RF_COM_H_56_PART_2_SUDHA.pdf

Media

extracted text
REC0GNI SING THE NEU PARADIGM
This alternative health care project phenemena

has been a

spontaneous upsurge in the last two decades and not an organised
planned movement.

From 1984, a team of us have been studying

this process through a series of reflections with individuals
and groups and network to build a new understanding of

Community Health from field level experience and grass roots
action.

Our attempt has been to look at successes and

failures, strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats

of all these community health action initiators.

Also by

taking a ’macro view’ and differences, we have been trying to

build the components of a new paradigm.

The broad definition that is emerging is:
"Community Health is a process of enabling people to exercise

collectively their responsibility to their own health and

to demand health as their right, and involves the increasing
of the individual, family;-

and community aionomy over health

and over organisations, means, opportunities, knowledge,
skills and supportive structures that make health possible"

The components

of Community Health action includes:

Integrate Health with development programs,
Integrate curative with preventive, promotive and

rehabilitative activities,

Experiment with low-cost, effective, appropriate

technology,
Involve local, indigenous health knowledge, resources

and personnel,
Train village-based health workers,

Initiate, support community organisations like youth

clubs, farmers clubs and mothers clubs,
Increase community participation in all aspects of
health planning and management,

Generate community support by mobilising financial,

labour skills and manpower resources.
....2

..

2
While facilitating these managerial/technological innovations

the Community Health action initiators have to seriously
face up to a wide variety of 'social processes' and 'value

issues’ that are:
i)

Organisation of non-formal, informal, demystifying

and conscientising 'education for health' programs;
ii)

Initiating a democratic, decentralised, participatory
and hon-heirarchical value-system in the interactions
within the health team and in the health team­

community interactions;
iii)

Recognising conflicts of interests and social
tensions in the existing inequitous society and

initiating action to organise, involve all those

who do not/cannot participate at present;
iv)

Questioning the over-medicalised value system

of health care and training institutios and cha­
llenging these within the health team; learning

new health oriented values;

v)

Recognising that community health needs community­
building efforts through group work, promoting

co-operative efforts and celebrating collectively;

vi)

Confronting the super-structure of medicalised

health delivery system to become

- more poor people oriented
- more community oriented
- more socio-epidemiologically oriented

- more democratic,
- more accountable

vii)

Recognising the cross-cultural conflicts inherent

in transplanting a Western Medical model on a

non-western culture and hence exploring integ­
ration with other medical cultures and systems

in a spirit of dialogue.

3

viii)

health efforts

Recognising that community

with the above principles and philosophy
cannot be just

a speciality;
a professional discipline;

a technology fix;
a package of actions;
a project of measurable activities;

but has to transform itself to
a new vision of health care;

a new value-orientation in action
and learning;

a movement, not a project;
a means, not an end
Are these the axioms of an alternative?
These new'issues',

being

'values', approaches to health is now

recognised by a growing number of coordinating

groups, academics and policy research groups as well.
Four coordinating groups among the NGOs including the
Voluntary Health Association of India, The Catholic

Hospital Association of India, The Christian Medical

Association of India and the Asian Community Health Action

Network have all identified with this new thrust in the
policy statements of the 19B0s(

)

The ICMR/ICSSR Health for All prescription includes
these dimensions as well (

)

A plea for a New Public Health is the latest in a series

of issues and thearetical perspectives emerging from
academic centres as well.

However recognising the paradigm is after all only the
first step.

Taking action to build a new structure is a

challenging and daunting task.

Converting the old system

to a new way of life is not going to be easy

HEALTH FOR ALL
ICMR/ICSSR

Prescription

A MASS MOVEMENT

TO
I reduce poverty, inequality

AND SPREAD EDUCATION

H; ORGANISE POOR AND UNDERPRIVILEGED
TO FIGHT FOR THEIR BASIC RIGHTS
M MOVE AWAY FROM COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE,

CONSUMERIST WESTERN MODEL OF HEALTH
as

CARE AND REPLACE IT BY AN ALTERNATIVE

BASED IN THE. COMMUNITY.

EVOLVING POLICY ALTERNATIVES

The National Health Policy statements are beginning to

echo these ideas and values.
Whether this is ’populist rhetoric' or a serious 'rethink'
only time will tell.

NATIONAL HEALTH QQLICY, 1983

Recommendations
For restructuring Health Services

1.

Organised support of volunteers, auxiliaries, paramedical
and multipurpose workers

2.

Selection and training of community health volunteers

3.

Building of self reliance and effective community participation

4.

Establishment of a well worked out referral system

5.

Establishment of a nation wide chain of sanitary-cumepidemiological stations

6.

Concept of domiciliary and field camp approach

7.

Devising planned programmes to reduce governmental
expenditure and fully utilising untapped resources

8.

Setting up centres to provide speciality and superspeciality
services

b

9.

Mental Health care and care of physically handicapped

10.

Priority to unpriviliged and vulnerable section of
society

11.

Ensuring adequate mobility of personnel of all levels

of functioning.
VHAI (

)

\ the cover STORY

\

Community Health In India >

Preamble

brings to the Readers

This story

of Health Action a birds eye view of an emerging

process in India in which there is a growing shift
of emphasis in health work from

Doctors and Nurses
Hospitals and Dispensaries
Drugs and laboratory investigations

surgery and medical technology
to

Village/Community based health workers

Health education/awareness building
Appropriate health technology

Community based health actions

Involvement of traditional healing t -

ns

Integrated rural development
and- m\r-n

The process reflects a growing diccnchantment with the
'





';'rT

“ ~J

hosoital/institutional based high technology models of

health care which we transplanted and adopted in India

to meet the health needs of our people-.especially since
independence.

The process also reflects a commitment and a growing
diversity of efforts and initiatives all over the country
to adapt, innovate, create, alternative approcahes to
health care that are more relevant to our people-’ s needs

and

social realities.

White it is not possible ■ to

introduce readers to all the participating groups and

initiatives in theCommunity Health Movement we have

..2

2
attempted to explore as much of the diversity as possible
as well as quote from the wealth of documentation, reflections

and educational materials that this ferment is generating,

HEALTH ACTION

July 1989
Theme: Community Health in India

1, Community Health ; Exploring the Indian
Experience

CHC„ Bangalore

2i/Voluntary Agencies in Community Health :
The need for a new paradigm

Alok flukhopadhyay

3'. Community Health : Learning through
our failures

Pram and Hari
John

4; Building Holistic Health Communities

Edwin S.J

5,

Samuel Joseph

^an a Hospital be Community Health oriented?

S, SEARCH: fin experience in Community Health
Research

Abhay Bang

7*./Training for Community Health Care
: A medical college experience

Dara Amar

8. Health of People is Wealth of Nation

Jacob Cherian

9. Community Health : Keeping Trac*;-.
basic Resources inventry)

CHC9 Bangalore

0>'Organ!zing Deople for Health
~ Problems and Contradictions

Anant R S

■ £/f'•/ )-^ErA:'L.Tj+

C.

STAGES IN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES

E

lEADIwL, 7p

MORE

tD^PLt'ic

PRIMARY HEALTH CARE DEVELOPMENT ARE:
Stage 0: Community has to come to the hospital resulting in
limited access to health care.

Stage 1: Mobile clinics which give episodic services unable to
deal with complications developing between the
intervals of care.

Stage 2: Public Health Services which attempt to achieve disease
control without necessarily depending on active
recepient community involvement.
Stage 3: Hospital-based,, community-oriented, Primary Health

Care whe;re all resources and health funcationaiies

are taken regularly and frequently from hospital
bases into communities requesting and cooperating
actively with this assistance.

Stagg 4: Community Based Primary Health Care (CBPHC) with
facilities and health personnel firmly established

in communities requesting them and actively cont­
ributing to their implementation.

Tertiary hospitals

are then used only for referrals, training and
assistance as and when required.

Stage 5: Multi-sectoral, multi.disciplinary integration of many
different comoonenfes in each community, leading to

improved health and economic developmemt.
Stage 6: Education, organisation, mobilisation of resources

and active implementation of socio-economic development
of people for their own total health at the micro­
project level.
Stage 7: political activity by communities at the macro

'

level to ensure primary health care with the quality

of wholeness in life for all.
(Source: Fiona Plus, A Bi-monthly bulletin on Primary Health

Care in Community Health, )

ALHA ATA - - Tan Years After

A decade age, on September 25, 197B, the Alma Ata
conference formulated at Primary Health Care (PHC) strategy

to achieve "Health for All" (HFA) by the year 2000.

Some

argue that there has been virtually no success and that we
should abandon the strategy.

Others maintain that consi­

derable progress has been made and that we only need to
redefine the objectives dightly in planning for the year 2000

In its first evaluation report, WHO claimed that some
progress has been made towards HFA 2000.

Paradoxically, it

is the developed countries that have benefitted most,

Deve­

loping countries still have not achieved much success in
PHC coverage.

The obvious success stories, such as the

achievement of 50 percent coverage in child immunization

and the final eradication of small pox, cannot conceal the
wide gulf which still exists between the urban "haves" and

the rural "have-nots".

Nearly 65 percent of people inAlndia

are trapped in the vicious cycle of poverty, malnutrition
and infectious disease, which reduces their capacity to

work and limits their ability to plan for the future.

For

example, 100 to 200 out of every 1000 infants born alive
still die during their first year of life.

In spite of the dismal statistics, some progress has
been made in the decade since Alma Ata, including reductions
in the infant mortality rate, the crude birth rate and the

death rate, and an increase in life expectancy.

The concept

of the community health worker, who is selected by the local
community to serve the community, has had considerable
impact.

Medical education has been re-oriented toward social
goals, hhd the teaching of preventive and social

medicine has been upgraded.

There has been a signifciant

progress in re-orienting the PHC to maximize the use of

limited resources through better management.

2

2

4. A community means its members feel with one another.
A community, devoid of feelings, is not yet a community
It may be just a task force.

Community members "weep with those who weep and

laugh with those who laugh".

5. A community celebrates together.
It brings imagination, feelings and art to play in

the collective affirmation of persons and events
and mysteries of life.

6.

A healing community heals not only by the explicitly

therapeutic programmes but also by its process of
affirmation and the strength of the relationships.

Community is an antidote against alienation,
loneliness, insecurities and the resultant
psychosomatic problems.

7.

A liberating community, conse uently a healing

community is a participating community.
Participation in decision making is what makas a

mass into a people. When people decide together they

become conscious of their dignity as partners in
progress, as subjects and equals and not just

objects and the ruled.

8.

A community that is empowering, hence liberating
and healing, makes its members not only to decide

on the choice of various solutions proposed

but also to see the problems together.

Knowledge is power. A community that has been enabled

3

3

to identify the problems and constantly to

evaluate them is an empowered community.

Fev; will dare to exploit that community.
9.

A community that is effective is necessarily small.

This follows from our earlier principles. A
big community can neither offer powerful relationships

nor scope for participation.
Only a fellow - ith a big voice can make himself

heard in a big village. Small men feel too small
to speak up in bigger structures.
10.

A community that intends to have wider macro

level ira-pact ensures linkage with other similar

communities through representative structures at
various levels. This ensures both the smallness

of the community and the wider level effective

action with effective grass-root participation.
11.

A healing community takes a holistic view of
health that includes the various social, economic,

environmental and other factors affecting health.
Do we have such communities?

Such structures or

infrastructures that would make community health action
more sustained and more participatory at grass-roots?

Until we have such communities whatever we call
community health programme may at the most be a rural

extension programme and not real community health action.
Community health is not just a programme for the

people; it is also something of the people and by the people.

4

4

They say examples speak louder. Let me share with you an
attempt where we try to integrate the community structure
aspect or the infrastructure aspect, into community health
action.

We call this project Basic Holistic Health Communities.

BASIC HOLISTIC HEALTH CONr.UHITIES

Our first step here is to start organising basic
communities of thirty houses each. We have altogether

170 such basic communities now.

These communities are geograohical, ensuring that
nobody is left out. This geographical aspect ensures also
a permanent identity for the communities. As long as

the houses are in a given geographical area the communities
are also there. Even if for some reason or other some communities
or all the communities in a village remain dormant for sometime

the day somebody wakes them up they come alive and ready
to jump into action.

These communities meet once a week or twice a week

or even oftener as the case may be. These meetings are
either for prayer, or for celebration, or for nonformal

education or for discussions on problems affecting them and
so on.

Five representatives from each community make the
representative general body of the villa< e. One representative
from each community makes the executive body of the village.

Representatives from the villages make the zonal
representative bodies, the general body having a representative

5

4

They say examples speak louder. Let me share with you an
attempt where we try to integrate the community structure

aspect or the infrastructure aspect, into community health
action.

We call this project Basic Holistic Health Communities.

BASIC HOLISTIC HEALTH COi-WHITIES

Our first step here is to start organising basic

communities of thirty houses each. We have altogether

170 such basic communities now.
These communities are geographical, ensuring that

nobody is left out. This geographical aspect ensures also
a permanent identity for the communities. As long as

the houses are in a given geograi hical area the communities

are also there. Even if for some reason or other some communities
or all the communities in a village remain dormant for sometime

the day somebody wakes them up they come alive and ready

to jump into action.

These communities meet once a week or twice a week

or even oftener as the case may be. These meetings are
either for prayer, or for celebration, or for nonfomial
education or for discussions on problems affecting them and
so on.

Five representatives from each community make the
representative general body of the villa- e. One representative
from each community makes the executive body of the village.

Representatives from the villages make the zonal
representative bodies, the general body having a representative

5

5

each from the communities and executive committee having
village representatives at the ratio of one representative
for five communities. What is discussed below that is

st grass root communities, each up to the top through
their representatives at various levels and what is
discussed at the top is reported back to the basic

communities.

Our system of handling finance in one of these villages
called Kodimunai, will make this accountability to the

grass roots clearer. Here the Treasurer is
free to spend on his own discretion upto Rs.50.00 for

emergency expenses. When the President and the Treasurer
decide together they can spend upto Rs. 10'.'. 00. The Executive

Committee of the village can spend upto Rs.500.00.

The

representative general body of the village having five
representatives each from the communities can spend upto

Rs.1000.00.

If it is more than Rs.1000.00 the representative

general body of the village makes the decision and sends
it for referendum among the basic communities. The decision

is not carried if more than half the number of the
communities fail to support the decision.

This type of two way communication helps for sustained
ection. It is enough for anybody in any of these 170

communities to remember the problem and the issue will come

alive again.
Once we build these basic communities we use these

communities for nonformal education on health concerns.
They become grass root forums for health motivation,

participation through decision-making evaluation and follow up

6

6
Here the care is taken not just to propose solutions
but more especially to make them see the problems themselves

so that through the process of ongoing situational

evaluation they are enabled to remain empowered.

This we do through various processes. One such
programme is our holistic health orientation camps in

basic communities. This willbe a week long programme where
trained volunteers help conduct health discussion
sessions in the basic communities with the help of a few

structured community-discussion exercises. Each community
will be encouraged to do also creative assimilation projrammess

whatever they learn in the discussions in an evening is
translated by the community into cultural programmes

to be staged in the community next evening. The village
level celebration that will take place the last day will
bring to a wider audience the best of the cultural programmes
produced by these communities. This health camp normally

will include also an exhibition and also half a day or one

day seminars to various categories of people with orwithout
audio visual programmes. Wherever possible we

would include

also house visiting programmes and a health survey of the

village.
In addition we. prepare discussion themes and circulate
them among the basic communities. These discussion themes

are structured in such a way that they elicit participation

of the community. Each theme contains an initial activity
related to the theme, questions to elicit participation,

a deepening process through the points given, questions
leading to community decision, and a conceding activity by
way of a song or so.

....7

7

Our next process will be to make these communities

accept responsibility for their own health care. This we

intend, to do by way of promoting a holistic health
insurance scheme run by the people- themselves.

Recently we had a survey to find out the average annual
medical expenses incurred by a family. This survey, conducted
in four villages, showed that the average amount was

Rs.4086.00.

We will be able to reduce this to just Rs.500.00

with proper

educational preparation and involvement

by the poo- le. For this, we would need to transcend the
allopathic boundaries and include other therapeutic

systems including drugless ones.
Our health insurance programme is expected to consist

of the following components: nonformal education through
basic communities, collection of funds through
basic communities, primary health care through village
level representative tody and its appointees, secondary

and other levels of health care throu *h zonal bodies and the
referral centres chosen by them.

Unfortunately, even the example given is not yet a
realised drearn. Well, this is the vision. We are not yet
sure how far we will reach. May be in spite of our

optimism we may r-'ach only half way. But we feel even
that would be worth the efforts, as it would be a se

step in the right direction.

PRIMARY FE'.LTH CARE

DECLARATION OF 'LEA-ATA — 12.9.1970
RELEVANT EXTRACTS.

