SDA-RF-CH-1A.16.pdf
Media
- extracted text
-
CH
SDA-RF-CH-1A.16
Multiple Indicator Survey - 2000
(MICS-II)
A Brief Note on the Survey Methodology,
Implementation and Preliminary Results
unicef
Strategic Planning.Monitoring and Evaluation Section
UNICEF India Country Office
73, Lodi Estate, New Delhi 110 003
Tel: 01 1-469 0401 Fax:011-469 1410
Multiple Indicator survey - 2000 (MICS-II)
Introduction
In September 1990, 71 heads of stale and 88 ministerial representatives convened at United
Nations (UN) Headquarters in New York for the World Summit for Children (WSC). The
World Summit for Children adopted a declaration on the Survival, Protection, and
Development of Children and a Plan ot Action lor its implementation. The Plan of Action
identified seven rhajor goals and twenty supporting goals relating to the survival, health,
nutrition, education and protection of children to be reached by the year 2000. The UN
system was given the task of assisting countries in achieving these goals and measuring
progress. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) was asked to be the lead agency in this
process.
After the WSC, a set of goals for the mid-decade and end-decade were aereed upon.
The World Summit Plan of Action called for a mid-decade and an end-decade review of
progress. The need to measure progress toward these goals increased the demand for high
quality and timely, data. In many developing countries, routine reporting systems were often
found to be inadequate, and did not uniformly collect infonnation on many of the goals.
The 1993 SAARC Summit identified specific targets and goals to be achieved by the
year 1995. This led to a global movement on identifying Mid-Decade Goals (MDGs) to be
achieved by all by the end of 1995 and institutionalisation of appropriate indicators for
measuring progress against these Mid-Decade Goals. UNICEF led a process to develop an
affordable, fast and reliable household survey system that would fill gaps in knowledge and
update available data. UNICEF worked with a number of agencies, including the UN
Statistical Division, WHO, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNDP, the World Bank, London School of
Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and the Centre for Disease Control to develop a model
questionnaire to measure standard indicators for the Mid-Decade Goals. The model
questionnaire was incorporated into a manual that had detailed instructions for planning and
implementing a cluster survey. The questionnaire and manual were distributed to UNICEF
country offices with instructions that they should carry out a MICS if there are no other
Table 3: Selected Indicators from the Multiple Indic?*
Si no List of indicators
31 Percent of children age 12-23 months who received:
BCG
35
XV
36
55.0
77.0
69.9
66.0
58.9
50.4
si.sC, J52<93.8
’
s
86.3^
% ■VO
Percent of children currently attending school by current age;
5- 9 years
10- 14 years
6- 10 years
11- 13 years
Percent dropouts from:
Government schools
__Private schools
Child Labour
Percent of children age 5-^14 working for some one outside the
family:
For pay
Not for pay
Page ■ 22
89.6
83.7
78.8
68.5
93.8
91.6
82.1
65.6>
52;5
64.3
56.0
46.5
Not immunized at all
34
35.6
0.6
94.8
94.1
89.8
82.4
96.0
94.3
89.3
85.9
67.2
0.0
67.7
DPT2
DPT3
OPV1
OPV2
OPV3
Measles
Fully immunized
Percent of children age 12-23 months having BCG scar
Education
->
Percent of children ever attended school by current age:
5- 9 years
10- 14 years
6- 10 years
11- 13 years
Jammu &
Kashmir
All India
DPT1
32
XIV
33
Himachal
Pradesh
78.6
.
