12154.pdf

Media

extracted text
0&$&&ffl&& Pft&f&&W0$ &&W*

diibtnilletl in ^Partial &uLf.ilmenl ef. lit a 3^»«aZ ^xcuninalien 0$.

^)osf-^rad smIo 3)iploma in cfteal/k &are /Jdminislraiien

Under the Guidance of
DR. C.M. FRANCIS, M.B.B.S., Ph.D. (Cambridge)

By

SR, SUMA VADAKKECHURAVALIL

HEALTH CARE AD^0MiSTRAT0Oi)l
ST, JOHN'S MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL

BANGALORE - 560034
AUGUST - 1993

Donated b\ Dr. C M Francis in Feb. 2010

&$&&%&&

ukm ilied in ^Parlial 3Fid^ilmenl o/ /Ao 3~inad ^xaminaiion ef.
^Posf-^rad uale Q)iPlotna in ^Coallli &are ^Idminisii'alion

Under the Guidance of
DR. C.M. FRANCIS, M.B.B.S., Ph.D. (Cambridge)

By

SR. SUM A VADAKKECHURAVALIL

HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
ST. JOHN'S MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL
BANGALORE - 560 034

AUGUST - 1993

PREFACE

Negligence is as ancient as humanity, yet something so modern

and a reality.

It is present everywhere and in everyone although in

varying degrees.

Negligence is present in the Medical Profession

and health care services.

This seems to be on the increase.

There

is a certain amount of oeterioration in the standard of medical
profession today; and this is probably a reflection of the deterio­

ration of the standard that is prevailing in the other professions
and in the Society itself.

His greed for money, wealth and power

Man is never satisfied.

prompts him to deviate from that which is right and good, ultimately

ending up in malpractice and in unethical ways.

In such a situation

that is saturated with this malpractice, negligence and conniption
where people seem to pay a deaf ear to the voice of conscience, every
one gets cheated by the other.

become something epidemic.
remedy.

Malpractice and negligence has almost

Legal approaches seem to be the only

So we have the Consumer Protection Act.

In this paoer,

I have tried

to explain the legal aspects of

Medical negligence and the application of Consumer Protection Act to
the medical profession and the health care institutions.

Generosity is exactly that has helped me in the preparation of
this paper.

A number of people have generously helped me in this

endeavour.

I am greatful to all of them.

I greatfully place on record

the direction and guidance that was given to me by Dr. C.M. Francies,
MBBS, PhD (Cambridge)

in every possible way.

His vast knowledge on

the subject and his rich experience in the field of medicine and life
itself were the best of reference material.

I could ever have.

I

cannot forget the kindness and the understanding I have experienced
from my Guide.

It was a learning process.

Special thanks are due to Rev. Fr. Percival Fernandez, M.A., MBPA,

PhD (USA), the Director of the Course; and to Prof. A.K. Roy, MBA(USA),
the course Co-ordinator of D.H.C.A., who had been instrumental in

selecting this subject for my study,

I certainly cannot forget the

help I received from Prof. C.K. Tewari, M.H.A., who had been so generous
with his time and possessions (materials).

The generosity of Dr. Ravi

Narayan who provided me with the printed materials certainly lightehed
my anxiety to a great extent.

I also owe my gratitude to Dr. Thankaraj

who helped me to take the initial steps in this study.

I extend my

gratitude to one of the Officials from the State Consumer Protection
Redressal Commission, Bangalore, all the Administrators and Doctors
of the three hospitals where I was able to carry out my study.

Fiy

soecial thanks to Fr. Patrick Roorigues, Administrator of St. John's

I-fedical College Hospital, Bangalore and Dr. Lobo, the Medical Superinten­
dent of the same hospital, who did give me their Kind co-operation to
complete this study.

I also appreciate the co-operation and support

that was extended to me by all the faculty members and my colleagues

of D.H.C.A.

I extend my gratitude to my superiors and sisters in tny congrigation
for giving me the time and opportunity to attend this course and conduct

this study.

I am really grateful to all those who had been a help

to prepare this paper end also to Mr. Rajan who helped me with the
typing of this paper.

SR. sum

CONTENTS

PREFACE

TAB IE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER I

A.

INTRCDUCTICH

6

B.

EEDICAL CARE SERVICES

6

-

PURPOSE AND SCOPE

-

CHRISTIAN INVOLVEMENT

C.

IEGAL STATUS OF MEDICAL PROJESSICH

15

D.

DEMAND FCR SERVICE

22

E.

MEDICAL ETHICS

25

-

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA

-

INTERNATIONAL CODE (MEDICAL &

NURSING)

CHAPTER H

A.

PURPOSE OF Tffi PAPER

b;

organization

O.

ANALYSIS OF CURRENT SITUATION

46

D-.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

55

of the paper

42

43

chapter hi
A'.

OBJECTIVES OF TEE STUD!

76

Bf.

MSTHDOLOGI

74

0.

SCOPE OF THE STUDI

77

CHAPTER JV

A.

MEDICAL KEGUGEJEE

- DEFINITICK OF MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE

79

- RESPCR5IBILEEIES OF THE PHIS IC IAN

86

- RESPCKSIBILEtlES OF THE INSTITUTION

90

- LIABILITIES OF MEDICAL STAFF,

B-.

79

OTHER

STAFF AND THE INSTITUTION

90

- VARIOUS IEGAL INTERPRETATIONS

99

LITIGATIONS AND DEFENCE

108

CHAPTER V

CONSUMER PROTECTICK ACT

I

120

- LEGAL VIEWS

121

- VIEWS OF THS INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

133

- VIEWS OF THE CUSTOMERS AND THE PUBLIC

141

I
CHAPTER VI»

148

RESULTS:

A.

RESPONSES OBTAINED FROM THE ADMINISTRATOR FROM:

HOSPITAL

’A’

148

HOSPITAL

»B‘

151

HOSPITAL

»C»

155

V. JMlUSIS OF THE RESPONSES OF Tffi ADMINISTRATORS
OF

G.

D.

HOSPITAL

’A’, HOSPITAL

4

HOSPITAL

»C'

158

RESPONSES OBTAINED FROM THE DOCTORS OF:

V.

HOSPITAL

«A5

170

2.

HOSPITAL

IB’

132

3,

HOSPITAL

«C«

1%

STUDY

COMPARATIVE

OF

TEE

THS DOCTORS ( f BOS5 ITAIS

E.

»B’

OBTAINS)

RESPONSES

FROM

DOCTORS.

‘A’,

RESPONSES
’B’

VARIOUS

4

OBTAINED
»C’

CATEGORIES

FROM
20$

OF

22

CHAPTER VH:

234

DISCUSSION

CHAPTSI VUI:
Tffi

FUTURE

260

CHAPTER II

SUWARI

AND

COMO LUS IONS

273

CHAPTER I;
A'.

REFERENCES

B'.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

C.

APPENDICES

D.

ILLOSTRATICKS

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

MEDICAL CARE SERVICES
- PURPOSE AND SCOPE

- CHRISTIAN INVOLVEMENT

LEGAL STATUS OF MEDICAL PROFESSION

DEMAND FOR SERVICE
MEDICAL ETHICS

- MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA
- INTERNATIONAL CODE
(MEDICAL & NURSING)

< CHAPTER

)

I

i < t
MxiUauk /V <•«['• c -.. • < j
A.

\
INTRODUCTION

\
Law regulates public activities.

in the

industrial field,

or in the medical field.

It can be

or in the educational field

In the medical uorld,

the

lau is concerned with improvement of physical, mental,

X
and social well-being of the people.

to promote health and present illness.

It is meant
It is also

meant to have better management of people with

disease.

Therefore,

the laws relating to the medical

recti­

world need to be examined

and modified even

fied from time to time in

rel'ation to their impact

on the society and people they aim to

-CTed-i-ea-l -Ne,g 1 i ge n ce

regulate.

; •

4Je—have "file lau related to medical negligence .
-which-i-s-a branch of the

law of negligence;-.which in

turn jss a branch of the law of torts.

mainly a judge-made

law developing over the years

through changing judicial decisions.

wrong done

lau

Torts is

Torts is a

by one person to another for which the

provides a remedy.

Unlike the criminal lau,

torts aims at monetarily compensating the victim

2

-

2

:

;

-

rather than punishing the offender.
the victim and

Its focus is on

not on the motives of the offender.

The torts offer civil redressal in the form of com­
pensation.

Negligence is a careless acty-an- act-uarrtring—

.care, and may

result in harmful consequences.

"A person

is said to be negligent when be/she acts without due
care in

action.-

regard to the harmful consequences of his/her

The tort

of negligence is made up of various

components - .namely—

a.

A duty ola an obligation recognised by the law
requiring the person to comply with certain
standards of conduct

others
b.

for the protection of

against unreasonable

risks.

A failure on the part of the person to conform
to the standard required - what is known as the
-breach of duty".

c.

A

reasonable close cs^yal connection between the

conduct and the

d.

resulting injuries.

Actual loss or damage

-Pled-ieal negligence

resulting to the other.

is like any- other negligence.

—It is the negligence by a medical person.
a—=s-urgeon-j—or -any ether* membe r of
or the health care institution,

A physician,

the medical profession;

if he/it has not exercised

3

care in the management of

reasonable

to a negligence suit.

The degree of

tution is expected to exercise,

care a person or insti­

-Bub The test is the

the ordinary skilled person,

to have that special skill.

This principle

patient.

duty of

He owes
care,

required skill and

becomes applica­

The doctor is expec­

knowledge to treat that

certain duties to the patient,

i.e.,

the duty of

the

namely,

care in his decision to take

the patient; duty of care in his decision to treat

duty of

stan­

exercising and professing

ble when the doctor accepts the patient.

ted to possess the

liable

varies from case to case de­

pending on the fact of each case.
dard of

a patient may be

the patient

care with regard to the type of treatment to be admi­

nistered; and the duty of care in providing the patient the
right kind or the proper information.

Any deviation from

these duties of care is negligence.

Rights of the patient :

—Where there is a right,

there is a remedy.

Any

patient

who is treated by a particular doctor or a hospital,

has got

certain

rights.

The patient has the

-b-i-lity and availability of health services.
to be treated as an integrated whole person.

extended to

and also to receive

He has the

He has a right
His rights are

receive information and to give informed of the

medical consequences of the action.
opinion,

right >to accessi-

He has a

right to second

information from the doctor.

right also to privacy and confidentiality.

He

and his family hag the

right to adequate

legislation when

he is deprived of any.of the above mentioned

rights,

have suffered damage or injury as a part of it.

or

Jn such

situation he has the right to appeal or ask for the

remedial

ft-was always there-.

measures.

‘Ftemedies for deficient services

.-----------In the past there were two options open to the patient
with complaints against the doctor oft- the hospital.

The first

option was to file a case in the civil/criminal court of law.

This was not very much appealing to the plaintiff as it was

very expensive

fee),

(a large amount had to be deposited as court

and time consuming (it may take many years for a deci­

sion to be arrived at and then there was the possibility of

appeals).

The aggrieved person also had to employ a lawyer.

All these resulted in frustrating and harassing experience
for the patient/the plaintiff,

with the original purpose

getting diluted and lost in the labrynthine corridors of

time,

procedure and jurisprudence.

have

recourse

to -the second option by filing a complaint

with the Medical Council of

of medical professionals.

ham

If

the

'The aggrieved person can

India,

a statutory body composed

This too had its own disadvantages,

council finds -that the doctor .was negligent,
\ . \ ». <? 'A. r-£>l. PV jti. »

they punish the doctor by de-recognising his

V i•! J

registration or

••A)

, th.

A.

V1 ,

,■!

licence to

practice as a doctor.

The State Medical Councils

•5

-

:

5

:

But

also have the same powers.

compensate the
on his

-

certainly,

it did not

loss or damage suffered by the patient

relatives.

Consumer Protection ftct,

1986;

. Both the above mentioned-options did not satisfy the

patient.

In 1986,

a third option became available for the

patient^--—the—consumer of-the health care service--— by the

enactment of the Consumer Protection Act by the Parliament.
The Consumer Protection Act provides for redressal of grie­

vances,

when there is deficiency of goods or services.

The -Consumer Protection-Act assures the patient speedy
redressal of grievances in special consumer courts at the

district,

state and national levels.

There is no court fee

St
charged,) and (idoes not need the service of an advocate either.
All that is

required is a written complaint on a plain paper

with the demanded amount of

St-

compensation; which- can be submi­

tted to the Consumer Forum either in person or by post.

The

Consumer Court will ensure

deicision/

the plaintiff with a speedy

redressal within 90 days.

■In short.,, the Consumer Protection Act,

conferring any new right,

while not

provides for a simpler,

and faster avenue of redressal of grievance.

cheaper

6

B.

HEDICAL CARE SERVICES

Independence itself

Before

India had a well

organised medical care service system along with adminis­

tration, police, engineering,

forestry and education.

This

then,

Indian medical Service,

had a military and

civil wing meant primarily for the needs of the armed

forces; most of the civilian officers were held in
reserve to meet the

in times of war.

requirements

With the attainment of independence,

in 1947,

major changes were made in the health administration.

Based on the

recommendations of

the Shore Committee,

the medical and public health departments were combined -

both in the centre and the states - under one single
administrative

head.

Recent happenings of national significance like

the Lentin Commission report which brought to light the
danger*ous prevelence of spurious drugs,

their use in

major hospitals and the connected incidents in the matter
of medical care in the country have brought in the minds
of every citizen, the need for quality of medical care.

In the minds of professionals who manage hospitals both
large and small, the same question assumes even greater

importance with the added

The

real fear of

legal aspects, especially the

legal implications.

responsibilities on the

professionals as well as the institutions themselves
are becoming more and more clear with new decisions and

rulings,

in the country and,

more so,

in the advanced

countries.

In order to

What is this medical care service?

understand what is medical care service,

one needs to

know what is health care service; medical care forms part
of health care service.

"Health care service
for fellow human beings.

is an expression of concern

It is defined as a multitude

of services rendered to individuals,

or commu­

families

nities by the agents of health services or professions for
the purpose of promoting,
ting health.

maintaining,

Such services may be

monitoring or resor­

staffed,

organised,

administered and financed in every imaginable way,

they all have one thing in common;
i.e.,

diagnosed,

helped,

by health professionnel.

cured,

but

People are being "served"

educated and

In many countries,

rehabilitated
health care

service is completely or largely a governmental function."

Though it is primarily

Health care is a public right.

the

responsibility of the government,

people in equal measures,
helped by individuals

to provide it to the

the government is supported and

as well as private and voluntary

health care institutions to provide this

right.

3

3

India,

In

the health care services are delivered

through the health system which constitute the management
sector and involves organizational matters such as planning,

mobilising and allocating resources,

determining priorities,
translating oolicies

education.

into services,

evaluation and health

These health systems aim at health development.

Currently the goal of health system is to achieve health
for all by 2000 A.O.

The best way to achieve this goal,

three tire system of health care service

- Primary health care

the

has„been introduced;

whereby the first level contact

between the individual and health system takes place

and

'essential'

health care is provided.

It is at

this level the health care will be most effective

within the context of the individual's and commu­
nity' s needs and limitations.
Secondary health care is where more complex problems

are dealt with - comprising essentially curative

services.
-

Tertiary health care is where super speciality care

is provided at the

regional/central level institutions.

"The health care services have certain

such as appropriateness,

bility,

accessibility,

comprehensiveness,

characteristics

adequacy,

affordability and feasibility."

availa-

2

9

-:9s-



Medical Care Services ;

medical Care Services form part of health care services.
"medical care service is a subset of health care service.

The term medical care service refers mainly to those personal
services that are provided directly by the physicians or

rendered as a result of the physician's instructions.
medical care services

hospital care."

range from domiciliary care to resident

3

"medical care services begin with the sick and seek
to keep them alive, make them well or minimize threat to

health from disease or environmental hazards and seek to
protect as many people as possible from the harmful conse-

quences of the threat."

4

Problems of medical care services in
In

India

India we have a national health policy but we do

not have a comprehensive national health service due to the
inadequate financial resources to furnish the cost of running

this service.

Today approximately 80% of the health care

service facilities are concentrated in the urban areas and

is

catering to the 20% elite population of the country.

They

are mostly disease - oriented and hospital based services.
Another problem is inadequate staffing.

Added to them is

scarcity of essential drugs and medicines at affordable prices.
The modern curative and preventive health services do not

10

10

reach the

rural population which constitute 75$ of the

total population (1991
lation

Most of

census).

the

rural popu­

rely on the primitive and indigenous systems of

medicine because of the unequal distribution of available

resources between the urban and

rural areas,

and lack of

penetration of health services to the social periphery.
The primary health care services try to reduce these in­
balances.

Purpose of medical care service

The entire health care services,

especially the

medical care services aim at preservation of life and
promotion of health.

a.

Preventing measures ;

As the proverb

^expression)

goes "Prevention is better than Cure",

it is

always better and cheaper to prevent the disease

than to cure.

prevented.

What can be prevented need to be

Preventive measures are as old as

history itself.

good even in the

It holds

of health and medicine.

a branch of medicine

case

Preventive medicine is

in general and is not the

same as public health.

Preventive medicine is

applied to healthy people.

Its primary objective

is prevention of disease which in turn promotes

health and preserves life.

Immunization is based

11

11

□n this principles;

this immunization

to prevent the occurence of disease,

of the person and control of

helps
protection

the disease in the

case of communicable diseases.

b.

Caring :
'care'

The dictionary meaning of the word

is to feel affection,

protect,

to like,

to feel interested in,

It is greatly appreciated
as the sick.

fl

to look after,

to

etc.

by the healthy as well

healthy person continues to be

healthy when he is well cared for.

The

sick get

well faster and gain good health if they are trea­
ted with care and love.

not more)

health.

Care is an important (if

as curative and preventive aspect of

Caring is certainly within the boundaries

of one's experience.

It is something that is

subjective; yet something so

real and concrete.

Care is something that is internal yet it cannot
be contained within oneself.

blood of

Caring is the

health/medical care service.

vital to the preservation of

life

It is

life and promotion of

health.

c.

Curative measures :

of years old.
remedy.

These

Curative medicine is thousands

Every problem has to have a solution/

remedial measures in medical cure

service are the curative measures.

Nature herself

12

12

has provided us with provisions for it.

Science

and technology have added/contriouted towards
this greatly.

The primary objective of curative

measures is removal of disease from the person

affected by it.

Thus

approach measure.

The

avails the diagnostive

ailments.

it

is an individualised

curative

aspect of medicine

techniques and treatment of

it is a specific and potential asoect

of health care services.

It is prevelanr/existing

in every system of medicine.

curative measures

contain a vast body of scientific knowledge,

tech­

nical ski'll, medicament and machinery highly orga­
nised - not merely to treat disease but to preserve

life (and promote health)

itself as far as

it could

be possible.

Curative medicine has gone through tremendous

growth as a result of progress in medical technology
and scientific inventions and interventions.

d.

Promotive measures ;

Health promotion is a concept

belonging to the present centuary which took its

shape from the

realisation of the fact that the

public health had negl-ected

the

citizens as an

individual while the state/country had a direct
responsibility for the health of

As a result of

this

the

individuals.

realization of health promotion,

13

:

13

public health nursing came into the picture.
As a part of health promotion,

are being introduced.

various programmes

Health promotion

science and art of preventing diseases,

is "the

prolonging

life and promoting health and efficiency through

organized community effort."

Promotive aspect of health is intended to

strengthen the host through variety of approaches/
interventions and not directly against any particular
disease.

Various approaches to the promotive aspect

of health care/medical care are mainly through health
environmental modifications,

education,

nutritional

interventions as well as life style and behavioural
changes.

In short,

health promotion is "the process

of enabling people to increase control over,

and to

improve health."

e.

Rehabilitative measures ;

Rehabilitation is a recently

emerged medical speciality which involves various
disciplines such as physical medicine or physiotherapy,
occupational therapy,

psychology,

dance,

is the

education,

placement,

speech therapy,
social work,

service,

confined and

etc.

audiology,

vocational gui­

Thus "rehabilitation

co-ordinated use of medical,

social

educational and vocational measures for training and
re-training the

individual to the highest possible

:

14

level of functional ability."

Rehabilitation aims at reducing the impact
of disability and handicapping conditions and enabling the

disabled and handicapped to achieve social integration or,
in other words,

the active participation of the disabled and

handicapped people to the main stream of community life.

"In

rehabilitation there are various areas of concern

such as
medical rehabilitation - restoration of function
-

vocational rehabilitation - restoration of the capacity
to earn a livelihood.

-

Social rehabilitation - restoration of family and social
relationships.

-

psychological rehabilitation r restoration of personal
o
dignity and confidence."

Health personnel and medical services :
Health/medical care service is a team work,

ting of various types of services

of persons.

involving various categories

It is rendered by doctors,

health personne1/professionaIs.

consist-

nurses and allied

Everyone of them is equally

important in the building up of the health of individuals
and community.

The degree of

responsibility that is vested

on each one of them by the society/ community varies.

15

:

15

In the medical care service,

the maximum responsi­

bility is shouldered by the physician and then the nurses
and then only the allied professional.

Hence

the doctors

are more liable for the negligence that may/can happen during
the process of medical care service.

Christian involvement :
fledical profession and the healing ministry by the
Christians in

India has been growing

tude over the years.

in variety and magni­

institutions and services

flany are the

being operated by the generous persons who have dedicated

theaselves to this area of Christian work.

The Christians,

has responded to the health

particularly the catholic church,

care needs of the country to a remarkable degree.

Yet the

fact remains that the health needs of this vast and poor
country are not met adequately.
document of the Government of

The national health policy

India depicts the (pre.vailing)

existing picture of health care services and medical profession

a cause of serious and urgent concern.

C.

LEGAL STATUS OF MEDICAL PROFESSION
According to the Directive Principles in the

Constitution,
raise

Indian

one of the primary duties of the State is to

the standard of living of the people and improve their

health status.

In order to achieve this purpose,

laws h.;ve been formulated aiming to

regulate

several

the health care

.....16

16

Some of these laws are meant to minimise the

facilities.

dangers often connected with these facilities themselves while

the others regulate the

quality of health care by attempting

to keep a check on self-styled health specialists.

Yst some

sale

others have been formulated to have control on movement,

and distribution of toxic substances.

Host of

unfortunately,

comprehensive,

laws are

the existing

they are not being enforced.

but

Such neglect of

legal provisions operates against the public to the benefit
of

the violators.

Doctors and Laws
Under the Medical Council of

India Ret,

1956,

every

doctor after having acquired the necessary qualification^

is expected to register himseIf/herseIf and get the
before he/she can practise
or treatment.

lieence

and collect fees for his advice

The Medical Council of

India is empowered by

the Act to ensure the enforcement of this Act and also to
take the necessary disciplinary action in case of serious

professional misconduct - even to cancel the

the doctor,

if and when necessary.

association,

negligence and

registration of

Adultery,

improper

advertising are some of the

issues on which registration can be cancelled.

The Act has made provisions to

regulate

the activities

of the medical practioners especially those engage in unethical
medical practices.

17

17

✓"The

Indian Medical Council Act (1956)

Medical Degrees Act (1916),

have been invoked to prevent

doctors from advertising, deemed
by doctors,

and the

to be unethical practice

professional misconduct and use of unrecognised

or fake degrees.

The State Medical Council must be made to

regulate and supervise the professional conduct of the

doctors registered with the council and to ensure

adequate standards are maintained

In all legal issues
lobbying,

the media and,

cannot be underestimated.

in medical practice."

relating to health,

where

the

g

role of

recourse in law,

appropriate,

Otherwise,

the producer will

continue to dictate to the deriment of the

According to the Act,

that

consumer.

the medical practitioners are

forbidden to make/convert the profession into a business,
trade,

etc.,

which will degrade the nobility of the profession.

"Nothing in the Act shall extend or be
extend,

to prejudice or in anyway affect the

construed to
lawful occupation,

trade or business of chemists and druggists and dentists or
the

rights,

privileges on employment of duly lincensed

apothecaries so far as then extend to selling,

compounding

..


..10
or dispensing medicines."

18

18

Under the

law of tort

the doctor is expected to

the necessary knowledge and skill and also to

possess

exercise

reasonable degree of care while managing/treating
If he fails in these

a patient.

injury or loss to the patient,

which result in harm or

then the patient can demand

the due compensation from the doctor for his negligence.

-’"'It is the duty of every -registered practitioner to

bring to bear upon all his professional activities that
standard of

skill and knowledge which is to be expected of

a practitioner of his experience and status and of comparable
standing to him.

-It is also his duty to exercise

care in his treatment of a patient.

If the failure to

exercise the necessary degree of skill or care

-to the patient,

injury,

damages.

reasonable

results in

he will have^ a right of action

for

Whether reasonable skill or care has been exercised

.in a particular case is a matter which has to be considered

-in

relation to the facts of each case."

The

11

law also demands of the doctors to explain the

facts about the nature and the purpose of the treatment or
procedures,

to the patient or to his family (if needed)

and

then obtain a fully informed consent ,> and only after that

the doctor is expec-ted to/permitted to ca rryout/pe rf o rm the
required treatment/procedure.

doctor is expected

In case of emergency,

the

to use his discretion and provide the

19

19

necessary emergency treatment and maintain the prooer
record.

"A doctor has no

right to do anything to a patient

\

without his consent except

in case of emergency wh^re he

must exercise his discretion.

The securing of a signature

to a consent
should not be allowed to become an end in
\

itself.

The most important aspect in any procedure must

always be the duty to explain to the patient or relative

the nature

arid purpose of the proposed operation and thus

to obtain a fully informed

consent.

In our country this
\

\

should be even more important (though admittedly also more
difficult)

since there is so much illiteracy and lack of

inf ormation."

12

Drugs are another entity subject to standards.
The Drugs and Cosmetics Act,

as well as

1940 provides for the control

regulation of the drugs and cosmetics while they

are being produced,

distributed,

It is upto the

and sold.

State Drug Controllers to see to the enforcement of the
provisions of

this Act^and the Drug Controller of

all the powers to co-ordinate the activities of

India has

the various

State Drug Controllers to ensure uniform application of the

provisions of this Act

throughout the

country.

"A drug which has been declared h'armful or irrational
x

X.

X.

by the

technical bodies cannot

(in theory)

be purchased

20

20

I
or prescribed by any Government authority;

irrespective of

the fact that the orders of the Government prohibiting the

manufacture and sale of the drug might have been stayed by
a court.

This Act now extends to^'ayurvedic and unani products

. , „
as well."

13

The Act provides safety to tha citizens-(-the people)'.
But the link between the drug manufacturers,

the medical

practitioners and the chemists endanger the health and well­
being of the individuals,

although the defaulter can be

imprisoned for upto three years and the goods confiscated
\
under the Drug Control Act,

Health Service and the

1956.

law

In the developed countries

like the United

States,

the United Kingdom and the Scandinavian countries,

there were

adequate provisions for medical and nursing care for the entire

people.

India,’ -the situation is quite different...

But in

Radical and health care is grossly in adequate.
it,

there was

hardly any effort to

as litigation in

Adding to

redress injustice caused

India is time consuming,

and very expensive.

The strong nexus-amongst- the doctors who- provide protection

.to each other inspite of the wrong doings,

of

the

cases in the court.

Very often,

comes in the -way.

proper documents

are also not available to the patient who wants to file the
case.

Because of all these

reasons,

the patients seldom

21

21

cobs

forward to sue the doctors/hospitals.

The

litigation

does provide for the possibility of ensuring justice.
these are limited in content and form.
Government of

As a result,

But
the

India passed the Consumer Protection Act in

1986 in order to protect the consumers at large,

an-d—a-t—the

-s-a+Re—time ensuring their rights as consumers,

On April 21st

1992,

National Commission stated

the judgement made by the
that the medical profession and

the health care institutions also come under the purview of
the Consumer Protection Act and are liable for the negli­
gence and substandard services rendered to the patients
who are consumers of health care/medical care services and
facilities.

The Act defines

'service*

as service^ of any

kind and thus the Consumer protection Act includes all

services rendered or provided by the health care institutions
and the medical profession for a consideration.

The aim of the Consumer Protection Act is to provide
easier,

sive

quicker and cheaper redressal compared to the expen­

complicated and tiipecconsuming

Civil Court and the Criminal Court.

one provided by the
It also aims at quality

services as well as holding the producers and providers of
services accountable

and responsible for their actions.

The services rendered by the voluntary and charitable
health care institutions and persons are not commercial.

22

22

Still they are brought under the purview of Consumer

Protection Act for the same purpose,

i• e• ,

quality service,

responsibility.

accountability and

to ensure

"The patients are becoming more and more aware

of

table

in^their accusations

redressal form.
X.

D.

longer going to be chari­

their rights and they are no

A

when they approach the

consumer

single case can be sufficient to destroy
"

the image and

reputation of the hospital and the medical

professional

beyond repair."

DEHAND FOR

SERVICE

Health is something unique.

It is unique in the sense

that the supplier controls the demand.

behalf of the patient,

In the past,

on

the doctor used to take the decisions

regarding the type of service,

quantity,

quality and the cost

of the service, etc., delivered to the patients.

The doctor

made/took these decisions in good faith and the patient

accepted them too in good faith.

ship was built on mutual trust.

The doctor-patient relation­
But to-day

with the libe­

ration of the market forces in health care many a time,

is an absence and a misuse of this trust.
has

The patient who

lost his trust in the doctor and the hospital,

them to the
Hence,

there

court if

there

can take

there/deficiency or defect in service.£s

is a greater need for these

institutions and

23

:

23

the medical professionals to be

awake,

alert and very,

very conscientious.

certainly is a trying period

The present situation

for the voluntary,

charitable

and non-profit health care

institutions and its personnel.
ting situation,

Though faced with a temp­

we got to refain from the entrepreneurial

approach to medical care practices
use of medical interventions.

and the existing over­

We need to refrain from

entering into business arrangements with other physicians,
private

laboratories and pharmaceutical

that we do not trade

on our patients'

maintain our own security.

etc.,

companies,
trust,

so

in order to

Our services demand us to

provide our doctors with all the necessary defence cover and

other necessary support in order to retain them.
sent situation demands (more than ever before)

The pre­

quality

medical care at a reasonable cost on one hand and on the

other hand,

we have got to spend

large sums on equipments

and facilities to improve and also to be upto-date.
to

refrain from using defensive medicine

inspite of

We got
the

temptations to be on the safe side.

The present situation is

likely to increase

the cost

of medical care which means only the rich will be able to
avail our services and facilities and the poor who really
needs our services will be neglected as their accessibility

24

:

will be diminished.

institutions and

If

the poor -has no access

their health care facilities,

to these

there any

is

meaning in the existance of such charitable and voluntary

institutions especially

in a country like ours where the

the population are poor,

majority of

In the present situation,

great,

ignorant and illiterate?

the demand for our service is

really

the possibility of providing them to those who

but

deserve it is very little.

How are we going to face this

challenge???

'"The Consumer Protection Act forces us to provide
quality medical care • et—a -reasonable

cost.

On the other hand,

'"'■'we may have to spend large sums to purchase new equipment and

facilities to improve our diagnosis.

We will be forced to

protect ourselves with tests and investigations that are not

in normal circumstances.

needed

consultants may have

In some cases,

to be invited for a second -or—third

opinion before taking a decision on the

in turn,

which will,

external

individual cases,

raise the cost of our services.

. We will

be -forced to pass on this investment to the patients.
jjn-ly the

rich and those who can -pay, benefit from our services?

■Will the poor and needy be neglected?

..for us

to

Will

......

Is

it possible

refrain from the entrepreneurial approach to

medical practice and the prevalent over use of medical inter­

ventions?

Is it possible for us to refrain from entering

into business

arrangements with other physicians,

laboratories and pharmaceutical companies

our patients

private

and thus trading

trust for our own security?"

25

I
I

:

E.

25

MEDICAL ETHICS

Every profession has its own

codes of conduct to

guide tv« members of the profession.

medical profession too.

the

Medical ethics form apart of

which is founded on the public consci­

general ethics

ence).

This is true of

Although it does not have the

legal force of

law,

at times it is even more forceful as violation of medical
ethics can be viewed very seriously by the other members
of the profession.

legislation.

Very often ethics is followed by

Therefore,

we consider the

when

affecting medical practices,

legislation

it is very important to

understand the ethics of medical profession.

Medical ethics is not a

ready made solution to

the problems in the medical practice.

provides a practical guidance.

in healing to come

But it certainly

It helps those engaged

to conscientious decisions in the

best interest of the patients.

It is with this spirit

that we could approach the current ethical problems in

medical practice.

The term

'Ethikos'

'Ethics'

is derived from the Greek word

and it stands for rules of

conduct that govern

the natural way in which human beings act.

"In modern connotation,
distinguished from morals.

ethics has

come to be

Where as morals

are belief

26

sanctioned by mysterious powers,

intellectually derived.

The latter in contrast to the

are also considered to be

former,

ethical levels are

less profound and more

amenable to change.

Any professional ethics can be considered only as
a species of

general ethics.

Behind medical ethics,

for

instance must stand such cardinal virtures as wisdom,
justice,

temperance,

courage and benevolence.

This means

that ethical principles to which it cannot run counter.

Ethical issues

require nothing tout application of medical

ethics in a more specialised field.11

16

DEFINITIONS OF MEDICAL ETHICS :
"Medical ethics is a systematic effort to work

within the ethics of medicine,
been service to the sick.

which has traditionally

It is part of general ethics.

It is the application of what is good and

from the values in health care.

right derived

It deals with norms that

govern the behaviours of medical profession.

It is con­

cerned with the obligations of the doctor to the patient;
other doctors and health professionals and the society."

17

"Ethics is that science which studies the morality
of human act through the medium of natural reasons. ' It is
that science,

which is directive of

the moral acts of man's

will according to the basic rational principles.
ethics

In a word,

teaches us how to judge accurately the moral goodness

27

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

X
or badness of any human action.
ethics

Therefore,

is a form of special ethics.

the application of

medical

It is concerned with

general nrinciples to the moral problem

of medical profession.”

1R

"Medical ethics is a systematic thinking on values
that are at work in health care profession and formulation

of norms to protect these values."

19

"Medical ethics is a systematic effort to elaborate
the prospective and ethical norms of governing the medical

profession.

It is

on the human values implicit

reflection

in medical care and hence is an indespensable

guide to

achieve the true good of the patients and the physicians

I
I
I
I
I

themselves."

2D

The source of ethics are

the various values; especia­

lly the concept of love for one's neighbour.

love - love for one's neigh­

thereby every religion upholds

bour - as the most important of

all principles.

colour,

sex and social status.

respect for life and quality of

is an expression of

life.

this quality of

Ethics

regardless of caste,

places greater value on human life;

creed,

Every scripture,

Its main aim is

ethics

In other words,

life one maintains.

The fundamental values of medical profession are

relief of suffering,
cure of disease,

care of persons,

promotion of

prevention of disease,

health and preservation

......... 28

of

life.

:

28

:

Combining the two principles,

the medical ethics

is formed which though does not provide a ready-made

solution,

it certainly enables the medical person with

a valuable exercise in ethical reflection thereby provides

the necessary guidelines before any medical undertakings.

ETHICAL CODE
Ethics enables one to think and act/do

right and good for self and the other.

what is

An ethical code is a

set of guidelines which enable the professionals to foster
and maintain the ethos of the profession.

On the whole,

the ethical code is derived and influenced by humanism,
religion and also the hippocratic oath.

It needs to be

revised and updated depending on time,

place and people.

It is an expression of conviction/principles/values that

one gives importance to.

"An ethical code is a set of guidelines that guaran­
tees and fosters the genuine ethos of the profession.

Ideally it is formulated by members of the profession itself,
though with the help of

also be

the specialists in ethics.

It would

good to involve the society at large.

Flost such codes are more or less derived from the

oath of

hippocrates and strongly influenced by Christian

humanism.

An ethical code needs constant revision accor­

ding to contemporary values and insights,

but care must be

29

:

-

taken to preserve what
f reedom."

29

:

-

is essential to human dignity and

21

Medical profession is one which deals with human
beings - who are sick and helpless - One of

the character­

istics of the medical profession is that it handles life;
life

that are delicate.

Hence ethical code of donduct

are of vital importance to this profession more than any
other profession,

to guide the members of the profession.

It (Ethical code)

is not a parliament.

made law.

It is

formulated by the members of the profession themselves with
the help of experts in ethics and

fession.

Hence,

is approved by the pro­

it is equally (if not more)

forceful.

It is the voice of conscience which calls the members of
the profession (doctors in the medical field)

to do what

is right and good for others - namely the patients.

"Ethical code of conduct are important to any pro­

fession.

It is all the more so for medical profession.

The codes of conduct can succeed only if the profession,
as a whole,

feels responsible for its implimentation.

the doctors as members of the profession fails to be

If
respon­

sible and do not take action against those who do not
observe the code,

the code becomes ineffective.

Ethical code

is not legislation.

But

forceful as it is aoproved by the profession.

it

is equally
The final

.30

:

30

court in all action is the conscience of the doctor (and

of the patient).

There appears a voice which summons the

doctor to do what is good and avoid evil."

THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF

CODE Of ETHICS OF

22

INDIA

Although there is an international code of medical

ethics,

every country is privileged to have its own

of medical ethics for the doctors of that country.

Medical Council of

code
The

India - a statutory body set up by the

parliament - has set up its*

own code of medical ethics

which is to be observed by the doctors of this country.

They are as follows;

A.

-

"General Principles" - explains what is expected of

of

the doctors in

1.

The character of the physician

2.

The physician's responsibility

3.

Advertising

4.

Payment of professional services

5.

Patent

6.

Running an open shop

India regarding

and copyrights

^Dispensing drugs and appliances

by physician)

7.

Rebates and commission

8.

Secret remedies and

9.

Evation of

legal restrictions.

31

:

B.

31

Duties of physicians to their patients:- are described

in terms of

0.

1.

Obligation to

2.

Patience,

3.

Prognosis and

4.

The patients must not be neglected

the

sick

delicacy and

secracy

Duties of the physician to the profession at large
such as :

D.

honours of the profession

1.

Upholding the

2.

Membership in medical society

3.

Safe-guarding the profession and

4.

Exposure of unethical conduct

Professional service of physician to each other
namely:

E.

1.

Dependence of physicians on each other

2.

Compensation for expense

Duties of physician in consultation includes
1.

Consultation should be encouraged

2.

Consultation for patients'benefit

3.

Punctuality in consultation

4.

Conduct in consultation

5.

Statement to patient

6.

Conduct in consultation

;-

after consultation

32

:

F.

G.

H.

32

7.

Treatment after consultation

8.

Consultant not to take charge of the

9.

Patients referred to specialists.

Duties of physician incase of interference

case and

co m p 1 e s ;

1.

Appointment of a substitute

2.

Visiting another physician's case and

3.

Engagement for an obstetric case

Duties of physician to the public such as ;
1.