Primary health care is essential health care based

or. practical, scientifically sound and socially acceptable

methods and technology made universally accessible to

individuals and families in the community through their full
participation and at a cost that the community and country

can afford to maintain at every stage of their development

in the spirit of self-reliance and self-determination. It
forms an

integral part both of the country’s health system

of which it is the central function and main focus, and of

the overall social and econcmic develo ment of the community.
It is the first level of contact of individuals, the family

and community with the national health system bringing health
care as close as possible to where people live and work, and

constitutes the first element of a continuing health care
process.
Primary health cares

1.

reflects and evolves from the economic •conditions
and socio-cultural and political characteristics
of the country and its communities and is based on

the application of the relevant results of social,
biomedical and health services research and public

health experience?
2.

addresses the main health problemsin she community,

providing promotive, preventive, curative and

rehabilitative services accordinglly;

2

2

3.

includes atleast: education concerning prevailing

health problems and the methods of preventing
and controlling them; promotion of food supply and proper

nutrition; an adequate supply of safe water and basic
sanitation; maternal and child health care, including
family planning; immunization against the major infectious

diseases; appropriate treatment of common diseases and

I/' '

/lip-. '-/I:.. .;..g injuries; prevention and

control of locally endemic diseases; and provision of
essential drugs;

4.

involves, in addition to the health sector, all related

sectors and aspects of natJonal and community development,

in particular agriculture, animal, husbandry, food,
industry, education, housing, public works, communications
and other sectors; and demands the coordinated efforts
of all those sectors.

5.

r-quires and promotes maximum community and
individual self-reliance and participation in the

planning, organization, operation and control of primary
health care, making fullest use of local,national and other
available resources; and to this end develops through

appropriate

education the ability of communities to

participate;
6.

should be sustained by integrated,functional and mutually
supportive referral systems, leading to the progressive

improvement of comprehensive health care for all, and
giving priority to those most in need;

3

3

7.

relies at local and referral levels, on health vzorkers

including physicians, nurses, midwives, auxiliaries

and community workers as applicable, as well as traditional
practitioners as needed, suitably trained socially and

technically to work as a health team and to respond to the
expressed health needs of the community.

ASIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH ACTION NETWORK (ACHAN)

was formed in 1980 by a group of twenty people with substantial

experience in working in health care among the poor in Asia
and operates through its network of concerned individuals and
non-gonernmental organisations in fifteen Asian countries, most

of whom have been engaged in innonative primary care at the
community level

ACHAN

seeks to spread a philosophy of community eased health care
that envisages a process of self reliant human development for
the oppressed poor in Asian communities which will result in

genuine social change.

ACHAN
views health as the physical, mental, social, spiritual,

economic and political shoneness of the individual and the
community

ACHAN
believes that health problems and priorities should be viewed
in terms in which the community sees them and that the community

should be actively involved in planning, implementation,
monitoring and evaluation of health care programmes.

BASIC PRINCIPLES IN C^I’S COMMITMENT TO COMMUNITY HEALTH

1.

Community Health is am approach to health care services.
It takas into consideration a philosophy, attitude and

commitment of working with people to help them help

themselves.

It is not a project, department or funding

system.

2.

Community Health focusses on the promotion and maintenance
of health and giv^s priority or etmhasis to the health

team, primary health care and community needs,

3.

Community participation is an essential component of
Community Health.

This recognises the potential rolgfaf

others to help educate, organise, mobilise and support

community development activities where the people have a

say in and control over their own future.

Community

participation thus becomes involved in people’s democratic
rights and their contributions to the development of their

society and nation.

4.

In Community Health there is a redognition of a three tier
system of primary, secondary and tertiary care approach to

the needs of the community and the resources available.
Therefore this approach accepts the role afid potential

of the hospital as integral to the Community Health.

A

commitment to Community Health is not necessarily anti­

hospital. Yet the hospital needs to be supportive of
Community Health and recognise and accept this wider concern

in health care services.
5.

In the provision of services in Community Health there is a

bias towards those who are oppressed, exploited, the poor and
the marginalised.

Thus priority would be given to rural

areas and urban slums.

Special groups for concern would be

women, tribals, dalits, small marginalised farmers and
landless labourers.

2

2
6.

The organisation of services under Community Health would

be appropriate, acceptable, easily available and affordable.

It would be cost effective and willing to use unskilled, semi
skilled adequately trained local health personnel.

7.

There is a place for voluntary agencies in Community Health.

8.

Community Health accepts that health cannot be improved by
health services alone; health and development need to be
interlinked and interdependent.

9.

There is a place for appreciating local customs, traditions,

beliefs and health care systems and relating health
services to tha culture and socio-economic situation of

people.

Appropriate indigenous medical practices and

trained practitioners, or traditional birth attendants
are encouraged in Community Health.
10,

In tha final analysis Community Health is not apolitical.
If it concerns the welfare of people and the provision of

adequate and appropriate health care then health becomes a

social justice issue.

It is concerned with structures and

systems of society that seem to benefit a few at the
expense of many.

STAGES IN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES lEMDInu, TO MO*t

CvhApLG”TE

PRIMARY HEALTH CARE DEVELOPMENT ARE:
Stage 0: Community has to coma to the hospital resulting in

limited access to health care.
Stage 1: Mobile clinics which give episodic services unable to

deal with complications developing between the
intervals of care.
Stage 2: Public Health Services which attempt to achieve disease

control without necessarily depending on active
recepient community involvement.
Stage 3: Hospital-based., community-oriented, Primary Health

Care where all resources and health funcationaiies
are taken regularly and frequently from hospital
bases into communities requesting and cooperating

actively with this assistance.

StagQ 4: Community Based Primary Health Care (CBPHC) with
facilities and health personnel firmly established

in communities requesting them and actively cont­

ributing to their implementation.

Tertiary hospitals

are then used only for referrals, training and
assistance as and when required.
Stage 5: Multi-sectoral, multi.disciplinary integration of many

different components in each community, leading to

improved health and economic development.
Stage 6: Education, organisation, mobilisation of resources
and active implementation of socio-economic development

of people for their own total health at the micro­

project level.

Stage 7: political activity by communities at the macro
level to ensure primary health care with the quality
of wholeness in life for all.

(Source: Fiona Plus, A Bi-monthly bulletin on Primary Health
Care in Community Health, )

STAGES IN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES lEADXhu TO MCRt

('vhApLfTt

PRIMARY HEALTH CARE DEVELOPMENT ARE:
Stage 0: Community has to corns to ths hospital resulting in

limited access to health care.

Stage 1: Mobile clinics which give episodic services unable to
deal with complications developing between the
intervals of care.
Stage 2: Public Health Services which attempt to achieve disease

control without necessarily depending on active
recepiant community involvement.

Stage 3: Hospital-based, community-oriented. Primary Health
Care where all resources and health funcationaiies

are taken regularly and frequently from hospital
bases into communities requesting and cooperating

actively with this assistance.

Stag§ 4: Community Based Primary Health Care (CBPHC) with
facilities and health personnel firmly established

in communities requesting them and actively cont­

ributing to their implementation.

Tertiary hospitals

are then used only for referrals, training and
assistance as and when required.

Stage 5: Multi-sectoral, multi.disciplinary integration of many
different components in each community, leading to

improved health and economic developmemt.
Stage 6: Education, organisation, mobilisation of resources

and active implementation of socio-economic development
of people for their own total health at the micro­

project level.

Stage 7: political activity by communities at the macro
level to ensure primary health care with the quality
of wholeness in life for all.

(Source: Fiona Plus, A Bi-monthly bulletin on Primary Health

Care in Community Health, )

CHAI’s Philosophy and Vision of its Community Health Programing
The Community Health Department of CHAI also felt the need for

a correct understanding of its role in the field of health.

All

the points mentioned above were the basis for its conclusions.

Accordingly we believe that:
1.

In a country like India, so vast and varied, where

80% of its population lives in the rural areas and

about 90% of the country’s health care system caters

to the need of the urban minority, a new orientation
and rethinking of the whole health care system is the
need of the hour.

2.

Health is the total well-being of individuals, fami­

lies and communities as a whole and not merely the

absence of sickness.

The demands an environment in

which the basic needs are fulfilled, social well-being

is ensured and osychological as well as spiritual
needs are met.

Accordingly a new set of parancters

will have to be considered for measuring the health

of a community such as the people’s part in decision
making, absence of social evils in the community,

organising capacity of the people, the role women

and youth play in matters of health and development
etc., other than the traditional ones like infant
mortality rate, life expectancy etc.

3.

The present medical system with undue emphasis on

the curative aspect tends mainly to be a profit
oriented business, and it concentrates on ’selling

health’ to the people, and is hardly based on the

ceal needs of vast majority of the people in the
country.

The root causes of illness lie dago ub

in social evils and imbalances, to which the real

2

2
answer is a political end, understood as a process

through which people are made aware of the real

needs, rights and responsibilities, available
x

resources in and around them and get themselves

organised for appropriate actions.

Only through

this process can health become a reality to the
vast majority of the Indian Masses.
4.

The concept of Community Health here whould be

understood as a process of enabling people to
exercise collectively their responsibilities to
maintain their health and to demand health as

their right.

Thus it is- beyond mere distribution

of medicines, prevention of sickness and income
generating programmes.

EXPLORING JARGON

Ths World Health Organization has defined Health as a * state

of physical, mental and social uell being and not merely an

absence of diseases of infirmity
While this definition focusses on the health of individuals
it could as uell be a description of the ideal state for
families and communities,. Community Health uould therefore

mean ’a precess of improving the physical,, mental and social

uell being of the community and all its component members.
This interest in health action focussed on the community and

not only on tho individual is not nou.

from times immemorial

efforts have been mads by doctors and communities to evolve

health actions that are focussed on the environment ~ physical,
chemical, biological, social, mechanical, psychological, culture

ecological rather than on individual patients.

This increasing

knouledgs has over times evolved into various disciplines
and today though ue use these names synonymously they do have

their oun distinctive meanings and focus.

In a uay they also

represent the historical development of skills focussed on
community health

1. Medicines The art of preventing and curing disease
2.

Hygiene: The Science of Health

3.

Public Health: The branch of medicine that deals uith

statistics, hygiene and the prevention and

overcoming of epidemics.
4.

Preventive Medicine: The branch of medical science that

deals uith prevention of diseases
5.

Social Medicine: Systematic study of human diseases uith

special reference to social factors

2

6.

Socialised Pledicine (^tate medicine):

Tha control of medical practice by an

organisation of the government, the practitioners
being an integral part of/the organisation from
which they draw their fees and to whibh the

public contribute in some form or other
(same as National Health Service)

7.

Community Pledicine! A unified and balanced integration

of curative, preventive and promotional

health services focussed on the
community

As Parks textbook (standard reference in India) says

"Once looked upon as a healing art, medicine is looked
upon today as the sum total of all activities of a

given society that tend to promote, restore and
maintain ths health of the people.

Uhere such a

concept prevails, medicine includes more than a
physician’s action; it becomes community health"
Community Health as we understand it today includes all

the ideas and disciplines mentioned above and more.

As new

aporoaches evolve the definition bee mes more comprehensive

RECOW-'CEWOATICNS

Ue therefore make tha following recommendations:
1.

The Government of India should, in consultation with

all concerned, formulate a comprehensive national

policy on health dealing with all its dimensions,

viz., ohilosophical and cultural, socio-economic,
nutritional, environmental, educational, preventive

and curative.

The coordinated and planned imple­

mentation of this oolicy should ba the collaborative

and cooperative responsibility of individuals,
families, local communities, health personnel and

State and Central Governments.
2.

The basic objectives of this policy should be:

a.

to integrate the development of the health

system with the overall plans of sooio—economicpolitical transformation;
b.

to ensure that each individual has access to
adequate food and is provided with an environment

which is conducive to health and adequate

immunization, where necessary;

c.

to devise an educational programme which will

ensure that every individual has the essential
knowledge, skills and values which would enable

him to lead an effectively healthy life and to
participate meaningfully in understanding

and solving the health problems of the family
and the community;

d.

to replace the existing model of health care

services by an alternative new model which will be
- combining the best elements in the tradition

and culture of the peoplm with modern science
and technology,

2

2

— integrating promotive, preventive
and curative functions,

- democratic, decentralised and participatory,
— orianted to the people, i.e., providing
adequate health care to every individual and

taking spacial care of the vulnerable groups,
- economical, and
- firmly rooted in the community and aiming

at involving the people in the provision

of the services they need and increasing
their capacity to solve thein own problems,

and
s. to train the personnel, to produca drugs and
materials and to organise research needed for

this alternative health care system.

3.

A detailed time-bound programme should be prepared,

the needed administrative machinery created and
finance provided on a priority basis so that this
new policy will be fully implemented and the goal

of "Health for All" bo reached by the end of the

century.

(Recommendations of the ICMR/lCSSR on "Health for All"
An Alternative Strategy)

ORGANIZING PEOPLE FOR HEALTH

- ££221222_22^_£22^ ^ac*^2ii0^2•
Ansnt R S

(This reflection is based on the experience of work in a
health-education-concientization project in a few rather
remote, backward villages near Pune, and on the debates,

discussions in the Medico-Friend-Circle)

General Perspective on Health-work

Most of/the major determinants of the health status of a
population - food, water, sanitation, shelter, work-environment

cultural relations...... are far beyond the control of health

workers.

But Medicos can, with the help of the community,

organise preventive and therapeutic (symptomatic or curative)

services, can do health-education and advise the planners on
health-implications of different socio-economic interventions.
These medical interventions are very valuable to prevent

certain deaths and diseases, to relieve human su-ffering. But
they have only a marginal role in improving the overall

health-status of the population.

For example, infant and

child mortality can be reduced with immunizations and ORT...etc

but no health-programme has abolished malnourishment in
children

of a nation.

The department of health aiming to improve the health
of the people through so many national disease control programs

and now through the programme of ’Health for All by 2000 A.D’
is therefore a utopian, misleading idea.

As a part of a

thorough going socio-economic change, medical interventions

can be a very good supplementary tool to improve the overall
health-status of the people.

But the idea that "Health for

All by 2000 A.D" would be delivered by the health-ministry/
health projects by the NGOs, though very attractive, is a

2

2
misleading one.

All that health-people can hope to achieve is

"Health-care for All by 2000 A.D".
This is not sterile semantics.

There is a strong reason

and a contexi/’or making this distinction.

There is a wide­

spread technocratic, and managerial illusion that improvement

in health of a nation, whidn is in reality, prrimarily a function

of socio-economic development, can be achieved with technolo­

gical, managerial interventions.

Lay people are made to believe

that the beneficient state through its Health-Programmes, or the
Health-Projects run by NGOs, would improve the health of the
people with the help of modern science and technology.

These

slogans are being promoted in the context of the continuing
crisis in the economy leading to increase in poverty, unemploy­

ment, inflation, drought and ecological disaster.

Other basic

element required by for the success of "Health for All" -

improvement in socio-economic situation of the people—is in
practice, missing due to this economic crisis.

What remains is

the misleading idea of "Health Eor All" to be achieved by the
efforts of the health-workers.
Those who undertake health-work primarily with an

intention of not ’giving a few pills’ but of doing some ’basic-

work’ can, in fact, make very valuable, basic work.

Many

improvements and some thoroughgoing changes are needed, many
new ideas, practices have to be founded and developed, many
vested interests to be fought in the field of organising

medical care and health-education.
technocratic work.

This is not a purely

There are many sociological, ideological,

technical, practical issues to be resolved.

Health-work, done

with the aim of taking up one of the so many challenging issues,

can be very valuable, basic work, a historical need today.

3

4

village Bommunity Development Association, on whose behest
this work is being done nor the local organisations are

health-organisations as sush.

Health work is considered as a

part of a broader work of education, conscientization,

organisation on a range of socio-economic issues.

Health is

considered neither the main issue nor a mere entry point.
Even with a limited aim, and with the support of the broader

social work done by the local organisation, the process of

increasing the health awareness amongst this marginalised
population and of fostering collective self-help has been
very gradual one and beset

with many problems.

Achievements, Problems, Contradictions
Our health-work consists of training of Village Health

Workers (chosen by the marginalised people themselves) in the
diagnosis and treatment of routine viral fevers, malaria,
diarrhoea, conjunctivitis, scabies, wounds, skin infections

etc., and distribution of iron and Vitamin-A supplements to
children and pregnant women.

These elementary curative

services are used to:

a.

establish the credibility of the Village Health Workers;

b.

as an occasion to interact with the people;

c.

an attempt to meet the felt-need of the people.

Rural peer are not much interested in general health-education;
given the arduous life they life.

But a rural poor is more

incluned to listen to why’s and how’s of diarrhoea-control,
when he/she is suffering from diarrhoea and effective treatment

is given by the same person who gives health-education about

diarrhoea.

