MFCM050: Draft Manuscript - The Bhopal Disaster Aftermath - an epidemological and socio-medical study.pdf

Media

extracted text
r.

draft .manuscript
for private circulation only
not to be quoted

THS

BHOPAL

L I S A 5 T S It

A F T E a M k T H

—an epidemiological and socio-Eiedical study

15—25 March 1985

medico friend circle



&

1
Dedicated to the thousands
who died or were disabled
by the Bhopal Ge>s Disaster

—one of the worst industrial

accidents in

recorded history;

with a

resolve to prevent
cedi cal research
from becoming an exploitation

of human suffering

with a

resolve to make
me di c cl r es e ar ch

an expression of
humane concern

/

*

L

t

Compcjrisons of some of the important characteristics of
J
Hagar ana Anna Hagar populations (study/control
populations )

Table 1A
Age-Sex Structure
Age

Sex

J P Hagar
%
148
n

Anna Hagar
%
138___
n

11-15 years

M

8.10

10.14

F

0.46

4.35

1/1

35.81

34.78

F

33.78

31.88

6.08

10.14

6.75

8.70

16-45 years

43 +

F

S^leJLB
History of smoking anc chronic
diseases

8poking

U)

Chronic
(b)
6.1s e co ec

+

+

J P Hagar
n “3548
%

Anna Hager

22.75

25.0

77 ..24

75.0

0.58

10.37

99.41

83.62

n = 138
%

z (a) a smoker is ... ne v?ho has smoked at least one ciga- rette per day lor at IccOt one year in a life time.

(b) chronic diseases specifically included
thna,
chronic bronchitis, tuberculosis and others.

%

i

J

Table 10
Oc cupat 1o ns anc inc oae
levels

J P Mag ar
%
n = 148

/jana Nag ar
7o
138
n

Uns killed

18.91

27.73

Skilled

7.43

8.73

Sell-enployed

13.51

15.32

Service

14.18

10.21

Houo evork

29.72

24.08

Oth ere

16.21

13.86

•j-esc than ks.5G.0C

4 • 68

4.58

~£ ,51-75

10.93

22.93

.76-100

16.40

21.10

ks .101-125

‘ 14.84

13.76

53.12

37.61

Occupation

Per c ap 11 a 1 nc <ie pe r
Lion th he f Dre
exposure

Lis . 12 6 o 0 0 a n5. aho ve

//

o
£1

o
00t>T|

o

o
co.

o

o

o

O

<n

<0>

O
Q
O^,________ CH

00£V

x:

OOZt*

c
o

OOTT-.

p

Q)

P
G

(D

P

x

0)

0)
CD

(0

n

P
0)
p
M-J
CD

4J,
G
G
E
E
O

C
O

o

p
p

o

<

z

006£

(D
P

(!)
ft

<
008

z
z

00

<

P
Q)

ft
U)

0)

I
009-£*

-X

-X

*

0)

ft
G

C

u

x:
p

0

OOOT-

ft

CD

0)

<

E

O

a

ft

Q)

E
O

009-

1 .
**

00

■x

00E$*t

u

C
H

■x

OOSi-x-x
•c-X-X
-c-X

tn

-c-x

■x

OOT- ■X

CD

G
T5

4*

>

00frTJ

T5
G
4-1

O

0
E
O
O

c

■X

(X
<

P OOZIf
P
C

o

I

z

c
(0
x:
o

C
O

ft
h

g(U

ft

p
G
0)
O
P
(1)
ft

0)
P
P
•H

ft

ft ooovf
CD

006'

u

<

P
(D

0)
u

*

-x

o

I

E 00TI:

g

*

-X

OOETx

P
(D

008-

P

■x

CD

ft

oor

-x
X
X

CD

0)
0)

009'**

ft
G
P

oos- X

C

X
X

o
o
c

H

*

-x

-x

X

oow
0)
E

-x

•x

*

-X

*

X

•X
-X

-X

-X

•X*

X
OOE' X *

t:

x

002-

-X-X

-X

•X

•X
•X

*

■X

OOT"