Physician as citizen

2.

Public health and

3.

Pharmacists.

Disciplinary actions

are also stated in the code of

medical ethics by the

Indian Medical Council through

which the

registered medical practioners are

warned

against professional misconduct which may be brought
before the appropriate medical council which has the

authority to punish the registered medical practitioners
under the

Indian Medical Council Act,

1956.

The disci­

plinary action mainly are the temporary or permanent
de-registration of the name of the doctor concerned,
depending on the seriousness of the offence and profe­

ssional misconduct.

Disciplinary action is taken by the

appropriate medical council,

against violation of the

33

of the code in letter or spirit

List of the infamous acts that may be punished by

erasure from the Register and by that,

by issuing

this notice the medical councils are in no way pre­
luded from considering and dealing with any form of

professional misconduct on the part of the

R.R.Ps.

The list is as follows:-

a)

Adultery or improper conduct or association with
a patient.

b)

Conviction by court of law for offences involving

moral turpitude.
c)

Issue of wrong professional certificates,

reports

and other documents.
d)

Contravening the provision of the Drugs Act and
regulations made thereunder

e)

Selling scheduled poison to the public under cover
of his own qualification except to his patients.

f)

Performing or enabling an unqualified person to
perform an abortion or any illegal operation for

which there is no medical,

surgical or psychological

indication.
g)

A physician should not issue certificates of efficienc

in modern medicine to unqualified or non-medical person
h)

A

physician should not

articles and give

contribute to the

interviews

lay press

regarding diseases and

treatments which may have
himself

the effect of advertising

or soliciting practice.

(But he

is allowed to

write or give talks on radio broadcast on matters
relating to public health,

i)

hygienic living,

etc.).

An institution run by a physician for particular purpose

such as maternity home,

sanatorium,

tised in the

but

lay press,

etc., may be adver­

it should not contain any­

thing that advertises himself.
j)

It is improper for a doctor to use unusually large sign

board and write on it anything other than his name,

quali-fications obtained from a university or statutory
body,

titles and name of his speciality.

The same should

be the content of his prescription paper too.
k)

Disclosing the secret of a patient

that have been learnt

in the exercise of the profession.

Those may be dis­

closed only in a court of law under orders of presiding
judge.
1)

m)

Refusing on

religious ground alone to give assistance

craniotomies on

or conduct sterility,

birth control,

living children,

theraputic abortions when there

and

in

is medical indication;

unless the medical practitioner

feels himseIf/herseIf

incompetent to do so.

Not obtaining in writing the consent from the husband
or wife,

parent or guardian in the

the patient himself as the

ming an operation.

case of minor,

case may be,

or

before perfor­

In an operation which may

result in

35

:

sterility,

35

the consent of

both husband and wife is

needed.
n)

reports of the patients

Publishing photographs or case

in any medical or other journal in a manner by which
their identity could be made out without their permi­
ssion;

should the identity be not disclosed,

consent

is not needed.

o)

If you are

running a nursing home and if you employ

assistants to help you,

the ultimate

responsibility

rests on you.

p)

No physician must exhibit publically the scale of fees.
But there is no obgection

to the same being put in the

physician's consulting or waiting room.

q)

Use of touts or agents for procuring patients.

r)

Claiming to be a specialist unless you have put in a
good few years of study and experience or have a
special qualification in that branch.

you are one,

do not undertake

lity even for your friends.”

Once you say

work outside your specia-

23

INTERNATIONAL CODE OF MEDICAL ETHICS

(World Medical Asso­

ciation - 1949).

"Adopted by the Third General Assembly of the World

Medical Association at London in October 1949,

the

Inter­

national Code of Medical Ethics states the most general

36

36

:

principles of ethical medical practice.

It was modeled

after the declaration of Geneova and the

Codes of ethies

of most modern countries.
the

But unlike most national codes,

International Code omits reference to specific unethi­

cal practice as well as to judiciary procedures.

ginal draft included

which,

|he ori­

a statement on therapatic abortion,

because of its contraversial nature,

from the adopted version of the

was deleted

International Code of

fledical Ethics.

J"

Duties of a doctors in general :

A doctor must always maintain the highest standards

of professional conduct.

A doctor must practice his profession uninfluenced
by motives of profit.

The following practices are deemed

unethical.
a)

Any self advertisement except such as is expressly

authorised by the national code of medical ethics.
b)

Collaborate in any form of medical service in whiehthe

doctor does not have professional independence.
c)

Receiving any money in connection with services

rendered

to a pationt other than a proper professional fee,

even

with the knowledge of the patient.

Any act,

or advice which could weaken physical or

mental resistance of a human being may be used only in his

inte re st.

37

:

37

%
great caution in

A doctor is advised to use

divulging discoveries on new techniques of

A doctor should

treatment.

certify or testify only to that

which he has personally verified.

Duties of doctors to the

A

sick :

doctor must always bear in mind the obligation

of preserving life from conception.

may only be performed

if the

Theraputic abortion

conscience of the doctors and

the national laws permit.

A doctor owes to his patient complete loyalty and
all the

resources of his science.

or tre atment is beyond his

Whenever an examination

capacity he should summon another

doctor who has the necessary ability.

A doctor shall preserve

absolute secrecy on all he

knows about his patient because of

the confidence entrusted

in him.

A doctor must give emergency care as a humanitarian
duty unless he is assured that others are

willing and able

to give such care.

jjj

Duties of doctors to each others ;
A doctor ought to behave

to his colleagues as he

would have them behave to him.

..........38

:

38

A doctor must not entice patients from his colleaoues.

A doctor must observe the principles of "The Declaration of Geneva"

,

approved by

INTERNAT ICNAL COUNCIL OF NURSES

"The

1.

:(Code for Nurses 1973)

international Council of Nurses approved an

international code of ethics in
notable

the World Medical Association.

1973,

which includes several

changes over its earlier 1965 code.

The 1973 code makes explicit the nurses responsibility
and accountability for nursing care.
statement found in the 1965 code,

an obligation

gently and

It deletes the

"The nurse is under

to carryout the physician's orders intelli­

loyally," which tended to abrogate the nurse's

judgement and personal responsibility.

2.

The 1965 code stated that "The nurse believes in the
preservation of human life,

adding:

"The fundamental

responsibility of the nurse is three fold;
life,

to eonserve

to alleviate suffering and to promote health."

In its place,

the 1973 code points to a four fold

responsibility,

"to promote health,

to prevent illness,

to restore health and to alleviate suffering",
that "respect for life,

dignity and

adding

rights of man are

inherent in nursing."

3.

The traditional concept of the

ssed in the

1965 code:

virtuous nurse was expre­

"In personal conduct nurse

39

2

39

:

should not

:

knowinlgy disregard the accepted pattern of

behaviour of

the

In its place the

community in which they

live and work."

1973 code incorporates a statement that

places emphasis on

the profession;

"The nurse when acting

in a professional capacity should at all times maintain
standards of personal conduct that would

upon the profession."

The text of the

reflect credit

1973 code for nurses

follows:

The fundamental responsibility of the nurse is four

fold:

to promote health,

to prevent illness,

to restore

health and to alleviate suffering.

The need for nursing is universal.

nursing is respect for life,

dignity and

Inherent in

rights of man.

It is unrestricted by considerations of nationality,
creed,

colour,

age,

sex,

politics or social status.

Nurses render health services to the
the family and community and

with those of

£

race,

individual,

co-ordinate their services

related groups.

Nurses and people
The nurse's primary responsibility is to those people

who require nursing care.
The nurse,
values and

in providing care,

respects the beliefs,

customs of the individual.

41

:

40

The nurse holds in confidence personal

information

and uses judgement in sharing this information.

Nurses and practice

fl.

The nurse carry personal responsibility for nursing
practice and for maintaining competence by continual

learning.

The nurse maintains the highest standards of nursing
care possible within the

reality of a specific situation.

The nurse uses judgement

in relation to individual

competence when accepting and delegating responsibilities.

CODES AND STATEMENT RELATED TO MEDICAL ETHICS :

The nurse when acting in a professional capacity

should at
that

J.

all times maintain standards of personal conduct

would reflect credit upon the profession

Nurses and society ;
The nurse shares with other citizens the

responsibility

of initiating and supporting action to meet the health and

social needs of the public.

ji. Nurses and Co-workers ;
The nurses sustains a co-operative relationship with

co-workers in nursing and other fields.

41

:

The nurse

the

41

takes appropriate action to safeguard

individual when his care

is endangered by a co-worker

or any other person.

.

Nurses and the profession :

The nurse play the major role in determining and

implementing

desirable standards of nursing practice and

nursing education.

The nurse is active in developing a core of profe­

ssional knowledge.

The nurse acting through the professional organi­

zation,

participates in establishing and maintaining

equitable social and economic working conditions in

nursing."

25

■42

I
I

CHAPTER II

A.

PURPOSE OF THE PAPER

B.

ORGANIZATION OF THE PAPER

C.

ANALYSIS OF CURRENT SITUATION

D.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

42

:

CHAPTER

A.

II

PURPOSE OF THE PAPER :

1.

This term paper is prepared in partial fulfilment

of

the

requirement of the

course in Health Care

Administration.

2.

This study,

i.e.,

legal aspects of medical negli­

gence and Consumer Protection Act,

important subject.

is a very

This is the latest and

expanding movement in our country.

many develop­

ments are taking place at three levels,
a)

Gove rnment :

rapidly

namely

A number of governmental regula­

tions are being framed and enforced

regarding

medical negligence and consumer protection.
b)

public

is becoming more and more auara of their

new found rights and are becoming alert day by

day especially in the

c)

literate areas.

P rofessionals are very much conscious about the
impact of the Consumer Protection Act to their

profession and so they

react.

Some are in favour

of the movement and extend their support.

Others

feel it as a threat to them and their profession;

So their reaction is a negative one.

•43

:

3.

43

This subject is very much relevant to the
care services and medical profession,
applicable

to voluntary health care

health

especially

institutions.

As a student of health care administration,

I feel,

it is very important to know about this subject and

therefore

I decided to do an indepth study on this

subject.

B.

ORGANIZATION OF THE PAPER

This study is divided into nine chapters.
Chapter I includes the following aspects.

-

Introduction speaks about the topic of the legal

aspects of medical negligence and its

reference

to Consumer Protection Act.

- The second part explains in brief about the medical
care services,

its purpose and people.

- The third part deals with the

legal status of

medical profession and the fourth part goes on to
the demand for service.

- The fifth part is concerned with the medical ethics
with special reference to Medical Council of

India

and the international code of medical and nursing

ethics.

:

44

Chapter II explains the purpose of this paper and the

reasons for selecting this topic.

It analyses the

current situation with special reference to the past
situation.

It also speaks about the legal

remedies

that were available in the past in case of medical neg­
ligence and the further remedy that is available today

in the form of Consumer Protection Act,
rature is reviewed,

1986.

The lite­

concerning the topic to highlight

current reactions.

Chapter III explains the objectives of

this study

and what is being aimed at by doing this study.

The

chapter gives the methodology adopted for this study as

well as its scope.

in detail -

Chapter IV deals with medical negligence

in its first part-emphasising the

responsibilities of the

physicians and the health care institutions in
to medical negligence.

It also touches

relation

on the various

liabilities concerning the medical profession as well as

the institution under various circumstances.

The

also deals with the various legal interpretations

The second part of the chapter explains the
and defences in

relation

chapter
in brief.

litigations

to medical negligence affecting

the medical profession and

the hospital services

at home

and abroad.

•45

:

45

Chapter V tries to explain the Consumer Protection
Act,

the legal views related

views of

are

to the Act as well as the

Indian Medical Association,

the Consumers

the patients who

of the medical care services - by the

doctors and institutions - and also the views of the
public at large.

Chapter VI deals with the

result of

carried out in different hospitals on the

the

study

topic of

medical negligence and Consumer Protection Act.

Chapter VII is an analysis of

the findings and

a discussion on it.

Chapter VIII speaks of

health care institution

the future as to how the

is going to face

this challenge;

the precautions and protections required from the side of
medical profession and the health care

institutions.

Chapter IX summarises the study in brief and gives

the conclusion.

Following the nine

chapters a re

the

references,

bibliography and the appendics.

4-6

:

C.

ANALYSIS Or

46

CURRENT SITUATION

Plan is a social being and not an island.

He

lives

in society where he needs each other and owes a duty towards

one another,

so that,

he does not

neighbours and other members of
commission and omission,

i.e.,

injure the others - his

the

society - by acts of

by doing what he should not

have done and not doing what he should have done.

human,

Being

But if he delibe­

he is prone to make mistakes.

rately or negligently causes an injury to the other,
he

then

can be punished by law for breaking the natural law

of his duty towards one another.

When we cause an injury to the other by failure of
our duty negligently,we are

liable.

the law of torts/civil wrong.

in the medical

It is abranch of

When a negligence occurs

field by a medical person,

it is called

the medical negligence which again is a branch of negli­

gence in general.

According to Charaka,
hi? patients as his own

every doctor should consider

children,

and care

the same sentiments and dedication,

to be suffered by them

Council,

for them with

not allowing any harm

^the patients).

The

Indian Medical

a statutory body consisting of doctors,

the doctors that the prime object of

exhorts

their medical pro-

47

:

Fession is to

47

render service to humanity and not financial

gains which should oe a secondary consideration.

In

reality today,

we

see that both these

dations are taken very lightly.

recommen­

Ue see and witness a

certain amount of infidelity by the medical professional -

to the sacred Hippocratic oath pronounced by every doctor
and

the Florence Nightingale's pledge pronounced by every

nurse - at the time of their graduation.

Medical negli­

gence is so common and frequent these days.

In such situations of medical negligences the

patients had
could get the

two options in the past,

redressal of their grievances.

approaching the I’ledical Council of

was the

through which they

One was by

India and the other

legal remedy.

Legal remedy ;

From the legal point of

view the

doctors who were negligent were open to both criminal and
civil liabilities.

Criminal liability

is "when it

is proved

that the

doctor has committed an act or made an ommission that is
grossly

rash or grossly negligent,

which is proximate,

direct or substantive cause of the patient's death,
the doctor is punishable under section 304 A

of

then

Indian

Penal Code.

......... 4B

48

Civil Liability

arises in case of medical services

rendered on payment of a fee which comes within

view of sections 73 and 74 of

Law of

the

the

Indian Contract Act".

torts ; Apart from the

Indian

Civil liability can also arise due

under the law of torts.

To this,

the per?6

Contract Act,

to breach of contract

every patient has accessi­

whet her he/she oays for the treatment or not.

bility,

It

is not enough for the patient to prove that the doctor was

negligent;
care,

he has to prove that the doctor owed a duty of

but he deviated from the duty and as a

patient suffered harm.

result,

the

In this law of tort the emphasis

is on the injury/harm suffered by the patient and the

monetary compensation for the harm/injury suffered by the
patient,

provided the patient,

is able to prove the breach

of duty.

These legal remedies were not really appreciated by
the patients affected by the doctors'

negligence as this

legal remedy is a time consuming process;
whole

lifetime,

it may take the

sometimes even extending to the next gene­

ration where the legal heirs of the patient have
on with the

case before justice

is obtained.

to carry

Secondly,

it was a very complicated process as the complainant had

to file a case and then go through all the formalities of

inquiries,
etc.

the trial with cross examination,

Thirdly,

re-examination,

the complainant had to pay a court fee

(a certain percentage of the amount demanded as

compen-

49

:

This

sation).

49

uas not enough;

the patient/plaintiff had

to employ a lawyer to plead his case which means trouble
of searching for a good one and

paying the

lawyer's fee.

the cost involved in

For all these

reasons

the legal

remedy was a costly affair and complicated and time
ming one,

and after all these the plaintiff could never be

sure that he/she uas going to win the case;
he/she

of

wins,

and even if

he/she may not be alive to enjoy the fruits

legal battle.

lity;

consu­

So very few availed of this legal faci­

and the others

remained at the back and suffered

their problem in silence.

The second option that was available for justice
and remedy was by approaching the
where

Indian Medical Council

the plaintiff could complain about the doctor and

ask for justice.

But here if the Medical Council found

the doctor negligent,

the maximum they could do was to

punish the doctor by de-registering his name and

his

licence to practise as a doctor.

beneficial to the patient.
by the Medical Council.
of

The damage

This

removing

remedy uas not

is not compensated

So very feu came foruard to avail

this option.

In the meantime,the medical negligence kept on
mounting.

Numerous are the patients who suffered the damages

50

:

50

and injuries,

even dealth but very few could have access

to justice.

The

remaining suffered in silence - especially

the poor and

the

ignorant who considered it as their fault.

Some

knew it was

injustice but could not afford the

legal

battle.

Open any newpaper or any periodical; they bear wit­

ness to a number of medical negligences of doctors and
institutions in the public sector as well as in

sector of health care service.

the private

There may be a certain

amount of

exaggeration in those

the media,

and one

cases that comes up

in

got to take them with a pinch of salt.

But there will be a lot of truth too.
those uho/afford will publish the

Even here

too only

cases in the media and

an

the others remain in the dark.

Let us have a look at one of the

recent judgements

made by the Madras High Court awarding Rupees 17.35 lakhs

in damages to Mr.Chandrasekar,

a former table tennis

champion for serious consequences of a simple operation.
(This

case

was b.rought out by the

Indian Express - Bangalore

on the 26th May 1993 in its front page).

It certainly

makes amends at personal level for grave medical lapses.
But it also lays down a precedent
might apply to such'cases

setting principle that

in the future.

No cash compen-

51

:

sation can

51

repay or make up for the serious and permanent

physical and mental disability.
promising career,

an operation

Mr.Chand rasekar,

with a

was virtually reduced to a cripple after

which was supposed to be a simple one.

a long battle,

the

court upheld the

on the part of the doctors.

After

charge of negligence

The judgement was an encoura­

ging one which makes the medical profession more accounta­

ble to the

individual patients as well as the community

and society at large.

Mr.Chandrasekar could perhaps afford such long

legal battle.

But majority of our patients and

their

relatives are not in a position to fight out their grie­
vances in the

law court,

in a similar manner and gain

justice.

But what else can they do?

approach

for help?

Whom can they

How can they have access to justice?

In similar situations,

the Consumer Protection Act can

be a soothing balm for the individual patients and the

public.

Bringing the medical profession under the perview

of Consumer protection Act may bring a

lives of these poor and
society.

ignorant and

ray of hope

into the

less priveleged of our

The Consumer Protection Act could be a means to

make the doctors/medical professionne1 and the
institutions more accountable

and

health care

responsible for their

actions.

52

:

In

52

the past too,

of patients and
negligence.

thousands

relatives who had been victims of doctor's

Hut

to legal battle

uere hundreds and

there

they were notin aposition to have access

like Fl r. 0 hand rase ka r and feu others.

Some

try to attempt legal battle selling all they have

uith a

determination to have justice.

really

will have

I wonder how many

the patience to persevere till the end?

Let us go over the case of Aswini Rane of

Bombay

who was more successful in giving birth to a sweet little

baby.

the

can neither play nor talk with it - after

But she

caesarean operation on 23rd April 1990.

Now all that

she can do is a little more than open and shut her eyes and
lie on her back

After three years Aswini still

has a feeding tube passing through her nose and
stomach.

Her three year

Another tube helps her pass urine.

old son Akshay sits near her and says,
mummy talk to me."

please make my

Aswini's husband Ashok Rane,

a job in the distant suburbs,

her bedside.

"God,

into her

Rajaram S.

who has

spends some hours everyday by

Parah,

a small photo studio near Dadar,

Aswini's father,
has exhausted

and had a heart attack few months ago.

He

who owns

his savings

scent Rs.4.25 lakhs

on Aswini's treatment and has sought a compensation of

Rs.10 lakhs.
we do not

"Her horoscope says she

know when,"

he says.

will be

well but

27

53

:

These are

53

cases just two out of hundreds,

brought to the broad day light.

that is

What happens to the

rest?

Perhaps the Consumer protection Act can be an answer to
the question as the Act aims or "seeks to provide for

better protection of the
the purpose,

interests of

consumers and for

to make prevision for the establishment of

consumer councils and other authorities for the settlement

of

consumer dispute's and matters

connected therewith.

It seeks to promote and protectithe
It seeks the

rightd of

consumers.

rights to be promoted and protected by the

Consumer Protection Councils to be established at the
Centre and States.

It seeks to provide speedy and simple

redressal to consumer disputes.

A

quasi-judicial machinery

is sought to be set up at the district,
levels.

State and Central

These quasi-judicial bodies will obderve the

principles of natural justice and have been empowered to

give

reliefs of a specific nature <aed—tro—a-we-rd-.

appropriate,

Wherever

compensation is given to the consumer.

Penalties for non-compliance of the orders given by the

quasi-judicial bodies have also been provided."

28

Consumer Protection Act is the latest Act and the

Consumer movement is the

latest movement in the country

and it is a rapidly expanding one.
because

it provides a speedy

It is expanding rapidly

redressal compared to the

54

:

54

never ending civil cases.

The procedure is very simple

and the process is very cheap

compared to the complicated

and expensive formalities in the

law courts.

need of a lawyer to plead for you,
court fee.

pay the

cross-examination,

There is no

nor is there need to

One need not go through the ordeal of

re-examination, etc.

All that is

required

is to write the petition/complaint on plain paper giving the

details and the compensation expected as well as the address
of the doctor or the Hospital that has

caused the injury/

The complainant can either give it personally or

damage.

send it by post to the appropriate forum,
district forum if

lakh rupees

i.e.,

to the

the compensation sought is less than one

(recently revised to five

lakhs);

to the state

forum or state commission if the compensation demanded is

between five lakhs to twenty lakhs and to the national

commission if the compensation goes above twenty lakhs.
Once the petition is sent to the disputes redressal forum,
the forum takes care of the

rest and makes sure that the

consumer is provided with justice.

A

recent

ruling in April 1992 has brought medical

services and the doctors in the private sector under the

ambit of the Consumer Protection Act.

doctor in
The

India was equivalent to God.

Indian patient

had immense

In the past the
"Vaidyo Narayanu Hari".

confidence

in the doctor.

55

:

55

But today that is not the case.

care

Many doctors and health

institutions have drifted away from the original

ethical aspect of the profession which has affected the
trust the patient had in

do not

the doctor.

Today the patients

consider their doctor as a Hari or Narayana;

react to the impersonal;

they

dealings

unethical and commercial

of the medical professional by demanding justice and their

due

right.

As the doctors and the medical profession are brought
under the purview of the Consumer Protection Act,

there is

a very strong reaction by the Medical Community.

They feel

threatened

(except for few who feel that the

not affect an upright medical person),

strongly.

C.P.A.

will

and they protest

They have challenged the C.P.A.

by

filing their

petition in the Supreme Court asking the Supreme Court to
exempt them from the Consumer Protection Act.

The Supreme

Court has accepted the petition but has not yet given a

decision.
the

There is a certain amount of uncertainity about

result of this case pending

got to wait and

in the

Supreme Court.

Ue

see what the Supreme Court is going to say;

how it is going to respond.

D.

REVIEU OF LITERATURE

:

P.H. Addision says,

"Medical negligence

is a compli­

cated subject and the liability of the doctor will always

depend upon the circumstances of the particular case."

29

56

56

:

Regan and Moritz says about medical negligence
"A physician must treat bis patient in a manner consistent
with the standard of practice,

aceepted methods

utilizing

and procedures in diagnosis and in treatment.

He must

possess and exercise that degree of skill and care
is

which

commonly and ordinarily possessed and exercised by the

other reputable practitioners in the community in the case
of

similar cases.

It is immaterial whether the patient

is being treated gratuitously or for a fee."

Bernard Knight says,

called

'malpractice'

30

"Medical negligence

was formerly

medical negligence

is no

different in law from any other type of negligence;
from the fact that the

apart

courts adopt more sympathetic and

lenient view towards the doctor than other types of defen­
dant - a fact not appreciated by many doctors,
believe that the

reverse

is true.

Negligence, medical or otherwise,
known as a tort,

tion,

is a civil wrong

a difficult concept to describe.

a doctor may be held in bre'ach of contract,

professional behaviour
the

who tend to

falls short of the

contract between him and

the patient.

Tn addi­

if

his

requirements of

For negligence

57

:

57

of any kind to be proved,

(i)

it must be shown that :

that tile defendant (.doctor)

care to the plaintiff
(ii;

owed a duty of

(patient;

that the defendant was in breach of

that

duty.

(iii)

That the plaintiff suffered damages as a
result."

31

M ihi r Desai in his article

and

law'

says,

'Medical malpractice

"Medical negligence is a branch of the

law of negligence which in turn is a branch of

of torts.
ment.

law

The tort (Law is not based on any act of Parlia­

It is mainly a judge made

law developing over the

years through changing judicial decisions.
possible

the

It is not

to define torts but broadly speaking tort is

a wrong done by one person to another for which the law
provides a remedy.

The idea is to monetarily compensate

the victim rather than punish the offender as would be
the

case

in criminal law.

doctor's negligence causing death of a

such as

patient,

It includes disparate events

defamation of a person

of the offender are not very relevant.

etc.

The motives

The focus is on

the victim.

58

:

A person

53

is said to be negligent when she/he

acts

without due

care

her action.

When we say that a person has been negligent,

in

regard to harmful consequences of his/

we are saying that she/he acted in a way that she/he ought
not to have acted.

ought to have

acted.

This assumes that we

know how she/he

The way in which we

consider that

she/he ought to have acted is the norm or standard which

entitles us to condemn the person for being negligent when
she/he fails to comply with the standard."

32

Dr.U.Brahma Reddy says about medical negligence,
"A doctor is deemed negligent when it is established that:
the doctor owed a duty of care to the patient;

was

as a

in breach of the duty:

result.

negligence,
care.".1

the doctor

and the patient suffered damages

An error of judgement

does not amount to

had the doctor exhibited reasonable degree of

33

As per the article in Health for the Millions,
December 1992 - Vol.
is defined as want of

XVIII.

No.:6,

"Medical negligence

reasonable degree of care and skill

or willful negligence on the part of the medical practi­
tioner in the treatment of a patient with whom a relation­

ship of professional attendant is established so as to
to his bodily injury or permanent disability or loss of

life." 34

59

lead

59

:

Dr.
a

Pritam Phatnani says,

"(Medical) negligence

legal concept and comes under the

'B'

suffers harm,

'A'is said to be negligent.

are three basic ingredients.

(b) dereliction of duty

(c)

Thus legally,

there is no dereliction of duty.

harm coming to patient due to such
the doctor is not negligent."

if there is

For instance,

syringe,

not sterilised before giving injection,

Mason J.R. and

there

patient suffers damage directly

if hands are not scrubbed and needle,

?

Thus,

Duty of care to patient

(a)

due to the dereliction of duty.
no damage,

'a'

When

and there is a breach in duty and

'B'

owes duty of care of

law of tort.

is

forceps are

and if there is no

'malpractice'

legally,

35

H.A. Me Call Smith

says,

"in deter­

mining whether there has been negligence in medical treat­
the courts pursue the same line of inquiry as they

ment,

pursue in any other similar claim:

did the conduct of

the defendent amount to a breach of duty of care which he

owed

to the injured plaintiff?

ently,

Expressed somewhat differ­

this amounts to asking whether the standard of treat­

ment given by the defendant fell below the standard expected

of him by the

law and whether there was,

fault in the legal sense.
underpinning of the

law in

strict liability may be

therefore,

any

Fault remains the theoretical
this area until such time as

imposed."

36

60

60

Chacko in his article on medical negligence says,

T.

"A person who holds himself out as a medical practitioner

impliedly undertakes that he

is possessed of the

skill and knowledge for the purpose.
the patient certain duties,

requisite

Such a person owes

namely,

a duty of care in deciding whether to undertake

a)

a case or not;
a duty of care

b)

in deciding what treatment

to give;
a duty of care

c)

in the administration of that

treatment

and a duty of

d)

care in answering questions put

to him by the patient,
which he

in circumstances in

knows that the patient intends to rely

on his answer.

A

breach of these duties will support an action for

negligence

oy the patient.11

An article by F r.

"A

37

P.D.

Mathew and P.M.Bakshi says,

person is said to be negligent when she/he acts without

due care

in regard to the harmful consequences of her/his

action.

A physician,

profession,

surgeon or other member of the medical

if he has not exercised

reasonable

care in the

61

61

treating of a patient, may be
Uhile

the degree of care

facts of each case,

liable to a negligent suit.

to be exercised depends on the

it is generally presumed that the test

is the standard of the ordinary skilled person,

and professing to have tnat special skill. 1

Consumer Protection Act :

Protection Act is an Act

exercising

38

The Act says,

"Consumer

to provide for better protection

of the interests of consumers and for that purpose

to make

provision for the establishment of consumer councils and

other authorities for the

settlement of consumer's disputes

and for matters connected

therewith."

39

It provides for better protection of the

of consumers and for the purpose,

interests

makes provision for the

establishment of consumer councils and other authorities
for the settlement of consumer disputes and for matters

connected therewith.

"It seeks,
.

inter alia,

right of

consumers such as;-

(a)

right to bo

the

to promote and protect the

informed about the

standard,

quality,

quantity,

and price of goods to

potency,

purity,

protect

the consumer against unfair trade practices;

:

(bj

the

right

62

to be protected against marketing or

goodswnich are hazardous

(cj

tne

to

life and

property;

right to oe assured wherever possible,

accesss

to an authority of goods at competitive price;
(d)

the

right to be heard and to oe assured that

consumers'

interests will receive due consideration

at appropriate forums;
(e)

the

right to seek redressal against unfair trade

practices or unscrupulous explanation of consumers;

and

right to consumer education.

These objects are sought to be promoted and protected
by the

Consumer Protection Council to be established

at the Central and State level.

To provide speedy and simple
disputes,

redressal to consumer

a quasi-judicial machinery is sought to be set-up

at the District,

State and Central levels.

These quasi

judicial bodies will observe the principles of natural

justice and have been empowered to give
nature and to award,

consumer.

reliefs of a specific

wherever anpropriate,

compensation to

Penalties for non-compliance of the orders given

by quasi-judici al bodies have also been provided."

Sudhir Vyas says in D.H.News service,

"the decision

(of the National Commission) has put Medical Practitioners

in a quandray.

" We are not worried simply because the

63

63

the decision will cause unnecessary harassment to doctors

but because ultimately,
Dr.

I.M.Modi of

society will have

to suffer" says

the Ahemedabad Medical Association."

Indian Express of 26/5/1992 says,

/i n

"Intricacies of medical

practices cannot be understood by the consumer forutn oh-quasi-judicial bodies as there can be no standard to esti­
mate a doctors'

quality of service," said Dr.

who also warned

Chairman of Progressive Medicos Forum,

that

J.3.Sood,

if the medical services were brought under the Act

doctors might

refuse to treat serious cases.

doctors accountable to their job,

To make the

every death allegedly

do to mishandling or negligence should be investigated by
a special medical board.

Medical treatment cannot be equated

with commercial services like banking,
42
or transport."

finance,

insurance

"The medical profession cannot be held under a constant

threat of legdl action.

Soliciting medical treatment is

like hiring a personar-lised service and
risk.

To describe a patient as a

would prove detrimental to the

'customer'

43

17th March 1992 says,

Mr.Ravindra Naryan,

a lawyer,

or 'client'

interests of society in which

doctors are held in high esteem."

Hindustan times

is at the patients

"According to

the difference between the

..........64.

Consumer Protection Act was that in

normal law and the
C.P.A.,

the

can directly go to the

Consumer (patient)

consumer court for comnensation for negligence,

without engaging a counsel.
and can

He

get an early decision."

has to pay no court fee

44

The V.H.A.I,

publication on medical negligence

Issue

the public says,

before

"The issue of consumer

rights has become an important issue during the
couple

The

of

years.

for the first time

In 1989,

Consumer Protection Act

if any,

(C.P.A.),

last
India,

in

1986 provided

consumers a forum for speedy redressal of their grievances
ranging from defective household applicances to medical

services.

lation and
-

The C.P.A.

is a piece of

comprehensive legis­

recognises six rights of the

Right to safety;

Right

Right to be heard;

consumer,

to be informed;

Right to choo^se;

Right to seek redressal;

to consumer education.

namely:

and Right

The consumer with complaints can

approach commissions at the district state and^central

.levels.

There are no court fees and the

not have to go through lawers."
Dr.C.M.Fran cis,
August

1992 asks,

consumer does

45

in his editorial of Health Action of

"By denying the cheaper and quicker

redressal method to those going to Government hospitals,

......... 6$

:

are we not denying the

65

right to

redressal of grievance

to the poorer sections of humanity?"

Chandra Kannapiran,
VHAI says,
with

"There

the

information officer to

is definitely a serious cause of concern

regard to consumer redressal forums.

Public minded,

competent oeople with integrity are already there,
politicization and infiltration of vested

be avoided.

These forums

tial that consumer organizations,

There

It

is most essen­

while upholding the
condemn any frivolou£s

should strongly

and malicious complaints

interest should

could become a tool for exploi­

tation against the medical profession.

rights of consumers,

but

against medical practitioners."^^

is probably a need for incorporation of a

provision in the Act for very strong action against
complainant where complaint
malicious.

the patient.

is found to be frivolous or

There is scope of misuse.

prevail in taking up

issues

the

Prudence should

to the consumer forums by

It should be properly

scrutinised before

the'consumer court takes up the cases.

There should be

accountability on the part of the medical profession.

Society expects a certain degree of efficiency and certain
norms of service to be established and maintained.

Consumer

courts could include medical persons with com-etence and

66

66

integrity.

Indian penal codes

Pledico-Laga 1 forums and

which deal with medical cases should be streamlined,
strengthened and simplified.

Ganu Naik,

Association;

India Radiology

Vice President of All

Ex-president of

Bombay says,

I.M.A,

Ue doctors are not here to kill out

profession is noble.
to cure,

permanently or atleast temporarily.

the Act,

we are portrayed as villains,

wise.

Accusations are

safer contrast dyes.

. , .

x •

the slightest

highlighted to its

And we are unjustly labelled

we will have to use the so-called,
sive,

o

seven^timss-more-expen-

The results?

xx

x-

x

more waiting time for the patient."

S.C.Chakrabarty (Nagpur)

More expenses,

48

says,

"In the

doctors who become notorious while practising,
bad name due to their greed,
up

the

(hauled up)

of the noble profession.

case of those

causing a

chances of being hauled

for negligence or malpractice cannot be

they should be

Because of

unless proved other­

hurled against us;

mistake is politicized, publicized,

sensational limit.

"Medical

ruled out,

and

because they are the black sheep
I he entire medical fraternity

need have no fear just because a few will land theoselves

in. trouble.

The

Indian Medical Association would do well

67

:

to exhort its members
as in the past,

67

to be as dedicated and since re

rather than to Fight a losing and prolonged

legal battre prompted by an ego problem."

Juliet Nathwani,

Uombay says,

"The

a consultant psychiatrist,

from

inclusion of medical service under the

will evidently create a sense of

C.P.A.

49

security and deep

satisfaction in the fraternity of patients who will feel

assured that all possible caution and care

will be exercised

in the delivery of medical services since doctors

will be

made more accountable.

Medical personnel who are diligent,conscientious,
straight-forward and ethical would be unaffected

Act.

However,

on the acguisition of success and fame,

there is a tendency to display,
abruptness,

by this

a certain degree of

arrogance

distance and non-communication towards patients.

The Act would be a preventive measure to the development
of such an attitude.

Gross negligence

would,

of

course,

be

avoided and there would be a distinct improvement in hospital
services.

The ultimate goal should be patient satisfaction

and that itself is a very rewarding,

litigation-free expe­

rience.

68

-i 68

it is advisable,

However,

too,

that patients do not

turn very militant as that would be counter productive."^

K.B.Grant,

"I think it

Trustee,

Pune,

says,

should be a mutual arrangement on both sides.

In a consumer court,

However,

Ruby Hall Clinic,

a consumer seeks compensation.

the doctor is proved not

if

guilty,

then he should

given the same amount of compensation that the patient was

claiming - to compensate for the

slur on the doctors

tation.

Doctors should be judged,

must be

guarded against.

affair."

but

repu­

superficial claims

It should not became a one sided

51

Sanjeev Mulekar,

a Dermatologist,

Bombay,

says,

"I am glad that the Consumer Protection Act will be applied

Unfortunately commercialisation has crept into

to doctors.

our profession and a dissatisfied patient finds redressal

time-consuming,

doctors'

conscience is clear,

After all,

replaced,

expensive and frustrating.
he

As long as

should not be afraid.

the human body is not a machine that can be
come what may."

52

"The Consumer Protection Act should be clear

and concise.
judge,

If it is left to the interpretation of the

then that might be dangerous

because the personal

69

:

69

bias of the judge is bound to creep in.

If the Act does not

clearly state the subjects

it covers and doctors feci they are in a tricky situation,
then

in order to play it safe,

all types of

they will stop accenting

cases and this will harm the doctor-patient

re lation ship.

But if it is clearly stated

can take

legal action if the

or unscrupulous,
ssion should

then

I

that the consumer

certainly feel the medical profe-

come under the perview of this Act."

Justice Alladi Kuppuswamy says,

is treating a patient
see him in the

On

53

"Every doctor who

is afraid that the next day he may

court along with a lawyer.

This is because

of the possibility of taking medical negligence

consumer court.

dishonest,

doctor is negligent,

cases to

This makes him defensive and nervous.

the other hand,

without consumer court,

the patients

injured through negligence may never get justice."

Thus

54

there is a variety of ppinions with respect to

the Consumer Protection Act.

70

CHAPTER III

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

METHODOLOGY
SCOPE OF THE STUDY

- STUDY OF DECISION OF COURTS

70

CHAPTER

A.

III

OBJECTIVES

1.

To study the legal aspects of medical negligence
as it affects the patients (the public)

and the

medical profession and health care institutions,

Medical negligence is an act of omission or
commission by a medical person which is considered

improper by a doctor of average prudence.
results in harm or injury to the patient,

If it
the doctor

(or the health care institution) may become liable for
d amage s.

From the legal point of view,

health care institutions are remiss
duties or commit lapes,

if doctors or the
in performing their

they are open to both criminal

and civil liabilities,

When there has been injury or harm as a result

of the negligence of the doctors / health care insti­
tutions the patient

can avail the services of the

criminal / civil court or can approach the

Indian

Medical Council or can approach the Consumer fortynfor

the remedy / redressal (for pecuniary and non-pecuniary

damages).

71

71

2.

To study the Consumer Protection Act as it applies
to medical services,

when there is a defect or

deficiency of service.

According to Consumer Protection Act the

consumers

are
-

persons who buy goods for a consideration and

consumption;

and

persons who hire

services for a consideration.

Consumer forum assures the

consumer that the goods

that are defective will be corrected of its defect

replaced;

inury caused

as well as compensation for the damage or

(by the producers of those

goods).

Services

of any description made available to the user comes under

the purview of the Consumer Protection Act.