Hence the strategy of coupling health-education

and therapeutics.
The result of this strategy is a mixed one.

Let me give

some examples of positive experiences and then of some problems
and difficulties:

5
Our VHUs have a much greater support from the community
than that the Government’s VHU has.

They are trained much

better because both the trainee and the trainer are really

interested in this work and its philosophy.

These UHUs

spend a lot t>f time for this work; attend frequent meetings,

participate in other programs of the organisation, travel
to and camo at other villages.

All this is possible because

of/a support from the community.

The honorarium of a mere

Rs.50/- per month does not explain the interest, efforts of

these VHUs.

(Many of the VHUs even do not get any monthly

honorarium).

The quack practice of some traditional therapi­

sts and that of the compounder-turned-doctor, has been

considerably curtailed.
’injection-culture’.

Some dent has been made in the

People have collectively approached the

health authorities to complain about some specific grievances

about delivery of health services.

(for example, a Morcha

about a case of injection-pilsy; representations

about below

par functioning of health-services at the grassroot level..etc)
Slide-shows organised by VHUs on prevalent diseases like
scabies, diarrhoea are quickly being sought after.

More

than one hundred women from different villages had walked

for a feu kilometers and had waited patiently for hours to

see a slide show on women’s reproductive health.

This

indicates the interest of rural women in knowing about their
own body and health.

Discussions in meetirrs and Shibirs

about nutritional requirements of labourers, and of women,
about the relation between water supply and health has had

an impact.

In. the consciousness of a section of thr people

in the organisation, this new health-knowledge has given an

additional justification for the demand of higher minimum
wages, of leave from hard work during pregnancy, for improve­

ment in water supply,

6

6

These developments are in a way collective attempts

towards control over health care activities; are rudementary
forms of organised efforts around health issues.

However,

along with such achievements, there are some knotty problems
which show that it is still a long way to go before the

awareness of the health problems increases to such an extant
that people start influencing the health services and policies
in accordance with their own needs.
a.

There is a tremendous gao between the consciousness

of health-workers and that of the people.

People are primarily

interested in medicines; rather than knowledge.

There is a

strong tendency of going to the commercial quack for an

injection, pay him five or ten rupees.

But when it comes to

paying ten paise for the tablet taken from the VHW, there is
a tendency bf not paying for this self-help, even though over •

a period ofytime, people have realised that these tablets are
a^feffective as these injections.

There is less of a tendency

to see that this process of self-help becomes self-reliant

the dominant tendency is either to seek a commercial treatment.
It is not easy to go beyond the stereotype responses conditio­

ned by the dominant-culture.

b.

Hany people as yet

to see the work done by VHU8,

as a kind of social work done by the representatives of the

people.

Hany feel that these VH'Js work ’because they do not

need to work at home’ or ’because they must be getting

something from the agency’.

This is in spite of the fact

that these VH'Js were chosen by the people in a meeting; their
help and advice is sought; a call for a meeting, Shibir or
even for a Horcha is positively Responded to.

But still the

idea of a movement has not taken real roots.
c.

The Government health structure has cooperated by

providing medicines, sending their health personnel at request

7

7
etc.

In one remote area, a few of our illiterate VHMs usre

incorporated as Government's "Village Health Guides" (because

the PHC doctor was very much impressed by their knowledge),
even though the minimum educational qualification required
for this oost is 8th standard.

(This mutual cooperation

helps the health authorities to fulfill their targets for
remote areas)

But the Government authorities (all males)

dislike the questioning attitude, " rude manners" of our
women VHUs.

When our UHWs asked a pJHC doctor, in a meeting

about the budget of the PHC, and the expenditure under diff­
erent heads, he got infuriated.

Relations were also strained

because a fflorcha was organised to demand justice in case of
an injection-palsy in a boy after an injection in his arm.
Any attempt to take democracy seriously, to know and to

question some of the practices in the PHE are frowned upon.

The 'beneficient authority' obliges by cooperating as long
as its hegemony is not threatned.

"People's participation"

is a nice slogan, but when it is taken seriously in a

critical fashion, such attempts are despised.

This in

turn dampens the already low initiative of the people for

asserting their own right.

Such

are the problems and contradictions in the process

of 'organising people for health care'.

Both from a

theoretical as well as practical view point, there is no
doubt, that without the collective participation, control by

the people in fulfilling their health care needs, the health

delivery system will not really serve the people,

But the

process is a very complex, slow and difficult one.

It is

easier to talk about nice things, but very difficult to achieve
them,

A lot of practical and analytical work has to be done

before ue can confidently talk about a strategy of "Health
Care by the people" or under the control of the people.

TRAIL'IKC FOR COn-lUNITY HEALTH CARE

Dara S Amar
(This jbaper highlights some of the attempts made in St John’s

Medical College, Bangalore, to orient Health Workers,
including Medical students, towards Community Health Care.

The attempts have provided invaluable insights into this
important goal.

Being a Medical College, St John’s aims

at providing the training component in the formation of

health teams)
The Salient features of our present programmes are s

1 * Health Team Training
St John’s Medical College is in a unique situation to train

various members of the health team under one roof.

We

are able to create a better understanding among the members
of the team of each other’s role.

Medical students. Nursing

students. Community Health Workers, Deacons, School teachers,

Village mothers etc.

are the various health team members

who get their training at the college.

While the ideal objective is health and development, by
virtue of the training and competence of the faculty, the
emphasis has been on training in health.

It is coinple-

mr-nted by traaining in development by other organisattions.

Community Participation
One of the main objective of the community health progra­

mme of the college is the development of a participatory
process wherein the villagers themselves are responsible

for the financing of health care, supply of materials

and manpower.

This is particularly exemplified by the

Nallur Health Co-operative Centre, a project initiated

jointly by the college and the Mallur Milk Copperative

in 1973.

Village Health Committees have been formed at

each of the rural health centres and decisions are

....2

2
participatory in nature.

A large part of the organisation of

speciality rural camps are also done by the villagers.

This

is through their village youth groups and Mahila Mandals.

Even in the training of the health workers including medical
students, the village leaders are drawn in as resource

persons.
Coordination with other agencies

We work in coordination with governmental and non-governmental
health institutions.

Programmes such as the Rural Mobile

Clinics, Universal Immunization Programmes, integrated Child
Development Scheme, National Social Service and Rural

Internship Training are examples of such coordinated efforts.
Cur teaching faculty also act as guest faculty for various
sister institutions and organisations involved in health and
development.

Integrated health Care
Villagers in India often resort to indigenous systems of

medicine.

The training at the college of the health workers

including cur medical students, includes training in Herbal

Medicine, Herbo Mineral Medicine, Acupressure, Homeopathy
and Yoga.

Many of our graduate doctors working in remote

rural areas, have substantiated the fact that there is need
for integration with other systems of medicines as is being

attempted at the college.
Health Education - A priority

After years of experience in training health team members
for the villagers, we feel there is a greater need to pay

attention to training in health education.

In the long

run, it is the health education programme that have paid off

the maximum dividends.

With this in view, health education

receives a top priority in the traifting programmes conducted

3

4
senitize the health worker to the various aspects of rural

life and how each of these aspects is related to the total
health of the villagers.

Reaching out

Considering the resources and facilities available for
health care at St John's it is quite natural to try and reach

out to the underserved areas using the available resources

for health care.

Rural camps in the field of eye, ear, nose

and throat, skin, teeth, child health and General Surgery

are conducted in the villages.

Methodologies have been

evolved at the village 1*—el to ensure asepsis and follow-dp
for post operative care through the use of trained school
teachers, youth volunteers and traditional healers.

Specialist care, is thus made an ailable at the village itself.
In the bargain, the faculty have gained confidence that it

is possible to reach out with even ad anced health care to
the villages.

These exercises have also proved to be an

im ortant force of cohesion, among the various hospital
departments and Community Medicine Department.

The rural

mobile clinics further carry the health care facilities to

over

12 health centres, spread through three Community

Development Blocks covering over 300 villages.

In this

process of rendering services to the unreached, our trainees
(through the participation in such programmes) gain inva­

luable experience^
Understanding health and disease holostically
In order that our health team trainees do not dichotomise
health care into various compartments, the training programmes

focus on families rather than individuals.

Through programmes

such as the Clinico-social case study and field family

health care projects, the trainees are n®’e to understand

the cause and consequence of disease in terms of multiple
factors rather than only the clinical signs and symptoms
of the disease affected ’erson.

Emphasis is laid on

5

5
the planning and management of health care at minimal cost.
Our graduates would also he cost conscious and make their

programmes financially self perpetuating in the village
communities rather than make the people dependent on
charities.

Serving the urban under-priviliged
Urban slums in and around Bangalore, are also served by the

Medical College.

Health programmes such as immunization

Coverage against the major killer dieseases for children,

maternal and child heal'-'' clinics for expectant mothers
and school health programmes, are some of the urban based

health activities.

In addition, the Medico-Social Unit aM

also aids in counselling for a&coholisrn, drug addiction,

juvenile deliquency etc.
Continuing education
Although basic training in health care is imparted to various

categories of health x^orkers, it is important a follow-up
is done on the utilisation of the knowledge gained at

St .John's.

For this purpose, several methods are followed.

At the professional level, doctors can seek elective posting

in selected specialities for further skill ehhancement.
Regional Colloquia are organised for sharing professional

experience among Community Health Workers and Rural doctors.

This provides an opportunity for learning from each other.
Continuing education is also provided by St John's for

health agencies from afar.

The United Planters Association

of Southern India (UPASI) works in collaboration with the
Department faculty to train their Medial Officers, Nurses,

Compounders and even their Estate Managers in the field
of health care and health management.

Periodical newsletters
6

also act as a means of networking for graduates and

Community Health Workers working in various parts of the

country.

Development as part of health
Extension training in agriculture, water resources and
veterinary care for village youth, are part of field training

orogrammes given in rural health centres.

The stress is

on youth motivation and training in these areas, especially
among the rural unemployed youth.

Functional literacy

programmes and vocational guidance are some of the other
services rendered in the villages.

Our health trainees,

including our medical students, participate in these de­

velopmental programmes under their national Social Service

activities, which is coordinated by the department faculty.
Conclusion
All the programmes are updated constantly, depending on
the feed back received sfi their effectiveness and efficiency.
The emphasis is on training and health education rather than

mere provision of multiple services.

This ensures that

whatever have been the programme inputs, the results will

be long, lasting self perpetuating and effective.

TRAINING FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE
Dara S Amar

(This paper highlights some of the attempts made in St John's
Medical College, Sangalore, to orient Health Workers,
including Medical students, towards Community Health Care.

The attempts have provided invaluable insights into this
important goal.

Being a Medical College, St John’s aims

at providing the training component in the formation of

health teams)

The Salient features of our present -programmes are :
1. Health_Team Training

St John's Medical College is in a unique situation to train
various members of the health team under one roof.

We

are able to create a better understanding among the members
of the team of each other's role.

Medical students, Nursing

students, Community Health Workers, Deacons, School teachers

Village mothers etc.

are the various health team members

who get their training at the college.

While the ideal objective is health and development, by
virtue of the training and competence of the faculty, the
emphasis has been on training in health.

It is comple­

mented by traaining in development by other organisattions.

Community Participation
One of the main objective of the community health progra­

mme of the college is the development of a participatory
process wherein the villagers themselves are responsible

for the financing of health care, supply of materials

and manpower.

This is particularly exemplified by the

Mallur Health Co-operative Centre, a project initiated
jointly by the college and the Mallur Milk Copperative
in 1973.

Village Health Committees have been formed at

each of the rural health centres and decisions are

....2

2
participatory in nature.

A large part of the organisation of

speciality rural camps are also done by the villagers.

This

is through their village youth groups and Mahila Mandals.

Even in the training of the heal th workers including medical
students, the village leaders are drawn in as resource
persons.

Coordination with other a22n£l££

We work in coordination with governmental and non-governmental

health institutions.

Programmes such as the Hural Mobile

Clinics, Universal Immunization Programmes, integrated Child

Development Scheme, National Social Service and Rural

Internship Training are examples of such coordinated efforts.

Our teaching faculty also act as guest faculty for various

sister institutions and organisations involved in health and
development.

Integrated Health Care

Villagers in India often resort to indigenous systems of
medicine.

The training at the college of the health workers

including our medical students, includes training in Herbal

Medicine, Herbo Mineral Medicine, Acupressure, Homeopathy
and Yoga.

Many of our graduate doctors working in remote

rural areas, have substantiated the fact that there is need

for integration with other systems of medicines as is being

attempted at the college.
Health Education - A priority

After years of experience in training health team members
for the villagers, we feel there is a greater need to pay
attention to training in health education.

In the long

run, it is the health education programme that have paid off
the maximum dividends.

With this in view, health education

receives a top priority in the trailing programmes conducted

3

3

at the college.

Innovative methodologies such as Child to

child health education, rural mothers motivation programmes

and rural school teachers health education training programmes
are some of the important programmes organised by the college.
The health education methodologies include the development

of local audio-vi.suala aids in the form of simplified demo­
nstration models using locally available materials rather than
sophisticated charts, photos, films etc. The materials for

most health education sessions are prepared by the village
school children and village school teachers.

Nutrition

education involves teaching the village mothers to use their

own traditional recipes in a nutritionally correct manner.

The

aim here is to strengthen the existing traditional diets which
are often nutritionally far superior to the imported diet from

the urban areas,

Greater stress is laid on the use of local

cereals, pulses etc., along with promotion of breast feeding

as well as local weaning diets for the children.

Sensitisation to_the rural milieu
In order that all the trainees at St John's, including medical
students and nursing students, must understand the dynamics of

rural life, special training programmes are organised on a

residential basis at our rural health centres.

These rural

residential training programmes stress on understanding the

various factors which govern rural life and in turn the health
of the people.

Areas such as agriculture, animal husbandry,

small scale industry, customs and traditions, housing and
environment, role of women in society, food practices etc., are

all studied through field projects by the various groups of
trainees.

The training programmes are thus oriented to

4

senitize the health worker to the various aspects of rural

life and how each of these aspects is related to the total
health of the villagers.

Reaching out

Considering the resources and facilities available for

health care at St John's it is quite natural to try and reach
out to the underserved areas using the available resources
for health care.

Rural camps irs the field of eye, ear, nose

and throat, skin, teeth, child health and General Surgery
are conducted in the villages.

Methodologies have been

evolved at the village level to ensure asepsis and follow-dp

for post operative care through the use of trained school
teachers, youth volunteers and traditional healers.

Specialist care, is thus made aHailable at the village itself.

In the bargain, the faculty have gained confidence that it
is possible to reach out with even advanced health care to

the villages.

These exercises have also proved to be an

im ortant force of cohesion, among the various hospital

departments and Community Medicine Department.

The rural

mobile clinics further carry the health care facilities to

over

12 health centres, spread through three Community

Development Blocks covering over 300 villages.

In this

process of rendering services to the unreached, our trainees

(through the participation in such programmes) gain inva­
luable experience^

Understanding health and disease holostically
In order that our health team trainees do not dichotomise

health care into various compartments, the training programmes
focus on families rather than individuals.

Through programmes

such as the Clinico-social case study and field family

health care projects, the trainees are made to understand
the cause and consequence of disease in terms of multiple

factors rather than only the clinical signs and symptoms
of the disease affected person.

Emphasis is laid on

5

5
the planning and management of health care at minimal cost.
Our graduates would also ' e cost conscious and make their

programmes financially self perpetuating in the village
communities rather than make the people depeddent on

charities.

Serving the urban under-priviliged
Urban slums in and around Bangalore„ are also served by the

Medical College.

Health programmes such as immunization

Coverage against the major killer dieseases for children,
maternal and child health clinics for expectant mothers

□nd school health programmes, are some of the urban based
health activities.

In addition, the Medico-Social Unit ati*

also aids in counselling for alcoholism, drug addiction,

juvenile deliquency etc.
Continuing education
Although basic training in health care is imparted to various

categories of health workers, it is important a follow-up
is done on the utilisation of the knowledge gained at

St John’s.

For this purpose, several methods are followed.

At the professional level, doctors can seek elective posting
in selected specialities for further skill ehhancement.
Regional CoDoquia are organised for sharing professional

experience among Community Health Workers and Rural doctors.

This provides an opportunity for learning from each other.
Continuing education is also provided by St John’s for
health agencies from afar.

The United Planters Association

of Southern India (UPASI) works in collaboration with the

Department faculty to train their Medial Officers, Nurses,
Compounders and even their Estate Managers in the field

of health care and health management.

Periodical newsletters

6

6

also act as a means of networking for graduates and

Community Health Workers working in various parts of t'ne
country.