■x

•x
•x-x
**
•X*

-x

•X -X
-X -X

-X

of

in

"H

vo

~dd

3LLIODUT

UT

SSeSJOSQ

o

co
% UT

r*

o"

co

d
o>

“3

o

Tej le_1g
Comparison oetweer bocy curlace croa
(1.? ) ir. JF Hagar ere. Anna Hagar accor­
ding to_a0e-OGZ. (i’igurec it- bracket
:— O7J S . jj )

Fody sur ace area
(ciean)
in 3^ 1-5'

11-15 years

15-45 year;;

45-60 years

61 •> years

J F blage,:?
%
n
136

Anna Hagar
%
n = 137

Izi

1.23 (C.14)

1.2,2 (0.1S)

F

1.23 (C.12)

1.15 (0.13)

M

1.4S (0.09)

1.51 (0.12;)

F

1.37 (0.11)

1.35 (0.12)

i;

1.50 (0.14)

1.53 (C.CS)

F

1.37 (O.CS)

1.41 (C.22)

LI

1.35 (0.04)

1.30 (0,15)

F

1.32 (C.CG)

1.28 (0.05)

bote: The c iflc,r eno es in :cean Bbl’s vzere testec by !t *

test — all the c ill’erences \?ere statistically

n o n- sig n i 11 c E n t (1 £>)
gable 2

Leath cor.pensat ion v?ith or v/J-triout acc.it ion al
loan* in tvjo areas
. Coi-ipenst.ti on............. <> y/jLr-

without

Tot al

10cX

■?7 it li out
loan

uith
loan

2

3

2

4

11

Ho death

8

2

20

12

42

Total

10

5

22

16

53

nith

u

CUT
lOC.Ei

F Nag ar

jUHic, ik££.r

2

Leath

1

Ho death

17

32

46

Total

18

33

51

Table s 3 A

Comparison of Symptoms reported by individuals in
J.P. Nagar and Anna Nagar. (Expressed in percentage.
Numbers of cases are shown in bracket.)

SL.
NO.

Symptoms

1. • Dry Cough.

J.P.Nagar %

Ao Nagar %

P. Value

27.70 (41)

14.49 (20)

P

OoOl

2.

Cough with Expectoration.

47.29 (70)

23.91 (33)

0.001

3.

Breathlessness at rest.

10.13 ‘(15)

2.89 (04)

0.025

4.

Breathlessness on
usual exertion.

87.16 (129)

35.50 (49)

« o.ooi

5.

Chest pain / tightness.

50.0

(74)

26.08 (36)

« 6“. 001

6.

Weakness in Extremities.

65..54 (97)

36.95 (51)

7.

Fatigue.

81.-08 (120)

39.85 (55)

C< o.ooi

8.

Anorexia.

66.21 (98)

28.26 (39)

«0.001

9.

Nausea.

58.10 (86)

16.66 (23)

« 0.001

10. Abdominal pain.

53.37 (79)

25.39 (35)

0.001

11. Flatulence.

68.91 (102)

25.36 (35)

/ <0.001

12. Lacrimation.

58.78 (87)

42.62 (58)

<0.01

13. Blurred vision/photophobia

77.02 (114)

38.40 (53)

<<0.001

14. Loss of memory

45.27 (67)

11.59 (16)

«0.0Cl

15. Tingling/numbness .

54.72 (81)

20.28 (28)

<<0.001

*(a)

P Values were calculated by X

?

o

method.

Table ; 3 B

Comparison of Symptoms reported by individuals in
J.P.Nagar and Anna Nagar, (Expressed in percentage.
Numbers of cases are shown ,in bracket.)
(Symptoms significantly different but not analysed further)

*

P. Value (a)

SL.
NO.

Symptoms

1.

Skin problems

29.05 (43)

11.59 (16)

<0.01

2.

Bleeding tendency

9.45 (14)

2.89 (04)

<0.025

3.

Headache

66.89 (99)

42.02 (58)

4.