Any person

who hires these services by paying a consideration (fully/
partly

or promises to pay the charge) by fees,

beneficiary is a consumer.

services,

and even

If there is a defect in these

the consumer can file a case to the

consumer forum

and claim compensation.

The act defines service as

service of any description

which includes the services rendered by the medical profe­

ssional / health care

institutions - who makes their services

available to the public and are taking a remuneration.

They

7.2

:

must,

72

therefore, pay compensation if there is a deficiency

in their services.

3.

To study the impact of the Consumer Protection Act on

medical negligence and the doctor - patient relationship.

Negligence by itself is not enough to establish lia­
bility.

There must be an injury caused by the negligence.

It is upto the consumer to prove that there is a direct

cause-and-effect relationship between the negligence

and

the injury caused.

Medical profession and the health care institutions
who consider the Consumer Protection Act as an opportunity

(and not a threat)

to maintain their values and improve

their standard will be more careful and avoid negligence,
to the extent they are avoidable.

The doctor-patient relationship
by ethics of trust.

was characterised

To-day there is a certain amount of

loss of trust between doctor and the patients.

of

4.

trust is being replaced by the ethics of

The ethics

rights.

To examine the possibility of doctors resorting to
"defensive medicine" and other measures for their

protection against possible

litigation.

While Consumer Courts are a great help to

reduce the

73

odds that are heavily stacked against the

consumer,

it can lead to defensive / Protective medicine

by the doctors.
those

Indian health

The medical profession may shy away from

cases that are potential ones for litigations.

order to protect themselves,
may investigations.

the doctors may order too

Potentital medico legal cases have the

chances of going unattended.
waiting before

In

Patients may/can be

really being attended to.

kept

The doctors may

also take up more insurance to provide for contingencies.
All these lead to increase
the poor will be the

5.

in the cost of medical care and

ones whom it affects the most.

To consider changes in the Consumer Protection Act,

to

make it more acceptable to all parties concerned and

to reduce pit-falls and drawbacks.
Always changes are susceptible to reactions.
changes may be necessary to improve the legislation,

Certain

and

make the Consumer Protection Act better and more acceptable

to all parties.

The Consumer Protection Act must be a balancing point
between the

consumers and the providers,

concerned.

It should not be the

and be fair to all

licence for the consumers

to be frivolous or vexations or even mischieveous.

-

: 74-

:

-

Services remain services and there can be no
difference

in its value,

renders it.

no matter who provides it/

Whether he pays for the services or not,

the consumer is a consumer.

At present the Act applies only to doctors and

health care

institutions in the private (including volun­
it excludes services provided free of char­

tary)

sector;

ges.

Government doctors and Government hospitals are

outside the purview of Consumer Protection Act as the
services rendered are considered free.

provisions of

These and other

the law need changes such as bringing the

Government hospitals and its doctors also under the purview

of the Consumer Protection Act.

B.

METHODOLOGY
The methodology of this study is as follows :

1.

Review of literature
Review of literature is essential for conceptual

clarity and for an analytical reflection on the problem.
Keeping this in view,

an extensive review of the literature

on the subject was done by reading and analysis the diffe­
rent books,

journals,

reviews related to medical negligence

and the views of various organizations and experts regar­

The theoretical frame­

ding the Consumer Protection Act.

work has been formulated by reviewing literatures and having
discussions with the experts in the field as well as people

whom the topic affects the most,
trators of hospitals.

tical frame-work,

namely doctors and adminis­

Based on the

conceptual and theore­

a comprehensive questionnaire was prepared

to gather the opinions and view of the

administrators and

doctors of different hospitals.

2.

Questionnaires

Views and opinions were collected from administrators

and senior doctors working in three hospitals in the volun­
tary sector,.where services are provided mostly on payment,

though there is a large amount of free case.

(questionnaire

follow).

The questionnaires were issued to each administrator

and doctor personally at their own area of work.
waiting to introduce myself and the purpose,

the questionnaire to the doctors,

While

hnd then issue

I had the opportunity for

close observation of the doctors dealing with the patients.

Sufficient time was given to answer the

questionnaire.

The questionnaire uas collected personally.

All the adminis-

-

: 7C

:

-

trators and some of the doctors were interviewed to
support the answers in the

questionnaire - to see the

co-relation between their answers in the paper and in

person.

The administrators and doctors to whom these ques­
tionnaires were administered

are

working in three chari­

table and voluntary hospitals located in the same
They have varying bed strengths (300 - 800 beds).
samples were collected from the specialists,
hospital A,

20 from hospital 8 and

city.
Sixty

30 from

10 from hospital C;

this reflected the inpatient bed strengths.

3.

Visit to the State Commission

In order to gather information
of cases filed in pursuance of the

regarding the number

Consumer Protection Act,

that would be

current and accurate,

was visited.

Discussions and interviews were held with

reliable authorities.
the

the State Commission

Statistical data were obtained from

Commission with respect to cases filed,

disposed off

and pending.

4.

Study of medico-legal case files
To strengthen the understanding of medical negli­

gence and the mode of action by the plaintiff

I

as well as

respondents,

I went through some medico-legal case files

in a hospital where cases were on process.

C.

SCOPE OF THE

STUDY

Fledical negligence

cate one too.

is an ancient problem and a deli­

Consumer Protection Act

(the latest mode of

redressal of grievance to this ancient problem)

is the most

recent Act passed by the Parliament.

latest move.

ment in the country,

one of

Being the

the limitation to this study was

a certain lack of availability of material on the topic of
medical negligence and the use of Consumer Protection Act

to obtain

relief.

This paper limits itself to the
analysis of

responses

administration and

to sixty questionnaires by specia­

lists and three hospital administrators and two medico­
legal cases.

The patients (and their relatives/dependents) repre­

sent an important part of those affected by medical negli­
gence and Consumer Protection Act.

on their perceptions and

No survey was conducted

responses due to constraints of

time.

In spite of the above limitations,

the Study was

wide enough to give information regarding the application

of

the

law for Consumer Protection as it affected medical

negligence,

a deficiency in the service provided by the

medical profession and

the health care institutions.

CHAPTER IV

MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE

- DEFINITION OF MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE
- RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PHYSICIAN
- RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE INSTITUTION
- LIABILITIES OF MEDICAL STAFF, OTHER

STAFF AND THE INSTITUTION
- VARIOUS LEGAL INTERPRETATIONS

LITIGATIONS AND DEFENCE

: 79

CHAPTER

A.

IV

MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE

tvery doctor who proposes to practise medicine

takes the

'Hippocratic*

oath modified binding himself

or herself to observe the code of ethics contained in

it.

This is hou the ancients thought to ensure high

standards from the medical practitioners.

the ancidnt days,

these days ub often come across

doctors who do not follow the code.
a few are callous,

but, unlike

Some are negligent;

greedy and unethical in the profe­

ssion giving the impression that they have taken a

'hypocritic*

oath.

oath instead of the hallowed 'Hippocratic*

Many are the victims of such medical practitioners.

Vast majority of them are poor and ignorant who suffer in
silence.

Do they have any legal remedy against the

negligence of a medical practitioner?

What is the lia­

bility of a doctor who causes death, or serious mental
or physical injury to the patient through his/her neg­

ligence?

I,

We shall examine them.

Medical negligence

"A branch of the civil wrong is known as negli­
gence in general.

ligence,

A sub-branch of this is medical neg­

which deals with the situations,

in which

...J30

: 80

a physician or surgeon or other member of medical profe­
ssion may have to pay compensation,

cised reasonable care.

if he has not exer­

The degree of care to be exercised

depends on the facts of each case.

However,

in general,

it may be stated that the test is the standard of the

ordinary skilled man,
that skill.

exercising and professing to have

If a medical man fails to measure up to that

standard in any respect,

he has been negligent and has to

pay compensation to the person harmed by him.”

55

1, Duties of Care
This principle becomes applicable when the doctor

accepts a patient,

whether the doctor accepts fee or not,

whether he is a private practitioner or

general practitioner or a specialist.
medical advice or treatment,

a public servant,

A person who offers

impliedly undertakes that he

has the required skill and knowledge.

Such a person owes

to the patient certain duties of care.
a.

duty of care to decide whether to take in a patient;

b.

duty of care to decide what procedures to adopt in
diagnosis and treatment;

c.

duty of care in administering the treatment;

and

d.

duty of care in giving adequate information

to the

patient or,

in the case of the incompetent patient

to the close relations.

....81

-

:

81

:

-

A breach of any of these duties makes the doctor
liable to a suit by the patient.

"A practitioner must possess a reasonable degree
of skill and knowledge,
degree of

care.

and must exercise a reasonable

A doctor is not to be held negligent,

simply because something went urong.

Sometimes,

inspite

of taking every Reasonable precaution things go amis in

surgical operation and medical treatment.

He is liable

only when he falls below the standard of a reasonably

competent practitioner in the field."

2.

Standard of Care

In India the standard of care expected..ofa doctor
has been succinctly laid down by the Supreme Court as under:

"...........

A person who holds himself out to give medical

advice and treatment,

ssed

impliedly undertakes that he is posse*

of the skill and knowledge for the purpose.

person, when consulted by a patient,
certain duties,

undertake

viz.,

the case,

Sucha

owes him (to the patient)

a duty of care in deciding whether to

a duty of care in deciding what treatment

to give or a duty of care in the administration of that

treatment.

A breach of any of those duties gives a right

of action for negligence to the patient.

The practitioner

must bring to his task a reasonable degree of skill and

82

: ■ 82

knowledge and must exercise

a reasonable degree of care."

57

The Supreme Court adds that neither the highest

degree of care is required,

care enough.
care and

nor is the lowest degree of

What is required is a reasonable degree of

competence,

judged in the

light of the circumstances

of the case.

Depending upon the time, place, patient as well as

the doctor himself, the standard of care to be exercised
by the doctor differs.

For example,

which took place in 1947,
knowledge of 1954,

in judging an event

one cannot apply the medical

when the case is heard.

Thus in 1947,

a particular method of keeping ampoules of anaesthetic

drug in phenol was in vogue.

This cannot be held to be

merely because in 1954, medical knowledge favoured

faulty

a different method.

Ua must not look at the 1947 event

with 1954 spectacles.

If a doctor has acted in accordance with the accep­

table medical practice,

and has exercised the reasonable

he is not liable,

even of he has made a mistake in

care,

his diagnosis

or treatment.

(It does not amount to negli­

gence) .

83

83

:

3.Onus of proof

If a doctor is sued

for negligence,

the patient has

to prove that the doctor was negligent, except in those

circumstances where the

negligence is so evident that

it does not require further proof.

doctor,

if he feels that he

is not

In such cases,

guilty ,

the

then it is

up to him to prove it.
Il . Types of medical negligence

Medical negligence may assume a variety of forms.
1.

Negligence in diagnosis :

A proper diagnosis of the

illness is the first duty of a medical practitioner.

A wrong diagnosis leading to any injury to the patient

may invite liability in law.
2.

Negligence in diagnostic aids :

Adequate investigations

using acceptable means of diagnostic aids

necessary

for arriving at a proper diagnosis.

It may be necessary

to consult an expert in some cases.

If there is negli­

gence on the part of the practitioner to seek expert

advice in a given case, (e.g.: interpretation of an

x-ray film), the doctor may be held liable.

84

84

3.

Administration of drugs

Doctors and nurses have been

;

held liable tor negligent

administration of a drug

leading to death or injury of a patient*

4.

Failure to take precaution :

Every medical practitioner

is expected to take reasonable precaution in the treat­

ment of his / her patients.

There are certain drugs

which are known to cause adverse

reaction to certain

Such drugs are to be administered only after

patients.

test dose has been administered.

Otherwise,

the doctor

can be held liable for negligence.

5.

Consent of the patients ;

intervention on the

In a surgical operation or any

body of a person,

the written consent

of the person concerned is necessary if she/he is capable

of giving it.

consent,

If she/he is unable to give such a

someone competent should be asked to do it on

his/her behalf.

If a surgeon operates upon a person

without or against the consent, he/she can be held legally
liable for negligence.

It may happen that a patient refuses to give con­
sent

to an urgent life saving operation.

the doctor,

In that case,

to protect himself/herself , should place on

record the fact that the patient had been requested to
give consent but had refused to do so.

85

85

6.

Failure to give advice

liable if,

:

:

A doctor can be held legally

due to lack of reasonable skill and care,

he fails to give advice or undertake treatment which

was necessary in the circumstances.

An honest doctor

must either personally consult or refer his/her patient

to a more competent doctor if the practitioner cannot
arrive at a reasonable degree of certainty with regard
to proper diagnosis.

7.

The operation theatre

;

A number of litigations emanate

from the operation theatre.

These cases mostly relate

to negligence in respect of activities connected with

the operation process such as ;
of the theatre;

Unhygienic conditions

negligence with regard to the sterili­

sation of instruments,

glowes,

linen,

etc.

preparation of the patient for the operation;
sponges,

body;

Inadequate
leaving

forceps or other instruments inside the patient's

burns or other injuries caused in the course of

treatment / operation, etc.

Utmost care and precautions are to be taken in
the operation theatre to safeguard the life and avoid
injuries or harm to the patient.
doctor or

Any negligence of the

the hospital management leading to death or

injury will attract legal liability.

86

86

8.

Post operative care ;

to take

reasonable

:

Hospital authorities are expected

care of the post operative patient.

Hospital will be held legally liable if anything happens
to the patient due to lack of

reasonable

Other forms of medical negligence

listen / pay heed

care.

are failure to

to a patient's complaints; negligent

exposure of the patient to the

risk of infection;

neg­

ligence in advice about the risk of an operation or
failure to warn the patient about such risks;
staff,

111.

inadequate

etc.

Reap onsibilities of the physicians
Medical profession is considered to be one of the

It is also

most noble professions from time immemorial.

viewed as one of the most prestigeous one.

wants to be a doctor.

everybody

The patents are frantic to see that

their children become doctors.

wish to become doctors.

So

Host of the children too

Everyone is striving towards that

which is considered to bring fame and monetary rewards.
In this mad race,

some use their intellectual ability;

others make use of their financial capacity and yet others

avail the political influence.

I wonder how many are really

aware of the price that they have to pay in order to win the

..87

real prize - namely to be a 'medical-professional-doctor'!
The money paid in the form of capitation fee or the poli­
tical influence or the intellectual capacity that is dis­

played during the entrance examination and interviews may

provide an admission to the course.

But to be worthy of

this noble calling and to be a member of this noble pro­

fession one need something more than all these - namely a
head,

a heart and the hands - a head that is capable of

thinking,

reasoning and acquiring the necessary knowledge

a heart that is capable of loving and feeling

and skill;

for the patient,

his family

and community; and the hands

that are willing to be used for the benefit of the patients.
Only then,

one can be considered a doctor / a physician.

What are the

responsibilities of the physicians?

"A physician uho,

though unacquainted with drugs and

their effects or is ignorant of the nature of dieease,

takes money from the sick (for giving treatment),

punished like a thief."

yet

shall be

58

"A person who holds himself out to give medical advice

and treatment,

the

impliedly undertakes that he is possessed of

skill and knowledge

for the.purpose."

59

88

88 :

First and forsmost

the doctor must do all that is

in his capacity to equip himself with the necessary know­
ledge and skill required in treating the patients.

He must

consider it as his prime responsibility and avail every

opportunity

to acquire

knowledge and update himself for

the benefit of his patients and to maintain the nobility
of the profession.

The doctor is expected to attend to every patient
who comes to him.

He can refuse only if he is not competent

enough to meet the patient or if he has not got the facility.
A doctor is always expected to provide the first aid /
emergency treatment and then refer the patient to more com­

petent person / place.

Another responsibility
the illness correctly,
diagnostic aids.

taken,

of the physician is to diagnose

using the available and affordable

A mistake in diagnosis inspite of measures

can happen for which the physician is not responsible.

Sometimes a diagnostic procedure may be considered useful;
but if the doctor anticipates

any risk by that particular

procedure / during the procedure he should avoid that
particular diagnostic

procedure after explaning

the same

to the patient or close relatives.

89

•• 89

When a patient is treated by a particular doctor,
it is his

responsibility to provide the patient (and the

relatives,

if necessary) with all the necessary information

condition of the patient,

the treatment invol­

the side effects of the procedures

required and of the

regarding the

ved,

drugs,

also about the need and the type of treatment required

the alternatives available, etc.,

and get the consent of the

patient / relatives.

The doctor must make sure that the patients are

instructed properly so that there will be no contributory
negligence due to lack of instruction and information.

When a patient is taken for surgery,

it is ultimately

the surgeon’s responsibility to make sure that the instru­
ments are properly

sterilised,

the physical facilities are

safe and also to see that no secondary damage is caused to

the patient.

In case an accident happens the doctor cannot

blame anybody else for it.

In short,

a physician cannot be

cannot play with someone else's life.

that he has the

He

careful enough.

He must make sure

reasonable degree of skill and knowledge

and must exercise reasonable degree of

care in all his

/

undertakings.

If things go wrong inspite of it,

then he

is not negligent.

90

90

[V.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE

An institution;

INSTITUTIONS

whether it is charitable /voluntary

private / non-profit / profit-making / public,

is responsible

to see that the patients are safe and secure inside the

hospital,

and in the hospital premises.

rity should ensure that the health needs

The hospital autho­
of the patients

are met adequately and promptly.

The hospital owes duties

to patients and others directly,

such as proper maintenance

of buildings and grounds,

equipments and furnitures,

as well

as selection and supervision of employees, medical staff

and the agents*

When a person avails himself of hospital

facilities he expects that the hospital will provide the
necessary cafe.

He does not expect the nurses and other

employees to act on their own responsibility.

V.

LIABILITIES OF F1E0ICAL STAFF,

OTHER STAFF AND THE

Liabilities are legal responsibilities.

INSTITUTIONS:

In the context

of health care service it is something that a patient will

hold the hospital and its staff

(medical and non-medical staff)

accountable, for a damage or injury or death due to negligence.
Liability can be divided into ;
a.

personal liability or individual liability;

b.

Liability for employees and agents;

c.

Institutional liability;

d.

Joint liability for. negligence.

and

91

91

a.

Personal liability ;

Individual staff members are personally liable for
the consequences of their acts.

This liability is almost

always based on the principle of fault.

To be liable,

the

person must have done something wrong or must have failed
to do something that should have been done.

b.

Liability for employees and agents ;

Employers can be liable for the consequences of the
job-related acts of their employees or agents even if the

employer is not at fault personally,

c.

Institutional liability ;

Institutions can also be liable

for the consequences of breaches of duties owed directly to
the patients and others,

such as the maintenance of buildings

and grounds, maintenance of equipments and furnitures,

and

selection and supervision of employees and medical staff.

(1) Vicarious liability

As a general rule a man is responsible / liable only
for his own act; but there are certain circumstances in

which a person is liable for the wrong committed by others.

This is called Vicarious liability, ,

i.e.,

liability incurred fo

•92

92

another.

The most common instance is the

master for the
cases,

liability of the

wrong committed by his servants.

in these

liability is joint as well as several.

The doctrine of vicarious liability can be summed

up in the following maxims;

i)

"Qui facit per alium facit per se” - which means he,who

acts through another is deemed in law as doing it
himself.

The master's responsibility for the servant's

act had also its origin in this principle.

The

reasoning

is that a person who puts another person in his place
to do a class of acts in his absence,

he necessarily

leaves to determine according to the circumstances arise,
when an act of that class is to be done.

Consequently,

he is answerable for wrong of the person so entrusted

either in the manner of doing such an act,

or in doing

suth an act under circumstances in which it ought fiot
have been done; provided what is done is not from any

caprice of the servant but in the course of the employ­
ment.

ii)

Respondeat Superior ;-

'Let the master answer'.

Employers can be liable for the consequences of their

employee's job-related acts'

whether or not the employer

93

93

is at fault.

:

Under this doctrine,

the employer can be

liable for any consequences of an employee's activities
within the

course of employment for which the employee

could be liable.

wrong.

The employer need not have done

For example,

anything

if a nurse employed by a hospital,

injures a patient by giving the wrong medication,

the

hospital can be liable even if the nurse was properly

selected,

properly trained,

and properly

assigned the

responsibility.

The superior may not be the employer.

superior is only an employee,

Since the

respondeat superior does not

impose liability on the superior.

Superiors are liable

only for the consequences of their own acts of omissions.
The employer can also be liable for those acts of omissions

under respondeat superior.
under

The liability of the employer

respondeat superior is for the benefit of the person

who is injured,

not for the benefit of the employee.

The liability of the employer does not mean that the

employer must provide the employee with liability protection
It means that the person who is injured can sue either the
employee or the employer or both.
vidually sued,

and found liable,

If the employee is indi­
the employee must

pay.

94

94

If

the employee is not individually sued,

must pay.

Technically,

to get the money back;
tutions,

2)

:

the employer

the employer can sue the employee
but this is not done

by the insti­

because it may affect the future recruitments.

Borrowed servant ;

If

the hospital places some of the

staff under direct control of the doctor and the staff
does not receive instruction from the hospital,

the hospi­

tal is not liable for the wrongs or negligence of such
staff.

Instead,

the doctor is responsible.

This is the

doctrine of "borrowed servant".

In most of our hospitals we do not have this type

of system where the doctrine of 'Borrowed Servant* applies.

(3). Physician employees ;
When the physician is an employee of the hospital,

the hospital is liable under respondeat superior.
cases,

employer - employee

relationship must be found.

criteria for employer - employee

The

relationship is that the

hospital must have the control over the physicians
time, manner and methods.

In such

In such conditions,

for

the hospital

is liable for the acts of the physician during the course

of employ*-ment.

95

95 :

"

The hospital liability can be based on the liability

of the hospital for injuries caused by an employee's
violation of the employer's duties / hospital's duties.

(4) Hospital's duties ;

Hospitals have duties to persons that are

of

respondeat superior.

independent

To establish liability for injuries

caused by breaches of these duties it is not necessary to

It

show that an individual staff member breached a duty.

is sufficient to show that the hospital's duty was breached.
Areas in which the hospitals have an independent duty include:

i)

physical condition of the buildings and grounds :

The hospitals must exercise

reasonable care in maintaining

its buildings and grounds in a reasonably safe conditions
for all types of patients and visitors.

ii)

Selection and maintenance of equipments ;

hospital

has an obligation to furnish reasonably adequate equipments
for use in diagnosis and treatment of patients.

Problems

can arise when the hospital does not own necessary equip­

ments, when the necessary equipment is not available or when
the equipment has not been properly inspected or maintained.

96

-

iii)

can be

:

96

Selection and supervision of staff ;

liable for failing to exercise reasonable care in

selecting and supervising the

staff.

This applies to both

professional and non-professional staff.
applicants,
a)

A hospital

therefore, must be carefully checked like;

licence and

training,

Credentials of

(b)

qualification - must provide appropriate

supervision and evaluation.

The hospital also has a responsibility to exercise
reasonable care in selecting and monitoring members of the

medical staff."

d. Joint liability for negligence
practice,

; Usually in hospital

there is a tendency for the consultant to bear the

largest portion of the responsibility and subsequent damages.
But there is no written law regarding the apportionment of
responsibility.

This is frequently shared between consultant

junior doctors and the hospital management.

"In general practice,

applies as between partners.
each partner

the normal rule of civil law
By the Partnership Act,

1890,

is jointly and individually liable with his

co-pprtners for all acts of negligence committed by the

firm.

Thus,

if one partner in general practice commits a

. 97

-

negligent act,

:

97

:

-

the patient may sue all partners equally

and they may all be liable in damages,

even though other

partners may have no part whatsoever in the negligent act.
It is a common practice when forming a partnership, for
there to be a Deed of

Indemnity,

which provides that if

any one partner causes such financial damage to his fellows,
he must compensate them for their loss.

This indemnity is

quite separate from the original action for negligence.”

At times the

legal relationship between the principle

in general practice and his assistant can be that of a master
and servant.

Hence the principal is responsible for any

negligence of his assistant(even though the principal

is

responsible for any negligence of his assistant)even though

the principal has not been professionally concerned.

"Uhere a principal in general practice employsan

the usual legal relationship of master and servant

assistant,

applies.

The principal is responsible for any negligence of

his junior,

though the assistant himself may be jointly liable.

Both may be sued by an aggrieved!

patient, even though the

principal has not been professionally

concerned.

It is

upto the patient to choose whether he acts against the
assistant,

or the principal or both.

The same

applies

. 98

98

whether the principal employs non-medical servants,

as

receptionists

or

dispenser."

such

62

In hospital service the relationship between the

consultant and his registrar or houseman is usually one

of joint liability together with the hospital authority.

legal relationship of the

Here the

consultant to the assis­

tant is based upon the negligence of the consultant in
delegating authority to a junior not sufficiently profi­

cient to carryout the delegated duty.

"In hospital service a doctor is not
for the negligence of a nurse,
of the hospital management.

responsible

which is directly the burden

If however the nurse's

injurious

behaviour was a direct result of wrong direction by the
doctor,

he might find himself jointly liable.

Outside hospi­

tal in either a nursing home run by a doctor or in general

practice,

good,

the

relationship

of master and servant again holds

the doctor being liable for the negligence of an

employed nurse.

The same principle applies to medical auxiliaries,
such as radiographers,

students,

laboratory technicians,

and to the

where all these are employed in a hospital service.

.... 99

-

Unless the

:

99

:

-

wrongful act was a direct result of incorrect

instruction by a doctor,

the clinician incharge of the

patient will not be liable.

Action may be directed either

at the administration or jointly with them and the non-medical person at fault."

63

VI. VARIOUS LEGAL INTERPRETATIONS :

2,300 years ago,
treatise says,

Charaka in his immortal ayurvedic

"Ths physician should regard all his patients

as if they were his own children and vigilantly guard them
from all harm,

considering this to be his highest religion.”

It is indeed a noble thought.

And expressions of nobility

have a tendency to assume epidemic proportions.
to the treaiise of the ancient

Council of

Indian seep,

India solemnly declares in its

In addition

the Medical

'Code of Ethics*

that the prime object of the medical profession is to render
service to humanity and that the reward of financial gain
which is a sub-ordinate consideration.

But in reality the professional successors of Charaka

will confess that it is impossible to be good fathers when
they have so many children to look after,

sonable hours to put in.

and so many unrea­

On the other hand,

their patients*

100

100

:

complaint is that to get a good doctor is like experiencing
a snowstorm in the Sahara!

For the profession today, medical news is mostly bad
news unfortunately - news of over stretched health system

which cannot measure up to the expectations of burgeoning
patient population;

of hospitals bending under the weight

of corruption and o ve r-bureaucratisatiot);

of doctors who have turned

doctors insensitive to suffering;
medicine into a big,

of negligent

bad business.

Certainly the

Medical Community has had many achievements,

Indian

but its bad

news - the negative side of it occupies a lot of area -

makes the big news.

Most of the good journals of today are full of facts

about the medical mal-practice.
for the patients,

infact,

It is indeed very important

it is essential for them to know

and to be aware of the medical wrong-doings.
know what is going wrong,

They must

and where things are

how they are going wrong and how to find the

going wrong,and

remedies for

these wrong-doings.

"From the

legal point of view,

if doctors are

in performing their duties or commit lapses,

remiss

they are open

to both criminal and civil liabilities.

...101

101

a). Criminal liability

arises when it

is proved that a doctor

has committed an act or made an omission that is grossly
rash,

or grossly negligent, which is the proximate,
cause of the patient's death.

or substantiative

section 304 of the

Indian Penal Code,

direct

Then under

the doctor is puni­

shable with imprisonment for a term that may extent! upto

two years,

b).

or with a fine or with both.

Civil liability

arises in 6ase of medical service rendered

on payment of a fee.

These cases come within the perview

of section 73 and 74 of the

Indian Contract Act.

In a suit

for damages or compensation by a paying patient or his

legal representative;

the onus is on him to prove that the

doctor has failed to exercise ordinary duty and reasonable
care in the course of his examination and treatment,

resul­

ting in the damages for which compensation is claimed.

And

section 75 of the Contract Act states that a person who

rightfully rescinds a Contract is entitled for any damage
he has sustained through the non-fulfilment of the contract.

Civil liability can also arise,
the liability due. to breach of contract,

i.e.,

quite distinct from

under the law of torts

a wrong that is independent of contract - this liabi­

lity is applicable to doctors of all categories,

that is,

102

102

whether they provide their service for free or for a fee."

There had been number of legal discussions -

(treatises)
and "Tort".

trying to make a difference between "Contract"
But what is of

importance

to the doctors and

the medical profession - to appreciate - is that

are careless / negligent in their duties and
if

they do something positively wrong,

(

for any patient).

responsibilities

or if they are care­

less in managing their patients they are
sation under the law of contract

if they

liable for compen­

(for paying patients)

and

This is something that they

cannot escape.

At the same time the law is very considerate to the

doctors even in considering the liabilities.

The

law does

not expect the doctor to be perfect and successful always
in curing the patients and in treating him.

An error of

judgement is not a crime in criminal or civil law.

All that

the law expects from a doctor is to exercise reasonable
skill and care.

He got to guarantee care and not cure.

"In order to establish a liability,

the patient must prove

that :

- There was/is a normal practice
- The defendant doctor has not adopted

it.

105

:

103

- The -course adopted by the doctor is one that

no professional of ordinary skill would have

taken if he had been acting with ordinary care.

The

In the

law never pres-umes the doctor to be infallible.

words of eminent jurist,

therefore,

Lord Denning,

"You must not

find the doctor negligent simply because some­

thing happens to go wrong.

If,

for instance,

one of the

risks inherent in an operation actually takes place,

or

some complication ensues which lessens or takes away the
benefits that were hoped for;

or if in a matter of opinion

he makes an error of judgement,

you should find him guilty

only when he falls short of the standard of

a reasonably

skillful medical man."

The cry of so many medical practitioners today is

that the law is very hard on them and is very lenient
towards the patients.

With the enactment of the Consumer

But in reality

Protection Act, most of them feel threatened.
the law is rather sympathetic towards

the medical persons,

’"'In a recent Supreme Court Judgement
and others

observed;

Vs.

A. S.Mittal

State of Utter Pradesh and others),

it was

''But the law recognises the danger which are inhe­

rent in surgical operations.

despite exercise of reasonable

Mistakes will occur on occasion
skill and care."

104

:

Sometimes,

104

there are more than one school of

thought that are current on a given subject.

The doctors

are free to adopt any of these school s teaching.

doctor who honestly adopts one
others,

and if

the outcome /

If a

to the exclusion of the

result happens to be a failure,

he cannot be held to be negligent.

Then,

what is really negligence?

It is doing some­

thing that is prohibited to be done and not doing what

should have been done.

In other words,

omission or commission.

One form of negligence is rashness,

i.e.,

it is an act of

undertaking an assignment that is beyond one's

competence or doing something which no sane or sober doctor

in similar circumstance would ever do.

Rashness is the

result of the doctor's negligence in his duty to be careful

about the patient's safety.

C"), Contributory negligence

:

Sometimes the doctor may be negligent; but the patient
also has a share in the damage / harm and it is known as the

contributory negligence.
gsnce,

In the case of contributory neglir

it is upto the doctor to prove that the patient did

contribute to the damage by not paying heed to the instruc­

tions given by the doctor.

For example,

in a fracture case,

the patient is instructed to rest the part affected

(and is

105

105

plastered)

:

which quickens the

reunion of the bones.

But

if the patient walks or uses the fractured part,

and it

results in malunion instead of

the

patient sues the doctor,

re-union,

it is upto the doctor to prove

the contributory negligence of

the patient.

"A victim of negligence
or monetary compensation,

then if

is entitled to damages,

that are classified under two

heads;

1)

Pecuniary damages are amounts awarded for financial
losszpast or future,

not.

whether precisely calculated or

All medical expenses,

including costs incurred

on nursing and attendants and loss of earning capacity
are included in the calculation of pecuniary damages.

Tor example,

the case of T.D.Singh a Delhi based busi­

ness executive,

who left his body emaciated and his

bank account empty.

He had a second bypass operation

six months ago in a leading hospital in Bombay where he

had a similar operation seven years ago.

The operation

was successful but he fell ill with hepatitis B,

possibly

contracted through contaminated blood transfusion.

Singh has been drained of
Re.1

all his savings,

having spent

lakh for the first operation and Rs.1.5 lakhs for

, ,
67
the second."

.106

106

(2)

Non-pecuniary damages are amounts awarded for pain
and suffering,

past or future,

enjoyment of life in

and so on.

as well as

respect of sports,

Example the award of

of Chandrasekhar's

loss of

married

life

compensation in case

case - the former national table

tennis champion who suffered crippling disabilities
after he went in for a simple knee surgery in 1984.

"The manner in which monetary compensation is worked

is still a grey area.

But what's clear is

out,

however,

that

the basis of all monetary claims against doctor is

negligence - either by themselves or by their staff - provi­

ded the act of negligence

is the direct or proximate cause

of some

injury caused to the patient.

damages,

the claimant has to establish that ;

some harm or injury;

he has suffered

and the same is the direct consequence

of the negligence of the

The

So in a suit for

respondent doctor or his assistant.

relationship between the injury and the negligence must

be direct and proximate,

not remote."

While we consider the

^"’6 8

injury / harm it is equally

important to consider the risks involved in undergoing the
treatment.

Sometimes there is a greater risk in the life of

a patient who does not undergo the treatment, e.g.,

the

coronary bypass surgery which is beneficial to those patients

107

:

107

coronary events.

facing high risk of future

absence of aggressive treatment,

there is a chance for

myocardial infarction or even sudden death.

patients,

it is difficult

(with earning potential)

In the

to compute the

In such

life expectancy

curtailed by the failed surgery.

While still on the subject of damages,
vant to recall Lord Dennings Comments in

"Take

it is rele­

1981:

heed of what happens in the United States.

dedical malpractice cases there are very worrying especia­
lly as they are tried by juries who have sympathies for

the

patient and none for the doctor who is insured.

The doctors insure themselves

The damages are colossal.

and premiums are very high,

and these have to be passed

on in fees to the patient.

Experienced practitioners

are known to have

refused to treat patients for fear of

being accused of negligence.

Young men and women are even

deterred from entering the profession because of the

involved.

Not only must we avoid excessive damages,

must say,

and say firmly,

risk
we

that in a professional man an

error of judgement is not negligence."

108

: 108

B.

LITIGATIONS AND DEFENCES

The word litigation means the legal process
where a law suit is carried on.
every sphere and walk of

life,

It is applicable
i.e.,

in

wherever there is

dissatisfaction in a person with anything that is pro­

vided by another person,

especially when this provision

is in exchange for something that is of value.

When

this litigation occurs in the medical profession invol­
ving a medical person,

it is called medical litigation.

That is when a dissatisfied patient files a case against
treatment and care provided by a doctor or the hospital
itself

where the patient (the plaintiff) had

suffered

a loss or injury as a result of the treatment received.

These days people are becoming more and more

compensation oriented everywhere (all over the world)

and of late the claims for compensation sought for

damages / for personal injuries are steadily rising.

"The medical malpractice problem in America,
where doctors are covered by commercial insurance,

has become so acute

....

Although doctors in Britain

are only seldom charged with criminal negligence,

the

number of civil actions against doctors based upon an
allegation of negligence has increased considerably

during the past few decades0

Throughout

1 09

109

the civilised world the public has become more and more
compensation-minded and in recent years there has been a

steady rise in the number of all classes of claims in which
damages are sought for personal injuries whether they are

sustained in the
A

at work or otherwise.

road accidents,

claim may involve some other party and the damages may

be apportioned according to the proportional responsibili­

ties agreed upon or decided by the court.
for example,

There may,

be an apportionment of liability between

a member of the hospital medical staff and a member of

the nursing or laboratory staff."

70

In any litigation, first and foremost the court
has to find out and make certain of the facts.

Very

often there will be a direct conflict of evidence and
it is for the court to decide

wrong;

reject.
the

who is

right and who is

whose views and evidences to accept and whose to

It all depends on the party's ability to impress

court with regard to evidence and the

court will weigh

it with facts obtained and then decide/pass the judgement.

"In an action for negligence,
of all to ascertain the facte.

conflict of evidence,

I

court has first

Often there is a direct

for example,

examination was carried out.

the

whether a particular

It is for the court to

110

! 110

determine whose evidence

it will accept or reject.

If the court is not impressed by the evidence of

plaintiff or his witnesses.

the facts,

Only after it has ascertained

can the court decide,

negligence and,

the

whether there has been

in reaching its conclusions,

it is guided

by the views of the expert witnesses who have been called

to give evidence.

If one expert supports the defendant

Court is satisfied that his views represent that

and the

of a reputable school'of thought it can find in favour of
the defendant notwithstanding the contrary view held by

another expert representing another
Whilst the

changed,
cases has

school of thought.

law concerning the doctor's liability has not

its application by the courts in recent individual

revealed a trend to the disadvantage of the

p ractitione r."

71

In the United Kingdom there is an increase in the
litigations involving doctors.

in litigation in U.K.

result of

It seems that this increase

is due to impersonal elements as a

the introduction of National Health Service.

The second reason is because of

the operation of

the Legal

Aid and Advice Act which acts as a backbone for those who
never dared to and could not afford to have recourse to

legal remedy for negligence suffered.

The people seem to

111

111

have developed the attitude that they are sueing the
State at the State's expense.

"Although there has been an increase in litiga­
tion involving doctors practising in the United Kingdom,

this has not been on the same scale as in the United States.
It is generally believed

that the increase in litigation

against doctors and the hospital authorities in the United
Kingdom is due to two principal factors.'!« The -f-i-rst is the

impersonal element

resulting from the introduction of the

National Health Service Act in 1948.

The taking over of

the hospitals under the Act has brought about a radical

change in the

attitude

their local hospitals

and respect which patients had for

and their staff.
l
I

I

-•

f

A

good deal of this



respect has now gone and with at an inherent unwillingness
on the part of the patients to institute proceedings against

their local hospitals.
are sueing the

The present attitude is that they

'State**....,..' The second factor arises

from the operation of the Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949.•

•This has made it possible for many members of the public
who had hitherto not been able to afford to do so,
institute

to

legal proceedings against a practitioner and/or

a hospital authority for negligence.

A person can hardly

be blamed for instituting an action against a hospital
authority in respect of personal injuries when he believes

112

112

believes that he
expense."

is suaing the State at the State's

72

legal aid scheme

Is the

in U.K.

an instigation

It is true to a certan extent,

for litigation?
.the case always.

In fact,

there are certain regulations

and formalities to be followed by the litigant.
and foremost,

claim the

the

but not

litigant must obtain the

legal aid service.

-First

right to

This eligibility for legal

aid certificate depends on the income of the applicant.

the medical report from the doctor

He must also submit

which will be screened by the legal professional and

only if they are convinced of the need of
the plaintiff,

the

the complainant.

litigation by

legal aid certificates are issued to

When the

legal aid is not available,

the litigant can either use his own resources or get th6
financial aid from

the place where he works.