Development as_part_of health
Extension training in agriculture, water resources and

veterinary care for village youth, are part of field training

programmes given in rural health centres.

The stress is

on youth motivation and training in these areas, especially
among the rural unemployed youth.

Functional literacy

programmes and vocational guidance are some of the other
services rendered in the villages.

Our health trainees,

including our medical students, participate in these de­

velopmental programmes under their National Social service
activities, which is coordinated by the depatment faculty.

Conclusion
All the programmes are updated constantly, depending on

the feed back received eni their effectiveness and efficiency.
The emphasis is on training and health education rather than

mere provision of multiple services.

This ensures that

whatever have been the programme inputs, the results will
be long, lasting self perpetuating and effective.

COMMUNITY HEALTH AND PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
In 1978, Representatives of all the countries of the World

met in Alma Ata in USSR and committed themselves to the
concepts of ’Primary Health Care*

The Alma Ata declaration which is now a famous Health
document defined Primary Health Care

’as an essential health care made universally
accessible to individuals and acceptable

to them, through their full participation
and at a cost the community and country
can afford1

Primary Health Care (PHC) emerged in Alma Ata Declaration
as an alternative view of health and health care, which

included locating health in the wider context of socio­
economic development and exploring actions beyond orthodox

medical care, that would be pre-requisites and/or supportive

of the health of communities.

The four principles stressed

in the Oeciaratinn were!
1.

Equitable distribution

2.

Community participation

3. Multisectoral approach
4,

Appropriate technology

Apart from a series of technological and managerial

innovations that were considered in the view of Health
action that emerged at Alma Ata, probably the most
significant development was the recognition of a ’Social­

process’ dimension in Health care including

community

organisation, community participation, and a move towards

....2

2

equity.

Health service providers woult^be willing now to

aporeciate social stratification in society^ conflicts of

interests among different strata and to explore conflict
management.

These were not explicitly dslineatad but ware

inherent to the issues raised in the Declaration.

An

equally important fact was that these perspectives emerged
from the pioneering experience of a large number of voluntary

agencies and some health ministers committed to the deve­

lopment of a more just anc/equitable health care

system.

Since India uas a signatory and evidently an enthusiastic

proponent of this idea it has now become fashionable in
India to use ’Primary Health Care’ to describe all Alternative
Health Action and synonymously with Community Health(CH)„ While
PHC and CH have a lot in common it is important to ramember

that they are not synonymous;, PHC is included in CH but CH
is a much more comprehensive term and idea.

What are these differences

1.

Primary Haalth Care concdntrates on Primary level (first

line contact) and ignores orientation of tertairy and
secondary care,
Community Health means a new approach at all three levels

2.

Primary Health Dars talks about a community in apolitical
terms as if they uere some homogenous group.

It ignores

caste/class and other dimensions in society.
Community Health recognises stratification and conflict

and the role this plays in accessibility and opportunity

in health.

3.

Primary Health Care leaves the ’development’ and modern­
isation concept unquestioned.
Community Health locates itself in the centra of the

development debate and looks at health culture in a
uholistic uay.

3

3
4.

Primary Health Care leaves the medicalisatian of health

and the mystification and heirarchy of medicine unconfronted
Community Health confronts both these issues and tries

to evolve an alternative plural, demystification,

non-heirarchical value system.

5.

Primary Health Care has now become selectivised and all
these who would prefer vertical topdoun, siective, health

s

solution, funded by government and non-government,
international funding agencies have begun to gain control

over it.

Community Health by its very terminology does not allow
selectivisation, by concentrating on communities as

base, community as focus of action and participation,
the community health action remains comprehensive.

It may be diverse and if at all selective it is the
community which makes this choice.

CONNUNITY HEALTH AND HOSPITAL NEDICIN E
Ths community health approach has evolved from the
attempts of a large number of people concerned about the

present medicalised approach to health care and its
inadequacies in responding to the needs of the large majo­
rity - the poor and marginalised groups in society.

Most

of the people involved in developing components of this
new approach have themselves had much of their training
and experience initially in the hospital-dispensary

oriented system.

Some of the approaches have emerged from

a confrontation of the existing value system and culture
of the western-technological model of health care of which
the hospital and dispensary are characterstic examples.

Does this mean that the ’community health approach’
and the existing medical system of hospitals, dispensaries,
health centres, doctors, nurses, drugs, technology, centres

of specialisation, education and research are incompatible?
While recognising the need for a ’paradigm’ shift in
attitude and approaches from the ’provision of medical care*

to the 'enabling of community health* we feel that these
are neither metually exclusive nor incompatible.

It is necessary to recognise that many aspects of the

value systems of existing hihgly technological western
models of care which we have inherited and continue to
transplant in our country are somewhat counter-productive

to the goals of community health.
It is necessary to recognise that by their very nature,

such highly capital intensive technology systems skew
health services in favour of those who can afford to pay

for them.

Gradually the forces of a market economy of which

....2

2

such a model is an integral part, alienates the structure
from the poor and underpriviliged and all those who basically

cannot afford the luxuries of the type of health such

systems symbolise.
However, since community health is basically a new
vision, a new value system and a new attitude it can
confront and pervade the entire existing superstructure

of health care.
Arising from community based experience as a new
vision, community health has to challenge the super­

structure to become:

a.

more ’people* oriented

i.e sensitive to the realities of life of the large


•?

majority of people - the poor and underpriviliged,

b.

more ’community* oriented
i.e understanding health in its community sense and
not just as the problem of individuals.

c.

more socio-epidemioloqically oriented
understanding health in its wholistic sense - which
involves the biological, social, economic, cultural,

political and ecological dimensions.
d.

more democratic oriented
i.e more participatory and democratic in its growth,

planning and decision making process,

e.

more accountable
i.e increasing subservience of medicine, technology,

structures and professional actions to the needs and
hopes of the people, the patients, the consumers,

the ’beneficiafcies’ and the communities which they

seek to serve.
This confrontation of value systems and re-orientation

will help the superstructure and its different elements to
emerge from their present ivory-towered isolation and

3

3

irrelevance and gradually become supportive infrastructure
of a more just and healthy society.

However this change

cannot be miraculous or based on just good intentions

or any anount of wishful thinking.

It must be a serious

commitment to social analysis, participatory evaluation

and critical self-searching for greater relevance by

all those concerned with planning and decision making
in the present superstructure.

ISSUE RAISING - A CRITICAL TASK
When we think of ’Community Health’ or of health projects

of voluntary agencies, it is customary to think of micro level

field experiments and initiatives that have been described

previously.

However individually they can have little impact

on health policy or on the overall trends of health care
development in the country except at a local level perhaps.
No doubt a few individual ’charismatic' NGO health innovators

have participated and contributed to ’expert committee refle­
ctions’ initiated by the government.

But on a more long term

basis and to counter ’entrenched' medical vested interests and

ra. attitudes there is a growing need for lobbying and
issue raising groups at national and regional levels.

This

calls for networking and dialogue around values and approaches

necessary for the emerging Community Health vision.

Are there such groups in the country.

In the 70s the

medico friend circle emerged as one such group out of the

ferment that marked the Indira/dP era leading to emergency
and its aftermath.

Over the years this group has brought

together people from diverse ideological backgrounds to discuss
issues relevant to health care and medical education in the

country and through its annual meetings and bulletin voiced
these concerns and- explored alternatives.
The Kerala Sashtra Sahitya Parishad is a different type

of issue raising group promoting a scientific attitude but
also questioning the role of science in society.

Though

regional in its focus KSSP has af late become an important and

crucial ’health issue' raising group in Kerala.

The people’s

science Movement in Maharashtra and more recently the Karnataka
Rajya Vignana Parishad have also begun to explore health issue.

Another important network on the national scene is the

All India Drug Action Network which has brought together a

»

2

2
wide variety of individuals, groups and associations into a
movement for a fcational drug policy and rational therapy.

AIDAN has not only worked on an alternative drug policy but
has also worked at various levels from parliamentarians to

the level of the people discussing issues and raising

consciousness about the various dimensions of the problem.
The ’Bhopal disaster’ was another major event leading
to a great deal of involvement and networking of groups in

the country supporting the ’plea for relevant research,
rehabilitation and legal compensation policies’ for the
affected victims.

In the eighties an increasing number of smaller groups
are emerging at the national, regional and local levels around

drug, health and other issues.

The ’mfc’ type of network is

now becoming a generic phenomena.

However, all these groups

put together are still making little impact on the health
situation and are still relatively marginalised.
Lobbying and issue raising is neither a popular task nor
an easy one.

The ’Drug activists’ and the ’Bhopal activists’

have experienced the non-re$)onsivaness of the established
status quo system to issues of justice on the ’Drugs’ and
’Bhopal’ matters.

A national Health action network is yet to emerge in

the country.

Even when it does it will take some time before

it can make an impact.
any longer.

This task can however not be ignored

THE MEOICO-FRIEND-CIRCLE —

Works towards a pattern of medical care adequately geared to
the predominant rural character of our country.

Works towards a medical curriculum and training tailored to the
needs of the vast majority of the people in our country.

Wants tovdpuslop methods ot medical intervention strictly
guided by the needs of our people and not by commercial interests.
Stands for popularisation and demystification of medical scienee.

Believes in a democratically functioning health team and

democratic dacnetralisation of responsibilities.
Stresses the primary role of preventive and social measures to

solve health problems on a social level and the importance of
planning these with active participation of the community.

Works to <-rds a kind of medical practice built upon human values,
concern for human needs, equality and against negative, unhealthy

cultural values and attitudes in society, e.g. glorification of

money and power, division of labour into manual and intellectual,
domination of men over women,

urban over ruaal, foreign over

Indian
Believes that non-allopathic therapies be encouraged to take thear

proper place in the modern system of medicd care —
—medico-fteind circle — perspective and activities. 1904

ALL INDIA DRUG ACTION NETWORK (AIDAN)
AIDAN consists of numerous health, consumer, legal aid and
human rights organisations and people’s science movements.

It is a gjjoing network of academicians, professionals,
social activists, individuals and organisations who are

deeply concerned about the drug issue and working towards

the adoption end implementation of a people-oriented
Rational Drug Policy in India as a part of a people's

Health Policy.
AIDANTS

Demands

* Availability of essential and life saving drugs
* Withdrawal of hazardous and irrational drugs
* Availability of unbiased drug information

* Adequate quality control and drug control

* Drug legislation reform
* Use of generic names

* Technological Self Reliance

9. Training 'enablers* not 'providers'
The Community Health Action initiators in the country

described earlier have also developed many training centres evol­
ving middle level health manpower training programmes
in community health for doctors and nurses trained in

the orthodox medical system. Many of these training centres
have evolved in NGO projects after many years of primary
field level experience.

This new crop of training programmes differ from

conventional 'public health' and 'preventive and
social medicine’ in the country in many respects,

chief among which ares

1.

Most of the training programmes are open to

anyone interested in community health not

necessarily with a basic medical or nursing degree.
ii.

Nearly all of them have additional components in

the syllabus like social analysis, community dynamics

other systems of medicine, development issues,

appropriate technology, training of village based

health workers and so on which are not yet components
of public health courses in the country.

iii.

Nearly all of them are focussed on organisation
and practical management of community based

health programmes and training of local health

workers.

iv.

They all promote demystiffcation of medicine,

■SSUBMfr community participation, community
organisation and development. There difference
lies mainly in their overall socio-political

perspective and the role they expect of their trainee.

2

2

In this dimension they range from centres which

train for the delivery of an integrated package

of services to centres which train for enabling and
empowerment of communities.

v.

The duration of the course varies from 6 to 12 weeks

to 1 year.

vi.

Nearly all of them have experimented with more

participatory forms of training and generated
a number of case studies, role plays, simulation
games and learning exercises. This is in fact

a major contribution of these programmes though the
evolution of a participatory pedagogy is still

to be adequately recognised by orthodox medical
and health manpower educators in the country.

vii.

Apart from health projects which have grown into

training centres like RUHSA, CINI, Pachod, Jamkhed,

Deenabandhu, Ambilikkai, these training groups include
a medical college (St John’s, Bangalore), and a

Nurses Association (INSA, Bangalore) and two

Coordinating Agencies—CHAI & VHAI.
viii.

Only one academic department (Centre of Social

Medicine and Community Health, Jawaharlal Nehru
University, Nev; Delhi) offers MCH, MPhil and PhD
programmes in Community Health.

Only in 1988, has ti.ere been an attempt initiated by
VHAI, New Delhi, to organise a network of Community Health
Trainers in the country. It is hoped that this step will lead
to intensive dialogue and

mutual consultation among the

trainers so that some sort of common health manpower education
policy and new approaches to training can evolve which could

have wider relevance for manpower training in the country.

CHAI’s Philosophy and Vision of its Community Health Programme
The Community Health Department of CHAI also felt the need for

a correct understanding of its role in the field of health.

All

the points mentioned above were the basis for its conclusions.
Accordingly we believe that:

1.

In a country like India, so vast and varied, where

80% of its population lives in the rural areas and

about 90% of the country’s health care system caters
to the need of the urban minority, a new orientation

and rethinking of the whole health care system is the
need of the hour.
2.

Health is the total well-being of individuals, fami­
lies and communities as a whole and not merely the

absence of sickness.

The demands an environment in

which the basic needs are f ulf illed, socbI well-being

is ensured and psychological as well as spiritual

needs are met.

Accordingly a new set of paraneters

will have to be considered for measuring the health
of a community such as the people’s part in decision

making, absence of social evils in the community,

organising capacity of the people, the role women

and youth play in matters of health and development
etc., other than the traditional ones like infant
mortality rate, life expectancy etc.

3.

The present medical system with undue emphasis on
the curative aspect tends mainly to be a profit
oriented business, and it concentrates on ’selling

health’ to the people, and is hardly based on the

ceal needs of vast majority of the people in the
country.

The root causes of illness lie deqa ub

in social evils and imbalances, to which the real

. ..2
z
X
C .
A?1/

2
answer is a political end, understood as a process

through which people are made aware of the real
needs, rights and responsibilities, available

resources in and around them and get themselves
organised for appropriate actions.

Only through

this process can health become a reality to the

vast majority of the Indian Masses.
4.

The concept of Community Health here whould be

understood as a process of enabling people to
exercise collectively their responsibilities to

maintain their health and to demand health as
their right.

Thus it is beyond mere distribution

of medicines, prevention of sickness and income

generating programmes.

M
BASIC PRINCIPLES IN CHAI'S COMMITMENT TO COMMUNITY HEALTH

n
1.

Community Health is am approach to health care services.

It takes into consideration a philosophy, attitude and

commitment of working with people to help them help

themselves.

It is not a project, department or funding

system.

2.

Community Health focusses on the promotion and maintenance
of health and gives priority or emohasis to the health

team, primary health care and community needs,

3.

Community participation is an essential component of
Community Health.

This recognises the potential rol^of

others to help educate, organise, mobilise and support
community development activities where the people have a

say in and control over their own future.

Community

participation thus becomes involved in people’s democratic

rights and their contributions to the development of their

society and nation.
4.

In Community Health there is a recognition of a three tier

system of primary, secondary and tertiary care approach to

the needs of the community and the resources available.
Therefore this approach accepts the role afld potential

of the hospital as integral to the Community Health.

A

commitment to Community Health is not necessarily anti­
hospital. Yet the hospital needs to be supportive of
Community Health and recognise and accept this wider concern

in health care services.

5.

In the provision of services in Community Health there is a

bi-a-s towards those who are oppressed, exploited, the poor and
the marginalised.

Thus priority would be given to rural

areas and urban slums.

Special groups for concern would be

women, tribals, dalits, small marginalised farmers and

landless labourers.

2

2
6.

The organisation of services under Community Health would
be appropriate, acceptable, easily available and affordable.

It would be cost effective and willing to use unskilled, semi­
skilled adequately trained local health personnel.
7.

There is a place for voluntary agencies in Community Health.

B. Community Health accepts that health cannot ba improved by
health services alone; health and development need to be

interlinked and interdependent.

9. There is a place for appreciating local customs, traditions,
beliefs and health care systems and relating health
services to the culture and socio-economic situation of

people.

Apprepriate indigenous medical practices and

trained practitioners, or traditional birth attendants

are encouraged in Community Health.
10. In the final analysis Community Health is not apolitical.

If it concerns the welfare of people and the provision of
adequate and appropriate health care then health becomes a
social justice issue.

It is concerned with structures and

systems of society that seem to benefit a few at the
expense of many.

(A Note to Health Action Team in Secudderabad)

Health Action

July 1989
Theme: Community Health in India
: A new vision of Health Care

1. This issue will consist of a longish Lead article put
together by the DHC team in Bangalore which explores various
aspects of Community Health in India including the following:
a.

Health Development In India

b.

faking Stock of this development

c.