Muscle ache

72.97 (108)

36.23 (50)

5.

Impotence

8.10 (12)

0.72 (01)

6.

Anxiety/Depression

43.92 (65)

10.14 (14)

A. Nagar %

J.P.Nagar %

.05

Table s 3 C

Comparison of Symptoms reported by individuals in
J.P.Nagar and Anna Nagar. (Expressed in percentage.
Numbers of cases are shown in-bracket.)
( Symptoms-—Non - significant )
*

SL.
NO.

Symptoms

J.P.Nagar %

A.Nagar %

P.Value (a)

1.

Blood in Sputum

10.13 (15)

7.24 (10)

N.S.

2.

Fever

27.70 (4J.)

28.98 (40)

N.S.

3.

Jaundice

0.67 (01)

00

N.S.

4.

Blood in vomit/stool/
malena

12.16 (13)
-------

10.14 (14)

N.S.

5.

Vomitting

11.48 (11)

5.79 (08)

N.S.

*(a)

P Values were calculated by X

2

method.

Table 3D

Symptoms
No ./Total

%

p + G.i. + IJye + CNS

92/148

62.16

p (Pulmonary only )

4/148

2.7

P - NIL (ie G.I./CNS/Eye)

52/148

35.14

Symptom groups

(For symptoms included in grouping please refer 5.4.2.2

Table 3E
Symptom Complexes other than
Pulmonary System

Symptom Groups

No ./Tot al

%

G • I. (with or without eye/CNS)

31/148

20.94

3ye

(with or without GI/CNS)

32/148

21.62

CNS (with or without, Gl/gye)

2'3/148

15.54

r

!
i.■■




.



J

t

f

.

/ :

A .

i' .

*:



i
•' c

\y ® ■

'!

/ 'I

"v

\V

i V.’

‘ 1

l'i ■■ ' *<•.
:p.t
'ip ■'f

• ■ >"?

s

i ;• ’

'/■'

/

^4"

’ ‘‘I •?’

/ ■1 V •



;a\

<i
■' 4 J■ I

/

'/

; r.i' ’

“'k-

Vi

/• • . r

V

•. i. :

V .

I ■

v

-

I.

•J

1
Table : 4

Patterns, of disturbance of vision.in .10 — 45 yrs.,
of population in J.P. Nagar and A. Nagar. (Figures
in bracket indicate actual numbers.)

J.P. NAGAR %

ANNA NAGAR

Blurring of vision (1)

74.24 (98/132)
. (a)

28.57 (34/117)

(2)
Abnormal distant vision

42. U

(65/141)
(a)

21.88 (21/96 )

17.55 (20/114)
(b)

8.74 (9 /103)

(3)
Ab normal near vision

%

4

(4)

Corneal Opacity

4.7

( 7/148)
(b)

2.8

(4 /138)

NOTES-

1.
2.
3.

4^

Includes Photophobia.
Normal vision 6/9 - Distant Vision tested
by means of Snell Ws chart

By means of near vision chart
In J.P. Nagar and Anna Nagar each there
are two -central opacities.

2
^a) tested by X d.f.l

p

,, X .
v2- - (b)
testeda by X
d.f.l

P - Non-signifi-cant.

0.001

*4

‘ii

4

Table

5A

Mean pulse rate/minute (S.D.)in males &
females of J.P. Nagar and Anna Nagar.*

ANNA NAGAR

J.P. NAGAR
Male

77.13 (11.28)
n = 67.

77.94 (10.68)
n = 73

Female

85.73 (13.21)
n - 78.

85.05 (11.20)
n
59

Total

81.70 (13.20)
n = 145.

80.4 (13.0)
n ~ 132.

* All the differences in mean pulse rates
were tested stassically by ’ t* test and
found to be non-significant.

Table s 3 3

Mean Respiration Rate/m-. n te (S.D.) in
males & females ^f J.Pa Nagar and .Anna Nagar.