"One of the features of the

legal aid scheme is

that there are limitations upon those who have the

to claim the

legal aid services.

right

Eligibility of a legal

aid certificate depends upon the applicants'

capital and

income and of the possession of 'disposable capital'

'disposable

income'.

Legal aid committee

and

consider each

application on its merits and they will turn down an
application for legal and certificate to sue a member

11?

113

of the medical profession or a hospital authority if they

do not consider that the applicant has a prime facie case
for comp lain t.

When the

legal aid is not available, the litigant

is not necessarily forced to

rely on his own resources.

His trade union may feel disposed to give him financial

support in respect of a personal injury claim and this may
well involve a claim based upon an allegation of medical
negligence. ”

73

While filing a case in an attempt to sue the doctor
the plaintiff must prove that the doctor was negligent.

The burden of proof for negligence,

rests with the plain­

tiff except in circumstances where the proof is so obvious
like the amputation of the wrong limb or the removal of the

wrong organ or even leaving an instrument in the abdomen,
etc.,

Where the

legal maxim res ipsa loquitor applies,

i.e., the thing speaks for itself.

In all other circum­

stances the responsibility of proof

remains with the plain

tiff.

He has to prove that;

of care such as duty of

a patient;

(a)

The doctor owed a duty

care to decide whether to take in

a duty of care to decide what procedure to

adopt in diagnosis and treatment;

a duty of care in adminis­

tering the treatment; and a duty of

care in equipping the

114

114

:

the patient with adequate explanation and information.

(b)

The plaintiff also has to prove that there is an

accepted and approved / standard practice existing and
a reasonable degree of skill,

knowledge and care required

during the time of action on treatment,

but the doctor

failed to adopt that standard practice and apply the
reasonable skill,knowledge and care while treating the
patient which resulted in the damage the patient suffers /
suffe red.

(c)

The plaintiff has to prove that there were facilities

available to diagnose the case but the doctors failed to
have recourse to them and so the patient had to suffer

the loss or injury.

(d)

The patient required

or specialists

reference to other consultants

who were available but the doctor did not

refer the patient to the specialists resulting in the damage
suffered by the patient due to the negligence

of the

treating doctor.

(e)

The plaintiff has to prove also that there was certain

degree of

risk involved in the treatment of the patient but

the doctor failed to take the necessary precautions to avoid
that risk.

115

115

(f)

:

The plaintiff has to prove that the patient had not

given a proper and fully informed consent and so the doctor
is liable for the damage or loss suffered by the patient.

DEFENCES
Defence is the

charge against him.
gence,

response of the defendent to the
So when a doctor is accused of negli­

he has the right to defend himself by proving that

he was not negligent if he had fulfilled his duty of care
while treating the patient.

He has to prove that.he had

exercised reasonable degree of skill and applied reasonable
degree of knowledge while attending to the patient.

-He

.also has to prove that he had informed the patient or his

relatives of

the

risks,

involved and had taken the necessary

precautions to prevent the risks involved.

I-t is his duty

to prove thatz the accident was an inevitable one which he

could not avoid inspite of the precautions taken.

He can

also prove if there was / is a contributory negligence.

He can also prove that there are more than one school of

thought and he had adopted one which^turned but to be a
failure.

He must also prove that the treatment given or

the procedure on operation performed was with fully informed

consent of the patient / his relatives.

.116

:

116 :

There are certain limitations to litigation under

the limitation Act.

This limitation act is precisely to

protect the doctors (defendants)

from .state claims and to

encourage plaintiffs to institute proceedings within the
reasonable period of

time.

And the plaintiff has to sue-

But there is an exception

the doctor during this period.
to this rule where the plaintiff

after the expiry of time,

can sue the defendant

provided he/she gets the special

permission for it from the Court.who will obtain it on valid

reasons.

"The purpose of the limitation Act 1939 is to protect

the defendant f rom-st-a-te- claims and to encourage plaintiffs
to institute proceedings within a reasonable period of time

(Before 1963 the General position was that no action could

hebrought,

where the damages claimed consisted of or included

damages for personal injuries after the expiration of three

years from the date on which the incident which gave rise

to the action occured).
1963 a plaintiff could

By virtue of

the Limitation Act

sue for damages for personal inju­

ries outside the normal three year limitation period in

certain circumstances if he obtained the

leave of the coutt

to do so.

....

lhe Limitation Act 1975 does away with the need to

obtain leave from the Court.

Under this period the three

117



year period

run Prom the date on which the

accrued or the date
If the

11.7

cause of action

(if later) of the plaintiff's knowledge."

injured person dies before the expiration of

three year limitation period,

the period - as

the

respects the

cause of action surviving for the estate of the diseased
runs from the date of death or,

if later,

thd date of the

personal representative s knowledge."

Special defences

There are circumstances in which the facts will

speak for itself and the defendant is automatically held

-negligent.

Similarly there are circumstances in which the

doctor (the defendent) will be defended -too automatically
as in the case of contributory negligence;
limitations;

statutes of

proof obtained from investigations;

release from the patients;

valid

and institutions from which the

patient is already awarded the compensations.

■J,In preparing the defence of\ malpractice action
consideration will,

of course, be given to the question

of whethe r ...the re was contributory negligence on the part
of the patient; also as to whether or not the action may

be barred by the statute of limitations.

There should,

of course,

also be investigations to

determine whether some other special defence may be ■^■available

118

: 118

Thus if the physician has secured a valid release
from the patient,

he cannot the reafterCto] be sued for

alleged negligence in the transaction covered by the

release.

......

Finally,

it may be

industrially injured patient,
compensation award.

If so,

that the plaintiff,

an

has already accepted a

the patient is precluded

from maintaining a subsequent malpractice action against
the physician who treated him.

under similar circumstances,

Aw

4

However,

in other states,

such an action is not barred."

'

Another weapon that can be easily used by the
defendant to defend himself is the clinical notes; provided

they are maintained adequately and properly.

safe side,

To be on the

it is very important to maintain these records

uprto-date and with all sincerity and accuracy as they are
of inestimable value both For the patient as well as the

doctor.

"The importance of keeping accurate and contempo­
raneous clinical notes of findings on examination and all
treatment administered cannot be overemphasised.

Good

notes are of inestimable value,

not only when handling a

patient over to another doctor

but also in meeting any

criticism that may arise.

If a patient refuses to accept

the advice of his doctor,

this fact should be recorded in

119

75

-

writing.

:

119

-

In such circumstances the doctor would be well

advised to withdraw from the
that he

:

case and to inform the patient

is not prepared to accept any further responsibility

for his treatment.
Aaa.

In the

course of legal proceedings case notes dis-

closable to the other side.

The omission of essential

details from the notes may cast a doubt on the veracity
of the witness.

V

When there is a conflict of evidence the

court will naturally attach importance to the notes written
at the time.

Good notes may,

therefore,

be of the

greatest

importance in supporting the doctor's evidence as against

that of the plaintiff and his witnesses."

In short,

76

success and failure of every litigation

against medical negligence depend upon the circumstances
of the particular case.

But one thing that should be kept

in mind is the exercising of

reasonable knowledge and skill

and duty of care in the circumstances.

exercised reasonable care and skill,

If the doctor has

he is safe.

120

I
I

CHAPTER

V

CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

-

LEGAL VIEWS

-

VIEWS OF THE INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

-

VIEWS OF THE CUSTOMER

-

VIEWS OF THE PUBLIC

120:

CHAPTER

CONSUMER

V

PROTECTION ACT

"A peculiar feature of the

Indian

Constitution is

that it combines social and economic rights along with

political and justifiable
Singh in his book,

In this era
commercialisation,

tators,

says Or.Gurubax

legal rights."

'The Law of Consumer Protection.*

of

industrialisation,

urbanisation and

the consumers have become hglpless spec­

as manufacturers and producers of

utilize all the means possible

goods and services

(fair and foul)

the marketing of their products and services.

to promote

Yet to the

great surprise of these producers and providers,

alert consumer organizations and

there are

consumer activists who

persevered in their endeavour and kept on inspiring the
consumers to action.

In the early sixties,

a global move­

ment started in the United States and the United

to protect the interests of the consumers.
developed countries,

Kingdom,

In both these

the ones responsible for activating

the Government authorities to pass legislative measures to

protect effectively the consumer's rights,

tary organizations.
but they are

alert to

Today,

were the volun­

the consumers are not only awake,

a certain extent to protect themselves

• • •121

:

121 :

against the manipulations of traders and malpractices
of providers of services.

Before the

Independence of

India,

there were hardly

any Parliamentary law to protect the consumer's rights.
After Independence,

there we re a feu of them formulated;

but the implementation was not satisfactory.
among all other movements in
In fact,

in the fore-front.

India,

But today

Consumer movement is

it is the latest and rapidly

expanding movement in our country.

I.

THE

LEGAL VIEUS
The Consumer Protection Act,

1986,

is an Act for

the protection of the interests of the consumers.

It does

not provide any new right to the consumer.

There were

already other measures under the prevailing

laws such as

the C.P.C.,

I.P.C.,

of Goods Act,

G.P.C.,

the Laus of Contracts,

the Law of Torts, etc.

mer Protection Act,

the Sale

The purpose of Consu­

1986,is to provide for a better and

quicker remedy than the already existing ones.

It also

provides provision for establishment of Consumer forums
and Councils for the education of consumers and other autho­

rities so that the disputes between the consumers and provi­
ders / producers

of services and goods can be settled easily.

...122

— : 122 ; —

''Consumer Protection Act is ."an Act to provide for better
protection of the interests of Consumers and for that

purpose to make provision for the establishment of Consu­
mer councils and other authorities for the

settlement of


-77
consumer s disputes and matters connected therewith."

Consumer Protection Act is one of

the most

important

developments in the law of torts which was approved by the
then President k.Venkata^Raman on 24th April 1987.

In

India,

until the

recent past,

the concept of

Consumer protection was not understood in its real and

fullest sense.

But gradually,

understanding that the

his rights.

the public came to the

consumer was deprived of so many of

The Act specifies and defines the consumer

and explains what consumerism implies.

"Any person who is a buyer of any goods for a consi­
deration or any person who hires any service for a conside­
ration has been given the meaning of consumer'under the Act.

Consumerism devotes a thorough safeguard for the
consumers from all sorts of malpractices;
deed of market operations."

service means.

and exploitative

The Act also explains what

"Service moans services of any description

which is made available
does not

78

include the

to the potential users

rendering of

...........

but

any service free of charge

..12?

: 123 :

or under contract of personal service.”

The characteristics of Consumer Protection Act :

The act applies to all goods and services except
the ones received free nf charge and as gifts,

etc.

It covers both public and private sectors.

It provides compensation for losses,

injuries and

harm suffered by the consumer.

The act ensures the rights of the consumers and
provides provisions for the establishment of

consumer forums

and councils at the state and national levels to.promote
and protect the

rights of the consumers.

The most attractive part of all is that it provides
a simple,

speedy and cheap redressal of the consumers grie­

vances through its three-tire system.

"The provisions of this Act are

in addition to and

not in derogation of the provisions of any other law for
the time being in force.”

80

The purpose of the Consumer Protection Act :

The main purpose of the Act is to protect the consu­
mers - by strengthening his rights - against manipulations

124

- : 124

s ~

as malpractices by manufacturers of goods and providers of

by providing provisions for speedy,

services,

cheap redressal of consumer disputes,
viding compensation to the

simple

and

It also aims at pro­

consumer for the loss/harm/injury

suffered by him while or as a result of the use of any goods/

services for a consideration/price/cost .

"The Consumer Protection Bill,

1986 seeks to provide

for better protection of the interests of consumers and,
that purpose,

for

to make provision for the establishment of

consumer councils and other authorities for the settlement

of consumer disputes and for matters connected therewith.
It seeks,

consume rs."

The

like

rights of

to promote and protect the

interlia,

81

reasons for the enactment of C,P«fl,

In a country

:

India where majority of her people are poor,

and ignorant and are exploited by the powerful,

voice and no one to voice on their behalf.

illiterate

with no

The prevailing

remedial measures to protect their rights were neither
readily available,

nor accessible,

nor affordable.

they were not aware of these existing facilities;

Often

but even

when the consumers were being violated by the unscrupulous

persons,

they were hesitating to come forward and assert

their rights;

because there were

ing judicial relief,

certain lapses in obtain­

which discouraged them.

These lapses

125

: 125

mainly we re

*

The never-ending civil cases ;

1)

Often it took

years together to dispose of even small cases,

so much so,

the person may even die before the final judgement,

and in

case had to be continued by his heirs.

For

his place

this

the

reason the consumer preferred to suffer in silence

rather tnan

2)

go to the court for justice.

Complication of the procedure

remedy meant filing the case,

;

Seeking of legal

which in turn demanded of the

plaintiff to file number of documents,

a number of petitions

and inquiries followed by cross-examinations,

re-examinations

and so on.

3)

Cost involvement :

The

court fee that hai to be

paid by the plaintiff was another disadvantage which held
him back to keep quiet and suffer the

4)

Service of an advocate ;

loss in silence.

This was an added

trouble and expenditure.

In short, the delay, the cost factor and the compli­
cation of the procedure, etc., discouraged the people to
approach the court.

At the end of all these,

the plaintiff

could never assure himself of a favourable judgement.
after years of silent sufferings,

and the

serious discussions and

Today,

struggling by the oeople

reflections have brought out

an additional solution in the form of Consumer protection Act

... .1 26

126 :

a Christmas gift for tne people of

India on

the eve of

Christmas in 1986.

"The

three factors of delay,

complicated procedure

and litigation cost make people afraid of approaching the
courts.

These problems made the Government of

the Consumer Protection Act,

in 1986.

The object is to

dispense with the cumbersome technicalities of
provide speedy justice,

India pass

simple procedure,

law and to

and inexpensive


<-•
„ 82
justice."

Advantages of Consumer Protection Act :
"New brooms sweep well".

Anything new when intro­

duced will have its novelty.

But if it has to be apprecia­

ted by people in the

then it must offer something

long run,

better than what was already existing.

When the Consumer

Protection Act is compared to the previous

the C.P.A.

res,

offers a better procedure to the public/

consumers of goods and

1)

remedial measu­

Speedy justice :

services.

The Consumer Protection Act states that

every case of consumer disputes must be decided within ninety

days.

There are exceptions to this rule which is extended

upto hundred and fifty days.

.127

- : 127 ! “

2.

Filing a case in the civil or

Simple procedure :

counter petitions,

criminal court demands petitions,

ries, examinations

and

re-examinations,

the Consumer Courts none of

the

address of the one who

has caused the damage / loss / injury.
rest will be taken care of

This can be

3.

Only give four copies

by the consumer court.

given either personally or by post.

In-expensive justice ;

criminal courts,

fee charged,

consumer courts follow

All that is required is a written com­

plaint on a plain paper with the

and the

where as in

these formalities are necessary.

There is no particular procedure;

natural justice.

etc.,

enqui­

in the

Unlike

the civil courts and the

consumer court there is no court

nor is there any need of an advocate's service.

"The hall-mark of the consumer forums are quick

decision,

simple procedure and in-expensive justice."

Consumer Protection Councils

There are two types of machinery constituted by the
Consumer Protection Act.

One

is the Consumer Protection

Councils and the other is the Consumer Courts,
as the Consumer Redressal Agencies.

also known

There is a Central

.128

: 128 :

Consumer Protection Council and one in each state.

The

Central Consumer Protection Council is known as the National

Council and at the state level they are

Consumer Protection Councils.

known as the

These National and

State

State

Councils are composed of members from various walks of life

as well as representatives from various organizations like

public sector undertakings.
to give suggestions to the

These councils are meant mainly
Government to implement

the Act

effectively.

"The Central Consumer Protection Council (referred to
as the Central Council).

The Central Council shall consist

of the following members namely (a)

The Minister-In charge

of the department of Food and Civil supplies in the
Government,

who shall be its Chairman,

and

(b)

Central

such number

of other official or non-official members representing such
interests as may be prescribed."

84

The Act says clearly about the members of the State

Consumer Protection Council,
specify in such notification,

"(1)

a Council to be

Consumer Protection Council for
State Council.

(.2)

The State Government may ..

known as the

referred to as the

The State Council shall consist of

such number of members as may be specified by the State
Government by notification from time to time."

.129

- •• 12S ’ -

Consumer Redressal Forums

(Consumer Courts)

The second type of machinery constituted by the

Consumer Protection Act is the Consumer Courts at three
at District level,

levels,

i.e.,

level.

At the District level,

State

level and National

they are

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forums;
are known as the State Commission;

known as the District

State level they

at the

and at the National level

they are known as the National Commission.

The main purpose

of these forums and commissions are for the

redressal of

grievances of

consumers generally.

District Forums ;

(1)

Every district has a District

Forum at its headquarters headed by a person who is,
the qualifications to be,

or has

a judge as the President of the

forum and two more members including a woman and a social

worker.

Every appointment of these members will be done by

the State Government which will be on the

recommendation of

a selection committee consisting of the President of the
State commission,

Secretary of the

law department of

the

State

and the Secretary in charge of the department dealing with

consumer affairs ir. the State.

District Forums we.re to

handle cases claiming upto Rs.

one

amendment of

Dune 1993,

Rs.

section 17 of

(u)

lakh.

the C.P.A.

the District Court can handle

But now after the

passed on 18th
cases claiming upto

Five lakhs.

...130

I
- * 1 3©: -

(2)

State Commission :

State Commission,

In each State

headed by the President,

there is a

who is a sitting

or retired High Court Judge and is appointed by trie State

Government on the recommendations of
ttee

the selection commi­

consisting of Chief Justice of the High Court,

Secretary of the law department of the State

the

and Secretary,

in charge of department dealing with Consumer affairs in
one of whom should

the State.

I he re are two other members,

be a woman.

The State Commission can now handle

those cases

claiming upto Rs.lakhs and the ones who appeal from the
district forums.

The State Commissions are now strengthened

with administrative jurisdiction of the district forums

after the amendment of the Act.

(3)

The national commission :

Consists of a Presi­

dent who is a sitting or retired(or qualified to be) judge
of the

Supreme Court and four other members who

the field of economics,

try

commerce,

law,

accountancy,

and public affairs or administration.

shall be a uomnn.

represent

indus­

One of them

All the members of the National Commi­

ssion are appointed by the Central Government after consul­
tation with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and on
the

recommendation of the Selection Committee consisting

of a judge from the Supreme Court nominated by the Chief
Justice,

Secretary of the department of the

legal affairs

...

- : 151

of1

India;

Secretary of the department dealing with the

Consumer affairs in the Government.
ssion handles all cases where

The National Commi­

claim for damages is more

the

than Rupees twenty lakhs and appeals from the
ssion judgements,

of

State Commi­

persons dissatisfied with the judgement

the National Commission can appeal to the Sup feme' Court.

Impact of C.P.A.

on Medical Profession

Till of late if any patient had a dispute regarding

negligence from the side of the doctors/hospitals,
for the remedy by approaching the

law courts.

he sought

Here he had

to file a case either under the law of torts to claim dama­

ges or under section No.304A,
Penal Code to

get

336,

337

and 338 of the

the negligent punished.

However,

Indian

there is

drastic change to this way of approach by the patient,

after

the introduction of the Consumer Protection Act,

Nou

1986.

the patient approaches the Consumer forum and the State and
National Commissions,

with his grievances against the doctors

and/or hospital for various types of negligences.

option is far more advantageous

This new

compared to the previous

ones.

"Under this Act,
Consumers are covered

goods and

services availed by the

services of all types and

... 1 5i

- : 152, : -

nature are covered under this Act except free

and personal service (contract of

important

service

service).....................

aspect of this Act is the

Most

time bound disposal

of cases.

The medical profession is a professional service
offered by doctors and health care institutions and the

beneficiary or the end user of
is a consumer.

Mo reover,

become a health care
pharmaceutical

any professional service

this profession has re ally

industry with other sections like the

industry,

equipment manufacturers,

etc.,
g

actively participating in the health care delivery system."

Every coin has two sides.
Protection Act.

It has a Positive

the medical care service.

So also the Consumer
and Negative impact on

By bringing the medical profe­

ssion under the purview of the Consumer Protection Act,

the

patients who are the consumers of this service enjoy certain
benefits which are counted as the positive impatcs,

1)

It can be a means to check the

casual doctors

namely:

quacks and the

who are careless and negligent in their

dealings with the patients which in turn will help to improve
the standards of medical practice and make the medical pro­
fessionals more and more accountable.

...153

I

~ : 135 : "

2)

It is more beneficial to the patients as it

provides speedy,

easy and

cheap yet sure remedy to the

patients who suffer because of the negligent doctor /

hospital.

"There

are a few reasons for keeping medical services

under the purview of

1)

There

are

Consumer Protection Act.

These are

;

cases of medical practitioners dealing

casually with their patients because these doctors

are negligent,

and callous by nature.

The act may

serve as a deterrent to these doctors.

2)

The Act provides speedy,

easy and cheap remedy to

aggrieved patients against negligent doctors, enabling them to claim compensation.V

Dust as the C.P.A.

87

has these positive impact,

it

also has its negative effect on the medical profession.

1)

The applicability of the C.P.A.

to the medical pro­

fession can destroy the doctor-patient

relationship

which is built on trust.
2)

Patients'

inclination for unnecessary litigations,

dragging the doctors and hospitals to court can encou­
rage the use of defensive medicine (as no doctor will
allow anything to come on his way and destroy his

...J34

- : 134 : -

professional reputation that
a valuable asset)

and patient

Practice makes man expert .
yesterdays students.

is considered

as

selection.

Today's experts were

inclusion of the medical profession

The

the students and junior doctors from trying and

can deprive

learning from

their mistakes;

there will be

less chance for

practice.

After all he who has not made a mistake has made

nothing.

In the end,

it

can affect the future of the pro­

fession with less experts.

II.

VIEWS OF THE

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

in an landmark judgement,

In 1989,

the National

Commission,

in an appeal filed by a hospital and some doctors

in

ruled that the medical services in private sector

Kerala,

are covered by the Consumer Protection Act,
cal profession's

The

1986.

The medi­

reaction to this rule was prompt and sharp.

Indian Medical Association organised a nation wide cam­

paign seeking exemption of medical services from the purview

of Consumer Protection Act.

Numerous meetings of doctors

that were organised and the petitions that were filed in the

Supreme

Court

by the

Indian Medical Association are nothing

but an expression of their anxiety in ±he matter.

...135

- ! 155 : ~

But doctors are of divided opinion.

Some of

them

who are ethical and progressive minded and also devoted
to the

cause of

their patients and their profession, extend

their support to the Consumer Protection Act and openly

involve themselves with the consumer movement.

Yet some

others express their grudge and discontentment in the
Consumer Protection Act and openly consider it
and a threat.

as an evil

They fail to see the deficiency and malprac­

tices that are prevailing in the medical profession.

aruge strongly that the medical profession in

They

India has,

overall established a reputation for high standard of ser­
vice,

efficiency and concern for the patients.

"Doctors are divided even within themselves.

Progre­

ssive and ethical doctors have come out openly in support of

the COPRA and allied themselves with the Consumer movement.
Some other mainstream doctors have grudgingly accepted the

COPRA as a necessary evil or a fact of

life without conce­

ding that there may be something deeply wrong in the way

medicine is practised in our country.

The

later view-point

was expressed in an editorial of the National Medical Journal

of

India (May/june

though there are

1992)

by H.D.

Shourrie,

who agreed that

always some black sheep in any profession,

the medical profession in

India has over-all established
...136

- : 136 : -

a reputation for high standard of service,

and concern for the patients. ”

The

I.M.A.

efficiency

88

consider the Medical Profession as noble,

the doctor patient relationship as sacred and the treatment
unpredictable.

The socially conscious doctors accept the

fact that the medical profession today,

not patient oriented,

on the

whole,

but it is business oriented,

proved by these doctors themselves.

is

a fact

The ethical and the

progressive minded doctors are aware of the fact and they
accept that the medical profession must come under the

purview of the Consumer Protection Act,
black sheep within the profession.
that the upright doctors

to discipline the

They are

convinced,

and health care institutions do

not get affected by implementation of the Consumer Protec­

tion Act.

In fact,

they consider it as a blessing and a

necessity to improve the standard of medical profession and

the quality of health care services.

"Progressive

and ethical doctors are fully aware that

the excessive litigations could have
effects (due to defective medicine).
market dominated medical care,
the disciplining

of

counter-productive

But in the present

they see no alternative to

the black sheep by patients'

litiga-

, .
..89
tion."

... 137

- :157

□ n one hand the
the C.P.A.

I.M.A,

(some of

its members)

and on the other hand they (the

support

remaining members)

are fighting tooth and nail to get the medical profession out

of

the purview of the Consumer Protection Act.

These members

who want the medical profession to be excluded from the

Consumer Protection Act

argue that claims of negligence

can happen to even well-trained

personnel and also due

the strain and tension under which they work.

to

They also

blame the whole system of medical education and its defici­

ency in educating for the negligence.

find an excuse for being negligent,

This group of doctors
because there is no

specified system to update themselves.

They fail to accept

the personal responsibility for' updating themselves and for

the ongoing medical professional education.

"We
beings,

are not Gods.

We are human beings; and being human

anyone may commit a mistake.

make mistakes sometimes

.

Similarly,

a doctor

I do not think anybody

would put an artery forceps in the abdomen of a patient inten­
tionally and close it up

should start

The prevention of negligence

right from the college

level.

jurisprudence is taught in medical colleges.
only superficially without going in depth.

Yes, medical

But is taught

A student is

supposed to know the various legal aspects of our profession^

... 158

- :

commissions,

actions to be
All these,

138 s

omissions,

and negligence.

taken against you,

And about the

if you are negligent.

including probably today's detail at the

level

Unfortunately,

medical knowledge.

There

assessment of a doctor."

is no

college

there is no update of

recurring or repeated

90

This particular group of doctors feel that

better to correct the drawbacks of

the

it is

Indian Medical

Council and strengthen its powers than bringing the medical
profession under the purview of the Consumer Protection Act.

They consider the C.P.A.

more of a menace than a help.

"With Consumer Protection Act,

the doctor and you

have to go to the Court and create a lot of problems further.
If there are problems like a lacuna in the

in getting the judgement,

The

I.M.A.

why not we

I.M.C.

or delay

rectify them."

91

argues that the doctors come under personal

service and so they must be excluded from the Consumer Pro­

tection Act.

They threaten to use the defensive medicine

whicn in turn will increase the cost of medical care service,
which ultimately becomes an added burden to the patient.
They also demand,
to court,

if the consumer,

loses the case,

who has taken the doctor

then the amount asked as compen-

139

- : 159

* -

sation must be paid to ths doctor/health care

"If
what is the

Suppose,

he

a consumer goes to court and he

loses the case,

right of the doctor to go against

the patient?

tried to malign me and unnecessarily went to

court so that he might have a kick back,
92
so that he may not go to court?"

The

institution.

what

is the

remedy

Indian Medical Association is unhappy over the

decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressed Commi­

ssion to bring doctors under the purview of the Consumer

protection Act.

And they are determined to gear up for a

massive action plan to fight this decision of

the National

Commission.

"Giving three major reasons for being excluded from
the Act,

a spokesperson of

doctors,

and non-scientific members of the Consumer Forum

have no

right to try us.

fied persons.
tice and

Secondly,

I.M.A.

said,

"firstly we are

Doctors must be judged by quali­
this will result in defensive prac­

consumers will end up paying heavily for unnecessary

investigations and expert consultations.

Thirdly,

the

consumer will suffer even more heavily as doctors will

refuse to co-operate in situations
As a first plan of action,

the

of medical emergencies."

I.fll.A.

will take the issue

140

: 140 ;

to the Supreme Court and,

to a series of protest

if this fails,

marches and even go on a nation

wide hunger strike as a last resort.11

The

1.1*1.A.,

they will resort

93

the largest Voluntary Medical body

considers the Consumer Protection Act as a threat to them.
They have challenged the National Commission

ruling that

brought the doctors uncbr the purview of Consumer Protection

Act.

They aim at getting the decision of the National

Commission set aside.

They plan for various types of

protests and hold strike as a mark of their disagreement
and discontentment with the Consumer Protection Act.

"The Association is also planning various types of

public protest.

On August 11th 1993,

its 90,000 members

will wear black Arm-bands on their white-coats as a sym­
bolic gesture.

And in September they plan to hold a one-

day national strike to demonstrate their anger over what
Velayudhan Pillay,

I.M.A.

President,

calls "the most serious

threat the medical profession has faced in the country,

both to its credibility as well as its ability to function

without hindrance or fear."

94

Today the doctors are very unhappy that the pendulam
has swung to the extreme.

In the past,

there

was ample delay

...141

- :U1

:

in arriving at a decision on medical negligence,

the

courts of law.

Today the Consumer Forums are

mighty haste to dispose of the cases,
does not avail the medical experts*

through
in a

so much so it really

opinion and weigh

the

matter properly.

The

I.M.A.

is troubled because the COPRA does not

consider their profession as a unique and noble service.
They point out the inherent disadvantages of consumer court
"a science of uncertainity and the

as they define medicine
art of probability. 11

They complain that the doctors* skill

cannot be standardised by the I.S.I.
is incapable to decide

found wanting.

and the Consumer Court

where exactly their services were

They are

afraid that ^he Consumer Court

may favour the consumer as the decisions are being taken

by the non-medical experts,

"L. 1*1. Kapur, President of the Association of Medical

Consultants,

"Doctors

a 2,000 strong Bombay based body,

says,

are just 25 percent of the input for treatment.

There are para-medical staff,

blood bank,

poor infra-structure facilities,
themselves that could be

nurses,

ward boy^,

equipment and even patients

responsible for poor results.

,

we are becoming the scapegoats for everybody s woes.”

Yet

95

♦ • •142

- s 142 :

The

I.M.A.,

in their enthusiasm

to keep

themselves

and their profession out of t-he purview of Consumer
Protection Act,

Court.

are fighting their bailtie in the Supreme

I.N.A's writ

The Supreme Court has admitted the

petition out has not stayed the proceedings of the various

consumer courts deciding medical cases.

We still got to

wait and see what the outcome is going to be,

Supreme Court's decision is going to be

M.A.'s
I.

what the

regarding the

petition to keep the doctors and the medical

profession

out of the pervieu of the Consumer Protection

Act.

III.

VIEWS OF THE CONSUME RS AND THE PUBLIC
The end of 20th Century is witnessing radical changes

in the field of medical profession and health care services
in India.

The higher technology,

commercialization and

privatisation of medical education,

etc.,

have contributed

greately towards these changes.

The recent changes in the

law of the land has provided

an outlet to the public who had been discontented with the

medical care/profession/services.

The main

reason for this

increased unhappiness and dissatisfaction of the public
are the

regrettable increase in negligence,

malpractices,

incompetence and

within the profession on one hand and the

•••

143

- : 145 *• -

inappropriate expectation of victory in the battle against
disease and death on the other hand.
lation of Consumer Protection Act,

In the

recent legis­

the pouerless public has

suddenly found a means for redressing their grievances,

the first time

Thus for
tionship

in India,

the doctor-patient

rela­

is openly acquiring an adversial character on a

national scale.

new found

The

The consumer and the public cherish their

right and wcmt to make the maximum use of it.

scalpels are out for the doctors.

The patients

who had been trampled by the arrogant doctors who thought
no end of themselves,

who paid no attention to their neg­

ligence and callousness are now finding themselves in the
dock

faced by patients whom they least expected to react

and retaliate in this manner.

public at large,

For the consumer and the

the Consumer Protection Act is like a boon.

Earlier the doctors were safe and secure,

but today the

negligent* the careless and greedy who fails to be upright,
conscientious and turn the noble and sacred profession into
a big bad business are very very unsafe

their patients / the

in the hands of

consumers of their service and the

>ublic at large.

...144

- : 144 : -

"Across the country many state consumer dispute
redressal commisions and district forums

surge in such cases.

have been filed

of

In Kerala,

before the

the total cases.

report a marked

an estimated

1,800 cases

14 district flarums - almost

In Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra,

15%

an

estimated 100 malpractice suits are pending in each state.
And within a year the National Redressal Commission,

deals with

which

compensation claims of over Rs.10 lakhs has over

30 such cases pending disposal.

The

largest being Rs.3 crore

filed by an Amritsar - based petititoner whose son died after
the surgeon allegedly performed several unnecessary operations.

What more,

of

with most of these consumer courts disposing

cases within a year - as compared to an average

10 years

in regular ones - doctors suddenly find themselves forking
out hefty compensations with numbing suddenness.

The

consumer and the public who were trampled and

sedated by the
to wake

the

up

arrogant medical professionals

today.

are beginning

In fact they are already awake aided by

consumer grouos and the voluntary organizations.

any newspaper or periodicals,
sational news of consumers

Open

they are filled with the sen­

reactions and stories of their

grievances turned into appropriate compensations.

...145

- : 145 : -

Actually the consumers of health care / medical care
services are not against the doctors or to their service
rendered.

The public is in need of

them.

for is their rights as consumers and uhat

duty of

what they fight
they demand is the

care oued to them.

Given

below a re some of the view points of the consu­

mers of health care services and the public.

1.

The

consumers and the public are not after the honest

and upright doctors.
business minded

and

They are after the

quacks and

greedy doctors who turn this noble

sacred profession into big business and exploit

the public in the bargain.

Defending the poor and

vulnerable from such people

is the job of

the

consumer

activists and voluntary organizations.

2.

The public do not want to indulge in unnecessary liti­

gations;

but they are not going to spare the black

sheep either.

3.

All that the public and the patients expect from the

doctors and hospitals are their right as consumers.

4.

Trust is very important and it is built only by
exchanges between doctors and patients with mutual

trust;

there will then be few problems,

if not none.

146

: -

- :146

5,

Corporate medical care is the main
impersonal care.
dealings

Their concern is about

the shady

in the profession aimed at making money.

If doctors make

their profession a business then

patients will have
patients'

reason for todays

to treat them as traders.

and public's reaction is the

The

reflection of

the doctors action.

6.

Indifferent,

grievances of

lethargic attitude of the

I.M.C.

to the

the patient and their inability to

provide the aggrieved with due compensation encourage
the patient to prefer the option made

available through

the Consumer Protection Act.

7.

Since the doctors/hospitals are

given an equal oppor­

tunity to defend themselves the

consumers are convinced

of the fairness of the Consumer Protection Act.

8.

The public feel that the root cause of all the problem
and the tension that exists between the patient and

doctor are the present selection system for M.B.B.S.
Those who pay the capitation fee

are the ones who ex­

ploit the patients and the public.

..147

- :

9.

147 s

If the Medical professionals and the health care
institutions maintain the standard of the profession

and quality of service

then they can expect the

patients and the public to come out strongly in

support of the doctors and the hospitals.

10.

The

consumer groups are earnest not only in fighting

for the patients but also in protecting doctors from

false and frivolous

11.

complaints and

litigations.

"Today the public no longer consider doctors so
noble and high level of commercialisation of medicine

has lowered the doctor s social prestige."

In short,

all that the consumers of health care

service and the public demand from the doctors and the
health care institutions are accountability,

honesty,

up­

rightness, devotedness to the patient and safeguarding of
their own

right as consumers.

In turn,

offer their loyalty and there will be

the doctors / hospitals.

(the consumers and public)

The

they are willing to

no litigations against

litigations arise only when they

are exploited and their rights

are violated.

...148

CHAPTER VI

RESULTS
RESPONSES OBTAINED FROM THE ADMINISTRATOR
FROM

1.

HOSPITAL 'A'

2.

HOSPITAL ' B'

3.

HOSPITAL 'C'

ANALYSIS OF THE RESPONSES OF THE ADMINISTRATORS
OF HOSPITAL 'A', HOSPITAL 'B' & HOSPITAL 'C'

RESPONSES OBTAINED FROM THE DOCTORS OF

1.

HOSPITAL 'A*

2.

HOSPITAL 'B'

3.

HOSPITAL 'C*

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RESPONSES OBTAINED
FROM THE DOCTORS OF HOSPITALS 'A*, ’B' & ‘C

RESPONSES OBTAINED FROM VARIOUS CATEGORIES

OF DOCTORS

• 148 •

CHAPTER

VI

RESULTS
administrator's

HOSPITAL

1.

The

response.

'f\'
administrator of Hospital 'A 'is aware of the

legal aspects of medical negligence.

He

thinks that

the medical negligence is a big problem in the country

2.

He

is also aware of the Consumer Protection Act,

applies to health care institutions.

as it

He thinks it will

affect the medical profession to a great extent.

3.

The

administrator stated that the hospital had two cases

of alleged medical negligence, during the period between
April 1992 and March 1993;

4.

According

they are pending still.

to the administrator most of the health care

personnel in hospital 'a'

aware of the Consumer Protection

Act and its implications.

5.

The administrator said that he has tried to protect his
employees by providing indemnity insurance.

The hospi­

tal is not yet insured but it is under consideration.

149

:

6.

According to ths

149 : _

administrator,

the areas of

services

in his hospital that are more prone for medical negli­
gence

(ranked in order)

are :

(a)

surgical

(b)

medical

(c)

anaesthesia

(d)

nursing

(e)

laboratory

(f)

x-ray

(g)

Out patient department (O.P.D.)

5

Casualty.

7.

The

categories of employees more likely to be involved

in negligence cases / acts are

He

:

in rankings ;

(a)

administrat or and doctors

(b)

anaesthetists

(c)

nurses

(d)

lab technicians

(e)

x-ray technicians.

also added the ‘hospital*

as a whole could also be

sued.

8.

In hospital 'A* ,

there is no particular system for

attending to patients'

comments / complaints / sugges-

150

- : 150 : -

tions,

etc.

When the administrator was asked as

to how he handles any complaint by the patients,

the answer was that

they are

taken care of

as and

when they arise.

9.

According to the administrator of hospital 'A'

Consumer Protection Act

the

is somewhat beneficial to

the hospital as the doctors and staff may become a
little more careful and alert.

10.

In his opinion,

the Consumer Protection Act needs to

be modified ;

.

by adding a doctor too in the panel;

.

by imposing penalty on the complainant for
false complaints and false (undue)

.

claims;

by bringing the Government hospitals and

doctors also under the perview of the C.P.A.

11.

When the administrator was asked as to what would be
his attitude towards those patients who may sue the
institution or the employees,

he said that it depends

upon the merits of the complaints.

12.

The administrators's comments about the Consumer

Protection Act :
a)

It will improve the standard of medical profession
and the quality of health care services.

....151

MO- 17-0
. Xf
AH

- : 151

:

a hindrance to the profession/service.

b)

It is not

c)

It can be a means to check malpractice and quacks.

d)

It can destroy the image of the

e)

It will not dampen the spirit of service of the

institution

institution.

13.

When the administrator was asked whether the Consumer
Protection Act can cause closure of Voluntary Health

his reply was 'No'.

Care institutions,

14.