Health scene in 80s

d.

Alternative Health project phenomena

e.

Recognising the emerging paradigm

f.

Community Health

i.

Vs PHC ii) Role of Hospitals ill) Movement dimension

g.

Community Health - Issue raising groups

h.

Community Health - Training initiatives

i.

Community Health - Research Centres

j.

Building the new Health paradigm

The article includes a series of box items or quotations from
the diverse materials that have emerged in this process.

Since the Lead article is a longish one it could be interspersed
by shorter contributions mentioned in (2)

2, In response to the Editor’s letter we received contributions
from seven resource people which have been edited for the issue
/

a.

Alok Mukhopadhyay - VHAI

b.

Fr Edwin - Kerala

c.

Dara Amar - St John’s

d.

Jacob Cherian - Ambilikkai

e.

Anant Phadke - mfc

two articles are in the post (telegram messages)

f.

Abhay Bang - SEARCH and g) S Joseph - MGDM Kangaiha.

2

(A Note to Health Action Team in Secudderabad)

Health Action

July 1989

Theme: Community Health in India
: A neu vision of Health Care

1. This issue will consist of a longish Lead article put

together by the OHC team in bangalore which explores various
aspects of Commuhity Health in India including the following:
a.

Health Development In India

b.

Taking Stock of this development

c.

Health scene in 80s

d.

Alternative Health project phenomena

e.

Recognising the emerging paradigm

f.

Community Health

i. Vs PHC ii) Role of Hospitals iii) Movement dimension
g.

Community Health - Issue raising groups

h.

Community Health ~ Training initiatives

i.

Community Health - Research Centres

j.

Building the new Health paradigm

The article includes a series of box items or quotations from

the diverse materials that have emerged in this process.

Since the Lead article is a longish one it could be interspersed
by shorter contributions mentioned in (2)

2. In response to the Editor’s letter we received contributions
from seven resource people which have been edited for the issue

a.

Alok Mukhopadhyay — VHAI

b.

Er Edwin - Kerala

c.

Dara Amar - St John’s

d.

Jacob Cherian - Ambilikkai

e.

Anant Phadke - mfc

Cwo articles are in the post (telegram messages)
f.

Abhay Bang - SEARCH and g) S Joseph - f*lGDI*l Kangaaha.

2

5b. Hou did thsss initiatives evolve
These initiatives evolved in a variety of uays.

Health uas some­

times the entry point, sometimes it got into the package at a
later date.

Today they represent a uide variety of origins and

bases.

a.

A rural development programme uith a health component eg RfflHSA,

Tamilnadu, Banuasi Seva Ashram, UP

b.

A community based medical/health programme, eg Mini PHC of VHS,
Tamilnadu, RAHA Project, MP

c.

An integrated development programme in a tribal area. eg. VGKK,
Karnataka.

d.

An adult education/non-formal education programme uith a

e.

health component, dg AWARE, AP
A science education programme uith a health domponent
eg Kishore Bharati, MP

f.

A nutrition supplementation programme uith a health component.

eg Project Poshak</& Project Palghar , Maharashtra
g.

A conscientization/auareness building programme uith a health

h.

component, eg. Bodokhoni, Orissa
A community extension/outreach programme of a hospital

i.

A field practice area of a medical/nursinyparamedical training

j.

institute, eg. Mallur Health Cooperative, Bangalore
A school based health programme eg Deena ^eva Sangha, 8.lore

k.

A health programme as a component of a trade union movement

1.

A health programme as a component of a project focussed on

eg MGDM Hospital Project, Kangazha

eg. CMSS Health Project, '-'alii Rajhara

uomen’s issues eg. Women’s voice 8.lore, SEWA Ahmedabad
m.

Health as a component of a community action in urban slums
eg. Streehitakarini, Bambay

n.

A health programme for uorkers organised by an employers

association, eg GLUS, of UPASI for tea plantations, Kerala & TN
and so on

As the ’community health’ action initiatives greu in experience

and numbers a second generation of initiatives evolved:

a.

Issue raising groups like mfc, AIDAN, KSSP

b.

Coordinating/netuorking groups like VHAI, CHAI, CMAI and ACHAN

c, Community Health training centres like RUHSA, St Dohn’s and others
d. Community Health Research Centres like ARCH, FRCH, SEARCH & others
These uill be described later

2
Eamily Welfare activities

Environmental sanitation: Particularly safe drinking water supplies
and sanitary disposal of excreta, sullage and refuse

Nutritional supplementation and nutrition education, and
school health programmes

were the components
Rehabilitation as a health oriented action was seen mainly in the

context of people suffering from leprosy.

More recently the concept

of community based rehabilitation is also being experimented within

a few projects.

Basically this new approach believes in the

organisation of the disabled in the community into associations
and involving them in efforts to improve their own conditions

through programmes of education, income generation,skill training
and self reliance.
c•_Search_and_experimentation with low cost^ effective and

aporopriate technolor)j<
Hany projects had triedd to evolve

health care technologies,

or promote more appropriate

The emphasis was not only on it being

low cost but also on it being more culturally acceptable, demystif­

ying and more within the operational capabilities of local people
and health workers.

These included

improved dai (1R8A) kits

nutrition mixes prepared from locally available foods
indigenous MCH calendar

locally manufactured lower limb prosthesis, b ngles and tapes
to measure nutritional status of children
low cost sanitation options
home based oral rehydration solutions
herbal and home remedies from the badkyard or kitchen.

Two additional areas of technological appropriatness which had
been experimented within many of these projects were:

i. Health communications - attempts had been made to

3

Ths Conmunit^ Health phenomena - Three questions

WHO were the community health project initiators?

I

Since ths late sixties and particularly in theseventies a
large number of initiatives and projects began to get established

outside the government system by individuals and groups kasn to
adapt health care approachas to the needs of our people.

Broadly classified as voluntary agencies in Health Care (now

also referred to as non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in
policy documents) these initiatives were predominantly rural
to begin with but later some of the focus also shifted to the

tribal regions and urban slums.
Starting with illness care most of them moved on to whole

range of activities and programmes in Health and Development

creatively rea-^feing to local needs and realities-.

<2—

The originators of these projects were doctors, nurses, health
and development activists, who had been challenged and stimulated

by the social disparities and health needs of thelarge majority
of people in the communities they served.
Each project or initiative evolved in the context of a local

social reality and a local health situation.

Since these were

diverse each of them evolved their own process of action,
package of services and local health organisation./

HOU did these initiiives evolve

These inititives evolved in a variety of ways.

Health was

sometimes the entry point, sometimes it got into the package
at a later date. "7<~cA

xeyo>-ez>e.znP <=,

cx-->cL

‘’c.-se-s,

a.

A rural development programme with a health component.

b.

A community based medical/health programme, e-^/

c.

An integrated development programme in a tribal area*? /&x tc,
<J
An adult education/non-formal education programme with

d.

'5 Rc>

P M-C c5[ V"H-

M-JIs

a health component,
b.

A science education programme with a health component, e^,

f. A nutrition supolementation programme with a' health
.

component,

g.

-

A-cV<S-c> Pcnha-k- -r- P^tsfe-aP Pe~} cA-~> a.

J



A conscientization/awareness building programme with a
pocsziokhesv. ■., C-

health component,

h.

v

A community extension/outreach programme

of” a hospital e--=j- H&DM

I'<=-1 Pcje.c'pl'(d.'‘<p7''C-

i.

A field practice area of a medical/nursing/paramedical
I4ec}ll> Ctxrpe^^^vC . PP-^’d pdp*<5-

= <-

training institution. ‘-'5'

'

'

j.

A school based health programme, <s-^

k.

A health programme as a component of a trade union movement.<z--<=r
pw-j
/Pejlr P-pf
A health programme as a component of a project focussed on

1.

,

.

women’s issues

/=l

Vanuz-

e-

j

--

5ecJa,AA^Ixct

d

Health as a component of a community action in urban slums.
, P> crrnto’pj .
n. A health programme for workers organised by an employers
.
. .
e<s
Lc-huuv
association.
op

m.

and so on. .—

,

I.

)

As the ’community healttf action initiiives grew in experience

and numbers a second generation of initiatives evolved:

a.

Issue raising group

b.

Coordinating/netuorking groups

c. C o mm u n i t,y._.H e al_t h e d u c a_tio n/ d oc.ume n t/^re se ure e- c e n t r e s

Oji. Community Health training centres

J^,e. Community Health Research centees

Bu-t—mox-e—abaut i t later. •«
■TT-^-C
be <-U p<.v'U <>r.

ee«'!' “ere the comnonsnts of Health Action in these initiatives?
There has been a tendency in many circles to see each project
as an altarnative approach to health care.

Our experiences of
(6)
studying many of them convince us that many ideas, experiences,
A
components of service and the dynamics of action from these
projects taken together would help build an Alternative

Approach and none are independently the complete alternative.

Hence learning from the commonness of approaches and
identifying the rich variations that exist would be a more

meaningful way of deriving the new approach of community health
The component of the new approach to health action in the
Community are:

a.

Development activities

Recognising ill health as the product of poor nutrition, poor

income, poor housing and poor environment many health projects

had gradually?involved with
agricultural extension programmes

water supply and irrigation programmes

housing and sanitation schemes
income generation schemes
basic education including literacy, non-formal education

and adult education programmes .
^any projects which had started with a development focus were
in turn adding a health care dimension to their activities.

b. Preventive^ Promotive and Rehabilitative orientation to
ggglth action
dost of these health projects had moved beyond the medicalised

concepts of health symb lised by

drug distribution to

activities - focussed on individuals and groups that present
ill health and promote well being.

Immunization programmes

Maternal and child health care
....2

2
Family welfare activities

Environment al sanitation'Particularly safe drinking water

supplies and sanitary disposal of excreta, sullage and

ref use
Nutritional supplementation and/nutrition education

and
School health programmes

were the commonest compoaents.
Rehabilitation as a health-oriented action was seen mainly

in the context of people suffering from leprosy.
■'

c

■ • *.. ■ •;<
o-1 ip

c. Search and experimentation with low cost^ effective and
appropriate technology

Many projects had tried'' to evolve or promote more appropriate
health care technologies.

The emphasis was not only on it

being low cost but also on it being more culturally acceptable,

demystifying and more within the operational capabilities
of local people and health workers.

These included

improved dai (TBA) kits

nutrition mixes prepared from locally available foods
indigenous MCH calendar

locally manufactured lower limb prosthesis, bangles and
tapes to measure nutritional status of children
low cost sanitation options

homa based oral rehydration solutions
herbal and home remedies from the backyard or kitchen .

and -so^on.
Two additional areas of technological appropriatness which
had been experimented within many of these projects were:

i. Health communications - Attempts had been made to

....3

-

<£> h ■ f ><■■>

JJ f
j

• >'.c Ov f

■>’ ■■■

appropriate: technology

For PICH Work

1. Patient Retained Health Records

Coloured cards in a strong plastic cover retained with patients
who bring them during clinic visits.

Alloted spaces and

information for all aspects of mother and child care - Also

a personalised health teaching aid.
2.

Arm circumference insertion tape

To measure mid-upper aym circumference a useful indicator of
nutritional status of individuals and communities useful for

helping workers detect severe undernutrition and for raising
level of consciousness among community concerning the
problem.

3.

Child's bangle

Typically Indian method for diagnosing undernutrition by

mothers and health workers.

The bangle positive child includes

those with marasmic or third degree protein calorie malnutrition.
4.

indigenous Calendar

With festibals, full moons and conversion to English months

to help mothers place the birth of the child on the exact

date.
5.

Amsnisia recognition chart

Simple coral used to detect anaemia by comparing the colour
of tongue,lower lip and nails with picture on card the colour
of tongue.

6.

A Sterile delivery pack

Consisting of sterile cotton tie, a new blade and a small
bottle of disinfectant,this kit costing a few paises can

be used to prevent tetanus in the new born.
7.

Better Child Care

A * informative booklet with colourful pictures and

2

2
basic massages to help health workers and mothers to

discuss child care issues



vh-ai C?)

(FpX—Furjthar-details contac t VHAI9 Net/ Delhi)

"Technology can only be considered appropriate
if it helps lead to a change in the distribution

of wealth and power......’’

3
use low-cost madia alternatives like Flash cards and
flip charts and also to adapt local folk media and
traditional cultural/art forms like

puppetry
kathas (story telling)

street theatre
music and dance forms particularly those uhich
were common features of the festival culture in
India.

In tribal regions effective adoptions to ’nachna’
(song and dance improvisations) was a common feature.

Recording and evaluation tachniques - Many projects have

ii.

evolved simple mathods of recording quantifying and keeping

track of health activities or material resources utilised
by the health workers.

These were geared to the

capacities of local people (if they were people retained)
or to the capacities of the local health workers.

Many

were geared to get over the constraints of illiteracy.

d.

Recognition, promotion and utilization of local health

resources
Local health resources include local family based traditions

of health and self care as well as traditional systems of
medicine and their practitioners.

Many health projects had

created positive relationships with
local dais (traditional birth attendants)

traditional healers
folk medicine practitioners
and

the practitioners of various non-allopathic systems of
medicine practised locally.
This relationship had gone beyond a mere association to an

4

LOCAL HEALTH RESOURCES
’The Miraj Experience’
1. Training of Indigenous Dais
173 Dais out of 186 identified by a survey were trained.

The

emphasis of the training was on scientific techniques in home

delivery, elements of good antenatal, intranatal and post­
natal care, basic cleanliness and hygiene.

They are also

taught to recognise danger signals in pregnancy/labour as
well as motivate for family planning methods.

Dais were

provided with autoclaved delivery kits.
2.

Village health aides

40 local part time women attendants provided to help the
government ANfl were retrained as village health guides who
could do early reporting of pregnant women and postnatal cases,

births and deaths, communicalbe diseases, fevers, neonates and

infants unprotected against preventable diseases, collect

mothers and children for immunization, distribute iror/and
folic acid tablets, follow up TB, Leprosy patients and so on.

3.

Indigenous medical practitioners

6 local Ayurvedic doctors were put in charge of Ayurvedic clines

run by the project.

Also serving the project area on a private

basis were 62 untrained practitioners of Ayurvedic medicine,

33 registered medical practitioners without formal training,

3 bone setters.

The doctors of/:he project would invite these

practitioners during their weekly village visit to join them
in examining and teeating patients.

This training method was

beneficial to both parties concerned.
Eric Ram (

)

4
acceptance of some of the medical and health practices of

these systems, by the projects themselves.

Promotion of

locally available herbal medicines and home remedies was

in important component in many.
e.

Training 2£_villat]e_based_health_cadres

Training of locally selected individuals in the village
in basic health care activities

minor ailment treatment
first aid

recognition of illnesses needing higher levels of
referral and care

nutrition
maternal and child health care

family welfare motivation

environmental sanitation
identification - reporting - basic measures in

communicable disease control especially
malaria
leprosy
tuberculosis

mental health care
and so on has been probably the most characterstic feature of

all these projects.

The selection methodology, the training

methodology, the range of skills and the scope of training,
the plan of activities and the remuneration and community

support of these health workers reflect// a wide diversity - but

the most import mt result of this trend has been the conscious
demystification of health issues and the creation of better

informed village-based individuals who are available to help

...5

•The Mandwa Experience’

Several Community Health Projects have demonstrated that most
communicable diseases can be controlled even under the existing

socio-economic conditions.

In the Mandwa Project thirty

village women given simple knowledge through weekly discuss­
ions under the village tree, and with a simple supportive
service were able to achieve this.

few examples.

Let me illustrate with a

They took finger prick blood smears of any

patient suffering from fever with rigors and gave them four

tablets of chloroquine.

If the smear were positive they

gave Primoquine treatment.

flora than that they drew attention

of the village to control the mosquito vector.

They were

remarkably efficient in suspecting tuberculosis in individuals
with the classical symptoms especially if they were contacts

of known cases.

If the diagnosis was established on examination

of the sputum of X-ray they gave the 90 streptomycin injections
and supervised the regularity of the other anti tuberculosis
treatment by convincing the patient of its importance not only

for himself but also for the rest of his family.

taught

They also

other pimple measures like disposal of sputum to prevent

the spread of the disease.
These women diagnosed twice as many leprosy patients as the

full-time leprosy technicians, ensured that regular treatment
with Dapsone was taken after confirmation of diagnosis and

since these were in the early st ges, there was not a single
new case of deformity; the old deformed patients were helped to
return home and take regular treatment, for on having seen the

germs under a microscope they were able to convince the village
of chemical sterilization by regular treatment and induced

confidence by visiting the patients in their homes and par­

taking of their meals.

2
There was a marked reduction in deaths from gastro-enteritis

not onl^ because of ORT but because of the creation of an
epidemiological conscioisiess in the villages for being prepared
for the monsoons.