•k

J.P„ NAGAR

ANNA HAGAR

Male

21.73 (3.98)
n = 59

21.21 (3.84)
n = 74

Female

21.84 (4.93)
n = 70

20.9 > (3.70)
n = 56

Total

21.87 (4.51)
n = 139

21, 09

3.77)
n = 130

All the differences in mean resn Lration rates
were tested stastically ’t‘ tes-i and found to
be non-significant.

Table 2

5 C

Mean'blood Haemoglobin in gm.% in J.P.Nagar &
Anna Nagar. (The figures in bracket are S.Ds
of means.) n - sample size.

J.?, NAGAR

ANNA NAGAR

MaJ

14.68 (1.79)
n
11.
(a)

12.70 (1.35)
n = 17.

Female

12.7 (1.46)
n
20.
(b)

10.79 (1.34)
n =: 18.

(a)

(b)

td.f26 = 3.18
~d o f 36

v

<0o01

I'

,<0.001.

Table s C A
Mean Menstrual cyclo length in days in
J.P. Nagar and Anna Nagar after and before
gas exposure - ( Figures in bracket indicate
S.D. in days.)

J. P. N A G A R
After

Before

A N $ A

NAGAR

Before

After

32.32

25.59

35.41

36.10

(13.51)

(12.04)

(20.09)

(19.89)

n = 31.

n

n =•• 29.

n

31.

29.

0.131

t. = 2 o C13

J

d.f.60 ■'

d <. f. - 56

P <0.08

>0.8
t.

j .a.

d Lffe.rences in means menstrual cycles
Ir.ngth in da; s between J.P.Nagar and
Anna Nagar j^fter the gas exposure.
■j oa

2 <. <5

C<fo

58

P

/ 0,05

’ J

Table ; 6 B
Percentage distribution of Flow in J.P. Nagar &
Anna Nagar before and after the gas exposure.
( Figures in bracket are number of cases )

A N N A - N- A G A R

N A G A R

J. P.

Scanty

Excess Total

'

Scanty

- Excess

Total

Before

5,5
(2)

11
(4)

100
(36)

2,6
(1)

18.4
(7)

100
(38)

After

25,7
(9)

31.4

100
(35)

5,8
(2)

20.7
(7)

100
(34)

(ID

2

x2 =

11.96
d.f. = 2.
0.01
P

X"

< 1

d.f. “ 2.

P > 0.50

After the gas exposure
J.Po & A a N.

x2

7.82
d. f. = 2.
P< 0.025

Table s 6 C

Percentage distribution of colour of menstrual
flow in J.PoNagar and Anna Ne car before and after
the gas exposure (Figures ir bracket are No. of cases.

J.P. NAGAR

Before

After

ANKA

N AGAR

E1 ack

Total .

Black

Total

5-. 8
(2)

100
(34)

(0)

(37)

46.8
(15)

100
(32)

E .8
(3)

100
(34)

2
X r= 3.41
d.f. = 1
P - N.S.

X2 =
14.46
d.f. = 1
P zl 0.001

After the gas exposure
2
X = 12.03
d.f. = 1
P

100

0.001

- JP Nagar s AN = Anna Nagar

Jrl • and A.N>

I

Table s 6 D
Percentage distribution of Dysmenorrhoea
in J.P.Nagar and Anna Nagar, before and
after the gas exposure. (Figures in bra­
cket are number of cases.)

J.P. N A G A R

A N N A

N A G A R

+ve

Total

4-ve

Total

Before

28.5
(10)

100
(35)

48.7
(19)

100
(39)

After

65.6
(21)

100
(32)

39
(14)

100
(36)

x2

x2

9.21
d.f. = 1

P

0.71

d.f. = 1

N.S.

P

0.01

After the gas exposure
J.P. and A.N.
x2 = 4.89
d.f. = 1
0.05
P

Table ; 6 E

Percentage distribution of Leucorrhoea in
J.P. Nagar and Anna Nagar - before and
after the gas exposure. (Figures in bra­
cket are number of cases)

N A G A R
P.
NonSpecific Speci­
Total
fic Leu.
Leu.