He

also said that

the Consumer Protection Act will not

deter more voluntary hospitals being opened

15.

in the future.

This administrator feels that Consumer Protection Act
can increase the

cost of medical care.

HOSPITAL 'B'

1.

The administrator of hospital 'B'
aspects of medical negligence.
negligence

2.

is aware of the legal

He thinks that the medical

is not a big problem in the country.

He is aware of the Consumer Protection Act,
to the Health Care

Insitutions.

as it applies

He thinks that it will

affect the medical profession and the health care

insti­

tutions to some extent.

...152

- : 152 : -

3.

The

administrator informed that he had three

cases of

alleged medicals negligence during the period April
1992 to flarch 1993.

4.

The cases are pending still.

The administrator said that most of his health care

personnel are aware of the Consumer Protection Act and
its implications.

5.

He did not

respond when he was asked whether he has

tried to protect his hospital and his employees.

The

hospital is not yet insured against medical negligence;
it is under consideration.

6.

The areas of services in the hospital that are more prone

to medical negligence are the departments of surgery
and anaesthesiology equally in the first place and then

medical.

7.

The

categories of employees more likely to be

in negligent acts are the doctors and the

8.

involved

anaesthetists.

The administrator said that there is no particular system

in his hospital for patient's comments /

complaints /

suggestions.

9.

He

thinks

to the

that the Consumer Protection Act is beneficial

institution,

the sense of

to the extent that

responsibility of

this law increases

the medical personnel in

rendering care and treatment.

155

- : 153 : -

10.

The administrator of" this hospital thinks that the

Consumer Protection Act needs to be mod ified;Mod ifi-

cations suggested ;

It needs to be so modified as to

prevent 'speculative'

litigation inspired by a motive

of

gain.

The act has no provision for payment of

compensation to doctors who have been subjected to

unjustified and frivolous legal proceedings.

11.

When asked about his attitude towards those patients

who may sue his institution or his employees,

he said

that wherever the complaint happens to be prima facie
true and justified,

he sympathises with the patient

conce rned.

12.

His comments about the Consumer Protection Act are

as

follows :

a)

It will improve the standard of medical profession

and the quality of health care services.

b)

it is not a hindrance to the profession/service.

c)

It cannot destroy the image of the

d)

It can be

institution.

a means to check malpractice

and the

quacks.

e)

It will not dampen the spirit of service of those

institution.

...154

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- : 155 : -

can to avoid mistakes and negligence.

them in acute

worry and anxiety with huge

Hou much more

careful do large claims make them than

they would be

if the claims were

HOSPITAL

1.

Why keep
claims?

about Rs.1

lakh?

'C'

The administrator is aware of the
medical negligence.

legal aspect of

He thinks that the medical negli­

gence is a big problem in the country.

2.

The administrator isaware of the Consumer Protection

Act,

as it applies to health care institution.

also thinks that

He

it will affect the medical profession

and the health care institution to some extent.

3.

The hospital had faced cases of medical negligence.
During the period April 1992 to March 1993 there were
two cases.

4.

Now there is no case pending.

According to the administrator most of the

health care

personnel are aware of the Consumer Protection Act and
its implications.

5.

The administrator has tried to protect hospital and

employees from being sued by the patients / consumers
of the service by instructing them to take care of the

...156

I

- s 156 : -

patient and not to cause such situations.

The hos­

pital is not covered by insurance against medical

negligence.

6.

The area of

services in the hospital that are more

prone to medical negligence are medical and surgical.

7.

The categories of employees who are more likely to

be involved

in negligent act are doctors,

adminis­

trators and nurses.

8.

The administrator said that there was no particular
system for patients'comments / complaints / sugges­

tions to be

attended to.

But it is under considera­

tion.

9.

The administrator thinks that the Consumer Protection

Act is not beneficial to the

institution in any way.

It may cause more anxiety; it involves a lot of money.

10.

The administrator does not

know if the Consumer Protec­

tion Act needs any modification or not.

11.

When asked about the administrator's attitude towards

those patients who may sue
employees,

the institution and its

the answer was that it is an eye opener to

all the doctors,

nurses and administrators.

...157

157 :

12.

The administrator's comments: -about Consumer Protection
Act.

a)

It will improve the

and the

standard of medical profession

quality of health care services.

b)

It is not a hindrance to the institution.

c)

It cannot destroy the image of the institution.

d)

It can be a means to check malpractice and the

quacks.
e)

It will not dampen the spirit of service of those

institutions.

13.

This administrator feels that the Consumer Protection
Act will not cause closure of voluntary health care
institutions.

14.

The Consumer Protection Act will not deter more
voluntary hospitals being opened in future.

15.

According to this administrator the Consumer Protection

Act tends to increase the cost of medical care.

16.

The administrator of hospital 'C'

had no further

comments or suggestions.

158

158

Analysis of qua stionnaire - administered

trators of Hospital 'a'
1.

The

,

'B'

and 'c'.

administrators of hospitals 'f\' ,

aware of the

to the adminis­

'B'

and 'c'

are

legal aspects of medical negligence.

the administrators of

'fl'

and 'c'

While

think that medical

negligence is a major problem in the country the
administrator of hospital

differs in his thinking,

it is a 'No!

for him,

2.

' B'

All three

administrators are aware of the Consumer

Protection Act as it applies to the health care institu­

tions.

'C'

While the administrators of hospital 'B'

and

think that the Consumer Protection Act will affect

the medical profession to some extent,
of hospital

'a'

the

administrator

thinks that it will affect the medical

profession to a great extent.

3.

All the three hospital administrators have faced cases
of medical negligence in the past one year.

'A'

and 'C'

Hospitals

had two cases (of medical negligence)

during the period of April 1992 to March 1993;
tal 'B'
be

had three cases.

cleared of both cases;

Hospital 'c'

each

Hospi­

had managed to

the other two have got the

cases pending iill.

...159

159: -

:

4.

Administrators of all three hospitals feel that most

of their hospital employees / the health care perso­

nnel are aware of

the Consumer Protection Act and its

implications.

5.

Hospital 'A'

has tried to protect the employees by

providing indemnity insurance.

Hospital

'Cz

tried

to protect them by instructing the employees to take
care of the patients and not to cause any situation of
medical negligence.

None of the three hospital administrators have
insured the hospital against medical negligence.

hospitals 'A*

and

'B*

are considering the matter,

While the

hospital

'C'

h_.s not given a thought to it.

6.

There is a difference in the opinion of three adminis­
trators with regard to the areas of services that are

more prone to medical negligence.
of Hospital

'A'

The

has ranked Surgery as the most vulne­

rable area for medical negligence,

then Medicine and

Anaesthesia comes in the third place.

trator

administrator

of hospital 'B'

The adminis­

feels that Surgery and Anaes­

thesiology are equally prone for medical negligence
and has ranked both in the first place and then Medicine.

160

I
- : 160 : —

According to the

administrator of hospital

,

the

a re as that are most prone for medical negligence is

Hedicine.

Nursing comes in the second place.

hospital 'Cz

This

does not seem to have faced any case of

medical negligence in the areas of Surgery and Anaes­
thesia;

7.

The

they are not mentioned in the

response given.

administrators differ in their opinion regarding

the categories of employees more
in negligent act.

likely to be involved

Although all three of them agree

that the doctors are the ones most likely to be invol­

ved in negligent act.

The administrator of hospital

'A’

includes himself too in the first place along with

doctors; then the anaesthetists; and the nurses are
ranked in the third place,
hospital 'Rz

whereas the administrator of

has left out the nurses altogether from

the categories of employees more likely to be involved
in negligent acts.
ries are

According to him only two catego­

likely to be involved in medical negligence:

they are doctors first and then the
The administrator of hospital 'c'

anaesthetists in his list.

anaesthetists.

has not included the

According to him the doctors

and administrators are the most vulnerable

categories

and the nurses.

...161

: 161 :

8.

None of

three hospitals

the

The administrator of hospital

complaints are being taken care of
arise.

any particular

comments / complaints and sugges­

system for patients'

tions.

seem to have

'a'

said that

as and when they

The other two administrators maintain silence

on this point.

9.

The administrators of hospital 'a'

seem to be

line of thoughts as both of them say that

on the same
the C.P.A.

and '0'

is beneficial to the institution to the extent

it increases the sense of

responsibility of the medical

personnel in rendering care

and treatment and

keeping

whereas the administrator of hospital 'c'

them alert,

differs on this point.

He views C.P.A.

as a caude of

anxiety and financial involvement.

10.

There seems to have
the

a certain degree of understanding in

responses of the

hospital 'B'
modified.

administrators of hospital 'A'and

on the point that the C.P.A.

needs to be

Both seem to suggest the same thing in diff­

erent words,

namely,

i)

including the doctors in the panel of judges;

ii)

including the Government hospitals and doctors

under the purview of Consumer Protection Act;

162

and

“ ! 162 : ~

iii)

imposing

for false

penalty

complaints and

unjustified claims.

The administrator of hospital 'C'

to be

aware of/known whether the Consumer Protec­

tion Act

11.

does not seem

requires modifications or not.

The attitudes of the three administrators towards the
patients

who may sue

their hospital / employees seem to
The attitude of

vary from each other slightly.

nistrator of hospital 'A'

of the complaint while

the admi­

is that it depends on tile merit

the administrator of hospital 'Bz

seems to be sympathetic towards the patients provided
the complaint be prima facie true and justified.

administrator of hospital 'Cz

The

considers it as an aye

opener for self and the medical professionals.

12.

The administrator of the hospital 'Cr
positive

seems to be

as he feels that the Consumer Protection Act

cannot destroy the image of the institution.

this,

rather

all three of them,

Other than

have the same comments namely

that;
i)

the

C.P.A.

will improve the

profession and quality of

standard of medical

services;

..163

- : 163 : -

ii)

it is not a hindrance to the profession /
se rv i ce ;

iii)

it can be a means to check malpractice and the
quacks;

iv)

and

it will not dampen the spirit of service of those

institutions.

13.

The administrators of all the three hospitals seem to be
optimistic and of one mind when they say that the Consu­

mer Protection Act will not cause

closure of the Volun­

tary health care institutions.

14.

They do not feel either,

that the Consumer Protection

Act will deter more voluntary hospitals from being opened

in the future.

15.

All the three administrators seetp to be convinced

(although in varying degree)

that the Consumer Protection

Act tends to increase the cost of medical care.

16.

While the administrators of hospital 'A*

and 'Cz

were

not inclined to add any more comment / suggestion on
the subject,
to be

the administrator of hospital

rather generous with them.

'Bz

seemed

They are ;

164

- 8164

i)

i

Compensation over Rs.1

lakh should not be

admissible except in extra ordinary cases,
nature of

legally
the

which should be specified.

ii) The consumer protection act should perform a protec­
tive function

sense of

-nd induce a hightened

res­

ponsibility in medical personnel but should not
provide

a means to the

litigious persons and legal

professionals looking for an opportunity to make
big money.

Huge claims for Rs.10

lakhs or more,

show the strong

which are not particularly uncommon,

interest of litigants and their legal advisors in

making money.

After all most doctors are careful

in the way they work.

They do what they can to

avoid mistakes and escape negligence.

Uhy keep tham

in acute worry and anxiety with huge claims?
more careful do large claims make them,

than they

would be if the claims were about Rs.1

lakh?

The

responses gathered from the questionnaire,

filled in by the administrators of hospitals
'C'

How much

'ft',

'and

give the impression that there is certain amount of aware­

ness among the health cars
ing degree though)

institutional authorities (in vary­

about the Consumer Protection Act and its

implications to health care and medical profession as well as
tha legal aspects of medical negligence.

Some have already

taken steps to protect themselves and their

employees while

others are on the process of it.

...165

:

165

RESPONSES OBTAINED FROM THE ADMINISTRATORS

Hospital 'A'

1 .a. Aware of the legal aspects
I
of medical negligences
I

Hospital 'B '

Hospital 'C '

Yes

Yes

Yes

b. Medical negligence is a big
problem in the country

Yes

Yes

Yes

2«a« Aware of the Consumer Protec­
tion Act as it applies to
health care institutions

Yes

Yes

Yes

To some

To some

extent

extent

Yes

Yes

Yes

b. How many ? From April 1992 tc March 1993 (no: cases)

Two

Three

Two

c. Cases pending now

Two

Three

Nil

Health care personnel in the
hospital are aware of the
C.P.A. and its implications

Most

Most

Most

5 .a. Have tried to protect the
hospital and employees from
being sued by patients

Yes

I

b. C.P.A. Will affect the medics 1 To a
profession and the health cai ■e great
institutions
extent

3.a. Have faced cases of medical
negligence in the (this)
hospital

'+.

b. 5y

Yes

By instruction
to take care
of the patients
and not to
cause such
situations.

Providing
the
indemnity
insurance

c. Hospital is covered by
insurance against
medical negligence

No

No

No

d. Insurance coverage of the
hospital is being
considered

Yes

Yes

No

1 66

I

Hospital 'A'
i
; Hie areas of services in the 1.Surgical
hospital that are more prone1 2 .Medical
to medical negligence
3.Anaesthesia
1
_____I
Categories of employees
1. Doctors &.
7.
Administra­
I more likely to be involved
in negligent acts
tor
1 2.Anaesthethetists
3.Nurses

6.

8. a. have (a) particular system
for patients ' consents/
complaints/ suggestions

No.

b. Patients couuents/ complaints They are taken
suggestions are treated
care off as anc
when they come.

9.a. Consumer Protection Act
is beneficial to the
institution

b. Beneficial (by)
(if yes)

Somewhat
Doctors and
staff can be
nore alert

Hospital *B 1

Hospital ’O’

1 .Surgical &
Anaesthesia
2. tie di cal

1. Medical
2.tbrsing

1.Doctors
2.Anaesth­
etists

1.Doctors
2.Adminis­
trators
3•Nurses

No

Under
considera­
tion



-

Yes

No

To the extent
this law
increases the
sense of reap onsibility of t♦he
medical perse rrnel
in rendering care
and treatmeni

c. Not beneficial (because)
(If no)

-

-

10.a. Consumer Protection Act
needs to be modified

Yes

Yes

This is
going to
cause more
anxibty &
financial
involvement

Don 't Know

167

• 167

I

Hospital ’A’

11.

12.

Hospital 'B 1

b. Suggestions for modifi­
cation of C.P.A.

1 .A doctor to 1.Prevent
be in the
speculative
panel
litigation
2.Penalty for
inspired by
false compl­
a motive to
aints and
gain
false claims 2.Provision
3.Government
for payment
hospitals &
of compen­
doctors to
sation to
be included
the doctors
for false &
unjustified
complaints

Attitude towards tbbse
patients who may sue
the institute or
employees

Depends on the When the comp­
merit of the
laint happens
complaints
to be prim
facia true &
justified
sympathises
with the
patient con­
cerned.

Hospital '01

It is an
eye opener
to all the
doctors,
Nurses and
Administra­
tors.

Comments about C.P.A.
a. Will improve the standard
of medical profession &
the quality of health
care services

Yes

Yes

Yes

b. It is a hindrance to
the medical professior/
service

No

No

Nd

c. It can destroy the image
of the institution

Yew

Yes

No

d. It can be a means to
check malpractice and
the quacks

Yes

Yes

Yes

e. It will dampen the spirit
of services of those
institutions

No

Ito

No

16®

:

168

Hospital

13-

u.

15.

16.

'A'

Hospital •B 1

Hospital 'C*

C.P.A. Causes closure of
voluntary healtn care
institutions

No

No

No

C.P.A. will deter more
voluntary hospitals
being opened in
future

No

No

No

C.P.A. will tend to
increase the cost of
medical care

Yes

To a small
extent

No

Other comments/suggestions
Hospital B :
- Compensation in excess of Rs. 1 lakh should
not be ligaily admissible except in extra­
ordinary cases, the nature of which
should be specified.
r The C.P.A. should {oerform a protective
function and induce hightened sense
of responsibility in medical personnel.
but should hot provide a means to
litig^-^ions persons and legal profess­
ionals who are looking for a chance to
make big money.

Most doctors are careful in the way they
work and with the C.P.A. hanging over their
heads even if the amount that might
have to be paid is less than Rs. 1 lakh
they do what the can to avoid negligence.
Why keep them in acute worry and
anxiety with huge claims ? How much
more careful do large claims make
them than they would be if the claims
were about Rs. 1 lakh ?

169

:

169

RESPONSES OBTAINED FROM DOCTORS
Questionnnaires were prepared for doctors and
distributed in three different hospitals.

The distribution

was planned in such a way that it could be

answered by

Total sample size was 60

various categories of doctors.

(sixty).

30 questionnaries were answered by the doctors

in Hospital 'A*,

'B'

20 in Hospital

and

10 in Hospital 'C*.

It was also divided in such a way so that 20 ques­
tionnaires were

answered by General Surgeons;

Medicine (physicians);

and the

10 by General

remaining 10 by Anaesthetists

10 by the Obstetricians and gynaecologists and 10 by other
All of them having experience of 10 years

specialists.

and more.

The distribution done
HOSPITAL 'ft'

:

was as below;

with bed strength - 800

Sample size - 30

1.

General Surgeons

-

10

2.

Physicians

-

5

3.

Other Specialists -

5

4.

Anaesthetists

-

5

5.

Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists
-

5

30

...J70

-

:

170

:

with bed strength - 600

HOSPITAL * B'

:

Somple £>iz,e
1.

General

Surgeons

-

7

2.

Physicians

-

3

3.

Other Specialists

-

3

4.

Anaesthetists

-

4

5.

Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists

-

3

20

HOSPITAL *C*

:

with bed strength - 300

Sample size - 10
1.

General Surgeons

-

3

2.

physicians

-

2

3.

Other Specialists

-

2

4.

Anaesthetists

-

1

5.

Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists

-

2

10

Responses obtained Prom the doctors

HOSPITAL 'f\'
Sample Size - 30

1.

a)

Medical negligence is a major problem in the country

Yes

16

5 3. 3%

No

14

46.7%

171

:

53.3

171

per cent of the doctors considered medical

negligence is

a major problem in the

country.

But

the

remaining 46.7% were not very much aware of this problem.

b)

fiuareness of legal provisions in case of medical
negligence

To great extent

8

26.7%

Somewhat

18

60.0%

Not much

4

13.3%

Only 26.7% of the doctors who responded to the ques­

tionnaire were well aware of the

medical negligence.

legal provisions in case of

Sixty percentage had some idea about it

but 13,5% were not at all aware of this fact.

2.

Provisions of C.P.A.

as it affects the medical profession

To great extent

12

40%

Somewhat

15

50%

Not much

3

10%

Fourty percent of the doctors seem to be aware of the
provisions of C.P.A.

to the medical profession a great extent

and fifty percentage had some idea and ten percentage of

were not much aware of

it.

172

them

172

3.

impact of C.P.A.

The

on medical proFession

Good

6

20%

Fair

17

56.7%

Bad

7

23.3%

Twenty percent of
of C.P.A.

the doctors think of the impact

on the med.leal profession as good and 56.7%

of them think it is fair.
impact of C.P.A.

4.

a)

C.P.A.

But 23.3% do think that the

on medical profession as ^ad.

will affect the doctor-patient

relationship;

Yes

17

56.7%

No

13

43.3%

Around fifty seven percent of the doctors feel

that the C.P.A.

will affect their relationship with

their patients and the other 43 percentage of them feel
that these things will not come in their way where

patients are concerned.

b)

According to the

response obtained from the doctors

of hospital ' f\' ,

if C.P.A.

patient

relationship

defensive medicine.
risk.

result,
be

affects the doctor­

then they will have

resort to

They will be reluctant to take

They will be suspicious

about patients;

as a

their relationship with the patients will

an unnatural one.

-

:

!

173

~

I
5.

a)

Membership in

I.PI.A.

|

Yes

13

43.3%

|

No

17

56.7%

About fortythree percent of

the doctors are

I

members of

Indian Medical Association where as

|

majority of

them in this hospital do not belong

to this association.

I
I

b)



Application of C.P.A.

to the medical profession ;

Yes

17

56.7%

No

13

43. 3/b

Almost fiftyseven percent



of the doctors are

"

in favour of the

|

rendered by the medical profession whereas the

application of C.P.A.

to the

service
rest

of them about fortythree percent are not in favour.

I
m

6.

a)

Individual-Professional indemnity insurance :

B

Yes

9

30%

|

No

21

70%

Among the doctors who responded to the
tionnaire only thirty percent have the

u

ques­

individual

174

:

174

indemnity insurance against medical negligence;
the other seventy percent have not yet

insured

themselves.

b)

indemnity insurance through the

Professional
institution

;

Yes

30

100%

No

0

0

Hospital 'A*

has provided all the

l,its)

doctors with professional indemnity insurance.

c)

Feel the need to be insured

:

Yes

12

40%

No

1

o.3%

While forty percent of its doctors feel the
need to protect themselves through indemnity insurance

only a very small percentage of them express that
they do not feel the need for it.

The

rest of the

doctors have abstained from expressing an opinion.

d)

Insurance premium against medical negligence

Very high

6

20%

Reasonable

18

50%

One fifth,

i.e.,

;

twenty percent of the doctors

feel that the insurance premium is very high.

Sixty

....175

175

percent find it

not expressed

7.

-

reasonable.

Twenty percent have

their feelings on the matter.

affects the professional f reedom

C.P.A.

Ye s

18

60%

No

12

40%

Sixty percent of the doctors think that

the C.P.A.

has an influence on their professional freedom.

The other

forty percent do not think in that way.

8.

a)

C.P.A.

needs modifications:
Yes

24

80%

No

1

3.3%

Eighty percent of the doctors think that if C.P.A.
continues to be applicable to the service
the doctors,

(3.3%)

of doctors feel it does not

cation.

A small minority

require any modifi­

About seventeen percent of the doctors have not

expressed

b)

it needs to be modified.

rendered by

their views regarding this modification.

modifications suggested by some of

make C.P.A.

the doctors to

more applicable to their services;

To include doctors also in the panel;
To protect the

reputation of the concerned doctors

.... 176

I
-

: 176

:

-

- To bring the Government hospitals and its

doctors under the purview of

the Consumer

Protection Act.

- To make provisions

for payments to be made

to the doctors by the patient for baseless

and false complaints.

9.

a)

I.M.C.

can handle the problem of medical negligence

efficiently:
Yfes

13

4 3. 3%

No

16

53. 3%

Majority of the doctors (53.3%)
Indian Medical Council is not

the

authority,

negligence,

feel that the

able although

it has

to handle the problems of medical

efficiently.

Less than half

(43.3%)

feel that it is capable of handling them.

small percentage

(3.3%)

of

A very

the doctors have not

voiced their opinion.

b)

Modification of the

I.M.C.

Yes

8

26.6%

No

8

26.6%

Act will make it adequate

177

Ml

:

small percentage (26.6%)

A

responded to the

questionnaire is of

modifications will make the

number (26.6%)

adequate.

of the doctors who

I.M.C.

the opinion that

Act adequate.

An equal

feel that modification will not make it

Almost half of the doctors have not made any

comment on the subject.

c)

Some of the suggestions for modification of the

I.M4).

Act:

- Power to fine the doctor and award damages to

the patient.
Power to monitor the C.P.A.

monitoring the

instead of the C.P.A.

I, M.C.

- Power to monitor the professional competence of

the doctors.
- I.M.Q.

should ensure quality doctors and not the

rotten ones of today.
- Maintain the

standard and quality jn the private

clinics and nursing homes.

10.

Have faced problem in managing patients because of C.P.A.

Yes

1

3.3%

No

29

96.7%

Grand majority $96.7%}

of the doctors agree

that they have not faced any problem in managing patients

178

• 178

because of C.P.A.

It is only a very small percent of

3.3 of the doctors that has faced such problems.

11.

Pleasures taken towards self protection

Some of the measures that are taken by the doctors
to protect themselves in the above mentioned situations

are

that :
- By explaining everything in detail to the

patients and when necessary to the

regarding the patients condition,



relatives

the treatment

involved and the prognosis.

- By communicating to the patient

in writing.

- By increasing the professional fee,

to meet the

insurance cost.

12.

In view of C.P.A.,

the

steps that can help to

avoid litigation and its effects are

a)

as below:

large majority of

the doctors in hospital 'A

i.e., 93.3% of them,

agree that they need to

A

provide proper explanation to the patients

before and after each procedure / treatment.

bj

Around sixtyseven percent of the doctors here

feel that regular visit to the patient to make
sure that the patient

is comfortable and gets

all care is important.

179

-

c)

: 179

Almost eightyseven percent of the doctors are
convinced

that they have to get the patient's

consent before every procedure/treatment.

d)

About sixtythree percent of the doctors want to

avoid

taking any risk.

others and

e)

They prefer to consult

refer the patients to other specialists.

In this hospital 33.3% of

the doctors feel safer

by providing the emergency treatment and then

refer

the patient to more competent persons.

f)

One doctor (3.3%)

suggests that proper medical records

Importance should be given to

should be maintained.

audit and self assessment.

13.

C.P.A.

will improve the

standard of medical profession

and quality of care :

Yes

6

20%

No

5

16.7%

To an extent

17

56.7)?>

Twenty percent of the doctors are sure that C.P.A.
will improve the standard of medical profession and the

quality of health care services.

Majority of them

(56.7%) feel that to an extent it will improve the

180

I

: 180

standard and the quality of

A small percen­

17.7% feel the contrary.

tage of

b)

service.

Those,

who are positive about the imporvement in

the standard of profession and quality of services,
that the C.P.A.

vigilant,

will make

responsible,

to exercise

the doctors more careful

accountable and will inspire them

better judgement use

reasonable care in their

decision and treatment of the patient.
the C.P.A.

say

They feel that

is an ideal means to check the quacks and

stop the unethical and poor quality of medical care

se rvices.

Those who differ give their reasons ;

c)

- C.P.A.

makes the medical professionals to be

ruled

by fear always.
- It has no control over the Government hospitals and
doctors

- It encourages defensive medicine.

14.

C.P.A.

resort to defensive medicine;

will make doctors

Yes

24

80%

No

5

16.7%

181

:

Eighty percent of
that C.P.A.

-

:

181

the doctors in hospital

'f\' feel

will make them resort to defensive medicine.

A minority of

16.7% do not feel thus.

3.3% of

the

doctors have not expressed their opinion on this matter.

15.

C.P.A.

increases the cost of medical care ;

Very much

14

46.7%

To some extent

15

50%

Not at all

0

0%

Exactly half of the doctors - fifty percentage of
them feel that the C.d.A.

will increase the ;cost of

medical care to some extent.

A slightly smaller percentage

(46.7%) of them feel that it will increase very much.

3.3%

of the doctors have not said anything about it.

Responses obtained from some of the doctors in hospital

16.

'Az

regarding their honest reaction to the patient who may

sue them are as follows;

If I am wrong I will accept my fault.
fault,

If

I

am not at

then I will counter sue the patient in the law

court.
-

I do my best for the patient.

I am not going to be

bothered with these complaints.
I will be polite,

but

I will defend myself

182

: 182

-

I will use defensive medicine

- I will be outrageous
- I will react legally
- I

will have nothing more to do with that patient

Other comments and suggestions

17.

- Out of

court settlement is always better.

- Do not

let the lawyers be

- C.P.A.

is good;

involved in it.

but must include in,the

Government

hospitals and doctors

- Awareness has to be increased among the doctors
- Pledical personnel must be included in the panel
- Doctors

and patients need to be educated on C.P.A.

RESPONSES OBTAINED PROW DOCTORS OF HOSPITAL * B*

Sample size.

1.

a.

20

Medical negligence is a major problem in the country
Yes

10

50%

No

10

50%

Fifty percent of the doctors in hospital '8*
feel that medical negligence is a major problem in the

country.

But the other half of

them do not feel so.

185

t 183

b.

Auareness of

legal provision in case of medical

negligence
To great extent

7

35%

Somewhat

11

55%

Not much

2

10%

Thirty five percent of the doctors are aware
of the

legal provisions in case of medical negligence

to great extent.

The majority of

them that is fifty

five percent of them have some ideas about
Ten percent of

it.

the doctors are not very much aware of

them.

2.

Provisions of C.P.A.

as it

affects

the medical profe-

ssion
To great extent

9

45%

Somewhat

8

40%

Not much

3

15%

45% of the doctors are aware of the provisions

of C.P.A.

extent.

as it affects the medical profession to great
Forty percent are aware of it to a certain

extent making a total of 85%.

15% are not very much

aware of it.

184

5 184

3.

The

impact of C.P.A.

on medical profession

Good

4

20%

fair

8

40%

Bad

8

40 %

Only twenty percentage of doctors in hospital
' 8Z

think that the impact of C.P.A.

ssion is good.

on medical profe­

While forty percent of

its impact is fair,

them think that

the other forty percent view it

as bad,

4.a.C.P.fi.

will affect the doctor-patient relationship

Yes

15

75%

No

5

25%

While

seventyfive percent of the doctors think

that the C.P.A.
patients,

b.

As per the

will affect.their relationship with their

twenty five percent of them think the other way.

response obtained,

C.P.A.

will affect them in

such a way that they will be forced t^5 use defensive
medicine,

avoid taking any risk and finally end up in

problem for the patient.

They feel that with the C.P.A.

in action they will have an unnatural relationship
their patients.

185

with

186

b.

Professional indemnity insurance through the
institution

Yes

0

0

No

10

100%

None of the doctors are insured by the insti­
tution .

c.

feel the need to be insured
Yes

18

90%

No

2

10%

Ninety percent of the doctors feel the need

to be

insured

while the

against professional/medical negligence

remaining ten percent do not feel the need

for it.

d.

Insurance premium against medical negligence

Very high

2

10%

Reasonable

11

55%

Majority (55%)

of the doctors feel that the

insurance premium is reasonable while ten percent of

them feel that it is very high.

Thirty five percent

of the doctors have not voiced their opinion on this

matte r.

18?

-

7.

C.P.A.

: 187

I

-

affects the professional freedom

Yes

19

95%

No

1

5%

The

smallest possible percentage of doctors

respondents feel that the C.P.A.

among the

affect thek p rof essional freedom.

All the

(5%)

will not
rest which

makes 95% of the doctors feel very strongly that the

8.

a.

C.P.A.

will affect their professional freedom.

C.P.A.

needs modification

Yes

19

No

0

95%

Ninety five percent of the doctors responded
feel that the C.P.A.
continue

them.

needs to be modified,

if it is to

to be applicable to the service rendered by

The

remaining five percent have not said any­

thing about the need for modification.

b.

In order to modify the C.P.A.,

some of their sugges­

tions:

.

Include the doctors in the panel of judges.

.

Bring the

government hospitals

and doctors also

under the purview of C.P.A.

188

188

.

Compensation must be awarded to the doctors falsely

accused.

.

9.

a.

Protect the

I.M.C.

reputation of

the doctors.

can handle the problem of medical negligence

efficiently

Yes

8

40%

No

12

60%

Majority of the doctors
that

the

(sixty percent)

Indian Medical Council is not able to handle

the problems of medical negligence effiently.

forty percent are for the

b.

feel

Modification

I.M.C.

Only

handling them.

is required to make the I.M.C.

Ret (rtore)

ade quate.

Yes

11

55%

No

3

15%

Fifty five percent of the doctors feel that
the

I.M.C.

Act must be modified so that it will become

capable of handling the problems of medical negligence
efficiently.

Only 15% do not feel the need for modi­

fication of the act.

30% of the doctors have not

responded.

... 189

189

:

Some of the suggestions brought out by these

c.

towards the modification of the

.

Power to

Ret ;

I.fl.C.

raise the standard of

doctors

t

the medical profe­

ssion and quality of services especially in the

private clinics and nursing homes.

.

Power to monitor the professional competence of
the doctor.

.

Power to punish the negligent doctors and

award

the damages.
.

Power to monitor the C.P.A.

Have faced problem in managing patients because of C.P.A

10.

Yes

0

0

No

19

95%

Ninety five percent of the doctors

have faced any problem because of C.P.A.

seem not to
The

remaining

five percent has not given any response to this question.

1 1.

Pleasures taken towards self protection

In order to protect self some of the measures taken
as per the responses are

.

:

Proper explanation and information provided

patients and relatives,

treatment

to

regarding their illness,

and the expected outcome.

.190

: 190

.

Communicating to

.

Personal

the patient in writing

indemnity insurance,

is charged

the cost of which

to the patients.

Defensive medicine

.

12.

,

Some of the

will help

steps that the doctors are in favour which

to avoid

litigation and its effects in view

of C.P.A.:
a.

Eighty five percent of the doctors feel that proper
explanation before

b.

and after treatment

is helpfuj_«

Eighty percent of the doctors are convinced that

consent before any treatment is a must.
c.

Seventy percent of the doctors agree that regular
visits,

ensuring the comforts and care to the

patients will avoid

d.

litigations.

Sixty five percent of the doctors prefer to avoid

taking any risk.
e.

Forty five percent of the doctors are for giving

the emergency treatment and then refer the patient
to a more competent
f.

Two doctors jj

ment

and

person.

ten percent

jj

suggest proper treat­

good rapport with the patients and their

relatives to avoid litigation and its effects.

191

191

13.

a.

C.P.A.

the standard of medical pro­

uill improve

fession and

quality of medical services

Yes

3

15%

No

3

15%

13

65%

To an extent,

Yes

While fifteen percent of the doctors are convin­

ced that C.P.A.
profession and

will improve

the

standard of medical

quality of medical service,

percent of the doctors agree that

sixty five

to an extent it uill

improve

the standard and quality of the medical profe­

ssion.

This makes a total of 80%.

Only 15% disagree

comple tely.

b.

Those doctors

who are optimistic about the C.P.ft.

improving the standard of the profession

and

quality of service strengthen this statement by
adding their views.

.

C.P.A.

is the weapon to weed out

the quacks,

to strai­

ghten the unethical doctors and their poor quality

se rvices.
.

It will enable the doctors to be
them to be

accountable,

prompt

careful and vigilant and enable them also

to accept responsibility for their own words and deeds.

... 192

: 192

c.

who entertain the negative feelings state that

Those

it is like the

rod

against the doctors.

It makes

discremination as the Government hospitals are excluded

from it.

14.

C.P.A.

will make doctors

resort to defensive medicine

Ye s

20

100%

No

0

0

All the doctors to whom the questionnaire
distributed

unanimously

agree that C.P.A.

were

will make

them resort to defensive medicine.

15.

C.P.A.

will increase the

cost of medical care

Very much

15

75%

To some extent

5

25%

Not at all

0

0

Seventy five percent of doctors
very sure that the C.P.A.

medical care.

responded

will increase the

cost of

Twenty five percentage of them feel that

it will increase the cost to some extent.
it that all the doctors think that the

care

are

This makes

cost of medical

will increase due to C.P.A.

195

!

16.

193

!

hospital

The

responses of some of the doctors in the

'B

regarding their reaction towards the patient who

may sue the doctors are as follows:

.

If

I am sued

then I
.

I

and if negligence

will sue him in the

will be

is not proved,

court.

indifferent to such patient there-

af fee r

17.

.

I will use defensive measures.

.

I will teach him a lession,

.

I

will warn him to be careful

Other comments and suggestions
.

Include the doctors in the panel of judges.

.

Include the Government sector.

.

Discourage the involvement of lawyers who make

it a means to earn easy money.
.

Create awareness among the doctors and patients.

.

Strengthen

the

I.fl.A.

and the

I.fl.C.

194

: 194

RESPONSES OBTAINED FROM THE DOCTORS OF HOSPITAL ’C1

Sample size

1.

a.

10

Medical negligence is a major problem in the country
Yes

7

70%

No

3

30%

Seventy percent of the doctors in this hospital

think that medical negligence is a major problem,
the country,

in

whereas the remaining thirty percent do

not think this to be a major problem.

b.

Awareness of

legal provision in case of medical negli­

gence
To great extent

2

20%

Somewhat

5

50%

Not much

3

30%

Twenty percent of the-doctors seem to be aware
of the

legal provisions in case of medical negligence,

to a great extent while fifty percent of the doctors
are somewhat aware of it.

Thirty percent of them are

not much aware of this fact.

195

: 195

2.

Provision of C.P.A.

as it affects the medical profession

To great extent

3

30%

Somewhat

5

50%

Not much

2

20%

Thirty percent of the doctors who responded are

aware of the provisions of C.P.A.

medical profession.

as it

affects the

Fifty percent of them have

idea about it while the

some

remaining twenty percent has

very little of it.

3.

The impact of C.P.A.

on the medical profession

Good

3

30%

Fair

6

60%

Bad

1

10%

Thirty percent of the doctors responded consider
the C.P.A.
profession,

to be having good impact on the medical

whereas majority of them,

i.e.,

percent think its impact is fair and the

sixty

remaining ten

percent consider it as bad.

....196

;

-

4.

a.

ig6

:

-

will affect the doctor-patient

C. P. A .

Yes

5

50%

No

5

50%

fifty percent of tho doctors
that

the C.P.A.

of

them do nnt

C.P.A.

will make them have

cine.

They will be

very

5.

a.

with

think so.

will affect their

relationship with their patients

patient

responded feel

remaining fifty percentage

who feel that the C. P . A .

Those

who

will affect their relationship

their patients whereas the

b.

relationship

remark that the

resort to defensive medi­

always suspicious about every

who goes to the doctor and also they will be

reluctant to take any

Member of

risk.

I. H. A .

Yes

5

50%

No

5

50%
the doctors who

fifty percent of
members of the

responded are

Indian f'leaiical Association while the

remaining fifty percent are not.

b.

Application of C.P.A.

to the medical profession

Yes

4

40%

No

6

60%

•197

•• 197

Majority consisting of

sixty percent of

doctors are not in favour of the C.P.A.
to

the medical profession

the doctors.

and

the

the

being applied

service rendered by

The other forty percent of them have no

objection.

6.

a.

In dividual professional indemnity insuranc e

Ybs

3

30%

No

7

70%

While a smaller 30% of
ponded have

the doctors who

res­

the professional indemnity insurance

individually the majority of seventy percent of

them

do not have it.

b.

professional indemnity insurance through the insti­
tution

Ye s

0

0

No

10

100%

None of these doctors are

insured by the

institution in which they work.

c.

Feel the

need to be

insured

Yes

5

50%

No

1

10%

..198



!

198

:

Fifty percent of

"

these doctors feel the need

to be insured whereas only ten percent

they do not feel the need to be

have said that
Forty per­

insured.

cent of the doctors have not given their response to

this question.

d.

Insurance premium against medical negligence
Very high

2

20%

Reasonable

5

50%

Among the

seventy percent of the doctors who

responded to this question twenty percent feel that

it is very high.

Fifty percent feel that

the insurance

premium against medical negligence is reasonable.

7.

C.P.A.

affects the professional freedom

Yes

5

50%

No

5

50%

Fifty percent of the doctors feel that the

C.P.A.

affects their professional freedom while the

other fifty do not feel that the C.P.A.

comes dn

their way.