98.7
98.1
99.1
75.5
93.2
96 2
82.3
97.6
76.2
96.8
82.4
90.3
88.7
90.0
Survey (MICS-ll)
Karna
taka
Kerala
Madhya
Pradesh
90.9
95.6
^69:3
88.5
90.3.^ <59:2^
85.6
85.3 X I-. 48^
82.0
■A 80.0
^>38.3
90.9 \ , \95.0 <464.3
x
87'^
%94.3
57.3
>91.9
48.7
-^72.2
88.4
47.7
<68/0
71.9
29.4
1.1
0.0
1.5
^8-L5k
Maha
rashtra
Manipur
93.3
89.7
77.4
77.1
73.3
64 4
78.5
74.7
66 4
Megha
laya
69.9
60.6
56.7
47 4
74.9
70.5
60 3
36.8
82.7
70.8
96.6
94.5
84.4
82.6
60 4
0.0
61.5
57.0
0.0
30.1
0.7
81.0
74.1
50.3
73.2
64 5
61 3
89.2
90.5
96.7
. 99.6
‘ 99.3
99.5
76.3
88.9
84.6
89.6
95.0
97.0
97.3
96.6
94.3
96.4
95.9
79.7
73.1
92.2
74.2
87.4
79.9
94.0
75.6
87.6
93.5
93.6
94.9
93.7
91.8
90.7
97.1
87.1
83 6
89 1
81.6
87.0
86.2
87.4
86.0
73.8
72.7
96.4
98.0
99.0
98.7
12.9
2.2
1.7
0.2
13.5
1.8
7.7
2.9
3.0
1.2
3 5
5.5
0.4
0.8
1.5
0.3
3.7
1.9
0.9
7.2
1 7
0.2
9.6
1.8
3.2
0.6
4.5
0.9
2.8
2.5
0 7
0.4
1.1
0.4
88.3
1.3
78.7
81.9
82.2
82 8
3.5
UNICEF, India: MICS-II Preliminary Results
1
Table 3: Selected P iicators from the Multiple Indic?' xr Survey (MICS-II)
Sl no List of indicators
37 Percent distritbution of children working for some one out side
the family by sector of work:
Agriculture and livestock
Manufacturing
Cottage industry
38
Domestic labour
Other (excluding service)
Percent of children age 5-14 years:
Engaged in households chores
Engaged in household chores for more than four hours a
week
Engaged in family enterprise/work
Engaged in family enterprise/work for more than four hours a
week
- -
39
XVII
40
41
42
43
44
45
Mean number of children ever born to women age 45-49
Percent of currently married women age’15-49:-.^*
Using any contraception
Using any modern contraceptive^
Kashmir
Karna
taka
30.7
4.5
2.8
19.1
28.6
7.6
4.9
0.0
18.2
49.8
16.5
56.1
16.3
24.3
12.0
3.3
40.7
52.6
3 0.9,5* W39J5
31.4
8.4
38.3
7.4
•• JX6
^4.6
‘ t.
Madhya
Pradesh
Maha
rashtra
Manipur
Megha
laya
53.
0.0
12.0
32.6
1.7
0.7
5.2
29.1
10 4
0.2
02
69.9
13.6
49.5
2.8
00
38.5
7.3
46.8
38.7
56.5
57.1
50 4
JF' 33.4
13.9
6.8
34.0
6.5
44.0
9.2
38.7
7.6
47.7
5.8
* 3.9
6.1
2.2
62
6.7
4 6
94
20.7^ ^6.7
6.6
10.4^*
6.2
34.8
48.4
6.8
9.4
11.6
1.8
2.8
3.0
40.1
9.0
13.9
13.8
6.5
2.5
6.3
6.3
31 0
9 9
-82.5
27.9
64.8
24.7
97.7
74.4
2.26
3.27
85.5
34.1
143.8
4.17
5.08
80.9
23.8
92.6
2.64
66.7
33.7
137.2
4 47
3.77
60.8
27.5
103 6
3.30
5.04
62.0
56.4
45.1
42.2
57.5
38.0
14 0
55.9
21.1
12.9
7.2
Median duration of work by children who engaged.
For someone outside the family
In household chores
In family enterprise/work
Marriage, Fertility'and Contraception
1
Percent ever-married among all women age 15-49
Crude birth rate
General fertility rate
Total fertility rate
'7^
Himachal
Pradesh
Jammu &
All India
*
"”'V
10.0
9.7 Sr
10^.
