exists, giving rise to the middle men exploiting the economic
benefits due to the c :lt ’-/ator as being the actual grower.
13.9
'Thilo th< study has help'd to draw broad conclusions based
on its f in in^?' .'.vrv?r f r f ^rreulat inq suitable policies on
mark t
t . wo
..ction of the two species of
hoc c Lyne no e./d Casurina, a rooular sample survey is considered
ssenti.al tn objectively assess its needs.
strict
Hnsume
rdly
ir • t
Position: 1793 (3 views)