199

:

8.

a.

C.P.A.

199

needs modification

Yes

7

70%

No

2

20%

The majority (seventy percent)
are convinced that the C.P.A.

of the doctors

needs to be modified

whereas twenty percent of the doctors do not think

b.

so.

Ten percent remained silent on this matter.

Some

of the suggestions that were brought out by

the doctors of hospital 'Cr.
- Protect the reputation of the

concerned doctors

- Include the doctors in the panel.
- Bring the Government hospitals and the government
doctors also within the purview of the

Act.

- Provision for the compensation of the doctors and

hospitals that were falsely found fault with.

9.a.

I.fl.C.

can handle

the problem of medical negligence

effici-ently

Yes

5

50%

No

5

50%

200

: 200

The do ctors who

responded

to this question

While the fifty percent

are of divided opinion.

of them are convinced of the efficiency of the

I.M.C.

in the matter an equally strong fifty percentage feel

the other way.

b.

Modification of the

I.M.C.

Act will make

it adequate

Yes

5

50%

No

1

10%

Fifty percentage of the doctors feel that the

modification of the I.M.C.

Act will make

ten percent disagree on this point;

it adequate;

forty percent

remained silent.

c.

The suggestions brought out by the doctors towards
the modification of the

I.M.C.

Act;

«

Power to fine and awared damages.

.

Power to monitor the professional competence of
the doctors.

.

Power to have more control over the private
and nursing homes where

standard

and

clinics

quality need

to be ensured.
.

Power to monitor the C.P.A.
monitoring the

instead of C.P.A.

I.M.C.

.... 201

: 201

10.

Have faced problem in managing patiants because of

C.P.A.

Yes

0

0

No

10

100%

None

of the doctors who

responded seem to have

faced any problem in managing patients because of C.P.A.

11.

Pleasures taken towards self protection

.

Proper explanation to the patient,

providing the

patient with all the necessary information
informed

and secure

consent.

.

Communicate to the patient in writing

.

Maintain the proper and essential medical records

.

Having the professional indemnity insurance.

.

Meeting the insurance cost by passing it on to the

patient.

12.

Main steps to avoid litigation and its effects in view

of C.P.A.
a.

provide proper explanation to the patient before and

after every treatment / procedure.

Hundred percent

of the doctors agree on this point.

• • • « 202

-

b.

:

202

:

Make ths patient consent before every procedure /

treatment.

Ninety percent of

the doctors are con­

vinced of this need.

c.

Seventy percent of
honesty with

d.

the doctors feel sincerity and

the patient is the step

that

will really

lead you away from litigation

and its effects.

Regular visits to the patient

to ensure that he is

comfortable and gets all care.

Sixty percent of the

doctors think in this way.

e.

Provide emergency treatment and then
to more

refer the patient

Sixty percent of the doctors

competent persons.

think it is a good step to be taken.

f.

Avoid taking risks,

consult other doctors and

the patients to the other specialists.

refer

Only forty

percent of the doctors favour this idea.

13.

a.

C.P.A.

will improve the

standard of medical profession

and the quality of service

Yes

3

30%

No

5

50%

To an extent yes

2

20%

203

;

20?

Thirty percent of the doctors are of the
opinion that C.P.A.

will improve

medical profession and the

the

standard of

quality of

services.

Twenty percent feel that it will improve the

dard and the

stan­

quality in the field to an extent while

fifty percent strongly disagree.

b.

Those who are of the opinion that it will improve
the standard of the medical profession and the quality

of service,

.

C.P.A.

support the statement by saying that,

will make the doctors alert,

Vigilent,
exercise

responsible,

accountable;

careful,

they will

better judgement and reasonable degree

of care in their decisions and treatment of the
patient.


They are convinced that it is an ideal means to check
the

c.

quacks and

stop malpractice.

Those who differ on the point give their reasons:


C.P.A.

will be

the

rod and the doctor will be

always ruled by fear.

.

It has no control over the health care and the
medical profession

in the Government

sector.

204

204

.

It makes doctors to re sort to defensive

medicine.

14.

C.P.A.

will make doctors resort to defensive medicine

Yes

7

70%

No

3

30%

While

seventy percent of the doctors are con­

vinced that C.P.A.

will make them resort to defensive

thirty percent of them do not think so.

medicine,

The

remaining ten percent have not voiced their opinion.

15.

the

cost of medical care.

Very much

6

60%

To some extent

2

20%

Not at all

1

10%

C.P.A.

will increase

Sixty percent of the doctors strongly feel

that the C.P.A.

will increase the cost of medical care.

Twenty percent of them feel that it will increase the

cost only to some extent while ten percent do not think

that C.P.A.

will make

any difference in the medical care

where cost is concerned.
have not given

Tan percent of

the doctors

their view on the matter.

. 205

B3 of medical negligence
Radical negligence may assume a variety of forme.

1.

Negligence in diagnosis :

A proper diagnosis of the

illness is the first duty of a medical practitioner.
A wrong diagnosis leading to any injury to the patient

may invite liability in law.
2.

Negligence in diagnostic aide :

Adequate investigations

using acceptable means of diagnostic aids

necessary

for arriving at a proper diagnosis.

It may be necessary

to consult an expert in some cases.

If there is negli­

gence on the part of the practitioner to seek expert
advice in a given case, (e.g.: interpretation of an

x-ray film), the doctor may be held liable.

3.

Administration of drugs

Doctors and nurses have been

;

held liable tor negligent

administration of a drug

leading to death or injury of a patient.
4.

Failure to take precaution :

Every medical practitioner

is expected to take reasonable precaution in the treat­

ment of his / her patients.

There are certain drugs

which are known to cause adverse reaction to certain

patients.

Such drugs are to be administered only after

test dose has been administered.

Otherwise, the doctor

can be held liable for negligence.

5.

Consent of the patients : In a surgical ope ration or any
intervention on the body of a person, the written consent

of the person concerned is necessary if she/he is capable
of giving it.

If she/he is unable to give such a

consent, someone competent should be asked to do it on

his/her behalf.

If a surgeon operates upon a person

without or against the consent, he/she can be held legally

liable for negligence,

6.

Failure to give advice :

A doctor can be held legally

liable if, due to lack of reasonable skill and care,

he fails to give advice or undertake treatment which
was necessary in the circumstances.

An honest doctor

must either personally consult or refer his/her patient
to a more competent doctor if the practitioner cannot

arrive at a reasonable degree of certainty with regard

to proper diagnosis.
7.

The operation theatre ; A number of litigations emanate

from the operation theatre.

These cases mostly relate

to negligence in respect of activities connected with

the operation process such as :

of the theatre;

Unhygienic conditions

negligence with regard to the sterili­

sation of instruments, gloves, linen, etc.

Inadequate

preparation of the patient for the operation; leaving

sponges, forceps or other instruments inside the patient's
body; burns or other injuries caused in the course of
treatment / operation, etc.

ft person who holds himself out as a medical practitioner

impliedly undertakes that he

is possessed of the

skill and knowledge for tho purpose.

the patient certain duties,

a)

a duty of care

requisite

Such a person owes

namely,

in deciding whether to undertake

i-. case or not;
b)

a duty of care

in deciding what treatment

to give;

a duty of care in the administration of that

treatment
d)

and a duty of care in answering questions put

i

to him by the patient,

in circumstances in

U which he knows that the patient intends to rely
11

on his answer.

ft breach of these duties will support an action for

negligence oy the patient.

a.

Personal liability ;

Individual staff members are personally liable for
the consequences of their acts.

This liability is almost

always based on the principle of fault.

To be liable, the

person must have done something wrong or roust have failed

to do something that should have been done.
b.

Liability for employees and agents ;

Employers can be liable for the consequences of the
job-related acts of their employees or agents even if the

employer is not at fault personally.
c.

Institutional liability : Institutions can also be liable

for the consequences of breaches of duties owed directly to
the patients and others, such as the maintenance of buildings
and grounds, maintenance of equipments and furnitures, and

selection and supervision of employees and medical staff.

Vicarious liability
As a general rule a man is responsible I liable only

for his own act; but there are certain circumstances in

which a person is liable for the urong committed by others.

This is called Vicarious liability.

92

The Act says,

Consumer Protection Act ;

"Consumer

Protection Act is an Act to provide for better protection
of the interests of consumers and for that purpose to make

provision for the establishment of consumer councils and

other authorities for the settlement of consumer's disputes

and for matters connected therewith."

39

It provides for better protection of the interests
of consumers and for the purpose, makes provision for the

establishment of consumer councils and other authorities
for the settlement of consumer disputes and for matters

connected therewith.

"It seeks, inter alia,

to promote and protect the

right of

consumers such as;-

(a)

right to be informed about the quality,

the

potency,

purity,

standard,

quantity,

and price of goods to

protect the consumer against unfair trade practices;
( bj

the

right

to be protected against m..rketing or

goods unich are hazardous to

tne

life and

property;

rignt to be assured wherever possible,

accesss

to an authority of goods at competitive price*

(d)

the

right to be heard and to oe assured that

consu i<ers

interests will

receive due consideration

at appropriate forums;

(e)

the

right to seek redressal against unfair trade

practices or unscrupulous explanation of consumers*

and right to consumer education.
These objects are sought to be promoted and protected

by the Consumer Protection Council to be established
at the Central and State level.

Medical Negligence

Legal remedy

Criminal liability:(section 304A,IPC): Grossly rash or
grossly negligent act, which is proximate, direct or
substantive cause of patient's death.

Ciyil_liability:(sections 73 and 74 of Indian Contract

Act): Medical services rendered on payment of a fee.

Law of torts; Breach of contract, whether patient pays
or not.

Consumer Protection Act.

A

ft ,

AU

Ui.

sv, u^. A n^v^:
V/»

yAxJscvuxtv^

MS. 'j»0>J*i*<£

WT. 4A^WX^xCa^<X<jl*sx«^
?Je

(ey>

Itr krJ^

AsKuZtix^£ . N'c^tc^eAAjt*

zv^|lxZSja.

: 205

16.

Sincere

reaction to the patients who may sue the

doctor
Some of the doctors who expressed their reaction

to the patient who may sue them stated ;
.

I

will accept the fault

if

I am guilty.

If not,

I will counter sue him in the civil court.

I will tepch him a lesson

.

by not attending to him

t he reaf te r.

This is not going to bother my life.

.

I will carry

on with my work.

Why should

.

17.

I worry if

I carry a clear conscience?

.

I will be polite but will react legally.

.

I

will defend myself in the court.

Other comments and
.

ft

suggestions

"Legal Cell" of medical professionals must be

formed to fight the lawyers who support the C.P.ft.
for whom it is a good source of

income.

.

More discussions before legislation.

.

C.P.ft.

in itself is good.

But the discrimination

makes it bad.
.

Include doctors in the panel.

.

C.P.ft.

is good if properly used.

•••206

-

: 206

t

-

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESPONSES OBTAINED FROM THE

DOCTORS OF HOSPITAL 'A'

1:

a.

,

' B'

AND

'C'.

Medical negligence is a major problem in the

[

!
Hospital A

!
Hospital B '

country

Hospital C

'Total
Responses;
o b t a in e d

10

60

i

—;

Sample

Size

30

20

Ye s

16

5 3. 3%

10

50%

7

70%

33

55%

No

14

46.7%

10

50%

3

30%

27

45%

While comparing the opinions of the doctors from the
three hospitals,

it is evident that the doctors in hospital

'c'

seem to consider that medical negligence ig a major problem
in the country,

and

'B*

much more than the doctors in hospitals 'A'

which are more

or less

on the same level.

whole majority of the doctors (fifty five percent)

On the

think that

the medical negligence is a major problem in the country.

b.

Aware

of the legal provisions in case of medical negligence
Hospital A

Hospital B

Hospital C

30

20

10

Sample size

Total
Responses
obtained

60

I

To great
extent

8

26.7%

7

35%

2

20%

17

28. 3%:

Somewhat

18

60ft

11

55%

5

50%

34

56.7%

Not much

4

13.3%

2

10%

3

30%

9

15%

.. .207

-

: 207

:

"

Majority of the doctors are somewhat aware of

legal provisions in case

seven percent of

of medical negligence.

them in total have

Fifteen percent of

About fifty

some idea about it.

Twenty eight percent of them are aware of it,

extent.

the

to

them do not seem to

a great

know much

about it.

2.

Aware of the provisions of C.P.A.

as it affects the

medical profession.

Hospital A

Hospital B

Hospital C

<3o

Sample size

Total
Re sponse s

(C

To great
extent

12

40%

9

45%

3

30%

24

40%

Somewhat

15

0 0^6

8

40%

5

5 0%

28

46.7%

3

10%

3

15%

2

20%

8

3. 3%

Not much
_____________

Comparison' of the doctors'

of C.P.A.

awareness of the provision

as it affectsthe medical profession

half of them (46.7%)

are somewhat aware only.

are aware of it to a great extent;

shows that about
Forty percent

13.3% do not know much

about it.

208

:

208

!

"

Impact of C.E.A. on medical profes sion
I
I
I
I
Ho spital A ■ Hospital B | Hospital C
i

p.
I

j-

Sample
I

size

30

20

Total
Re sp on se s

10

60

Good

6

20%

4

20%

3

30%

13

21.5%

Fair

17

66.7%

8

40%

6

6 0%

31

51.7%

Bad

7

2 3. 3%

8

40%

1

10%

16

26.7%

Majority of

the doctors in all three hospitals consider

the impact of C.P.A.

on the medical profession to be fair.

21.6/o of thorn view it as good;

On the

seems to be

C.P.A.

4.

the

whole,

26.7% considers it as bad.

on the medical profession

impact of C.P.A.

rather encouraging.

will affect the doctor-patient relationship
Hospital A

Hospital 8
______ ___ ____

Hospital C

20

10

feample size

s

;No

Total
Responses i

60

17

56.7%

15

75%

5 -:

50%

37

61.7%

13

4a.3%

5

25%

5

5 0%

23

38.3%

A majority of doctors in total think that C.P.A.

affect their relationship with their patients.

'B'

will

In hospital

seventy five percentage of them are convinced that it is

going to affect their relationship

in Hospital ' f\'

,

with their patients.

'.Jhile

in the

in

smaller majority feels

same

way,

Hospital 'C',

there is an equal division in the way they think

about C.P.A.

On the

whole,

majority of them reveal concern.

209

;

:

209

Those who thought that C.P.A.



with their patients,

their relationship

said that because

they will be forced to resort to defensive medi­

of C.P.A.,

cine,

is going to affect

avoid taking risks and they will have

an unnatural

relationship with their patients.

5.

a.

membership in I.PI.A.
Hospital A

Hospital 8

Hospital C

Total
Responses

Zo

Io

Go

So

Sample Size
Ye s

13

4 3. 3%

17

85%

5

50%

35

58.3%

No

17

56.7%

3

15%

5

50%

25

41.7%

Comparative responses of

the doctors from the three

hospitals indicates that 58.3% of the doctors in total are
members of the Indian medical Association while 41.7% do not

belong to this association.

b.

In favour of the application of C.P.A.

to the medical

p rofession

Sample

Hospital A

Hospital B

Hospital C

30

20

10

size

Tot al
Responses
60

I

Yes

17

56.7%

13

65%

4

40%

34

56.7%

No

13

43. 3%

7

35%

6

60%

26

4 3. 3%

210

210

This question was answered by every doctor to whom

the questionnaires were administered.

(56.7%)

Majority of them

are in favour of the application of C.P.A.

the medical profession.

There is still a rather big

opposition to it by the doctors as 43.3% of

the application of C.P.A.

6 a.

to

them are against

to the medical profession.

Professional indemnity insurance individually
Hospital A

Sample

Hospital B

Hospital C

fo

Zo

size

T ot al
Re sponse s

Ye s

9

30%

4

20%

3

30%

16

26.7%

No

21

70%

16

80%

7

70%

44

73.3%

On the whole,

there is a very small percent of the

totic

doctors^are insured individually and have the professional
indemnity insurance against medical negligence.

26.7% of

them have professional indemnity insurance while 73.3% are

without it.

b.

Professional indemnity insurance through the

Sample

institution

Hospital A

Hospital B

Hospital C

Total
Resoonses

30

20

10

60

size

Yes

30

No

0

100%

0

20

0
100%

10

100%

211

30

50%

30

5 0%

: 211

The

comparative

only hospital 'a'

study of

the

responses revealed that

has provided its doctors with professional

indemnity insurance while hospitals

and 'c'

' B'

have not

covered their doctors with professional indemnity insurance.

c.

Feel the need to be

insured

Hospital A
Sample size

Hospital B

30

Hospital 0

Total
responses

10

60

20

Yes

12

40%

18

90%

5

50%

35

58.3%

No

1

3. 3%

2

10%

1

10%

/

6,7%

Only sixty five percent of the doctors responded;
majority of them feel the need to have the professional indem­
nity insurance.

Only 6.7% have expressed that they do not

feel the need for it.

d.

Insurance premium against medical negligence
Hospital A

Sample

Hospital B

30

size

;

Hospital C

20

Total
Responses

10

60

Very high

6

20%

2

10%

2

20%

10

16.7%

Re asonable

18

60%

11

55%

5

50%

34

56.7%

212

-

: 212

Almost 27% of the? doctors have not

how they feel about

negligence.

the insurance premium against medical

16.7% of doctors feel it is very highj

of the doctors feel it

7.

C.P.A.

responded as to

56.7%

is reasonable.

affects the professional freedom
Hospital A

Hospital 8

Hospital C

Total
response

30

20

10

60

Sample size
Yes

18

60%

19

95%

5

50%

42

No

12

40%

1

5%

5

50%

18

Every doctor has responded to this question.
whole,

grand majority of them (seventy percent)

that C.P.A.

professional freedom,

|

On the

the

remaining

does not come on their

Since such a big majority of them

30%

of them think

affects their professional freedom;

thirty percent feel that C.P.A.

70%

way.

feel that it affects their

it seems to be something that they are

sensitive.

8.

a.

C.P.A.

needs modification
Hospital A

Hospital B

Hospital C

Total
responses

30

20



60

Sample size

Yes

24

80%

19

No

1

3. 3%

0

95%

7

70%

50

83. 3%

2

20%

3

5%

213

! 213

The doctors of theso three hospitals feel that
C.P.A.

needs modification.

On the whole,

doctors feel that modification of C.P.A.

83.3% of

the

is a must while only

five percentage of them do not feel the need for it.
of the doc ors have not

such a big majority of

for modification of

responded to the

question.

11.7%
Since

them are so convinced of the need

the C.P.A,,

it will be good to look into

the matter and thus ensure the co-operation of

the medical

p rofessionals.

There were many suggestions with regard to the modifi­

b.

cation of C.P.A.

.

To include the medical professionals in the panel.

.

To include the Government hospitals and its doctors
also within the boundaries of the C.P.A.
reputation of the doctor concerned.

.

To protect the

.

To make provisions for the compensation of doctors by
the patient if the doctor is not proved to be negligent.

9.

a.

I.Fl.C.

can handle the problem of medical negligence

_________ efficiently_____________________________________________________
Total
Responses
Hospital A
Hospital B
Hospital C

30

Sample size

60

10

20

Ye s

13

43.3%

8

40*

5

50%

26

43, 3%

No

16

5 3. 3%

12

60%

5

50%

33

55%

214



When looked at
that majority

to handle

ciently.

43.3%

the

I.M.C.

the

it is evident

responses together,

of the doctors feel that the

(55%)

not able

214

I.M.C.

is

the problems of medical negligence effi­

of

the doctors in

total are convinced that
A small percent of 1.7^

can handle them well.

remains silent on the subject.

b.
I

Modification will make the

I.M.C.

Act adequate

...

Hospital A

Hospital B

Hospital C

Total
responses

30

20

10

60

Sample size
Ye s

8

26.7%

11

55%

5

50%

24

40%

No

8

26.7%

3

15%

1

10%

12

20%

Forty percent of the doctors feel that modification will
make the

I.M.C.

Act adequate.

to contradict this statement.

There are only twenty percent

Forty percent of the doctors

abstained.

c.

Those

who felt that the modification of

the

I.M.C.

Act

will make it efficient to handle the problem of medical negli­

gence adequately have made

a few suggestions.

IMC must have

power to ;
and also award damages;

.

Fine

.

Monitor the professional competence of

the doctors;

.215



.

.

: 215

monitor and maintain the standard and quality especially

in the private clinics and nursing homes;
control and provide admissions only on merit and never
on capitation fee which is the

in the medical profession;

control and handle

root cause of the tragedy

and

the quacks who spoil the medical pro­

fession.

10.

Have faced problems in managing patients

Hospital A

Hospital B

30

Sample size

Hospital C

1

3.3%

0

No

29

96.7%

19

Total
responses

10

20

Ye s

because of C.P.B.

60

0

95%

10

100%

1

1.7%

58

96.7%

A very small percentage of the doctors seem to have faced

problem in managing patients because of C.P.A.

96^7% of the

doctors never seem to have faced any problem in managing patient
because of C.P.A.

against just 1.7% of doctors who have faced

the problem.

11.

The doctors

responded that the measures that they have

taken to protect themselves from facing problem in managing
patients because of

.

C.P.A.

are :

Explaining everything required and providing the patients
with all the necessary information regarding the disease,
the treatment

required and also about the expected prognosis.

.216

s

216

:

By communicating to the patient in writing.
By raising the professional fee

to meet the insurance

cost.

12.

In view of

the Consumer Protection Act,

some of

the

steps

that can help in avoiding litigations and its effects in the
order of preference by the doctors

as follows

three hospitals are

of the

:

Hospital
A
Sample size

Hospital
B

Hospital
C

Total
responses

20

10

60

30

1)
Provide proper
explanation to the
patient before and
after each treatmer t/
28
p rocedu re.

9 3. 3%

17

85%

10

100%

55

91.7%

2)
Make the patier t
consent before any
treatment/p rocedure 26

86.7%

16

80%

9

90%

45

75%

3) Regular visits
to the patient to
make sure that he
is comfortable and
gets all the care

20

66.7%

14

70%

6

60%

40

66.7%

4) Avoid taking
any risk.................
consult others
and refer to the
specialists

19

6 3. 3%

13

65%

4

40%

36

6 0%

5) Provide the
emergency treat­
ment and then refe:
the patient to
other specialists

10

5 3. 3%

9

45%

I 6

60%

25

41.7%

217

:

b)

Suggestions added

.

21?

:

by the doctors are

maintain oroper medical records,

:

audit

and self assess­

ment;

.

provide good

.

maintain good

treatment;

rapport with the patients

and their

relatives; and
.

"13.

a.

bp sincere

C.P.A,

and

and honest with the patients always.

will improve the

standard of medical profession

quality of services
Hospital A

Hospital B

Hospital C

Total
Responses

30

20

10

60

Sample size
Ye s

6

20%

3

15%

3

30%

12

20%

No

5

16.7%

3

15%

5

50%

13

21.7%

To an extent,
ye s

17

56.7%

13

65%

2

20%

32

5 3. 3%

The comparative study of the

C.P.A.

responses indicates that

will improve the standard of medical profession and the

quality of services to some extent.

doctors (53.3%)

say that C.P.A.

quality to an extent only,
positive that C.P.A.

care.

21.7% of

statement.

will improve the standard and

20^> of them are convinced and are

will help

in the improvement of medical

the doctors do not

There

while the majority of

are also another

seem to agree with the
5% of the doctors who

,218

:

218

»

maintained their silence on the matter.

majority of

C.P.A.

these doctors

as a means to

raise

On

the

seem to be positive

whole,

a good

about the

standard of the medical nro-

the

fession and improve the quality.

b.

Those

uho said that it will improve the

medical profession and the

standard o£

quality of service strengthen their

opinion by the following suggestions.

.

C.P.A.

will make

responsible,

tho doctors more

careful,

vigilent,

accountable and prompt them to exercise

better judgement and use

reasonable

care

in their

decisions as well as treatment of the patients.

.

It will raise the standard by checking the

.

It will put a halt to the malpractices going on in

quacks.

the medical field today.
Above all,

.

c.

it will ensure the safety of the patients.

Those who were not convinced that C.P.A.
the

standard of medical profession and

will improve

service

quality of

give their reasons;
.

C.P.A.

is one siJed.

It leaves the Government sector

out of its purview and is hard on the private

sector

providing licence to the Government sector and its
doctors to do what they want.

.

it encourages the use of defensive medicine

indirectly.

....219

*• 219

It is a source of

big money for lawyers.

It makes the doctors to live in fear.

14.

C.P.A.

will make doctors resort to defensive medicines

Hospital A

Hospital 8

Hospital C

Ye s

24

80ft

20

7

70%

51

85%

No

5

16.7%

0

3

30%

8

13.3%

Total
responses

Sample size

100^

In total eighty five percentage of the doctors are very

strong on the point that C.P.A.
sive medicine.

will make them resort to defen­

It is only 13.3%

who think

the other way;

1.7% of the doctors do not say anything.

15.

C.P.A.

will increase

cost of medical care.

the

Hospital A

Hospital 8

30

20

Sample size

Total
Responses

Hospital C

10

60

Ve rymuch

14

46.7%

15

75%

6

60%

35

58.3%

To some extent

15

50%

5

25%

2

20%

32

36.7%

1

10%

1

1.7%

Not at all

The

0

0

responses of the doctors show that a majority of

them are of the opinion that C.P.A.
medical care.

While

will increase the

cost of

58.3% of them feel that it will be

increased very much,

a smaller percentage of them feel that

it will increase the

cost of medical care to some extent,

making a total of 95%.

There is only

1.7% to oppose the

...220

220

and 3.3% of the doctors have not responded.

two groups above

When the doctors were

16.

sincere
the

.

asked as to what would be

reaction to those patients who may sue

responses obtained from most of

If

I

am not wrong,

the doctor,

them are;

I will accept the punishment.

am wrong,

then

their

But

if

I

I will counter sue the patient in the

civil court.

.

I will first examine myself and see as to where

I had gone

wrong.
.

I will be polite but will defend myself.

.

I will have nothing more to do with the patient.

.

(*ly reaction will be legal.

.

The
made

law of the land is good enough unless I have

really

a blunder.

.

My reaction will be one of anger and disappointment.

.

I will use defensive medicine.

17.

Other comments and suggestions ;

tative ones
.

Formation of
the

,

The most

represen­

are ;
a legal cell of medical professionals to fight

lawyers who make money out of C.P.A.

Include doctors in the panel.

221

221

Increase

the awareness among doctors.

Out of court settlement without involving the

lawyers.

Nore discussion before legislation.
C.P.A.

as it

in itself is good,
is at present.

and doctors out of it,
and hospitals
C.P.A.

provided it is not one

sided

Keeping the Government hospitals
while

including private doctors

is not correct.

encourages defensive medicine.

222

222

RESPONSES OBTAINED FROM VARIOUS CATEGORIES OF DOCTORS
a)
l.

Medical negligence is a major problem in the country.

General
Surgery

General
Medicine

Specia­
lities

Anaesthe­
siology

O.B.Gyn.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

20

10

10

10

10

Yes

12(60%)

8(80%)

5(50%)

10(100%)

6(60%)

NO

8(40%)

2(20%)

5(50%)

0

4(40%)

No response

0

Sample size

b)Aware of the legal provisions in case of medical negligence.

To great extent 6(30%)

5(50%)

2(20%)

1(10%)

3(30%)

Somewhat

13(65%)

5(50%)

6(60%)

8(80%)

4(40%)

Not much

1(5%)

0

2(20%)

1(10%)

2(20%)

No response

0

0

0

0

1(10%)

1
i________
2.

Aware of the provisions of C.P.A as it affects the medical profession

To great extent 12(60%)

6(60%)

3(30%)

6(60%)

3(30%)

Some what

7(35%)

4(40%)

6(60%)

4(40%)

5(50%)

Not much

1(5%)

0

1(10%)

0

2(20%)

No response

0

0

0

0

0

223

• 22?

3.

The impact of C.P.A on medical profession
(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Sample size

20

10

10

10

10

Good

5(25%)

2(20%)

4(40%)

2(20%)

0

Fair

8(40%)

6(60%)

2(20%)

5(50%)

8(80%)

Bad

7(35%)

2(20%)

4(40%)

3(30%)

2(20%)

No response

0

0

0

0

0

f. -

----------------------------

4.a) The C.P.A will affect the doctor's relationship with his patients

Yes

15(75%)

6 (60%)

5(50%)

7(70%)

5(50%)

No

5(25%)

4(40%)

5(50%)

3(30%)

5(50%)

No response

0

0

0

0

0

b) If yes then how?
Resort to defensive medicine.

It makes the doctor

over conscious; Self protection; the doctor may lose his
human touch for the patient; Suspicion of every patient;

will be relectant to take risk; Result in unnatural doctor
patient relationship; Doctor may use negative medicine;

Profession will be made into a trade and business; will
become more meticulous about the details.

.224

S 224

5. a)/\ member of Indian Medical Association
(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

20

10

10

10

10

Yes

14(70%)

8(80%)

5(50%)

5(50%)

3(30%)

No

6(30%)

2(20%)

5(50%)

5(50%)

6(60%)

No response

0

0

0

0

0

Sample siae

b) In favour of the application of C.P.A to the service pendered

by the medical profession

Yes

10(50%)

6(60%)

2(20%).

7(70%)

6(60%)

No

10(50%)

4(40%)

8(80%)

3(30%)

2(20%)

No response

0

0

0

0

0

6. a) Have professional indemnity insurance individually

Yes

5(25%)

3(30%)

5(50%)

1.(10%)

3(30%)

No

15(75%)

7(70%)

5(50%)

9(90%)

7(70%)

No response

0

0

0

0

0

225

225

b) Have professional indemnity insurance through the Institution

—h
(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

20

10

10

10

10

Yes

12(60%)

6(60%)

10(100%)

7(70%)

6(60%)

No

6(30%)

4(40%)

0

3(30%)

3(30%)

No response

2(10%)

0

0

0

1(10%)

Sample size

i

c) Feel the need to be insured

Yes

11(55%)

7(70%)

4(40%)

3(30%)

3(30%)

No

9(45%)

0

0

0

1(10%)

No response

0

3(30%)

6(60%)

7(70%)

6(60%)

d) Insurance premium against medical negligence is

Very high

5(25%)

3(30%)

2(20%)

1 (10%)

1 (10%)

Reasonable

15(75%)

7 (70%)

8(80%)

4(40%)

6(60%)

No response

0

0

5(50%)

3(30%)

0


226

: 226

7.

C.P.A affect the professional freedom

1 ■

■ ■■

"

*

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Sample size

20

10

10

10

10

Yes

16(80%)

7 (70%)

5(50%)

9(90%)

6(60%)

NO

4(20%)

3(30%)

5(50%)

1 (10%)

4 (40%)

No response

0

0

0

0

0

v

8.a) C.P.A needs modification (if appliable to medical profession)
■ ■■ — -■ ■ .

V
Yes

19(95%)

10(100%)

8(80%)

3(30%)

10(100%)

No

1(5%)

0

2

0

0

No response

0

0

0

7(70%)

0

b)

Modifications to the C.P.A suggested by the doctors for C.P.A

- Include doctors in the panel - Maintain anonymity till the
judgement to protect the reputation of the concerned doctor.

Include the Government hospitals and doctors also under the
purview of C.P.A.

If patient loses the case, then doctor

must be paid the compensation.

frivolous complaints.

Penalty must be imposed on

Final verdict for the midical

negligence must be by the medio-legal experts.

227

• 227

9. a) I.M.C. has the ability and authority to handle the problems

of medical negligence upto the expectations of the patients
and doctors (adequately)



1--------------------------------

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

20

10

10

10

10

Yes

9(45%)

4(40%)

4(40%)

6(60%)

5(50%)

No

11(55%)

6(60%)

6(60%)

4(40%)

4(40%)

No response

0

0

0

0

1 (10%)

Sample size

b) Modification to the Act will make it adequate (the Medical

Council Act)

Yes

9(45%)

6(60%)

5(50%)

3(30%)

3(30%)

No

4(20%)

2(20%)

4(40%)

1(10%)

2(20%)

No response

7(35%)

2(20%)

1(10%)

6(60%)

5(50%)

c)

The modification suggested by the doctors to the Medical
Council Act.
- Power to fine and award the damages - C.P.A should be
monitored by the I.M.C.

Medical Council should

monitor

228

: 228

the professional competency of the doctors.

Should ensure

quality doctors by abolishing capitation fee and ensuring
admissions to M.B.B.S. purely on merit.

The present system

in the country guarantees rotten doctors.

More supervision to

ensure proper standard and quality in the private clinics and

nursing homes.

Check the quacks from time to time and punish

them properly.
10.

11.

Have faced problems in managing patients because of C.P.A.

(1)

i......
(2>

(3)

(4)

(5)

Sample size

20

10

10

10

10

Yes

1(5%)

0

1(10%)

0

0

No

19(95%)

9(90%)

10(100%)

9(90%)

No response

0

0

1 (10%)

10(100%)
0

0

Ip

The measures taken by the doctor to protect himself:

Lot of trouble is taken to explain everything to the
patient and relatives regarding the treatment, the future and

the prognosis.

To err on the side of conservatism.

to the patient in writing.

Communicate

Raising the professional fee to

meet the insurance cost.

...229

-

:

229

f

"

12. In view of C.P.A possible steps is avoid litigations and
its effects:

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

l<»

20

10

10

10

10

a. Provide proper
explanation to
the patient/
relatives

20(100%)

9(90%)

9(90%)

9(90%)

8(80%)

b. Make sure that
the patient is
comfortable

10(50%)

9(90%)

6(60%)

6(60%)

6(60%)

c. Consent of the
patient before
treatment

20(100%) ' 9(90%)

6(60%)

9(90%)

7(70%)

d. Avoid taking
any risk

14(70%)

5(50%)

5(50%)

7(70%)

5(50%)

e. Meet the emer­
gency and then
refer to the
specialists

10(50%)

6(60%)

4(40%)

5(50%)

1(10%)

Sample size

f. Suggestions added:-

self assessment.

Maintain proper medical records and regular

Excellent patient rapport is the single most

important factor to prevent patient resorting to the C.P.A.
Be sincere and honest with the patients.

Provide proper treat­

ment; everything else will be covered by it.

250

I
-

|

I
1

13. a)

: 230

J

-

C.P.A will improve the standard of medical profession and

quality of health care services.

i

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

20

10

10

10

10

Yes

5(25%)

0

4(40%)

2(20%)

1 (10%)

No

4(20%)

2(20%)

2(20%)

2(20%)

0

To,an extent
yes

11(55%)

8(80%)

4(40%)

6(60%)

7(70%)

No response

0

0

0

0

2(20%)

Sample size

b) If yes how?
Doctors will be more careful, vigilant, responsible

and accountable and exercise better judgement in their

decisions and treatments.

Fear of the 'rod’ will make the doctors more reasonable.
It will be a means to check the unethical and poor quality of
medical care/services provided in the private clinics and
nursing homes.

It is an ideal means to check the quacks.

It will help to improve the quality of care given to the
patients.

C.P.A will enable quality control in the field of

medical profession and in the lives of medical persons and

health care service as a whole.

*

231

c. If no. Why?

The medical persons will be ruled by fear.

It does

not have any control over the Government hospitals and
Government docotrs.

Most of the problems and malpractices

are at the primary health care system which mainly is

composed of quacks.

Check them first and malpractices

C.P.A does nothing to improve

will go down significantly.

the standard of medical profession.

It encourages

defensive medicine.
14.

C.P.A will make doctors resort to defensive madicine.
(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

20

10

10

10

10

Yes

18(90%)

9(90%)

8(80%)

8(80%)

8(80%)

NO

2(10%)

1(10%)

2(20%)

2(20%)

1(10%)

No response

0

0

0

0

1(10%)

Sample size

232

~

: 2J2



"

15. C.P.A will increase the cost of medical care.

16.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Sample

20

10

10

10

10

Very much

12(60%)

6(60%)

6(60%)

7(70%)

4(40%)

To some extent

7(35%)

4(40%)

3(30%)

3(30%)

6(60%)

No at all

1(5%)

0

0

0

0

No response

0

0

1(10%)

0

0

Sincere reaction of doctor to a patient who may sue him for

professional negligence.

- If I am wrong I will accept the punishment,

If I am not at

fault I will counter sue the patient in the law court.

My

attitude will be "think before you sue; Is it really negligence?"
I have done my best and I will not bother myself furter; I

will defend myself and resort to defensive medicines.

The

law in the country is good enough to protect me unless I am

really at fault.
went woong.

I will examine myself and see where I really

I will be polite.

My reaction will be legal.

My reaction will be anger and disappointment.

17.

Other comments and suggestions on the topic:
Out of court settlement by the I.M.A without going

. 233



2JJ

!

to the court and involving a lawyer.
More discussions before legislation
C.P.A in itself is good, but it must be extended

to the Government hospitals and Government doctors also.
Awareness among the doctors should be increased.

Include doctors/medical experts in the panel.

C.P.A is good if properly used.

C.P.A encourages use of defensive medicine.
A "Legal Cell" of medical professionals must be

formed to fight the lawyers who support the C.P.A for whom

it is a good source of income.

234

CHAPTER VII

DISCUSSION.

! 234

CHAPTER VII
DISCUSSION

Man’s wants are unlimited, the means are very limited;If we analyse our every day life and the present situation,
it becomes evidence that there is a limit to man’s NEEDS but

not for his GREED.

This greed is the root cause of most of

the malpractices that are going on today.

A close observation

of the present time realities gives an impression that everyone
in every walk of life is competing with each other, aiming not

x/

A

necessarily at excellence, but often in some or the other kind
of malpractice;'

As a result people get cheated by somebody or

Malpractice affects both tjie good and the bad." It

the other.

looks as though malpractice has become part of life and routine
of the day with its roots reaching deep into almost all
professions;-

"The deterioration of standards in the medical profession
is but a reflection of the deterioration of standards in

other professions and in the all-pervading public life of our

country;

A



Excessive greed, and the pursuit of money rather than

the pursuit of excellence, alone appears to be operating as a
motivating force in all our walks of life;-

Independence,

achieved in 1947 as a result of sacrifices in the long-drawnout freedom struggle, is misconstrued to mean licence to pursue

utterly selfish ends in disregard of any limitations thereon5?

... 235

:

255

The sense of accountability is rapidly on the wane in the
performance not only of the medical and legal professions,
but judicial, engineering, architectural, constructional

and business fields also.-

The rempant un account ability

displayed by the politicians who are otherwise supposed to
be the leaders of society, appears to be maihly responsible
for this deterioration."

(1)

There is no profession under creation that is not

noble, although the degree of nobility varies from profession
to profession depending on the amount of dedication put into

it by the professionals1.-

Every profession is a calling or a

vocation and its upgradation/degradation depends on its

professionals; by the way they go about with and within the

professions

Where medical profession is concerned, it is not

only a calling, but it is also a real challange.