The immunization rate for triple antigen rose from 15% to 92%
when the village health workers started giving them injections

on their daily rounds.

Since all pregnant owmen were identified

and immunized there was not a single death from tetanus in
five years.

No mass compaigns were even undertdcen in this

project, yet the so-called targets set by the PHC were over­

reached even in family planning.
This people-based approach even succeeded in the detection

of cancer, mental illness and in rehabilitation of the dis­
abled, all without campaigns and camps and at a fraction of
the normal cost of our health services.

Let us not minimize the role of the profession and services
in such a participatory aporoach.

Their main function should

be of teaching and encouraging the people to look after
themselves to the extent possible and overcome the fears in­
culcated through professional mystification.

Another important

role is to provide the necessary supportive service for those
few problems which require skills and facilities of a higher
level.

Their’s is not to appropriate the functions which

rightly belong to the people, for experience has shown that
they cannot undertake these functions themselves even at a

far greater cost.

The present approach has only led to

exploitation of the people’s health by the private sector and

lack of accountability of the public sector without much

impact on the health status as revealed by our statistics.
The supportive professionalised services have also to be of a
graded nature starting with the paramedical worker at the

3

3

subcentre to tha surgeon and physician at the Community
Health Centre.

The primary role of the Community Health

Centre should nevefcthless be of monitoring the people's
health with priority to the promotive and preventive

services.

The ICSSR/lCMR report has estimated that about

98% of all health and illness care can be undertaken

within a

1,00,000 population covered by the Community Health Centre
at a cost of about Rs. 30 per capita per annum leaving only

a marginal sector for tertiary hospital care.

Also that

this can be achieved only if the people have th§ finaicial
and administrative control over their health services with

guidance and support by the professionals.
I know that this is a radical departure from the existing

situation and may not be readily acceptable to those who

believe that all decisions on health must be left only to
the medical profession.

But four decades experience in an

independent India has clearly demonstrated that we have

not been able to achieve the desired result despite the
vast expansion of medical services in both the public as
well as the private sector.

Dr N H Antia
Source: Medical & Non-Medical Dimensions of Health, National

Academy of Medical Sciences Oration, April 4, 1987
Nej/ Delhi

To. vcPr -■■■'
!. j >

5
thair own people in times of crisis.

The pedagogical

approach in the training session will determine whether these

village workers will become ’Lackeys of the existing system’
or the ’liberators of their people’ as David Werner had
warned from his Mexican experience.

In many projects, however

we discovered that ones health workers had been helped to

understand the situation and plan and decide on local health

actions, certain lead rinip qualities did emerge and action
on issues wider than health was gpierated.

In a fishing

community women health workers had effectively organised
peoola to orotest against ths local bus system which refused to
allow women to carry their baskets of fish on thebus to the

local market,

In many plantations health workers called

link workers had emerged as local union leaders.

Such

situation aaere not at all unusual.

f.

Increasing community participation in health decision

making

In addition to training uillaga health workers many of these

prgects have attempted to involve the community or their
representatives in the planning and decision making process

through the organisation of local village informal leaders.
Hany had involved existing

youth groups
mahila mandals (women’s groups)

farmers associations

coqjaratives

and
teachers and religoli s leaders

This is a very important trend and a rather challenging approach
For community participation to be a genuine process of enabling

people to take responsibilities foj/:hsir own health services

two pre-requisite conditions are essentials

6

i.

Firstly ths involvement of all sections of ths community.

Il­

in the strafied village set-up with certain caste and
class groups dominating decision making and exploiting

certain other groups,, purposeful involuoment of dis­
advantaged and oppressed sections of the village often
mean even exclusive involvement,

ii. Secondly the health action initi tors must be willing to
learn from the people and their nun experience of local

culture and social reality.

This means a ’democratic

dialogue’ on equal terms arid involvement in all aspects

of decision making not just participation in programmes
organised by the health team.

These twc pre-requisite conditions have evolved to varying
degress in the different projects and hence the nature of

participation is variable.

The qualitative difference from the/above approach is only

of emphasis.

Many projects have themselves initiated or

catalysed the development of

youth clubs
mahila mandals

farmers associations

and various group activities recognising the need for local
organisations to participate in planning and sustaining health
actions,
This action has also emerged from the observation that even

the poor and marginalised are not themselves a cohesive group
of a*community' in the real sense.

They have internalised

various social, cultural, political, religious divisions that
divide society at large.

Hence building groups relationships

7

7

and group organisations around issues and common actions are
themselves pre-requisites for community health actions.
h. A quest for financial self-sufficiency and cpneration

of local resources

I
Many projects have concentrated on the dimension of financial

participation of the community as a dimension of community

participation.

These projects have therefore concentrated

on generating local finances through

insurance schemes
adding health functions to dairy and other cooperative
graded payment of services according to family income
festival collections

and so on.

Experience has, however, cautioned that an

exclusive pursuit of this objective can often result in the
exclusion of those sections of the community which need the
health services most, especially when the [jporchasing;
capacity of people is so skewed.

Many projects have however widened this approach of generating
local resources to means

local resources - material,

structural and human - that can be harnessed to support health
These have included

actions.

grains for nutritional programmes

accommodation for clinics and programmes
basic supportive services by volunteers,
grain banks, voluntary labour, building materials

ans so on.

i) Education for Health
•Health* education has been an important approach in most
projects moving beyond the ’conservative’ health education

approaches which usually includes information transfer on
available health services and do’s and dont’s for individual

....8

8
health.

The efforts have been demystifying and conscientizing,

helping groups to understand the broader issues in health cars
as part of a wider awareness building process.

These have

been specific components of health action^for have been intro­

duced as components of existing adult education and non-formal

education programmes.

As people discover the cause of illn­

esses that they commonly experiences, and identify their roots
within their own social situation, they are prepared

something.

to do

This has meant that thio approach has often served

as a starting point for individual or group education.

School

health programmes where teachers and high school students are
oriented to do something about their own health, that of their

own families and their community, share the same vision.

j • £22£2i2£»l£2il2£_22£_221iii£21„2££122
There are some projects where the health teams based on thar

own experience have begun to show a deeper understanding of
issues for conscientization and recognise the need to support

political action especially those of ’people movements’ and

mass organisations.

This support may be through the

organisation of health activities particularly for members of

such movements or the addition of health demands on the agenda
of people’s struggles.

In the South, especially the demand

for provisions of water supply has often become such a
rallying point.

k
A>yjC- Ze c>L ., ?ka_

l4-€Z^l^

fZ>te)'C^~j

C^_>-r^x>

<~> O

<^-^< CJ2-y? k cs~>~,

$.y / v' &-"'

ft study croup of ths Indian Council of Medical Research and

the Indian Council of Social Sciences Research listed out
J4ecJ^
the achievements and failures of th» whole,strategy as
/\

f ollcws:

Achievements
Life expectancy doubled

Health care services expanded
Manpower training centres increased
r

Small pox was eradicated

Plague, Cholera and Malaria controlled
Maternal and Child Health and Immunization programmes

increased

Largest Family Planning programme in the world
Failures
Health not integrated with Development

Little dent on Malnutrition and Environmental Sanitation
Morbidity Patterns not materially changed

Health Education neglected

TS, Leprosy, Filaria yet to be controlled
Infant/Maternal mortality rates still very high
Population stabilization - a long way to go
i

'

Overall
i

1. The model of health care was outdated and counter­
productive benefitting the rich and/jell to do

upper and middle classes
2.

Health was a low-priority national investment
u

.



QUANTITATIVE EXPANSION

By 1<£?2 when ue celebrated the Silver Jubilee of our
Independence ue had made rapid strides and a phenomenal
quantitative expansion of health care services.

(Insert charts 18, 21, 27, 28, 30 and 31 from
HEALTH ATLAS OF INDIA, 1986

0 HZ.
P‘

Central Bureau of Health Inteligancs

J0

Directorate Deneral of Health Services

Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
Government of India
Nirman Bhavan, Neu Delhi )

l^cxhle.


Co

nji/k
. .

( cm r i u I) r a

>0-7/’s/ <?

CRITICAL INTROSPECTION

In the seventies, ths Government of India set up an expert

group on Medical Education and Support Manpower to take
stock of the situation and suggest proposals for reforms.
This is what the expert committee had to say:

1. ”A universal and egalitarian programme of efficient and

effective health services cannot be developed against
the background of a socio-economic structure in which the

largest masses of people still live below the poverty
line.

So long as such stark poverty persists, the

creative energies of the people will not be fully released;

the State will never have adequate resources to finance
even minimum national programmes of education or health;

and benefits of even the meagre investments made in these
services will fail to reach the masses of the people.

There is, therefore, no alternative to making a direct,

sustained and vigorous attack on the problem of mass
poverty and for creation of a more egalitarian society.
A nationwide programme of health services should be developed
yt

side by side as it will support this major national endeavour
and ba supported by it in turn.
.

lie have adopted tacitly, and rather uncritically the model
of health services from the industrially advanced and

consumption-oriented societies of the west.

This has its

own inherent fallacies; health gets wrongly defined in
terms of consumption of specific goods and services; the
basic values in life which essentially determine its

quality get distorted; over-professionalization increases
costs and reduces the autonomy of the individual; and

2

2
ultimately there is an adverse effect even on the health and
happiness' of the people.

Those weaknesses of the system are

now being increasingly realized in thsUest and attempts are
afoot to remedy them.

Even if the system were faultless,

the huge cost of the model and its emphasis on over-profe­
ssionalization is obviously unsuited to the socio-economic

conditions of a developing country like ours.

It is therelftre

a traqddy that we continue to persist with this model even
!

whan those us borrowed it from have begun to have serious
misgivings about its utility and ultimate viability.

It

is, therefore, desirable that we take a conscious and

deliberate decision to abandon this model and strive to
create instead a viable and economic alternative suited to

our own conditions, needs and aspirations.

The new model will

have to place a greater emphasis on human effort (for which

we have a large potential) rather than on monetary inputs
»

(for which we have severe constraints).

3.

In the existing system, the entire programme of health

services has been built up with the metropolitan and capital
citis as centres and it tries to spread itself out irythe

rural areas through ibtermediate institutions such as
Regional, district or Rural Hospitals and Primary Health

Centres and its sub-centres.

Very naturally, the quantum

of quality of the services in this model are at their best
in the Centre, gradually diminish in intensity as one moves
away from it, and admittedly fail at what is commonly des­

cribed as the periphery.

Unfortunately, the ’periphery’

comprises about 80 percent of the people of India who should

really be thq^ocus of all the welfare and developmental

I
...3

3
effort cf the State.

It is, therefore, urgent that this

process is reversed and the programme of national health
services is built with the community itself as the central

focus.

This implies the creation of the

needed health

services within the community by utilising all local

resources available, and then to sunplement them through a

referral service which will gradually rise to the metropolitan

or capital cities for dealing with more and more complicated
•s)

cases®

: 4.'Throughout the last two hundred years, conflicts have arisen

in almost every important aspect of our life, between our
traditional patterns and ths corresponding systems of the
West to which we have been introduced.

In many of these

aspects, the conflicts are being resolved through the
evolution of a new national pattern suited to our own
genius and conditions.

In medicine and health services

unfortunately, these conflicts are yet largely unresolved

and the old and new continue to exist side by side, often

in functional dishormony.

fl sustained effort is, therefore

needed to resolve these conflicts and to evolve a national
system of medicine and health services, in keeping with
J}
our life systems, needs and aspirations;'
_____________________________________

________________________________ /^erv k

Many other expert committee reports and policy stntments

of the seventies began to make critical observations about

the inadequacies of the present health care model and
exhorted all concerned to search for more relevant alter­

natives and approaches

A MULTITUDE OF

QUESTIONS

What da all these statistics and critical introspection mean
to ths rural people who have suffered neglect for years?

Have

the post-independence policies made an impact on their lives?
Professor Ashish Bose while reviewing the Family Welfare
programme' has this to say:
^There are questions the masses would like to ask.

* 'Jhy are doctors not available at tbs Primary

Health Centres and ANI*ls net available at the

sub-centres?
* Why are medicines not available to the poor?
* Why is there no follow-dip of acceptors of

sterilisation?

* Why are women brought to the PHCs for
laparoscopic operation?

* Why are the X-ray machines not working in
so many PHCs and hospitals?

* Why is there no facility for oxygen and
blood transfusion euon in upgraded PHCs?

* Why are Government doctors so indifferent
to rural patients?

* Why don’t the PHC building have proper water

and electricity facilities?
* Why are the naw sub-centres and residential
houses built for ANf,ls so sub-standard and

located in such forlorn places?

Why do

contractors get away with sub-standard

construction under the so called Foreign-Aided

Area Projects?
”10 this controversy, if there is a fair debate, the masses

7c. Community Health: Is a movement emerging?
A study of the dynamics of community based health

action and the evolving approaches from micro level experience

show that ’community health’ could, become a movement
linked to a wider development and social chance process
in the country. There are many positive trends which

support this possibility. However, there are many negative
trends as well which could become major obstacles

for a genuine health movement in the country.

The positive trends are—
i•

Policy reflections of the Government

Policy documents and expert committee reports have
been echoing new approaches. Many decision makers,

administrators and technocrats within the entrenched

medical system are aware of these new approaches.

ii.

"Villace Health Worker Army”

A growing army of villagers and lay people have been
trained as village health workers by

oth non-government

and government agencies. Whatever the quality of training
this process itself is a phenomenal process of
demystification of medicine.

iii.

Non-medical Health Activists

A growing number of lay people, social workers,

developmental activists, journalists, teachers,
college students, non-medical scientists, lawyers,

consumer groups and so on are recognising the varied

dimensions of health and are getting involved in health
care issues

1

iv.

Health in the education process
Health issues are increasingly becoming part of the

syllabi of formal, non-formal and adult education
programmes in the country. Schools are also
gradually becoming focus of health activity.

v.

Health on the agenda of science movements
Movements for the popularisation of scientific
attitudes like KSSP (Kerala), Lok Vidnyan Sanghatana

(LVS, Maharashtra) and Karnataka Rajya Vigyan Parishad
(KRVP, Karnataka) are gradually taking up more

health issues.

vi .

Health issues emerging in other movements
The environmental movement has grown in recent

years with a number of processes around forest

issues, environmental issues and social problems.
In all of them, the health and nutrition of the affected

people is a growing concern. The women’s movement

is beginning to recognise health issues important
to women, eg., family planning, contraceptives,

amniocentesis and so on.
The Trade Union movement has got interested

in the’drugs issue’ but that involvement in health

issues is still quite marginal with the e ception o
independent trade unions like CMSS Dall! Rajhara

(Chatisgarh Project).
vii.

Health orientation of Coordinating groups and issue
raising networks
Groups like VHAI, CHAI, CMAI, mfc, SHC, AIDAN are
slowly increasing their commitment to lobbying on

various health issues.

All these trends call for a guarded optimism since
a series of negative trends are also becoming

incr asingly stident. These are—
i.

Commercialisation of medicine
Medicalisation, over professionalization and a

consumerist orientation of medical and health care
is increasing in the country. Medicine is becoming

big busness. The mushrooming of capitation fee

medical colleges and high technology investigative
centres catering to those vine can pay are components

of this trend.
ii.

Mushroominc; of medicalised health projects

Health projec s are mushrooming all over the country

sup orted by a combination of social, economic and
political factors. Foreign funding agencies are

vying with each other to fund the alternative.
Industrial houses are investing in it for income tax

purposes^ religious and social organisations are getting

involved for prestige, power and increasing their
membership; professionals getting involved for status

reasons. Most of these projects are •medical* providing

packages of services with little or no understanding
of the values/vision of the health movement or a

social analysis.
iii.

Verticaliz.ation of health efforts
Selectivization and vertical top-down health

programmes sponsored by government and encouraged

by International Funding Agencies like WHO, USAID,
UNICEF divert scarce resources and confuse community

health action initiators as well as waste time and

effort

A1

iv.

Inadequate Networking

Health action initiators themselves are not adequately

networking or lobbying with decision makers or opinion
leaders. While there has been a rich experience
of micro level experimentation there is inadequate
pooling of ideas, training, policy evolving efforts

and research;so the

.entrenched medical establishment

goes unconfronted.

v.

Status-quo forces
The ability of the existing status quo forces dominated
by the haves to internalise and coopt many of the

ideas and approaches into the*health, policy rhetoric*
butdefeating the spirit of the new vision must not be

under-estimated. The increasing number of paradoxical
policies and programmes on the national scene are an

incr asing evidence of this cooption.

vi.

Cooption of Health

The misuse and coption of the ;.ord—health—itself :C
a new and disturbing trends. The Drug Industry, the

medical technology industry, the five star hospitals,
the medical professionals are all using the word heath
to describe their initiatives most of which is the

same old curative high technology, drug oriented package -

deals under the new label. Alternatively through high
pressure advertising^insurance programmes, screening

programmes and medical check ups to promote ’over investigatioi
in the name of health is another trend.