20.1
..
^23.5;.
%
15.7
111.8
75.4
26.2
99.9
3.25
4.75
2.77
3.25
4.20
5.12
79.8
24.8
94.4
2.56
4.48
46.9
42.3
69.6
64.0
39.9
37.2
58.3
55.1
Kerala
4.7 ■
2.1X<
I.24
'73.5.^
21.2
73.2
^44:1 ?:
o.o*
5.1
6.9
10.1
13.3
5.80
i
Page - 26
UNICEF, India: MICS-II Preliminary Results
Table 3: Selected ln<
:ators from the Multiple Indicate
Sl.no List of indicators
XVIII Antenatal, Natal and Postnatal Car^ ' -?
46 Percent of mothers who delivered during the year preceding the
47
survey received'
Antenatal checkups
Two tetanus toxoid injections
Iron and folic acid tablets
Percent of mothers who consumed all the iron tablets given to
them:
Among those received ANC
48
49
50
51
XIX
52
53
Among all those who delivered during the last one year
Percent of institutional deliveries
Percent of deliveries attended by a health professional
Percent of caesarian deliveries
Percent of mothers who received postnatal checkups
Knowledge about HIV/AIDS among Women
Percent who have heard of HIV/AIDS among:
-
Himachal
Pradesh
Jammu &
All India
61.8
81.1
61.9
57.3
54.5
79.9
61.4
58.2
80.7
58.9
56.0
34.5
42.5
6.4
24.3
71.0
61.0*
71.4
32.3
.<-"42:0 •
43.7 'i
^15.9
Ever married women age 15-49
: *59.5
39.3
Never married women age 15-49
60i9 > " 77.6
All women age 15-49
- 43.0
63.9
Percent among women age 15 -49 who have heard about HIV/AIDS: > ‘
Reported that a person can avoided getting HIV/AIDS/k
HIV/AIDS/k67.2
73.1
Reported that AIDS virus can be transmitted from a mother to
a child
”
73.2
Reported that a woman can ask a man to use condom
Karna
taka
Madhya
Maha
rashtra
Manipur
Megha
laya
89.4
67 8
77 6
78 1
57.1
46 3
55 8
29 4
51 1
78.4
55.7
51.9
20.5
32.0
3.4
9.3
55.9
56 3
53 0
60.7
7.6
65 4
42.7
43 5
39 0
55 3
6.1
15 3
57 1
57 6
27 3
30 9
34
10 8
Kerala
Pradesh
so. r
84.2
96
>. 57.7
69.2
^>.75.4
/*92.5v^
73.4 v
49.3
*
. ^T.7 :: -
Reported that AIDS virus can be transmitted during pregnancy
Reported that AIDS virus can be trahsmitted from mother to
child during delivery
Reported that AIDS virus can be transmitted from mother to
child through breast
Approve that a healthy HIV infected person can continue to
work
Kashmir
Survey (MICS-II)
^10.8
*20.4
'-•56?5
■' 56.4
52.9
61.9
5.6
31.7
68.0
67.7
96.3
96.5
27.0
25.0
45.0
32.0
62.7
77.9
65.8
86.9
87.3
87.0
21.8
52.0
26.2
56.2
74 7
59.7
92.1
93 9
92 8
39 0
54 1
44 0
54.3
73.5
67.2
68.7
64.0
88 6
69 9
75.4
80.2
60.6
79.5
78.5
80.8
81.7
81.0
73.9
75.8
78.2
64.4
81.1
67.2
89 9
66 8
68 9
68.6
68.2
68.8
70.9
57.3
65.0
70.7
73.5
65 8
66.7
59.0
74.1
71.3
57.2
59 9
62 5
64.6
56 1
49.2
48.3
50.3
66.7
48.3
50.8
> 43.6
: 57.4
41.4
50.5
32.4
51.2
51.5
58.0
66.1
46.8
30 3
60 9
Page ■ 30
UNICEF, India: MICS-II Preliminary Results
Not viewed