Certainly

it is a junction where opportunities, responsibilities,
obligations and devotions meet together.

In fact all these

are the necessary characteristics of a medical professional
who profess himself/herself bythe sacred Hippocratic oath

whereby he/she proclaims to the world that the object of his/
her calling is to make health and not merely money.!
"If Physician lives upto the professional ideals and

strictly observes the code of ethics embodied in the Hippo­
cratic oath he may well conclude his days in poverty. If he

....236

• 236

acts like a businessman, he can acquire a big bank account

and a large estate within a few years but will furnish ample

ammunition for complaints about commercialization in the
medical practice.*1 (2)

Unlike any other profession, medical profession is a
demanding one.

One needs tremendous courage, determination

and also dedication to live upto its demands.

It is a unique

profession in which the professional gives himself/herself ,
his time, energy and entertainment.

It is a profession in

which the professional cannot own time as his own.>

Yet as

Dr. Lele says those who belong to this profession are doubly
blessed because, they earn good money as in any other

profession and even more-important they earn the everlasting
gratitude of those whom they are privileged to serve and care

for?
"Doctors have several ethical, moral and legal obligations

in the performance of their duties.

It is very important1?

therefore, that every doctor understands the nature of these

obligations and then fulfil these obligations to the best of
their ability; Further, all doctors should know about medico­
legal cases and the procedures to be adopted in them?" (3)

1. Negligence
Apart from the malpractices/arising out of greed, there are

many problems due to negligence.

The doctor or the health care

' 237

: 2J7

institution fails in discharging the duty of care. They then
become liable to be sued for negligence and damages, if harm

has been caused by the negligence.
a) Awareness; The findings from the survey of the opinions of
doctors and administrators show that the majority of doctors

and all the hospital authorities are aware of it which is a

good sign because only where

there is awareness there is chance

to be more careful?.1';

b) It js 3 maior problem;

There is difference of opinion as to

whether medical negligence is a major problem in the country?
The number of cases in the courts show that it is a major

problem (all cases of negligence do not come to the court).
Yet only 50% of the specialists consider medical negligence as
a major problem?

c) beqal provisions: Awareness of the legal provisions varied
between the doctors of the three hospitals. Most of them (85%)

were either somewhat or well aware of the legal provisions. It

is necessary that all the doctors should be fully aware of the

legal implications.

Probably seminars/workshops on medical

negligence and legal provisions might help to create awareness

of tie legal provisions?
2.a) Consumer Protection Act

According to Consumer Protection Act, consumers are

persons who buy goods or hire services for a consideration'?

As far as medical profession and health care institutions are

238

! 258

concerned, consumers are the patients who avail the services

of the medical professionals and hospitals/clinics/nursing

homes, etc. Services of any description made available to the

user, except the exempted categories, come under the purview
of the Consumer Protection Act.

Thus the Act includes services

rendered by the medical professionals and the health care
institutions who make their services available to the public
and are taking a remuneration.

They are therefore liable to

pay condensation if there is deficiency in their services and

harm results^
"The Consumer Protection Act (1986) opened up more avenues

for ordinary citizens wishing to take legal action,

Tiis Act

gave the Consumers the sanction to d irectly take up issues in

order that their grievences might be redressed.

The Act

gurantees certain rights to the citizens such as right to seek

redressal or the right to be heard before a court of LaW*.1 This

Act covers goods as well as services and has even made govern­
ment services answerable before law."(4)
The information gathered from tie questionnaires answered

by the doctors and hospital administrators gives a clear
indication that both these categories of people are very much

aware of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 4s it

affects the medical profession.

While 48% of the doctors are

only somewhat aware of it, 4o% of them are aware of it to a

great extent;’;

Both hospital wise as well as category wise the

239

: 239

doctors' response show that a great majority are aware of
the provisions of C.P.A. as it affects the medial profession

and health care institutions.

AH the administrators and 87%

of the doctors seem to be aware of it in varying extent which
is a sign that the medical profession is alert to the problem.-'

b) Impact qp the profession :

In general about 80% of the

doctors view the impact of C.P.A. on the medical profession
to be fairly good which indicates that there is certain amount
of appreciation of the C.P.A. by the doctors/medical profession.
The medical professionals and the health care institutions
who consider C.P.A. as an opportunity to maintain their values

and improve their standard, will be more careful and avoid

negligence to the extent they are avoidable’?

3. P£&yg.]-gnce Q.f-jneJical. pegliggjTfig.
Medical negligence is very much prevalent today. AH tie
administrators have faced cases of medical negligence in the
past.

Two of them had two cases each and the third one had

three cases within the past one year itself which is a proof

to this fact that the medical negligence is a major problem in
the country.

There is a contradiction on this aspect as the

doctors' responses show that only the smallest possible percent
of the doctors (1.7%) have faced problem in managing patients

because of C.P.A. This shows that the responders never had any
cases of medical negligence-.-

Though there is no separate data

240

240

available regarding the medical negligence

cases in the

State Commission, the available data of negligence in general

indicates that negligence is on the increase which certainly
gives reasons for great concern.

Information obtained at my visit to the Karnataka State

Consumer Disputed Redressal Commission, Basava Bhavan,Bangalore

and the discussion held with a reliable authority there was
very much enlightening regarding the present situation.

In

the State of Karnataka four district forums and the State
Commission started functioning in September 1989.

By 1991

every district in Karnataka has its own Consumer Forum.'
KAfUATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE
COMPLAINTS

YEAR

NO. OF COMPLAINTS
FILED

NO.OF COMPLAINTS
DISPOSED

NO.OF COMPLAINTS
PENDING

1990

133

123

10

1991

230

175

55

1992

340

63

177

1993

172

33

139

875

394

4 81

Totals

241

241 • •

APE ALS
YEAR

NO.OF APPEALS
FILED

NO. OF APPEALS
DISPOSED

NO. OF APPEALS
PENDING

1990

68

67

1

1991

165

139

26

1992

421

194

227

1993

322

45

277

TOTAL

976

445

531

As per the statistics available, it is clear that on an
average, about 218/75 complaints and 244 appeals are filed per

year with the State Commission, which shows that there were

comparatively less number of claims above Rs. One lakh in the

State.

The Commission was able to dispose of, on an average,

98.5 i.e. 45% of complaints and 111.25 i.e., 46% of appeals
every year.

now.

55% of complaints and 54% of appeals are pending

This does not give a good picture of the C.P.A. in its

implementation and functioning/
Statement showing the details of complaints filed in the

District Consumers Redressal Forums and disposed off by them
during the month of May 1993/

SL.
NO.

NAME OF THE
DCDRFs

01.

Bangalore (U)*

02.

Bangalore (R)

03.

Kolar

O.B.

RECEIPTS

----Not

TOTAL DISPOSAL PENDING

available -----

33

6

29

1

28

137

18

155

16

139

242

242

N0-

NAME OF THE
DLDRFs

04. Tumkur

O.B.

RECEIPTS

TOTAL

DE POSAL

PENDING

199

45

244

25

219

--

05. Chitradurga

. Not available

----

06. Shimoga

89

14

103

12

91

07. Mandya

72

11

83

25

58

08. D.Kannada

433

33

466

36

430

09. Kodagu

40

10

50



50

10. Hassan

333

6

339

5

334

11. Chickmagalur

144

7

151

9

142

12. Dharwad

146

39

185

23

162

13. U.Kannada

95

7

102

23

79

14. Raichur

98

7

105

4

101

15. Be 11ary

61

7

68

5

63

16. Bidar

— --

17. Mysore

677

24

701

11

690

18. Gulbarga

69

9

78

17

61

19. Belgaum

Not available

- -- Not

—— !«■ — —

available —————

20. Bijapur

113

15

128

5

123

TOTAL

2729

258

2987

217

2770

* The number of pending and new cases are so many in the

Bangalore Urban Forum that it has been decided to have one
more district forum (Deccan Herald, August 1, 199 3 )v

245

:

243

The statistics of May 1993 shows that in the beginning

of the month, there were already 2729 complaints in total that
were pending from the previous time and 258 new complaints,

totalling 2987 complaints to be attended to.

Out of these,

only 217, i.e., 7.3% complaints were disposed of in total,'

during the month; and 2770, i.e. ,92.7% were pending for the
next month.

C.P.A. was passed by the Parliament to provide easy, speedy

and cheap redressal to the Consumer.

But the study on the

findings (the statistics) and the information regarding the

implentation of C.P.A. (District forums and State Commissions)
in Karnataka at least^seem to belie the purpose.

this deficiency is due to lack of personnel.

It seems that

During the course

of discussion, one could learn that there are vacancies, but

the posts are not filled in; as a result, the work suffers, the
outcome of which is evident in the statistics.

According to the information received from a reliable
authority in the State Commission, at present there are 6-7

thousand cases pending in the district forum (Kaveri Bhavan),
but not enough personnel to attend to all of them in time;’

This again proves that the purpose of the Consumer Courts
are being defeated.

If it moves with this speed, then it will

not be able to prove to be any better or different form the

Civil Courts and Criminal Courts^

244

:

-

244

s

-

After the amendment of the Consumer Protection Act was

passed on the 18th June 1993, the State Commissions are given
the power of administrative control of the district forums,

which should improve the efficiency of district forums.

If not,

C.P.A. will be just another piece or ineffective laws in our
Country;
Under the amended rule, now the Consumers have to file the

complaints within one year from the date on which the cause of
Action has arisen (given in the Consumer Protection (amendment)
Ordinance 1993. pg;lo).
to a certain extent.

This may reduce the number of complaints

The same

amendment ordinance 1993 says

that the amount of compensation upto Rs.Five lakhs is to be
handled by the district forum and Rs.5o ,0001 to 2}00,000 is to

be handled by the State Commission and above Rs. 20,00000/-

by the National Commission.

This is going to increase

work

load of the district forum as well as the State Commission. Yet

another amended rule on page n of the same ordinance says that
the complaints that are frivolous or vexations will be dismissed
and the complainant will be penalised by paying to the opposite party

the cost incurred but not more than Rs. 10,000/-.
It was not possible to get specific information regarding

cases of medical negligence that were filed in the Consumer
courts as they are n<±

maintained separately.

A sizeable number

may be on medical negligence.

245

:

: 245

-

The survey conducted also gives the impression that although

there are some among the medical professionals who consider the
Consumer Protection Act as a threat to them and so certain amount

of resistance can be expected from t hem.:

But a good majority of

them consider C.P.A. as an opportunity.

Some of them, who seem

to be open minded, upright and patient oriented, welcome C.P.A.
as a blessing to the medical profession to retrieve and retain

their original values and standard.

Most of the doctors and

hospital authorities seem to belong here which is a good sigi;

4. Doctor Pat jept relationship.
In the past doctor-patient relationship was characterised

by the ethics pf trust.

But it seems to have been lost on the

wayside with passing of time.-

The survey indicates that over

60% of the doctors are positive that C.P.A. will affect their

relationship;

Among the doctors 75% of the General Surgeons

and 70% of the Anaesthetists^are whojf eel this way.

Anyway, it

is not a good attitude from the part of the doctors to consider

Consumer Protection Act in this manner.

Yet when such a big

majority of them feel thus, there is need to take this into
earnest consideration.
There are four ways of maintaining this doctor-patient

relationship.

1) Where the doctor provides the patients the necessary
information which will encourage the patient to give his consent

....246

: 246

so that the doctor can do for him whatever he thinks best. It

is known as the paternalistic TOdej.
2) Interpretative model is where the doctor is like a counsellor.

The doctor assists the patient to select the kind of treatment

he wants and it is the patient who really determines or decides
as to which treatment is to be given;1

3) Informative mpdej, wherein

doctor provides the patient all

the relevant information and available facts and the patient then
decides as to what treatment is to be given.

4) Deljberatjve mode?-'**

where the doctor is like a teacher/guide,

who indicates w.hat the patient should do, but the patient has
their right to Consider the type of treatment he/she wants after

weighing the pros and cons'-;

In the study conducted, a majority of doctors i.e. 62%
of them think t hat C.P.A. will affect their relationship with

their patients and will curtail their professional freedom and
so on. Certainly there is no peace for the wicked.

It is

smoothing rather difficult to understand. These very same doctors

who had expressed that they have not faced any problem in managing

patients because of C.P.A. and that C.P.A. will improve the

standard of medical profession and the quality of services, etc.,
now say that C.P.A. will affect their relationship with their

patients.

There is a certain amount of contradiction here.

Perhaps those doctors who think it is going to affect their

.247

: 247

relationship fail to realise that this loss of trust is because

the ethics pf trust is

being replaced by the ethics pf right.

5. Defensive Medicine
Self defence is the very nature and characteristic of life.

Whether it is human/animal/plants, whenever there is a threat to
safety, one always tend to use defensive mechanism/measures. The
study conducted reveals that as far as the opinions of the medical

professionals are concerned, 85% of the doctors are very positive
that C.P.A. is going to make them (the doctors) resort to defensive

medicine.

90% of the General Surgeons and Physicians and 80% of

the other three categories of doctors are of this opinion.

If

the doctors are certain to have recourse to defensive medicine,

then certainly it is going to increase the cost of medical care?
There may be unnecessary, costly investigations.

The

doctors

may be reluctant to take up complicated cases. This means the very

purpose of the Consumer Protection Act is going to be defeated?

Indian Medical Association
M.A.
I.

is an association of the doctors, for the doctors

and is also by the doctors.

From the survey conducted one cannot

help but come to the understanding that though majority of them
have the membership in I.M.A., it is only a small majority of
58%.

Nearly an equal strength of them (56.7%), unlike the I.M.A.,

are in favour of the application of C.P.A. to t he medical

profession.

This indicates that allthe members of I.M.A.

themselves are not of the same mind?

248

!

248

6. An£PAne,Ets~fc?.

The means to increase or to improve the quality of the
consumer Protection Act will be by making changes to the
existing Act.

Actually 8 3.-3% of the doctors from the three

different hospitals are of the opinion that the C.P.A. needs

modification, as one is made to understand from the survey
carried out in these three hospitals.

They are of the □ pinion

that modification of the C.P.A. will make it more acceptable

to medical professionals and this in turn is likely to be
beneficial to the patients-^

suggestions.
a) Include the representatives of the medical professionals in

the panel who will be able to judge the negligence of the doctors
in a better way.

This seems to be a just suggestion that needs

consideration.

b) They (the medical professionals) also request that the Consumer
Protection Act should not make any discrimination, by holding

private doctors and the health care institutions liable for
negligence on one side, and leaving the government hospitals
and its doctors free from this liability on the other side. As
far as I understand, what the doctors resist is not the Consumer

Protection Act, but the discrimination that it makes,''

The sun

shines on the rich and the poor, on the good and the bad, on th e
big and the small'?
plants.

The wind blows against the trees and the

The rain falls over the rocks and the plains1?

... 249

why

249

should the same law be different in its application on the

private and public sector ?

Why should the Consumer Protection

Act leave the Government hospitals and its doctors out of its

purview ?

Services remain services always and everywhere and

for everyone; and there can be no difference in its value no

matter who provides it or who benefits from it. Whether one

pays for the services or not, the Consumer is a Consumer.*
The explanation given for this discrimination is that the

patient does not pay for the services he receives in the
Can this explanation and excuse be

Government hospitals.

justified ? Do the doctors in the Government Sector really

provide free services ?

Are they not being paid from the tax

collected from the public ?

In f act they (the cb ctors who are

in the Government Service) receive a much bigger salary and
render much less service compared to those doctors working in
the private sector.

Therefore, inclusion of the Goverment

health care services, provided by the Government sector, also

under the purview of consumer Protection Act will release much

of the tension that is prevailing among the medical professionals

in the private sector, and make it more acceptable to them which
will automatically turn out to be beneficial to the patients?
In fact, the inclusion of the Government hospitals and its

doctors also under the purview of C.P.A. will help to taise the
the standard and improve the quality of services in the Government
sector as the public involvement will help to deter the corruption

... 250

! 250

The public whose eyes and ears are

that is going on there.

wide open (now) will have a strong voice too with which they
will be able to check the corruption and those involved in
this corruption.

Actually the Consumer Protection Act was enacted to make

justice available to the poor who suffered loss and injuries in
the hands of the negligent doctors and institutions but could; rot
afford the expensive, complicated and time consuming justice

through the courts of law.

But by keeping the Government doctors

and hospitals out of the purview of C.P.A., these poor are denied
justice.

It is the poor who cannot afford the cost of private

medical care who go to the Government hospitals and avail the
services there.

Those who can afford go to the private hospitals,

clinics or nursing homes.
the benefit of C.P.A.

And the rich who can afford is availing

In reality the justice is snatched away

from the poor and is offered to the rich.

That is exactly what

is happening by bringing the private sector under the purview

of C.P.A. and keeping the Government sector out of it;

This is

like giving with one hand and taking away with the other.
a paradox ’.

What

C.P.A. is actually giving more to the ones who already

have plenty; and those who haven’t any are denied?
c) Another modification suggested by the doctors who answered

the questionnaire is to make some provision for the compensation

of those doctors who are falsely accused.

It is a

good suggestion

and it will have a check on those consumers who take advantage of

251

• 251

the situation and run with any and every reasonable as well as

baseless complaints against the doctors and hospitals trying
to make money out of it.

What is it to them ?

the case they lose nothing.
they ask for.

If they lose

But if they gain, they gain what

This is not fair.

Anyway the doctors who suggested

this modification will be happy to know that the amendment of
C.P.A. (dated 18th June 1993), has already considered this and
has made some provision for it.

If the case is found to be

frivolous or vexatious, the complaint will be dismissed and the

conplainant will be made to pay to the opposite party the cost

but not exceeding Rs. 10,000/-.

7. a) Indemnity
Another fact that this study has revealed is the insecurity
that the medical professionals are feeling in the face of the

Consumer Protection Act.

Actually, the Act was passed to safe­

guard the rights of the Consumers and to make sure that they are

safe and secure.

In the medical field, it has hit the providers

of health services.

They are not very sure when they will be

dragged into the court, and which patient is going to charge

against them and which of their action is going to be weighed
in the court'.'

So to be on the safe side, they feel the need to

maintain their own security through the professional indemnity
insurance coverage.

252

-

: 252

:

-

7• b) Is the insurance premium reasonable ?
The study conducted indicates that majority of the doctors
(56.7%) and hospitals authorities feel that the insurance premium
is reasonable.

Yet, very few of them have the professional

indemnity insurance coverage individually.

Is it because they

are not able to afford this reasonable insurance premium or is
it because they are so sure that they will never be negligent

and their patients will never sue them ? Dr. R.D. Lele says that
the best insurance against litigation is to maintain a good doctor­

patient relationship.

If these doctors who have not had the

insurance coverage yet, if they have maintained such an excellent
relationship with their patients, then certainly it is a very

good sign and is the ideal way to be insured.

If not, then they

are.inviting trouble for themselves1?
Some of the doctors seem to provide for payment of insurance
premiums by increasing the professional fees.

On the other hand

some (very few) hospitals haveprovided the professional indemnity;’

In the survey, one out of three has insurance coverage for their
doctors, which is a good thing.

institutions are safe.

Atleast the doctors in those

But is it because of the generosity of

the hospital that they have made this provision for their doctors ?
Or is it because they want to retain their doctors for whom this

insurance coverage will be an incentive to stay back and work for
the institution ?

Those two out of three institutions that have

not provided this professional indemnity insurance coverage for
their

employees and thier institution itself, may not be very

safe especially under the present situation.

The hospitals cannot

253

beso sure that their doctors and other employees are so good that
they will never be negligent, and the patients will never sue

their employees or the hospital for negligence of any sort.
have already been taken to the Consumer Courts.

They

They should try

to protect themselves and their employees as soon as possible by

insurance against claims of damages.

8. Medical Goppcil Qf India
During the course of the study, one is made to understand

the doctors’ inpression about the I.M.C.

Less than half of the

doctors (43.3%) believe in the efficiency of the I.M.C. which is
the statutory body for regulating doctors."

Even with regard to

the modification required by the I.M.C. Act, less than half i.e.,
only 4o% of them feel that modifiLcation will make the I.M.C. Act

efficient and adequate while 4o% of them abstained from making
their comments.

Are these 4o% of the doctors indifferent to the

M.C.
I.

That will be a sad thing.

itself.

Those suggestions made by the doctors regarding the

modification of the I.M.C.Act and the consumer protection act,
seem to be rather genuine and practical and so it will be worth
considering them?
Modifications suggested:

- Power to fine and award damages
- Power to monitor the C.P.A. instead of C.P.A. monitoring the

M.C.
I.

254.

: 25^

■:

- Power to ensure "quality doctors" and not "quantity doctors*

by providing admission on merit alone and abolishing capitation
related admissions.

They feel this alone will ensure standard

of the medical profession and quality of their service^'

- Power to check the quacks and malpractices^

- Power to monitor the competence of the doctors.^
9. Steps to avoid litigation
It is rather interesting to learn the preferences of the

doctors in the steps that would help them avoid litigations and

its effects.

Maximum number °f them (91.7%) preferred to provide

proper explanation to the patient before and after each procedure
and treatment so that the patient will be aware of what is wrong

with him, what is going to be done and what is the expected outcome

etc., and then obtain afully informed consent.

The least preferred

step was to provide emergency treatment, and then wash the hands
off by referring the patient to other specialists or more competent
persons, where-by risk can be avoided.

Many of the doctors reacted

to it and responded that, medicine is one that involves risk; by
avoiding risk one cannot practise medicine^

This way of treatnent

is possible only if the patient happens to be an enemy of the
doctor.

All these are

indications

that although the doctors

are "afraid" of C.P.A., they are not in favour of using defensive
medicine.

They are still patient-oriented and patlent-centered

which is encouraging.

On the whole the medical professionals are

committed to their cause except for the black sheep of the
profession.'

25$

5 255'

Some of the doctors seem to take the steps to protect

themselves by providing proper information to "the patients. Some

of them go to the extent of communicating to them even in writing

which is a safe practise.

Dr. R.D. Lele

says that lack of

adequate communication is the single most important cause of
litigation.

Other causes are rudeness and callousness.1

1O;! Areas of, service more prone to medical negligence

There is certain amount of difference in the opinion of the

three administrators regarding areas of services that are more
prone to medical negligence.

Two out of the three feel that the

surgical department/sector is the one that is most prone to

medical negligence whereas the third one feels it is the medical
department that is most vulnerable one (perhaps this may be the

fact

in their respective hospitals).

All three of them seem

to differ in their second and third opinions.

While they are

’medical’ second and ’anaesthesia’ third for hospital ’A’; for
hospital ’ B’ it is ’medical’ in second place and ’anaesthesia’

comes on No.l along with surgery.

In hospital ’C’ the second

most vulnerable area seems to be the nursing department/area and

has not mentioned a third area in their response. From this study,
what I gather is, despite the order of preference/vulnerability,

two out of three mentions the surgical, anaesthesia and medical

areas and the third one mentions only the medical and nursing
areas-.1

When we relate to the reality, I feel that the administrator

of hospital ’B’ seems to be more close to the real.

But for the

256

:

25G

other two of them their reality may be what they have mentioned,
although it indicates that the surgeons and the anaesthetists

need special protection than the other categories of doctors^'
11. Categories gf employees more lively tp be involved ip
negligent Acts.

The study conducted on this aspect reveals that the doctors

are the most vulnerable groups of employees in the hospital that
are likely to be involved in the negligent acts as all three

hospital authorities are of the same mind.

Two out of three feel

that the administrators are the next group to be attacked by the
patients on negligence (I suppose on behalf of the hospital)

whereas according to the administration of hospital * B* he seems
to be very safe and not likely to be involved in the negligent
act, I to

feel he is rather right as he may be held responsible

on behalf of the hospital and not for his action.

Both

administrators of ’A’ and *C* feel that their nurses come in the

next category of vulnerable employees?

The three seem to agree

at the first time and differ intieir next opinions.

But that may

be the reality/experience/situation in their hospitals^’

But one

thing is clear that the doctors are the most vulnerable group and
they need more protection by the hospital than the others.
12. System for patjagts1 cpmments/cQmplaints/suggestions

Actually the pulse of the public can be measured/assessed
through the patients and their relatives.

They will be the ideal

groups to say how exactly the hospital is fairing in the conrnunity/

25?

:

society/ the locality.

257

5

They will be the ones who will be able

to tell the strengths and weaknesses of the hospital through a
system for patients’ comments/complaints/suggestions*?

From the survey carried out, it is very clear that none of
the three hospitals have got a particular system to measure the

patients satisfaction level.

Cut of the three hospitals only

one is giving a thought to consider the possibility of such a

system while the other two donot seem to feel the need for it or

io realise the importance of it.

The hospitals should take action

to put into effect a system to deal with complaintsand comments

on a regular basis.1
13. The effect Pf c,ptA, pp closure of hospitals and opening of

new hospitals.
The study conducted makes it very clear that all three
administrators are very sure that C.P.A. will niether result in

closure of the existing voluntary hospitals, nor it will be a
hindrance to the opening of new ones in the future^

This shows

that the C.P.A. does not come on the way of the medical/health

care services; something very consoling and a reason to rejoice.

Study of medicolegal.. c_a_$^_ ^hat ?re,. qigsrooega

I went through two of the cases that are on process wherein

the hospital and doctors were accused of gross negligences

In the first case a 56 year old lady died after the operation
of "multiple organ failure."

A case was filed in the High Court-

258

-

:

258

:

-

by the patient's daughter against the doctors and the hospital,

one month after the death of the patient*?
In the second case, a 13 year old girl was having a solid

retroperitoneal mass.

After various investigations the patient

was taken for operation.

Patient developed bradycardia and

cardiac arrest soon after the induction of anaesthesia.

The

patient was immediately resuscitated and surgery cancelled. Even

though the vital parameters improved, the girl manifested features
of cerebral anoxia?

With nursing care and nedication she

inproved from a state of opisthotonus and total unresponsiveness ,
to a remarkable extent.

discharge.

She was able to walk at the time of her

The hospital and the doctors were accused of gross

negligence?

In the first case, the hospital was called by the court
just once and after that there has been complete silence.

In

the second case, the hospital was called to the court a few times
but after three iears too, the case is not completed and no
judgement is passed?

If cases take so long to be settled by the court, what is
the

use of filing a case in the Law courts ?

Are the

Courts over-burdened with too many cases and few judges ? Whether

positive or negative, everybody would appreciate having quick
decision - lest the plaintiff and defendent may reach their

eternal reward leaving their cases behind in the courts of law?

■259

• 259

A final word

Medical negligence is with us and it has to be dealt with.

The patient (and close relatives) must get redressal of their

grievances.

For medical negligence to be proved, there is need

to prove that there has been deficiency in the duty of care.
Mishap or misadventure may happen in any medical intervention;
there is no guarantee that every procedure has led to harm or

injury, then damages will have to be paid.

on this.

All people are agreed

The difference is only on the mechanisms for redressal

of grievances.

....260

I

CHAPTER

VIII

THE FUTURE
-

HOW THE HEALTH CARE INSTITUTION
IS GOING TO FACE THIS NEW CHALLENGE?

-

PRECAUTIONS AND PROTECTIONS REQUIRED BY

THE MEDICAL PROFESSION AND HEALTH CARE
INSTITUTIONS.

: 260

CHAPTER VIII

THE FUTURE
Future is something that is a time yet to come.

Future is a

prospective condition, something remote yet so near.

Future can

be something which depends on the present and built on it.

It can

be either a continuation of the present or something that is entirely

It is something which depends very much on the plan that we

new.

make for the future.

The actualization and concreteness of tomorrow

will depend to a certain extent on the efficiency of our plan of
today.

I.

The future is a challenge.

It is a challenge, particularly for the medical profession and the
health care institutions.

This present era of consumer Protection

Act and the rapidly expanding consumer movement, presents the health
care institution and the medical professionals with a challenge with

force.

It is upto the medical profession and the health care insti­

tution to plan and decide as to how it is going to face this challenge.

The hospital authorities have to think of ways and means of

it.

facing

Quality is the answer, the solution and the weapon that I can

suggest best

to the present situation.

Quality is better than quantity.

For a health care institution

and the medical profession the quality of services provided can be

an advertisement and an asset that can be used to face this challenge

1. Criteria for assessing quality of care

Whether Governmental or non-Governmental, Voluntary/charitable

or corporate, quality of care is equally applicable to all sectors.

• 261

-

: 261

:

~

This quality of care is of greatest importance to the patients who are
the recepients of the services offered by the medical profession and
It is their(patients') interest to which

the health care institutions.

the institution should attach priority.

In order to provide the

patients, the consumers of health care/medical profession, their interests

and preferences must be considered.

Certainly, it is not going to be

easy to satisfy every patient, as wants, needs, hopes and desires
differ from patient to patient.

Therefore we must plan something that

will he materialised, that can be made available, something that will

be concrete and something that will be appreciated by the patients for
whose sake the health care institutions and the medical profession exist.

a) Personnel:
personnel.

No health care institution can function without the
Actions always speak louder than words.

The personnel

who work/render services in the institution and the kind of services

they render are the main factors that contribute to the fame and
name of the institution.

Just as face is the mirror of the mind,

the employees are the mirror of the institution.

The health care

institution has no visible products or tangible goods to exhibit to
the world to prove its efficiency and quality.

This job has to be

done by the employees by the kind of service they render to the
patient and the public.

It is the patient centeredness that is

counted and appreciated by the patients and it is the patients who
make/do the advertisement on behalf of the institution.

Iherefore it is very important and a vital necessity to have
people/professionals who are wall trained, legally recognised and

.. 262

: 262
professionally competent enough to provide/render service.

As far as

possible, the hospital must take care not to employ personnel with no

proper professional qualification to provide professional services.
This has

to be taken care of

to make sure of the safty of the patient,

the hospital as veil as the person himself/herself.

Having proper personnel is of vital importance to the health

care institutions.

But it is equally important to provide the patients

with an environment that is safe, secure, pleasent and conducive to

healing.
The institution (the authorities) should make sure that it

has professionals who are interested not only in a patient who responds
dramatically to a new antibiotics, but also is equally interested in

situations that require monotonous long

time care of patients as in

the case of a child with cerebral palsy.

The hospital authorities should ensure personnel(especially
medical professionals) who will treat their patients without making any

discrimination because of caste, creed, colour, status, political and
financial capacity, nationality etc. - doctors who will consider their

patients as one of their family member and treat him accordingly.

It

is not going to be easy; but it is a need.

It is the duty of the hospital authorities to make sure that
patients do not have to wait for too long to see a doctor or to get the

tests done or to pay a bill.

In case the patient is not satisfied with

a doctor, or feel the need to consult another doctor, the patient must
be allowed and even

helped to have his need met.
263

: 263
The institution will greatly reduce problems of negligence

or incompetence, if it can provide facilities for on going education
of the medical professionals and the facilities to up-date themselves

which in turn will be beneficial to the patient they treat.
In order to make things easy for the patients and their

relatives and the public at large, an efficient reception is a must
in every hospital which will provide the patients and the public with

necessary information.

b)

Facilities;

Every health care institution must provide or should

have the facilities to provide care that is of a recognised standard
of performance.

Certainly no patient will ever like to go to a

hospital that provides substandard care and treatment.

c)

Treatment; Ike treatment provided by the health care institution
must be such that it is open to all categories and types of people

without any sort of bars and distinction.
Sometimes the treatment may be very costly, especially in an

unusual case or situation(as in case of patient with cancer and needs

radiotherapy, chemotherapy etc.); but no patient must be turned back

(sent away) because he has no money.

Even if the patient has no money,

as far as possible, the hospital should consider the patient and provide

the essential treatment.

After all the hospitals are meant to save

lives and preserve and protect them and also to prevent what can be
prevented especially from further damages and losses.

264

I
~ : 264

:

-

Science and techenology are advancing day by day and
I
sophisticated facilities are becoming more and more common these days.

The hospital authorities and the medical professional must try to keep
pace with them and be practical minded to equip themselves with the

latest knowledge and moderately sophisticated ones.

It is very important

to be uptodate with the time and place and the need of the people.
Today most of our people cannot afford the sophisticated treatment;
but they certainly need the care due to them.

Opposition is a must for a proper democracy.

So also in a

hospital situation, a feedback system by the patients and the public
is a must to assess the efficiency of the hospital and also to see how

beneficial it is for the community and the public.

A feed back system

enable the hospital authorities to be aware of its SWOTs.

2.

ACCOUNTABILITY
Health care institutions are an asset of the community to
which it belongs.

The institutions, whether they are public or private,

are responsible to the community.

The health care institutions exist in the society; they
exist also because of the community/the society; and they exist also

for these communities and societies.

Hence, they owe a duty to the

society not to injure anyone individually or as a group, as the

health care institutions are accoubtable to the society at large.

The institution has to take the responsibility for what is

done for the patient.

As far as medical negligence is concerned, the

ordinary duty of the health care institution and the medical professional

265

: 265

is to exercise the reasonable care and provide the standard treatment.
If not, the health care institution as well as the medical professions
can be held liable for negligence.

The hospital authorities have to

make sure that its personnel are properly trained, sufficiently
competent and possess the licence to practice.

The hospital authorities

must make sure that the physical condition of its buildings and grounds

are safe enough for the patients, the visitors and the public to move
around freely.

happens to any of them due to the

If anything

negligence of the hospital, in providing proper facilities, then the
institution has to take the responsibility and pay the compensation.

"Hospital has an obligation to furnish reasonably adequate equipment

for use in diagnosis and treatment of patients; problem can arise,
when the hospital does not own the necessary equipments, when these

equipment is not available, or when the equipment has not been properly
inspected or maintained."(102)

5.

PROTECTION OF THE CONSUMERS INTERESTS

The patients are the consumers as they avail the facilities

and services of the health care institutions and the medical care
professionals.

"One of the reasons is that the patient places his

entire trust in the doctor.
doctor.

He is to have immense confidence in the

In the law of Hindus, we have a saying, "Vaidyo Narayan Hari."

This means a doctor is equivalent to Narayana or Hari.

The same holds

good with other countries also.

The greater the trust you have in a

person, the greater the duty to

take care." (10?)

• 266

: 266

The hospital and its personnel have got a grave responsi­

bility to provide care and treatment according to the standards
relevant today.

The method needs to be up-dated and mordern means

must be adopted in the diagnosis, treatment, even in the prescription
of drugs and so on.

The hospital and its doctors have certain

responsibilities to maintain and follow certain standard of care and
treatment that is widely accepted.

This standard has to be main­

tained both individually by the medical professionals and by the

institution as a whole.

4.

QIJR HISSION TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY

The health care institutions exist, not for themselves,

but for the community.

The medical man exists, not to make himself

richer, but to serve the sick and the suffering of the community/
society and if the needs of the community are not met by the doctors
and the health care institutions then they have no right to exit.

II.

PRECAUTIONS
As the saying goes, prevention is better than cure.

And

there is no use crying over the spilt milk.

The medical professionals and the health care institutions
as a whole, have to take certain precautionary measures to prevent
*

incidents/occasions that are unwanted and unpleasant.

accidents or unforeseen incidents can happen.

At times

But nobody will blame

the hospital for it provided the hospital/doctor had taken the

.... .267

-

5 267

:

-

necessary precautions to prevent them.

We are expected to take

measures to prevent only what can be prevented.

1•

Limits of medical care; We should know the limits of medical
care both as an individual and as an institution.

The medical

professionals and the health care institution as a whole deal
with human beings.

beings.

They handle life and death of these human

Therefore, care must be taken to preserve and promote

life, and health by exercising reasonable skill, care and knowledge.
If a doctor feels it is a case beyond his capacity and speciali­
sation, certainly he should not play with it.

While providing

the emergency treatment, arrangement must be made so that the patient

may be taken care by a competent and qualified person.

In all

simplicity and humility, the doctor must realise his limitation
which should prompt him/her to refer the patient to those who will
be able to manage the case efficiently.

For example,if a patient

with serious head injury comes to a doctot who happens to be a

gynecologist, while attending to the patient and providing the

emergency care, she should make arrangements so that the patient
may be taken over by a neurologist/neurosurgeon.

If such patients

come to a dispensary which has no facility to care for such patients,
the patients must be referred to a better hospital.

If necessary,

the doctor from the dispensary must accompany the patient to the

bigger hospital.
In the absence of these two measures, if something

happens to the patient, the patient or his/relatives can sue the

268

268
doctor for not exercising hie duty of care and for being negligent,

and for not taking steps to prevent further damage and the possi­
bility of shortening the expectation of life.

2.

Quality assurance; "A spoonful of honey can

catch much more flies

than a barrelful of vinegar" says St. ?rancis de sales.
Quality is the distinguishing character.

It is the

characteristic trait; the degree of excellence; the high rank of

social standing or the quality of proposition; its being either

affirmative or negative.

Quality of service is an important parameter for the

hospital which is accountable to the community as well as to provider
of the resources.

Quality assurance has become a major concern

in the delivery of medical care.

The demands of the community,

economics of medical practice specially due to technological

developments, increasing legal action in malpractice cases and

concern to protect the interests of the client have focussed the
attention on quality of assurance programme for all hospitals.

In the past, though there was so much of dedication put

into the services, especially by the voluntary charitable hospitals,
the health care institutions were very slow to respond to the concern
for quality and ensure quality.

But today this quality assurance

programme has become a vital necessity, to ensure efficiency of
health care service everywhere.

269

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- : 269

’ "

"Quality is not assured by chance but it has to be planned.
Quality assurance is a concept which strives to provide the evidence
required to establish confidence of all concerned, that quality
function is being adequately performed.

Quality assurance has

been defined as "sum total of the organised arrangements made with
the object of ensuring that product will be of the best quality."(104)

To measure the quality of service in absolute terms in

health care services is a rather difficult task.

All that can be

demonstrated is the improvements in the outcome of care and this

care/service rendered in an acceptable manner maintaining the

professional standard.

A hospital can be held liable for negligence

and want of care which may result in injury/damage or lose to the

patient only when it fails to apply that aesthetic touch of quality

in services rendered.

This quality can be projected and protrayed

primarily, only if the personnel rendering the service, has an
inherent quality which is automatically expressed in his/her action

or services rendered, and secondly it depends on the policy and
objectives of the institution which lays emphasis on the quality

of services rendered to the patients.

This requires constant

supervision, checking and dedicated and conscientious guidence by
those in authority.

"According to the American Society of Internal Medicine •Quality medical care embodies a scientific approach to the establish­

ment of a diagnosis and institutions of appropriate therapy and manage­
ment, designed to satisfy the overall needs of the patient.

..270

-

:

270

'•

"

It should be readily available, efficiently rendered and properly

documented."

It is an on going process.

Its goals are to measure

and to evaluate the professional services rendered to patient in
Services in a proper quality assurance programme

the hospital.

is measured against a prevailing and accepted standard of profess­
ional care.