Will the negative trends prevail and grow and prevent the
evolution of a health movement only time will tell. There
is every Indication that this may be so.

THE PARADIGM SHIFT

Medics! Model to Social Model of Health

INDIVIDUAL

COLLECTIVE/COMNUNITY

PATIENT
&
POPULATION

PERSON
&
SOCIETY

ANTI DEATH
ANTI DISEASE

PRO LIFE
PRO LIVING

PHYSICAL/MENTAL
PREDOMINANTLY

PHYSICAL/MENTAL/SOCI AL/
CULTUP AL/POLITICAL/ECOWJL OGICAL

DOCTORS/!WRSES
MEDICAL AUXILIARIES

TEAM OF HEALTH WORKERS

DISEASE
PROCESSES

SOCIAL

PROCESSES

HOS PI 'I ALS/DISPENSARIES
D RU GS/TECHN 01 ,QGY
—PROVIDING SERVICES

INTRACELLULAR

RESEARCH

PATIENT AS BENEFICIARY,

HEALTH PROMOTING AND
COMMUNITY BUILDING CENTRES
AND PROCESSES—-ENABLING/EMPOWERING
THE PEOPLE
——SOCIETAL RESEARCH

PEOPLE AS PARTICIPANTS

CONSUMER

SINGLE FACTOR

MULTI FACTOR

RISK/IDENTIFYING

PROCES^ IDEi

EPIDEMIOLOGY

EPIDEMIOLOG'

PROFESSIONALISED
COMPARTMENTALISED
MYSTIFIED KNOWLEDGE

DEMYSTIFYING,
PERSON CENTRED
AUTONOMY CREATING
AWARENESS BUILDING

'...UEST FOP VACCINE
AGAINST DISEASE

'FYI KG

Ds £

QUEST FOR AWARENESS BUILDING
PROCESS TO IMMUNIZE AGAINST
UNHEALTHY SOCIAL PROCESSES

Community/Village Health
Workers

O
c
i?

J

Source: Community Health Cell
Reflections^-)

Source: Community Health Cell
Reflections (u')

FROM INTRACELLULAR TO SOCIETAL RESEARCH

The new approaches to Community Health evolving in the
country have shown that a very important but neglected area
is research into socio-reconomic-political-cultural Factors

that affect health and disease and determine the nature of
health care development as well as the response of the
people.

Radical research in India has been preoccupied as in
other parts of the world with intracellulay or molecular

biological roots of disease and much of the research efforts

sponsored by ICMR and other national and regional,government
and private research centres has been in this direction.

Most

of it has been imitative research, ’we too have done it in
India' sort of Focus and there is the continued myopic wxki
view that the future of health in the country will be

determined by the discovery of a few more vaccines and
maybe the odd drug or contracsptiva.

This technological

focus has blinded us to the fact that the world-over health

care action initiators are proving again and again that the
clue to health of the people is in greater societal problems

in the wider social reality and to study them in a socioeoidemiological context to determine bottlenecks and to
evolve creative innovations is the need of the hour.

Some

ICMR institutions like the National Institute of Nutrition

in Hyderabad, National Tuberculosis Institute in Bangalore

and the Vector Control Research Centre in Pondicherry have
treaded the path of societal research and made unique
contributions to Primary Health Care and Community Health

but these are the exceptions to the overriding ru1e.
Have the NGO Health action initiators fared better?

Is anyone interested in health related societal research

in the country?

The development of NGO health research units keeping

in tuns with and exploring in depth issues arising out of the
emerging Community Health movement are few but these are

atleast positive signs.

The Foundation for Research in Community Health (Bombay)
the Action Research in Community Health, Mangrol (Gujarat),
Society for Education Research and Training in Health,(SEARCH)

Gadchirole (Maharashtra), Community Health Cell (Bangalore)
are examples.
A feu of the larger NGO Health Projects like CHOP, Pachod,

(Maharashtra) SEWA-Rural (Gujarat), CINI (Calcutta), Oamkhed

(Maharashtra) and RUHSA (Tamilnadu) have also begun to take up

some key research issues but this whole interest ie still
in a nascent state.
The Social Medicine and Community Health Department at

JNU is the only other national centre which is undertaking
societal research relevant to Health Care and Health policy

issues.

The medico fridnd circle’s efforts in providing

counter research expertise in the Bhopal disaster and its
aftermath was also a beginning of this new trend.
Much needs to be done by both governmental and

non-governmental groups, if the emerging ’Community Health’
approach and movement has to be put on a sound researched

social and epidemiological basis.

But this needs people who

see Research as an important need.

It also needs innovativa

•researchers’ who will be willing to learn existing health
care research methodologies and then creatively adapt it

through interactive, participatory approaches to study the
dynamics of Community Health care and the evolving movement.

With the preoccupation with ’microscopic research* are
such ’baloonist researchers’ available for the task?

Uill the M©Qs work together to pur pressure on the
•established medical system’ to commit itself to -ar new

vision of Health Care?
(^14-

Uill the N5&s work together to put pressure on ’Health

Policy and decision makers' to move beyond policy statements

and get health oriented programmes and actions of the ground?
<_U- c^C-ke-n

> V-ij.V'O—

Uill the N-G9s work with the people and their organisations
to enable and empower them to get the means, structures,
opportunities, skills, knowledge and organisations that

make health possible?

All these are unanswered questions.

Micro level experi­

ments have shown that a lot is possible, but macro level
change requires a collective understanding and a colle­

ctive action that is still to emerge .or-our—indi-vi-dualistic,
divided,politically sterile national scene.

UILL COMMUNITY HEALTH HAVE A CHANCE?

The World Health Organization has defined Health as a 1 state

of physical, mental and social well being and not merely an
absence of diseases of infirmity
While this definition focusses on the health of individuals

it could as well be a description of the ideal state for
families and communities. Community Health would therefore

mean 1 a process of improving the physical, mental and social

well being of the community and all its component members.
This interest in health action focussed on the community and

not only on the individual is not now.

From times immemorial

efforts have bean made by doctors and communities to evolve
health actions that are focussed on the environment - physical,
chemical, biological, social, mechanical, psychological, culture,
ecological rather than on individual patients.

This increasing

knowledge has over times evolved into various disciplines

and today though we use these names synonymously they do have
their own distinctive meanings and focus.

In a way they also

represent the historical development of skills focussed on

community health

1.

Medicine: The art of preventing and curing disease

2.

Hygiene: The Science of Health

3.

Public Health: The branch of medicine that deals with
statistics, hygiene and the prevention and

overcoming of epidemics
4.

Preventive Medicine: The branch of medical science that
deals with prevention of diseases

5.

Social Medicine: Systematic study of human diseases with

special reference to social factors
....2

2

6.

Socialised Medicine (^tate medicine);
The control of medical practice by an

organisation of the government, the practitioners
being an integisL part of/the organisation from

which they draw their 'fees and to whibh the

public contribute in some form or other
(same as National Health Service)

7.

Community Medicine: A unified and balanced integration

of curative, preventive and promotional

health services focussed on the
communi ty
As Parks textbook (standard reference in India) says

"Once looked upon as a healing art, medicine is looked
upon today as the sum total of all activities of a

given society that tend to promote, restore and
maintain the health of the people.

Where such a

concept prevails, medicine includes more than a
physician’s action; it becomes community health"

Community Health as we understand it today includes all

the ideas and disciplines mentioned above and more.

As new

approaches evolve the definition becomes more comprehensive.

TRADITIONAL MEDICINE

Ficus Carica
Fig. Tree (Anjir)
Use
1.

Tooth ache

apply few drops of milky jtiiice of the
tree by breaking a small branch. This can
be repeated if pain persists

2.

Ring worm

rub the affected area with the milky juice
twice a day until ring worm disappears

3.

Warts

wash the feet well and dry. Place few drops

on the warts and repeat every night until
wart disappears.

4.

Diabetes

figs are considered to have antidiabetic
properties. Few drops of milky juice of

figs in water every morning reduces
the sugar in the blood.

Lilliacease - Aloe vera/lndian aloe (H-Ghikavar)
Use

1.

Psoriasis

split the leaves of an aloe vera plant,
apply the juice directly to psoriasis and
let the juice dry. In a week it should be

healed.
2.

Bald head

fresh juice is to be applied on the scalp.

3.

Constipation

juice is a drastic purgative. Use fresh

juice 1-2 tsf for adults.

2

2

4. Dandruff

apply fresh juice on the scalp for an hour

and then wash it off. Repeat this daily until
dandruff disappears.

5. Burns

it has been proven a good remedy for

burns, treating effectively even 3rd degree

burns.
6. Halwa can be made out of freshy part of the plant which
is a remedy for indigestion and peptic ulcers.

Boat lilly, Commelinacea
Rhoeo spalhacea - Boat Lilly

Use
1. Whooping cough

leaves and flowers are boiled to make a
hot decoction. An oz. of the liquid is given

3 times a day and whooping cough disappears.
2. Bacillary dysentery : boil the leaves for 10 minutes and use

the decoction 3-4 times a day.

Papiliomacea - Fabaceae, Pongam oil tree - Karanj
Use

1. Herpes & scabies

apply the oil extracted from the seed for

3-5 days
2. Rheumatism

The oil massage with Karanj oil is considered
beneficial to those suffering from rheumatism

3. Bronchitis

the powdered seed is used as an expectorant

in bronchitis

4. Leprosy

oil of the seed is used in leprosy by the

tribals.

..... 3

3

Graminae

Lemon Grass
Use
1. cold and cough

widely used in cold ari cough. Tea

is prepared from leaves
2. Fever

it is given as a diaphoretic in fever
also carminative

3. Diuretic

tea made from the leave is diuretic

Euphorbiaceae - Phylanthus Niruri

Seed underleaf - Egg woman
Use
1. Jaundice

whole plant is used as a remedy

for jaundice
2. Diabetes

the plant is considered to be useful in
iS? diabetes

3. Dysentry

infusion of the young c_h shoots are
often used for dysentry

4. Skin ailments

juice is taken from the plant and

rubbed for skin ailments

Reference: 1988 Table Calendar, Holy Family Hospital, New Delhi

‘CmRs I C

■ |4<?cx 0U

P II

RECOmENDflTIONS

Me therefore make the following recommendations:
1.

The Government of India should, in consultation with
all concerned, formulate a comprehensive national

policy on health dealing with all its dimensions,

viz., philosophical and cultural, socio-economic,
nutritional, environmental, educational, preventive

and curative.

The coordinated and planned imple­

mentation of this policy should be the collaborative

and cooperative responsibility of individuals,
families, local communities, health personnel and

State and Central Governments.

2.

The basic objectives of this policy should be:
a.

to integrate the development of the health

system with the overall plans of socio-economicpolitical transformation;

b.

to ensure that each individual has access to

adequate food and is provided with an environment
which is conducive to health and adequate
immunization, where necessary;

c.

to devise an educational programme which will

ensure that every individual has the essential
knowledge, skills and values which would enable

him to lead an effectively healthy life and to
participate meaningfully in understanding
and solving the health problems of the family

and the community;

d.

to replace the existing model of health care

services by an alternative new model which will be

- combining the best elements in the tradition

and culture of the people with modern science
and technology,

... . 2

2

- integrating promotive, preventive
and curative functions,

- democratic, decentralised and participatory,
- oriented to the people, i.e., providing

adequate health care to every individual and
taking special care of the vulnerable groups,

- economical, and

- firmly rooted in the community and aiming
at involving the people in the provision

of the services they need and increasing
their capacity to solve thein own problems,

and

e.

to train the personnel, to produce drugs and
materials and to organise research needed for
this alternative health care system.

3. A detailed time-bound programme should be prepared,

the needed administrative machinery created and
finance provided cn a priority basis so that this
new policy will be fully implemented and the goal

of ’'Health for All” be reached by the end of the
century.

(Recommendations of the ICflR/lCSSR on "Health for All”

An Alternative Strategy)

PRIMARY HEALTH CARE

DECLARATION OF ALMA-ATA — 12.9.1978

RELEVANT EXTRACTS

Primary health care is essential health care based

on practical, scientifically sound and'socially acceptable

methods and technology made universally accessible to
individuals and families in the community through their full

participation and at a cost that the community and country

can afford to maintain at every stage of their development

in the spirit of self-reliance and self-determination. It
forms an

integral part both of the country’s health system

of which it is the central function and main focus, and of

the overall social and econcmic develo ment of the community.
It is .the first level of contact of individuals, the family

and community with the national health system bringing health
care as close as possible to where people live and work, and
constitutes the first element of a continuing health care

process.

Primary health care:
1. reflects and evolves from the economic ■conditions

and socio-cultural and political characteristics
of the country and its communities and is based on

the application of the relevant results of social,
biomedical and health services research and public

health experience;

2. addresses the main health problemsin the community,
providing promotive, preventive, curative and

rehabilitative services accordinglly;

2

2

3, includes atleast: education concerning prevailing
health problems and the methods of preventing
and controlling them; promotion of food supply and proper
nutrition; an adequate supply of safe water and basic

sanitation; maternal and child health care, including
family planning; immunization against the major infectious

diseases; appropriate treatment of common diseases and
injuries; prevention and

control of locally endemic diseases; and provision of

essential drugs;
a.

involves, in addition to the health sector, all related

sectors and aspects of nat'onal an-

community development,

in particular agriculture, animal husbandry, food,

industry, education, housing, public works, communications
and other sectors; and demands the coordinated efforts
of all those sectors, ,

5.

r quires and promotes maximum community and
individual self~reliar.ee and participation in the
planning, organization, operation and control of primary

health care, making fullest use of local,national and other

available resources; and to this end develops through
appropriate

education the ability of communities to

participate;

6. should be sustained by integrated,functional and mutually
supportive referral systems, leading to the progressive

improvement of comprehensive health care for all, and
giving priority to those most in need;

3

3

relies at local and referral levels, on health workers

7.

including physicians, nurses, midwives, auxiliaries

and community workers as applicable, as well as traditional

practitioners as needed, suitably trained socially and

technically to work as a health team and to respond to the

,

expressed health needs of the community.

STAGES IN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES LEADING TO MORE COMPLETE

PRIMARY HEALTH CARE DEVELOPMENT ARE!

Stags 0: Community has to come to the hospital resulting in
limited access to health care.

Stage 1: Mobile clinics which give episodic services unable to
deal with copplications developing between the
intervals of care.

Stage 2: Public Health Services which attempt to achieve disease
control without necessarily depending on active
recepient community involvement.

Stage 3: Hospital-based, community-oriented, Primary Health
Care where all resources and health funcationaries
are taken regularly and frequently from hospital

bases into communities requesting and cooperating
actively with this assistance.

Stagg 4: Community Based Primary Health Care (CBPHC) with
facilities and health personnel firmly established

in communities requesting them and actively cont­
ributing to their implementation.

Tertiary hospitals

are then used only for referrals, training and

assistance as and when required.

Stage 5: Multi-sectoral, multi.disciplinary integration of many
different comoonenhs in each community, leading to
improved health and economic developmemt.
Stage 6: Education, organisation, mobilisation of resources

and active implementation of socio-economic development

of people for their own total health at the micro­
project level.
Stage 7: political activity by communities at the macro

level to ensure primary health care with the quality
of wholeness in life for all.

(Source! Fiona Plus, A Bi-monthly bulletin on Primary Health
Care in Community Health, )

ALT1A ATA - - Tsn Years After

A decade ago, on September 25, 1978, the Alma Ata
conference formulated at Primary Health Care (fJ-HjC) strategy

Some

to achieve "Health for All" (HFA) by the year 2000.

argue that there has been virtually no success and that we

should abandon the strategy.

Others maintain that consi­

derable orogress has been made and that we only need to

redefine the objectives slightly in planning for the year 2000
In its first evaluation report, WHO claimed that some

progress has been made towards HFA 2000.

Paradoxically, it

is the developed countries that have banefitted most,

Deve­

loping countries still have not achieved much success in

PHC coverage.

p-:

The obvious success stories, such as the

achievement of 50 percent coverage in child immunization

and the final eradication of small pox, cannot conceal the
wide gulf which still exists between the urban "haves" and
the rural "have-nots".

Nearly 65 percent of people in/lndia

are trapped in the vicious cycle of poverty, malnutrition
and infectious disease, which reduces their capacity to
work and limits their ability to plan for the future.

For

example, 100 to 200 out of every 1000 infants born alive

still die during their first year of life.

In spite of the dismal statistics, some progress has
been made in the decado since Alma Ata, including reductions

in the infant mortality rats, the crude birth rate and the
death rate, and an increase in life expectancy.