ANNA
N A G A R
Non
Specific Total
Specific
Leu.
Leu.

Before

15.5
(7)

0
(0)

100
(45)

16.6
(7)

14.3
(6)

100
(42)

After

22.2
(10)

35.5
(16)

100
(45)

14.6
(6)

14.6
(6)

100
(41)

J.

2
X 5= 22.5
d.f. = 2.

x2

1
d.f. = 2

Aftcar the gas exposure
Jo P. & A.N.
x2 = 7.455
d.f. = 2.
P
0.025.

J P = JP Nagar

s

A N = Anna Nagar

P N.S

Table s 7

2
Distrib^einn of Mor-in values.of Body Surface Area (M ) ,
FEV, (Litre.), FVC (Lit..), FEV/FVC~% in different age­
sex gp. in J.P. Nagar'and Anna Nagar.(a)* (Figures in
• bracket are S.Ds) n = number of persons in each cell,
p - P value.
Age-Sex


BSA (M )

in yrs.

J.P

10-14

JF

15-44
14

15-6C
' 14

6i^

F

FEV,(Lit.)

FVC (Lit.J

FEV,/FVC

%

J.P.

A.N.

A.N.

J.P.

1.23
1.22 1.59
1.93
(0.14)(0.19)(0.74) (0.48)
n~4
n=4 P=NS

1.72
(0.77)
P=N.S.

2.20
87.05
(0.51)

87.8

1.77
1.22 1.15 1.75
(0-12) (0,13)(0.84) (0.33)
n=3
n=6
P=NS

2.07
(0.88)
P=N.S.

2.10
84.3
(0.40)

84.2

1.49 1,51 2.04
2.66
(0.09) (0.12)(0.47) (0.51)
n~=45 n~55 P40.0^1

2.99
2.39
79.1
(0.55)
(0.47)
P<0.001

88.9

1.-37 1.35 1.64
2.25
(0.11) (0.12)(0.44) (0.42)
n=56 n~52

1.97
2.54
(0.38)
(0.43)
P<0.001

76.3

88.6

1,50 1.53
1.88
2.26
(0.14) (0.09)(0.53) (0.19)1
n= 12 n— 6
P-< 0.05

2.20
(0.43)
P-0.05

2.54
85.3
(0.24)

88.9

•1.37 1,41 1.51
2.13
(0.09) (0.22)(0,48) (0.18)
n=±l n=7
P40.01

1.86
(0.58)
P<0.01

79.8
2.48
(0.21)

85.9

1.35 1.38 0.94
1.91
(0.04) (0.15)(0.39) (0.15/
n=2
n-4
P40.02

1.83
(0.35)
P=N.S.

2.17
51.8
(0.16)

88.0

1.32 1.28 1.39
1.90
(0.05) (0.05)(0.31) (0.07)
n=3
n=3
P40.05

1.96
(0.31)
P=N.S.

2.13
(0.15)

63.4

86.2

(a)*

A.N

P.

A.N.

All the differences in Mean Values between J.P. Nagar &
Anna Nagar in each age-sex category’ were tested by
!t‘ test.

1
Table 8

Exposure_History and Safety Measures

Nil

Anna Nagar
Ran Nil
Wet
towel Blanket out

124

8

9

1

2

Where at
J P Nagar
the
Ran
time of leak Wet
towel Blanket out

m the Basti.

5

Out cf home
(in Bhopal)

1

7

6

64

52

2

5
11

10

Out of Bhopal

Total Noe148

Total No. 158

Notes Nil means remained in the house without safety measure.

Table 9
Number of attacks (respiratory infections)
in the one month preceding the study__

Anna Nagar

J P Nagar
Age

One attack

often

Nil

One attack

Often

Nil

10-15 yrs

3

13

15

4

1

16

16-45

15

46

35

24

7

68

46 -l-

3

14

4

4

4

11

_21

73

54_

32

_ _12 _ _

95

Position: 219 (9 views)