The end and product of quality assurance is the

improvement of care; it is supposed to change the behaviour of

physicians and health tean members and there by improve the quality
of care." (105)

The hospital or medical personnel is not likely to be sued by
patient, if the patient was assured and provided quality care and

treatment by the medical professionals and the health care insti­
tutions.

^ven if the patient did sue, inspite of the quality of

care provided, the law in our country is such, it will not abandon
the medical man.

Here again it is important to remember that

quality care/treatment can be provided only by a quality person.

5.

Efficient management:

efficiency is the effective power to bring

to pass on fitness to do a job well.

In a way it is a kind of

exhibition of one's capacity or competence to manage things well.

It is the ability to bring out the maximum out-put or benefit with
the minimum input.

Efficiency is proved by the ability of the

person to allocate the scarce resources to achieve certain objectives.

The objectives of the medical profession and the health

care institutions are to preserve life by promoting life and health

271

: 271

as well as preventing and controlling diseases.

If these objectives

can be projected to the patients and the public at large and if the

medical profession really make an effort to achieve it by providing
and assuring quality care, then certainly the health care institu­

tion is safe and no patient will ever think of sueing a doctor or
the hospital.

4.

Insurance Coverage: No hospital or no medical professional can be

so sure of its being safe and free from being negligent, however
careful the doctor may be.

There is always a chance/risk and the

doctor and the hospital must be prepared to meet it at any time.
This is possible only by having the professional indemnity coverage.

It is a safty measure to face those times of problems and emergency.

jispecially today when the consumer movements are so active and the
consumer forums are so much consumer centered, the hospital and the

doctors cannot afford to take risk.

Today this professional indemnity

insurance coverage is a vital necessity for self protection on the

part of the medical professionals himself and to protect its employees
from the part of the institution.

The insurance premium is gone up so much that the doctors
find it difficult to pay it by themselves.

Hence the doctors will

not be so willing to work in an institution which is not willing to

assure him/her the necessary medical defence cover and the support.
On the other hand the hospitals, especially the Voluntary/Charitable

ones will also find it rather difficult to shoulder this burden of

‘272

272

providing professional indemnity insurance coverage to all its

medical professionals.

So for both the parties it is going to be

a difficult time and choice for both the hospital and the doctor.
This is only one side of the story.

On the other side the patient,

who has become suddenly aware of and alert about his newly recognised
rights as consumer, is not going to spare the hospitals or the

doctor.

275

CHAPTER IX

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

"

: 275

:

"

CHAPTER 1%
SUMMARY

AND

CONCLUSION

Where there ia law — both in letter and iff spirit - there

is discipline.

In order to bring about this discipline, in any

sphere of life, in any field of activity, there has to have some sort
of control.

In the medical profession we have the law that is related

to medical negligence which is not anyway different from the negli­
gence in general except that it is a negligence by the medical

professionals - which result or cause damages that is suffered by
a patient or his legal heirs and dependents.

Although the medical profession is one of the most respoiBi-

ble callings. /vocation in our community and country at large, it
reflects the rot that seems to have set into our system.

The medical

professionals seem to have forgotten' the very purpose of their

vocation, namely prevention and control of disease, caring and curing
of the sick, promotion of health as well as rehabilitation of the

handicapped - finally leading to promotion of life itself.

What we

witness and experience today is corruption and malpractice that has
set unto the profession giving way to commercialisation, indifference,

inhuman behaviour and lack of devotion to duty and to the profession

itself.

Standard of profession and quality of services seem to have

lost its meaning and value, and these seem to have been replaced by
commercialisation which has turned this noble profession into a

big bad business .

274

: 274

Under the Medical Council of India Act, every doctor who

wishes to practise is expected to have the minimum standard of
qualification and registration for a licence to practise the profess­

ion.

The Medical Council of India is empowered to maintain this

standard and ethics of the profession as well as the professionals.

Under the law of torts the medical professionals are expected

to possess the standard/reasonable/necessary knowledge and skill and
exercise reasonable degree of care while managing the patients.

Drugs are another entity subjected to standard and it is
upto the State Drug Controllers and the Drug Controller of India to

maintain this standard of drugs manufactured, distributed and used
in our country.

Though this Act is to ensure the safty of the people,

the link between the manufacturers and the medical practitioners as

well as the chemists endangers the health and well being of the

individuals.

Unlike the developed countries, in India, the medical care

is grossly inadequate on one hand and there is an increase in the
malpractice on the other hand.

But there was hardly any effort to

redress injustice caused as litigation in India is very expensive,

time consuming and complicated.

All these are factors that discourages

the patients from coming forward and seeking justice for themselves.
As a result, the Government of India, passed the Consumer

Protection

Act in 1986 in order to protect the consumers at large and at the
same time ensuring their rights as consumers.

On April 21st 1992,

275

•275
the judgement made by the National Commission, brought the medical
profession under the purview of C.P.A.

Health is something that is unique, in the sense, that the
supplier controls the demand.

The doctors made the decisions on

behalf of the patients: and the patients in turn accepted them
in good faith.

But today, the entire health system is facing a trying

period, as the medical profession is getting linked with the commer­
cialization which increases the cost of medical care and decreases

its quality.
Every profession has its own code of conduct.

The same is

the case with medical profession too which is known as medical ethics-

a branch or species of general ethics.

Medical ethics is not a ready

made solution to the problems in the medical profession, but provides

a practical guidance to the medical professionals.

It is "A systematic

thinking on values that are at work in health care profession and

formulation of norms to protect these values."(106)

Ethical code is a set of guidelines which enables the

professionals to foster and maintain the ethos of the profession.
It helps the professionals to think and do what is right and good
for oneself and others.

For the medical profession there is an

international code of ethics and each country has its own code of
ethics.

In India, we have the code of

ethics of the Medical Council

of India to guide our doctors.

276

: 276

Every doctor who proposes to practise medicine takes the
Hippocratic oath binding himself to observe the code of ethics
contained in it.

Today many are the victims of medical practitioners

who are often negligent, callous and greedy.

Vast majority of these

victims are poor, illiterate and ignorant who suffer in silence.

Negligence by itself is not enough to establish liability.
There must be an injury caused by this negligence.

to establish liability

In

other words,

in the medical profession, the medical

professionals/the doctor should owe a duty of care to the patient,

and the doctor has deviated from this duty and as a result of this

deviation from the duty an injury is caused to the patient.

then the doctor can be said to be negligent.

Only

An error of judgement

by a doctor cannot be considered to be negligence, provided he applied
his knowledge, exercised reasonable care and used the necessary/

standard skill and used means available to treat the patient, that
were of standard practice of the place and time and took all the
available precautions to avoid harm.

Every patient is assured of his rights as a patient, namely,
the right to safety, right to be informed, right to choose, right to

be heard, right to seek redressal and right to patient education.
These are not anything new.

They were always there.

Where there is a right, there is a remedy.

In the past

there were two options available for the patients to seek remedy in

277

:

case of medical negligence.
of law.

277

The first one was to approach the courts

Now there were two courts, i.e., the criminal court and the

civil court.

Criminal Court: In case where the plaintiff is able to prove that

the doctor was grossly negligent, which is the proximate, subsantive

or direct cause of the patient's death, under the Indian Penal Code
the doctor will be punished by imprisonment, fine or both.

Civil Court: A patient who is rendered service on payment can file

a suit if the doctor was negligent in his treatment of the patient

and seek compensation providedzhe proves that the doctor was negligent
and action will be taken and the patient will be compensated by the
doctor under the Indian Contract Act.

Under the law of torts, if it is proved that the patient
has suffered harm due to the negligence of the doctor who owed a

duty of care and has deviated from his duty of care due to which
the injury was caused.

Here also the responsibility rests with the

plaintiff to prove that there was a duty owed by the doctor and has
deviated from this duty which is the cause of injury.

Then the

patient will be awarded a compensation whether the patient pays for

the treatment or not.

These were possibilities for the patient to seek justice,
but they were not very practical especially for an Indian patient

who often happens to be an uneducated, illeterate and poor, as it

278

-

5

278

:

~

So there

was very expensive, complicated and never ending process.

was a second option open to the patient namely to seek Justice by

approaching the Indian Medical Council.

dven this was not

very much

appreciated by the patient; because, if the I.M.C finds the doctor

concerned negligent, the maximum they could do was to punish the doctor

by temporary or permanent de-registeration of his name and removing
his licence.

But that did not compensate the patient.

For all

these reasons, very few availed these available facilities

.

the patients prefered to suffer the injustice in silence rather than

appeal for justice.

In India the standard of care expected of a doctor is the
duty which the doctor owes to his patient which have been succinctly
or briefly laid down by the Supreme Court which states that neither
the highest degree of care is required, nor the lowest degree of care

is enough.

What is required is a reasonable degree of care and com­

petence judged in the light of the circumstances of the cases.

If a doctor is sued for negligence, the patient has to
prove that the doctor was negligent, except in those circumstances,

where the negligence is so evident.

Medical negligence may assume variety of forms such as

negligence in diagnosis, negligence in diagnostic aids, negligence
in administration of drugs, failure to take precautions, failure to
take proper consent,

negligence in the operation theatre and during

the post operative care, failure to give guidence etc.

279

279

Die doctor who undertakes to treat a patient must make
sure that he has the necessary knowledge and skill to handle the
case efficiently before he accepts the patient .

If he feels that

he is not competent enough to handle the patient, then the wise
thing is to provide the patient with emergency care (if needed)

and then refer to a person who is competent enough to handle him/

her.

A doctor handles the life and death of another person and so

he cannot be careful enough while dealing with the patient.

He

cannot play with someone else's life.

An institution, whether charitable, voluntary private or
public, non-profit or profit making, is responsible to see that

every patient who avails the service of the hospital is safe and
secure inside the hospital building and within the hospital premises
The institution is also responsible for the negligence of its
employees resulting in damage, harm or loss to the patient or his/

her legal representatives, apart from the personal liabilities of

the individual employee himself/herself.

From the legal point of view, if the doctors are careless
in performing their duties, or commit lapses, they are open to both
criminal and civil liabilities as well as the tort liability.

Here

what is important for the doctors to appreciate is that if they are

careless/negligent in their duties and responsibilities, if they are
careless in managing their patients, the law of contract the law of
torts and the Indian Penal Code will apply.

This is something they

cannot escape.

280

: 280

At the same time law is very considerate to the doctor in
considering the liabilities.

The law does not expect the doctor to

be perfect and successful always or infalliable.

ment is not a crime.

An error of judge­

All that is expected of a doctor is to maintain

the standard of the profession, assure quality in his service, exercise

reasonable care and use standard measure/precautions,

He is expected

to guarantee care and not cure.
Sometimes there are more than one school of thought that

are current on a given subject.

of these school's teaching.

The doctors are free to accept any

If a doctor honestly adopts one to the

exclusion of the other, and if the outcome happens to be a failure,

he cannot be held to be negligent.

The doctor is on the safe side if he can prove, though

there was negligence, the damage is the result of a contribution by
the patient, which is known as the contributory negligence.

When the negligence is proved and the amounts awarded for
financial loss of the past or future is known as pecuniary damages;

the amounts awarded for pain and suffering of the past or future as

well as loss of enjoyment of life in respects of sports, married
life etc., are known as non-pecuniary damage.

These days the people are becoming more and more compensa­

tion oriented everywhere/all over world and claims
sought for damages are steadily rising.

or compensation

In any litigation first and

foremost the court has to find out and make certain of the facts.

281

: 281

It is up to the court to decide who is right and who is wrong.

And

this depends on the parties' ability to impress the court with regard

to evidence; and the court will weigh it with facts, obtained and

then decide/pass judgement.

Unlike in developed countries, there was hardly any effort
to redress justice for damage caused, as litigation in India is very
costly, complicated and a never ending process.

Loyalty of the

doctors inspite of their wrong doings is another barrier for obtain­

ing justice through the Medical Council of India.

Therefore to ensure

and provide easier, quicker and cheaper redressal for the patients,
the Consumer Protection Act was passed on the 24th December, 1986.

On the 21st April 1992, a judgement made by the National Commission

brought the services rendered by the medical profession also under
the purview of the Consumer Protection Act.

This C.P.A. aims at

quality service and accountability by the providers and producers of
services and goods.

This is the very reason why voluntary, charitable

and non-profit health care institutions also were brought under its

jurisdiction.

Consumer Protection Act was very much accepted and appreciated

by the people of India: like the dry land yearning for rain fall,
the public was waiting for an easy, cheap and speedy way of justice,

to escape the malpractices and corruption and commercialisation that
had crept into the medical profession.

282

282
The Consumer Protection Act called for setting up of
Consumer Protection Councils, both at the centre as well as in

every state which is meant to give suggestions to the Government

to effectively implement the Act.
from all walks of life.

It consists of representatives

The redressal machinery is considered

under this Act as the three tire system which has been established

at the national (national commission), state (state commission),
and district (district forums) level.

hach of these forums are

presided by a retired or working judge of the Supreme Court, High
Court and District Court respectively.

C.P.A on the 18th

After the amendment of the

June, 1995, the district forums handle complaints

claiming upto five lakh rupees, and the state commission upto twenty
lakh rupees as well as all the appeals from the district courts.

The National Commission handles all the complaints claiming above
twenty lakhs of rupees and the appeals from the state commissions.

In all these forums the services are free of charge and the clearance
of the complaint is supposed to be within ninety days.

complication in the procedure.

There is no

All that the aggrieved person has

to do is to write the complaints on plain paper, giving all the details
and then give it to the forum/commission either in person or by post.

All the rest will be seen to by the forum/commission and the case
is to be decided within ninety days.

All the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

came into force on the 1st July 1987 throughout the country.
and Kashmir enacted its own legislation in this field.

Jammu

All the

,283

: 285

States and Union Territories constituted tne State level consumer
protection councils.

Some district forums are yet to be constituted

by the state Governments.

The Central Consumer Protection Council

was formed on 1st June, 1987.

The Council was reconstituted w.e.f

25rd August, 1990.

The National Commission started functioning on 27th December,
1988.

Justice Mr. V.B.Eradi is President.

The Consumer Protection Act has an amendement passed on
the 18th June 1993, which deals with a number of changes.

Hie application of C.P.A in the medical profession is aine d
at the protection of the patients, raising at the same time, the
standard of the profession and improving the quality of services.

On the whole most of the medical professionals and the

hospital authorities are aware of the legal aspects of medical

negligence as well as the application of C.P.A to the medical/health
care services.

It is being appreciated by them.

They seem to have

accepted most of the implications of the Consumer Protection Act.

A great majority of them consider the C.P.A as an opportunity to

improve the standard of profession and the quality of services.
most of the cases, the medical professionals are not against

Consumer Protection Act.

In

the

But what they are against is the discrimi­

nation made by the Act wherein the application to the Government

hospitals and its doctors are left out, whereas the private sector

284

! 284

is brought within the boundaries of the C.P.A.

They are also sore

that the consumer court does not have their (medical professional’s)

representation.

Once these two grievences are taken into considera­

tion, then more of their support can be achieved.

After all their

(the medical professional's) requests/demands are not something that
is too difficult to be achieved.

These requests/demands when taken

into consideration, the C.P.A may prove to be more successful.

The

future of the medical profession and the health care services will

be greatly influenced by this consideration.

If not, C.P.A may remain

another piece of ineffective law in our country.

■ 285

CHAPTER X

I
I
I

A.

REFERENCES

B.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

C.

APPENDICES

REFERENCES

1.' Park J.E. and K. Park : "Park’s Text Book of

preventive and Social Medline"

13th ed: 1991.

P:25, M/s. Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers, Jabalpur.
2. Ibid

P:25

3. Ibid

p:25

4. Surgeon-General’s Report on Health Promotion and

Disease Preventions HEALTHY PEOPLE,

US Department

of Health Education and Welfare, Washington 1979,

P:119.
5. Park J.E. and K. Park:"Park*s Text Book of Preventive

and Social Medicien” 13th ed: 1991. P:25 M/s. Banarsidas
Bhanot Publishers; Jabalpur.

6. Ibid

p:36

7. Ibid

P:37

8. Ibid

P:38

9. S.G. Kabrci and D.N. Saraf:"Legal Issues Relating to
Health", Health for the Millions . Vol.XVIII Feb-

April 1992, Nosl &2 P :53.
10. Editorial: Perspective on "Law, Medicine and People",

Radical Journal of Health,
P: 77.
11. Ibid

12. ibid

No.II March 1988 No :4.

13. S.G. Kabra and D.N. Saraf: "Legal Issues Relating
to Health" Health for the Millions
Feb - April 1992.

Vol XVIII.

No: 122, P: 53.

14. "Christian Medical Work and Consumer Protection
Act"; C.M.J.I.

Vol. 7: July - September : 1992;

No : 3; P : 12.

15. Ibid

P. 12

16. Neki, J.S : "Professional ethics in the field of
Mental Health Social Justice as its new Premise",

Ethics in Psychiatry, P : 1.
17. Francis C.M. : Medical Ethics I ed; 1993; P :4

Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New
Delhi.
18. Davis,F.A : Medical Ethics

6th ed; 1967 ; P :l-3

16; F.a. Davis Co, Philadelphia.

19. Kalam, Thomas : Class notes on Medical Ethics 1993
(Unpublished).

20. Lobo, George V, ; Current Problems in Medical Ethics

1989 P : 36, Better yourself Book, Bombay.
21. Ibid

P:36

22. Francis, C.M. : Medical Ethics

1st ed: 1993 P :19

Jayapee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New

Delhi.

23. Lobo, George V. : Current Problems in Medical Ethics
1989 P :36; Better Yourself Book, Bombay

24.

Bio E-thics - Vol :4

" Codes and Statement related

to Medical Ethics" P : 1749 -1750.
P : 1788 - 1789

25. Ibid

26. Lele, R.D : "The Medical Profession and the Law :
An Over View": The Medical Profession and the Law;

1st ed; 1992, P : 9

sajjan Sons Publishers, Bombay

27. Krishna Kumar, R, Maria Abraham; K.M. Rakesh; C.
Suiit Chandra Kumar; "The Patient battles". The
week;

June 13th 1993 ; 29, 30.

28. Gurbax Singh : The Law of Consumer Protection :

P: 3,4 Bharat Law Publications. •//>) /:'/r ')

/l?^

29. Addison : "Laws relating to medical practice";

Taylor1s

Principles and Practice of Medical

Jurisprudence.

13th ed; 1964 ; P:39. Churchill

Livingstone, London.
30. Regan and Moritz : "Malpractice" Hand Book of
Legal Medicine;

1956; P:31, The C.V. Mosby

Company, St. Louis.
31. Knight, Bernard ; "Medical Negligence", Legal
Aspects of Medical Practice; 3rd ed; 1982

P;48; Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.

32. Desai, Mihir: "Medical Malpractice and the Law",

Legal Perspectives; Documentation File No.11
Legal Research for Social Action P :19

33. Brahma Reddy, V : "A must when Medicine has become a

Business"; Health Action;

Vol:6; No.6; June 1993;

p. 14.
34. Glossary on "Terms as defined in the Consumer Protection
Act, 1986"; Health for the Millions;

Vol: XVIII;

No. 6; December 1992; P:34.
35. Phantnani Pritam,

: "Negligence in Medical Practice";

No. 171 - 172 - Medico Friends Circle Bulletin ;
May - June 1991; P :2.

36. Mason, J.R and R.A Me Call Smith : Law and Medical

Ethics, 1987, P:165 Butterworths, London.
37. Chacko, T ; "Medical Negligence"; Health Action;

January 1989; P:31.
38. Mathew P.D. and P.M. Bakshi : "Medical Malpractice
and the Law"; FRCH News Letter, Vol V, No.4; July August 1991; P. 7.

39. The Bare Act on Consumer Protection Act 1986: P.3.,
Laksmi Narayana Publications, Bangalore.
40. Gurbax Singh, Law of Consumer Protection Act;

P 3, 4; Bharat Law Publications.
41. vyas, Sudhir : "Decaan Herald New Service", The
Deccan Herald, Bangalore dated 24.7.1992.
42. Sood, J.J. : Indian Express, New Delhi dated

26.5.1992.
43. Ibid

44. Narayan Ravindra

: Hindustan T^mes, New Delhi

dated 17.3.1992.
45. "Medical Negligence", Issue before the Public;

1993, P. 2. voluntary Health Association of India,
New Delhi.
46. Francis, C.M.: In "Editorial" Health Action, August

1993; P:3.

47. Kannapiran, Chandra: "C.P.A. 1986 " Health for the

Millions,

January 1992 Vol: XVIII ; No. 3, P. 40.

48. Naik Ganu : "Who will judge the Doctors"; Health

and Nutrition;

October 1992. P. 64,

49. Chakrabarthy, S.C.: "Who will judge the Doctor";

Health and Nutrition; October 1992; P.64.
50. Nathwani Juliet : Who will judge the Doctor? ;

Health and Nutrition; October 1992; P. 64, 65.

51. Grant K.B.: Health and Nutrition;

October 1992;

P.69
52. Mulekar, Sanjeev: Health and Nutrition; October
1992; p.69

53. Gupta Anupama Das: Health and Nutrition;

October

1992; P.69
54. Kuppuswamy Alladi: "Balancing between the rights

of the Doctor and the rights of the patient";

Health Action, June 1993; P.9.

S6» Mathew, P.D. and P.M. Bakshi : "Medical Malpractice
and the Law"; Health Action;

August 1991.

56. Chacko, T : "Medical Negligence"; Health Action;

January 1989; vol. 2, No 1; P.31.
57. Mathew P.D and P.M. Bakshi : "Medical Malpractice

and the Law"; Health Action;

August 1991.

58. Bricihaspathi Shruthi : Sacred books of the East;

Vol. 15.

59. Erimback Laxman V, A.i.R, 1969; SC.131.
60. Tewari,C.K., Law of Torts-and Liability";

Legal Aspects of Health Care; 1993, Unpublished
notes of C.K. Tewari.

61. Knight, Bernard Legal aspects of Medical Practics ;
3rd ed; 1982; P.57, Churchill Livingstone,
Edinburgh.

62. Ibid

63. Ibid

64. Lele R.D. : "Legal cures to Medical Malpractice",
The Letter of the Law

Lifeline, Indian Express,

Bangalore dated 12.6.1993, P.9
65. Ibid
66. Ibid
67. Krishnakumar, B Maria Abraham ; K.M. Rakesh, C.
Sulit Chandra Kumar, "Patient Battles"; The week;

13th June 1993; P. 29.

68. Dr. R.D. Lele : "Legal cures to Medical Malpractice"#
The letter of jhe Law#

Life Line - Indian Express,

Bangalore 12.6.1993# P.9.

69. Ibid
70. P.H. Addison: "Lawa relating to Medical Practice";
Taylor's Principles and Practice of Medical Juris­

prudence ;

13th ed; 1984; P.40, Churchill Livingstone

London.
71. Ibid, P: 40, 41
72. Ibid, P: 41

73. Ibid., P:41

74. Ibid.# P:51
75. Regan and Moritz : "Special defenses"; Hand book of
Legal Medicine.

1956# P:89; The C.V, Mosby Company#

St. Louis.
76. Ibid, P:52.
77. Sen Gupta S.P;. Sen Gupta's Commentaries on the
Consumer Protection

Act ; 1st ed; 1992 P.l#

Kamal Law House# Calcutta.
78. Gurbax

Singh :The Law of Consumer Protection;

P.30,45; Bharat Law Publications.
79. Ibid. P:26

80. Ibid, P XXIII
81. Sen Gupta, S.p.j Sen Gupta's Commentaries on the

1st

ed; 1992; P.5; Kamal Law House, Caicutta.

82. Gourishankar, V : "Bringing Doctors and Hospitals

to Consumer Courts"; Health Action; Vol.6, No.6

June 1993; P.4.
83. Ibid., P.5

84. The Bare Act on Consumer Protection Act 1986;

P.4; Lakshmi Narayana Publications, Bangalore.
85. Ibid., P:4

86. Bal, A : "Medical Councils - failure to enforce code
of ethics"; Health for the Millions;

Vo. XVIII;

No. 6; December 1992; p:12.

87. Ibid, Ps25
88. Feature : "Consumers and the Medical Community";

C.M.J.I.;

Vol. 7, No 3; July - September 1992;

P. 5.
89. Ibid., P.7

90. Chari, A.k.,

: "More a menace than a help to health

Profession"; Health Action;

Vol.6; No.6; June 1993;

p. 20,21
91. Ibid., p.21
92. Ibid P.23
93. Feature; "Consumers and the Medical Community";
C.M.J.I. ;

Vol. 7; No.3: July - September 1992;

P.6.
94. Chengappa Raj, Prakash M. Swamy, and Lekha Rattanani:

"Doctors in the dock"; India Today,

30th; 1993 p.96
95. Ibid., P.99

96. Ibid., P.95

June 16th -

97. Feature "Consumers and the Medical Community";
C.M.J.I.;

Vol.7 ; No. 3; July- September 1992;

p.6.

98. Lele, R.D. • The Medical Profession and the Law;
1st ed; 1992; forward by Justice V.S. Deshpande;

sajjan Sons, Bombay.
99. Readings in Medical Care

edited by the Committee

on Medical Care teaching of Association of teachers

of Preventive Medicien; Chapel Hill, The University
of North Carolina Press, New York, 1958.

100. Lele, R.D. : The ^edical Profession and the Law;
1st ed; 1992; p.7 sajjan Sons, Bombay.
101. State of India's Health; 1992 p. 356, Voluntary

Health Association of India, New Delhi.
102. Tewari, C#k# Legal Aspects of Health Care : Un­
published notes, 1993.

103. Kuppuswamy Alladi: “Balancing Between the rights of
the Doctors and the Riqhts of the Patient", Health

Action;

Vol.6, No.6, June 1993; P.9

104. Sharma, R.R.^: "Medical Audit as tool for quality

assurance Programme in large hospitals". National

Hospital convention and 17th Hospital Management
Seminar, 1988; P.2.
105. Roy, A.K.: ‘“‘uality Assurance, unpublished notes, 1993.
106. Kalam, Thomas: Medical Ethics unpublished notes, 1993

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Medical Negligence and Common Protection Act
1. The Bare Act - Consumer Protection Act 1986
Smt. R. Yeshodha, For Lakshmi Naraysn Publication,

No. 8, Adinarayaa Temple Street, Cottonpet,
Banctalore - 53).
2. Bioethic's Vol:4

3. Dr. Gurbax Singh: The Law of Consumer Protection,

(Bharat Law Publications)

4. S.p. Sen Gupta: Sen Gupta's Commentaries on the
Consumer Protection Act:

1st Ed:

(

)

(K.K.

Lodha for Kamal Law House, 8/2 K.S Roy Road,

Calcutta — 700001, India).
5. Consumer Protection Judgement 1991,

mode of citation (1991) C.P.J:

Vol. 1 and II,

(Delhi Law times

office, 533, jawahar Nagar, Delhi-110007).
6. C.M.J.I.:

Vol:7, No:2, April-June 1992;

7. Consumer confrontation;

October 1992

Vol. 12, No:5; September-

(Consumer education and research society)

8. Freeh Newsletter; Vol: 1; No:3; March - April 1987,

Vol:VI; No.6; Nov-Dec. 1992.

9. Health and Nutrition; October 1992.

10. Health Action;

Vol:l &2; No:l, Jan 1989,

Vol:3; No;3; Mar 1990, vol:5; No:8; Aug 1992

Vol:5; No:12, Dec 1992. Vol:6, No:6; June 1993

11. Health for the Millions:

Vol: XVI; No:6; Dec 1990

Vol:XVIII; No: 1 & 2; Feb - April 1992. VolxXVIII;

No.3; June 1992. Vol: XVIII; No.6; Dec 1992.
12. India Today:

16th - 30th June 1993.

13. International Digest of Health Leg!siatlon:
Vol: 43; No: 4, 1992.
Jan 1993., Feb 1993., March 1993.

14. Utusein Kpnsumer:

15. The Killer Fluid: V.H.A.I., a report on I.V.

fluid contaminated case.
16. Legal Perspectives:

Documentat on file No: 11;

Legal Resources for Social Action.

17. Legal News and views:

Vol:III; No:3; March 1989.,

Vol:IV; No:l; Jan 1990.
18. The Indian Journal of Medical Education: Vol:V;

No:2; Jan 1966.

VolsXXX; No:l; Jan-April 1991.

19. Dr. R.D. Lele: The Medical Profession a nd the Law;
1st ed; 1992;

(Sajjan Sons Publishers, Triveni

Bunglow; Malad (West); Bombay- 400064).
20. Dr. C.M. Francis: Medical Ethics;

(jaypee Brothers Medical publishers,

1st ed: 1993;
(p) Ltd.,

Post Box-7193, B—3, Emca House, 23/23B, ^hsari
Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi - 110002, India).

21. R.F. Bridgman and M.I. Roemen: Hospital
lation and Hospital System,

Legis-

(W.H.O. 1973).

22. A. Rajkumar: Acta Applicable to Hospitals in India;
(The Christian Medical Association of India; Jana-

Kpuri, New Delhi - 110058).
23. Bernard Knight: Legal Aspects of Medical Practice :

3rd ed: 1982;

(Churchill Livingstone London 1982).

24. Regan and Moritz: Hand Book of Legal Medicieftt

(The C.V. Mosby Company. St. Louis. 1956).
25. Committee on Medical Care Teachina of the Associ­

ation of Teachers of Preventive Medicine: Readings
in Medical Care:

(Chapel Hill. The University of

North Carolina Press - New York- 1958).

26. George V. Lobo. S.J. : Current Problems in

Medical Ethics:

5th Reprint; 1989;

(Better

Yourselves Books. Bandra. Bombay - 400050, 1989).
27. Dr. Unnikrishna P.V. and Ms. Rama V. Baru:
Medical Negligence

Issue before the Public;

V.H.A.I., 40, Institutional Area; South of IIT,

New Delhi, 110016, October 1992.
28. Manorama Year Book 1993.
29. Medico Friend Circle Bulletin : 146 - December 1988.

147, Jan 1989., 164-165, Jan 1990., 166. Aug 1990

171-172, May-June 1991., 173-174. July 1991, 178-179
Jan-Feb 1992., 184-185, JUly-Aug 1992.

30. The National Medical Journal of India;

31. The Rational Use of Medicine:

Vol:5; No.6

(V.H.A.I., 40,

Institutional Area, South of IIT., New Delhi), 1989

32. Radical Journal of Health:

Vol:I; No:2; Sep 1984.,

Vol:I; No*3; Dec 1986., VolsII; No:3; Dec 1987.
Vol:II: No:4, Mar 1988.
33. uPABHOKTA JAGARAN,

Vol:I, No:8, March 1993.

(on

rights of consumers).
34. Park J.E. and K. Park: "Park's Text Book of Pre­
ventive and Social Medicine: 13th ed; 1991

(M/s.

Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers, Jabalpur.
35. Surgeon General's report on Health Promotion and
Disease Prevention: Healing People

(U.S. Depart­

ment of health education and welfare, Washington,

1979) .

36. A. Keith Mant: Taylor's Principles and Practice

of Medical Jurisprudence: 13th ed; 1984;
(A. Keith Mant; Churchill Livingstone, London.)

APPENDIX. ~ - 1

QUESTIONNAIRE - No, I.(For the administrators}

TOPIC : Legal aspects of medical negligence with special
reference to Consume^ Protection Act»(C.P.A.)
This study is conducted purely for academic purpose.

All the informations will be treated as confidential.
You are free not to answer if you wish so.

But I will

be grateful if you co-operate with me and give me these
in formations.
PLEASE TICK THE APPROPRIATE BOX

..........

Your designation,,...

1, a) Are you aware of the legal aspect of medical
negligence ? Yes/

7;To some extent

'

; No !

7

b) Do you think that the medical negligence is a big

problem in the country ?

Yes /

/

; No /

/

2, a)Are you aware of the Consumer Protection Act, as

it applies to health care institutions?
Yes /

i

;To some extent I

!

; No /

b)Do you think that it will affect the medical profession
and the health care institutions ?

To a great extent/

/

> To some extent

~

Jnot much

3, a)Have you ever faced any case of medical negligence

in your hospital ?

Yes <7"

» No __y

b)If yes, how many during the period April 1992 to March

1993 ?

c) Do you have any case pending now ? Yeeu 7

4.

; No /

7

Aire your health care personnel aware of the Consumer

Protection Act and its implications ?

; Most

All_

5.

; Some,

; None/’

J

») Have you tried to protect your hospital and your

employees from being sued by th® patients/consumer
of your service ?

Yes

i No /

~

/

b) If yes, how ?

c) Is th0 hospital covered by insurance against medical
negligence ?

J'!

; No

Yes /

d) If no, are you considering such coverage ?

6.

; No I

7

Yes /

7

Which are the areas of services in your hospital that
are more prone to medical negligence ?

Medical,1

7.

; Surgical

Nursing £

I

; 0. P.O.

X-Ray

'/

; Any other?

/

j

/ ; Anaesthesia

; Lab



/

;

''

I

Which are the categories of employees more likely to be
involved in negligent acts ?

Doctors /

"

; Nurses

/

7

; Anaesthetists

Lab~techniciansi£7» Xray technicians
Administrators./!. / ;

Any other ?,

;
;

8.

a)Have you any particular system for patient’s comments/
.......

complaints/suggestions ?
Yes£

i

; No

; Lhderconsideration

~

b)lf yes, then how do you treat these complaints/
comments/suggestions ? • ••••................ •

9.

a)Do you think that the Consumer Protection Act is
beneficial to the institution in anyway ?

J No j___ /

Yes

b)lf yes, how ? • •

c)
lf

/y

;

••

no why ?

...

...........

10. a)Do you think that the Consumer Protection Act needs

to be modified ?
Yes

/

/

;

No /

I

;

Don ‘t know /

/

b)lf yes, then what modifications do you suggest ?

1
2

3.

4

»..

11«

What is your attitude towards those patients who
may sue your institution or your employees?

12.

What is your comment about Consumer Protection Act?
a) Will it improve the standard of medical profession

and the quality of health care services ?
Yes l~j

; No /'~J

b) Is it a hindrance to the profession/service
; No

Z

/—/

c) Can it destroy the image of the institution?

Yes /

d)

]

Can it be A means to check malpractice and the

quacks?
e)

; No /

]

Yes/

1

; No

/

Will it dampen the spirit of service of those

institutions ?

i No~f

YesO

13.

Will consumer protection act cause closure of voluntary

health care institutions ?
Yes /

14.

j

; No /

I

Will consumer protection act deter more voluntary
hospitals being opened in future ?
YesO

15.

J NoO/

Will Consumer Protection Act tend to increase the cost
of medical care ?

Y®8 --- /

» No /

/

; To a small extent /

/

1 6. Other comments/suggestiona?

Thank you for your co-operation.

SR. SOFIA
S.J.M.C.H., BANGALORE

APPENDIX

JI

QUESTIONNAIRE - NO.II (For the Doctors)
TOPIC : Legal asppcty of medical - negligence with special
reference to Consumer Protection Act(C, P.Af)

This study is conducted purely for academic purpose*

All

the information will be kept confidential.

You are free

not to answer any question if you so wish.

But I will be

grateful if you co-operate with me and give these informations.

PLEASE TICK THE APPROPRIATE BOX

Your speciality
1.

a)

Do

.....................................

you think that medical negligence is a major

problem in the country ?

b)

No /

/

Are you aware of the legal provisions in case of

medical negligence ?

To great extent/

2.

f

..... Yes /

/

.........
Somewhat/

J

/

not much /

Are you aware of the provisions of Consumer Protection
Act (CPA) as it affects the medical profession ?
To great extent/

3.

/

/

not much /

/

What do you think of the impact of C.P.A. on medical
profession ?

4.

Somewhat/

Good I

I

; Fair '

I

iBad/

J

a) Do you think that the C.P.A. will affect your relationship
with your patients

b) If it does, how ?

........

Yes /

/

; No /

/

5.

a) Are you a membir of 1.1*1.A. ?

; No

Yes

b) 1.1*1.A. is not in favour of the application of
C. P.A to the service rendered by the medical

profession.
Do you agree ?

6.

Yes /

/

j

; No/

a) Do you have the professional indemnity insurance

Yes I

individually ?

1

J

; No •

b) Do you have the professional indemnity insurance
Yes I

through the institution ?

]

No/

i

c) If not, do you feel th« need to be insured ?
Yes /~~7

T

5 No /

d) If you have insurance against claims for medical

negligence, do you consider the premium ?
Very high I

7.

I

/

Do you feel that the C.P.A. affects your professional

freedom ?
8,

J Reasonable/

Yes

/

7

i No I

I

a) If C.P.A. continues to be applicable to the services
rendered by the doctor, do you think that it needs to
be modified ?

....

Yes [

/

;No /

/

b) If yes, then uhat would be your suggestions ? Please
list three important modifications*
1

2
3

9.

a) Do you think that the Medical Council of India

and State Medical Councils have the authority

and the ability to handle the problem of medical
negligence to the satisfaction of the patients
(Public) and the medical profession ? .... Yes I 1 ;N Of ~~7
b) If it is not adequate, would modifications to the

Yes /

Act make it adequate ?

J

/

; No

c) If yes, what modifications would you suggest ?
Please list three.

1

.........................

2

3
10. Have you ever faced a problem in managing the patients

because of C.P. A.?

Yea I

I

No

/

/

11« If yes, then what measures have you taken to protect

yourself ? Please list three

1
2

3
12. In view of C.P.A. what steps can help to avoid litigation

and its effects ? (Please tick one or more)
a) Provide proper explanation to the patient before and

after each procedure/treatment.

b) Regular visits to the patient to make sure that
he is comfortable and gets all care.
c) flake the patient consent before every procedure/

treatment

d) Avoid taking any risk......... consult others
and refer the patient to other specialists

e) Provide the emergency treatment and then refer
the patient to more competent persons

f) Any other ? (Please specify)

13.

.

a) Do you think that the C.P.A. will improve the

standard of medical profession and the quality of
health care services ?

Yes /

/

; No /

b) If yes, how ?

J

; to an extant Yes /

...............

c) If no, why ?

14.

[

......... .........

Do you think that C.P.A. will make doctors resort
to 'defensive medicine’? Yes/

I

; No i

!

15.

In your opinion,

will C.P.H.

of medical cere ? very much,

increase the cost
j

;

to some extent..

not at all

16.

Uhat would be your sincere re-action to a patient
who may sue you for professional negligence ?

Uhat other commenta/suggestions do you have on thia

topic ?
1

2.

............................................

3

.....

4

5

Thank you for your kind co-operation.

Sr. Suma
D.H.C.h. Student

S.J.M. C. H. BANGALORE. 34

I

Karnataka State Commission

of Compliant?

No.of Complaints

No.

Pending

rears

Karnataka State Commission

No.of Appeals
Appeal:

Pending

Years

Pending cases-O.B against Receipts

I////////Z4

Numbei

For the month of May 1993.

Districts -->

Numbers

For the month of May 1993

Total, Disposed and Pending Cases

g

g
b

Not viewed