The concept

of the community health worker, who is selected by the local

community to serve the community, has had considerable
impact.

Medical education has been re-oriented toward social
goals, fehd the teaching of preventive and social

medicine has been upgraded.

There has been a signifciant

progress in re-orienting the PHO to maximize the use of

limited resources through better managemant.

....2

2
were established in upper caste villages and to large extent
the poor were excluded from the services provided by us.

It

took us two years before we realised the implications and
moved away.
At the beginning we spent many months explaining our objectives
to "leaders” in the community and asked them to select village

health workers.

We found that though our stated target group

was the landless poor, the majority of those sent to ys by the
communities were from the land-holding classes.
to remedy this situation,

It took time

Mobile clinics were held on a

scheduled basis and it was several years before we learned
enough to see only those patients who were feferred to us

by the VHW.

The village clinics, though used as an "entry

point", tended to slow the process of acceptance of the VHW

by the community and we stopped doing them entirely after four

years,
Village health committees were formed with much fanfare but
after some time became inoperative when the committee members
found that apart from "prestige”, there was no monetary

benefit to be had.

Some of the committees also used the

VHW to run errands, etc., and had to be cautioned.

Once the

VHWs established their credibility, we found that the commi­

ttee was not really necessary.

We now operate on the basis

of trust between us and the VHW, and between her and the
community.

Of course, two independent control mechanisms

do exist in the programme, more to see the effectiveness of

the VHW than to "supervise".
Use of sophisticated drugs and diagnostic tests were a

legacy of our expensive medical education, and we inflicted
them on the community for a long time before really understanding

3

3
the peoole’s economicl deprivation.

The emphasis we nou

lay on herbal remedies is a response to this.

Ue hav® seen

the proven efficacy of several herbs commonly used at the
community level.

We started with a base hospital oroviding secondary care.
The hospital had a vary busy and often lucrative practice.
Ue found that ue tended to spend more time "curing" people

and slculy started de-emphasising this aspect.

The effec­

tive service carried out by the VHUs also diminished the
number of people uho needed secondary care.

Ue now believe

that if enough preparation of the community is done, it
should be possible to start programmes without base clinics,,

which ere often a hindrance.

Ue also believe strongly that

existing government facilities should be used, and if theyr

are inadequate, people should be organised to demand better
services rather than duplicating services.

Ue started this as a total community programme, for the rich
and the poor alike, for the upper and the lower caste, for we

believed that ue had a duty to all.

During the initial stages,

we found that the services offered by us were being extensively

used by those uho "have" land, money, education and who are
often from the upper castes.

This resulted in one of our

primary objectives being fulfilled - to double income levels .

A mid—programme assessment revealed that though ue had largely
achieved this objective, it was at the cost of the poor, who
showed only marginal growth while the "haves" showed specta­
cular growth.
initiated.

This was evident in a dairy programme we

This package programme involved bank loans for

cows and feeds, fodder development, milk co-operatives and

transport of milk to the dairy.

Not taken into consideration

was tha fact that the landless barijans were not used to cows
had bo place to grow green fodder, and if they had any iilk

4

>o

even the last drop to the dairyji while their children

were malncurishad.

The land-downing classes, on the other

hand, increased income levels significantly through the
dairy programme.

Also, we believed chat the transfer of

milk from inpoverished areas to the cities to be made into
cheese, chcclats and condensed milk was not socially just.
This and other lessons made us resolve to work only with

the target group i.e., the powerless; the landless and the
harijan. All programmes - health, agricultural, animal
husbandry, etc - were, offerad exclusively to' this group.

The VHWs too, served only them,

Thus our focus became defined

and we were able to serve the taget group better.

£2n™unii.X Participation

Expectations of community participation started coming into
vogue in the early 70s.

Me, too, started with a lot of

assumptions: that communities are homogenous and therefore

able to take collective decisions based on common good; that
communities consider health as a priority and that they will

identify and act upon their "felt needs"; that 25% contribution

by way of labout was participation; that food-for-work progr­

ammes were community participation, etc.

Only later did we

realise that widespread acceptance of our project did not mean
community participation.

We had, in fact, imposed a programme

on the community and had clearly defined areas in which they
should participate, thus acting contrary to our aim of enabling

them to make decisions affecting their lives.
We believed that the "leaders" expressed the collective need

of the people and many of our earlier schemes were based on

this assumption.

After several years of our education by the

community, us were able to see thefolly of this and involve

the entire community and not just "leaders" at all levels of

5

5

programme implementation, right from identification of priorities
and planning to evaluation.

To claim that ue have been entirely

successful in this would be untenable, but serious efforts bave

been made over the years.

Since we were unable to make defined

parameters, evaluation of this aspect is difficult.

It is also

hard, because the programme as we said earlier, has evolved
through many stages and has undergone changes in its objectives.
Self-Suff iciency
As a corollary of community participation, self-sufficiency

has been a goal in itself as well as a process.

Several ways

of seeking this goal were experimented with, particularly with
regard to the support of UHUs.

One way was to provide services

to the rich to raise resources.

There was an inherent danger

in this, for ue spent far too much of our times serving the rich

and this was contrary to our ideology, too.

Another al ternative

was to ask the VHUs to charge for their services, even a very

small amount.

The question remained, however: why should the

already marginalised and oppressed people be made to pay for
their health services while a lot of resources all over the

country were being allocated to server the "haves” and the
urban elite?
We had this problem until we realised that "self-sufficiency”
referred to the project, while what we were aiming to build at

the community level was "self-reliance".

Ue were working

towards building community capability in health care and,

community capability in health care and, hence, self-reliance.
Using a community-based approach, (appngriate personnel and

technology) we learned that it is possible to make communities

self-reliant.
Source:CONTACT, A bimonthly publication of the Christian Medical

Commission, Switzerland) (No 82 December, 1984)

ft Report from DEENABANDHUjTamilnadu)

Community Health : Learning from our failures
(Dr Pram John and Dr Hari John, graduates of CMC Vellore

recount the lessons they learnt from their failures so that

others may benefit from their mistakes and perhaps not
repeat them, thus saving time and efforts)

COMMUNITY HEALTH : Community Health, as it is known today,

started in the early seventies.

International organisations

and resource agencies from the West latched on to this whew
concept and touted it as being a panacea for all ills in the
community.

In the early stages there was a tendency on

the part of practitioners as well as promoters, to give less
publicity to problems and failures and to uphold '’successes’1
This resulted in :

1. a number of well motivated people going into community

programmes without learning from the failures of others and

thus having to reinvent the wheel, thereby wasting a lot of
.time and money, and
2. community health being practised in a haphazard

and

”non-scientific" way.

In fairness we should mention here that there were very few
models to go by and learn from.

But the lack of basic know­

ledge of social sciences was a great handicap and retarded
our progress; often a trial and error method had to be

adopted.

Apart from tine attitudinal problems botn out of

established values reinforced by sophisticated education,

we faced some early prlblems.,
We were well received by the better-off, and it was they who

offered houses in villages free of cost for establishing

clinics.

This fulfilled our requirement of "community

participation".

Only later we realised that all our clinics

2

ORGANIZING dEQPLE TOR HEALTH

— Problems and Contradictions.
Anant R S

(This reflection is oased on the experience of work in a
health-education-concientization project in a few rather

remote, backward villages near Pune, and on the debates,

discussions in the fledico-Friend-Circle)

General Perspective on Health-work

Most offthe major determinants of the health status of a
population - food, water, sanitation, shelter, work-environment,
cultural relations...... are far beyond the control of health
But Medicos can, with the help of the community,

workers.

organise preventive and therapeutic (symptomatic or curative)
\

'

'

.





.

■ ,

.s’

services, can do health-education and advise the planners on

health-implications of different socio-economic interventions.
These medical interventions are very valuable to orevent

certain deaths and diseases, to relieve human su-ffering. But
they have only a marginal role in improving the overall

health-status of the population.

For example, infant and

child mortality can be reduced with immunizations and ORT...etc.
but no health-programme has abolished malnourishment in

children

of a nation.

The department of health aiming to improve the health

of the people through so many national disease control programs

and now through the programme of ’Health for All by 2000 A.0’
is therefore a utopian, misleading idea.

As a part of a

thorough going socio-economic change, medial interventions
can be a very good supplementary tool to improve the overall
health-status of the people.

But the idea that "Health for

All by 2000 A.D" would be delivered by the health-ministry/
health projects by the NGOs, though very attractive, is a

2

8-'

2
misleading one.

All that health-people can hope to achieve is

"Health-care for All by 2000 A.0".
This is not sterile semantics.

There is a strong reason

and a context^or making this distinction.

There is a wide­

spread technocratic, and managerial illusion that improvement

in health of a nation, uhidn is in reality, prrimarily a function

of socio-economic development, can be achieved with technolo­
gical, managerial interventions.

Lay people are made to believe

that the beneficient state through its Health-Programmes, or the

Health-Projects run by NGOs, would improve the health of the
people with the help of modern science and technology.

These

slogans are being promoted in the context of the continuing

crisis in the economy leading to increase in poverty, unemploy­
ment, inflation, drought and ecological disaster.

Other basic

element required by for the success of "Health for All" improvement in socio-economic situation of the people—is in

practice, missing due to this economic crisis.

Uhat remains is

the misleading idea of "Health for All" to be achieved by the
efforts of the health-workers.
Those who undertake health-work primarily with an

intention of not ’giving a few pills’ but of doing some ’basic-

work’ can, in fact, make very valuable, basic work.

Many

improvements and some thoroughgoing changes are needed, many

neu ideas, practices have to be founded and developed, many

vested interests to be fought in the field of organising

medical care and health-education.
technocratic work.

This is not a purely

There are many sociological, ideological,

technical, practical issues to be resolved.

Health-work, done

with the aim of taking up one of the so many challenging issues,

can be very valuable, basic work, a historical need today.

3

3

Sut in ths sxisting socio-economic frame work and its
crisis let there be no illusion of really improving the

overall health of the people through health work.

Health-work alone ?
Anybody, who has any idea of the situation at the

grass root level, would agree, that in the rural areas,
it is not possible to build an organisation of the common

people around health issues.

The problem of poverty and of

paucity of basic amenities is so overwhelming that tural poor
are not in a position to rally around exclusively for health.
Those, whose basic needs are met, can perhaps form an

organisation on issues like occupational health.

Recently

in Puna, a Citizens’ group has been formed to discuss and

work even on the issue of mental health.

In rural areas,

and in the unorganised sections in the cities, however,
things are quite different.

But at the same time, unless

poor people become aware of health issues and actively seek

influence medical service, these services would continue

to be cut off from the people, and would continue to serve
the interests of those who need these services.

In other

words "health-care for all" can not be realised in its true

spirit unless it is’Health by All’——unless the people them­

selves actively participate in the decision making and
implementation.

Even if it is not possible to build an

aganisation of rural poor exclusively on health, health

should be one of the activities of a group trying to organise
the rural poor for

justice and for development.

It is with this perspective, that a health-education-cum

conscientization work is being done for the past seven years
in a rather remote, backward area near Pune.

Neither the

4

village Sommunity Development Association, on whose behest

this work is being done nor the local organisations are

health-organisations as sueh.

Health work is considered as a

part of a broader work of education, conscientization,

organisation on a range of socio-economic issues.

Health is

considered neither the main issue nor a mere entry point.
Even with a limited aim, and with the support of the broader

social work done by the local organisation, the process of
increasing the health awareness amongst this marginalised
population and of fostering collective self-help has been
very gradual one and beset

with many problems.

Achievements, Problems, Contradictions
Our health-work consists of training of Village Health
Workers (chosen by the marginalised people themselves) in the

diagnosis and treatment of routine viral fevers, malaria,

diarrhoea, conjunctivitis, scabies, wounds, skin infections
etc., and distribution of iron and Uitamin-A supplements to

children and pregnant women.

These elementary curative

services are used to:

a.

establish the credibility of the Village Health Workers;

b.

as an occasion to interact with the people;

c.

an attempt to meet the felt-need of ths people.

Rural peor are not much interested in general health-education;
given the arduous life they life.

But a rural poor is more

incluned to listen to why’s and how’s of diarrhoea-control,
when he/she is suffering from diarrhoea and effective treatment

is given by the same person who gives health-education about

diarrhoea.

Hence the strategy of coupling health-education

and therapeutics.

The result of this strategy is a mixed one.

Let me give

some examples of positive experiences and then of some problems
and difficulties:

s

5
Our VHUs have a much greater support from the community
than bhat the Government’s VHU has.

They are trained much

better because both the trainee and the trainer are really
intarested in this work and its philosophy.

These tyHUs

spend a lot t)f time For thia work; attend frequent meetings,

participate in other programs of the organisation, trai/el
to and camp at other villages.

All this is possible because

of/j support from the community.

The honorarium of a mere

Rs.50/- per month does not explain the interest, efforts of
these VHUs.

(flany of the UHWs evan do not get any monthly

honorarium).

The quack practice of some traditional therapi­

sts and that of the comoounder-turned-doctor, has been
considerably curtailed.
’injection-culture’.

Some dent has oeen made in the

People have collectively approached the

health authorities to complain about some specific grievances

about delivery of health services.

(for example, a Morcha

about a case of injection-pilsy; representations

about below

par functioning of health-services at the grassroot level..etc)

Slide-shows organised by VHUs on prevalent diseases like
scabies, diarrhoea are quickly being sought after.

Flore

than one hundred women from different villages had walked

for a feu kilometers and had waited patiently for hours to
see a slide show on women’s reproductive health.

This

indicates the interest of rural women in knowing about their
own body and health.

Discussions in meeting and Shibirs

about nutritional requirements of labourers, and of women,
about the relation between water supply and health has had

an impact.

In the consciousness of a section of tha people

in the organisation, this new health-knowledge has given an

additional justification for the demand of higher minimum
wages, of leave from hard work during pregnancy, for improve­

ment in water supply,

6

6
These developments are in a way collective attempts

towards control over health care activities} are rudementary
forms of organised efforts around health issues.

However,

along with such achievements, there are some knotty problems
which show that it is still a long way to go before the
awareness of the hsalth problems increases to such an extent

that people start influencing the health services and policies
in accordance with their own needs.

a.

There is a tremendous gap between the consciousness

of health-workers and that of the people.

People are primarily

interested in medicines; rather than knowledge.

There is a

strong tendency of going to the commercial quack for an
injection, pay him five or ten rupees.

But when it comes to

paying ten paise for the tablet taken from the VHW, there is

a tendency bf not paying for this self-help, even though over

a period ofytime, people have realised that these tablets are
agfeffactive as thase injections.

There is less of a tendency

to see that this orocess of self-help becomes self-reliant
tha dominant tendency is either to seek a commercial treatment.
It is not easy to go beyond the stereotype responses conditio­
ned by the dominant-culture.

b.

Many people as yet

to see the work done by VHWS,

as a kind of social work done by the representatives of the

people.

Many feel that these VHlJs work ’because they do not

need to work at home’ or ’because they must be getting

something from the agency*.

This is in spite of the fact

that these VHWs were chosen by the people in a meating; their

help and advice is sought; 3 call for a meeting, Shibir or

aven for a Morcha is positively tesponded to.

But still the

idea of a movement has not taken real roots.

c. The Government health structure has cooperated by
providing medicines, sending their health personnel at request

7

7

etc.

In one remote area, a feo of our illiterate VHUs were

incorporated as Government's "Village Health Guides" (because
the PHC doctor was very much impressed by their knowledge),
even though the minimum educational qualification required

for this oast is 8th standard.

(This mutual cooperation

helps the health authorities to fulfill their targets for
remote areas)

But the Government authorities (all males)

dislike the questioning attitude, " rude manners" of our

women VHUs.

When our VHUs asked a |3HC doctor, in a meeting

about the budget of the PHC, and the expenditure under diff­

erent heads, he got infuriated.

Relations were also strained

because a Florclia was organised to demand justice in case of
an injection-palsy in a boy after an injection in his arm.

Any attempt to take democracy seriously, to know and to
question some of the practices in the PHC are frowned upon.

The ’beneficient authority’ obliges by cooperating as long
as its hegemony is not threatned.

"People’s participation"

is a nice slogan, but when it is taken seriously in a
critical fashion, such attempts are despised.

This in

turn dempens the already low initiative of the people for

assessing their own right.

Such

are the problems and contradictions in the process

of ’organising people for health care’.

Both from a

theoretical as well as oractical view point, there is no
doubt, that without the collective participation, control by

the people in fulfilling their health care needs, the health
delivery system will not really serve the people,

But the

process is a very complex, slow and difficult one.

It is

easier to talk about nice things, but very difficult to achieve
them.

A lot of practical and analytical work has to be done

before we can confidently talk about a strategy of "Health
Care by the people" or under the control of the people

TRADITIONAL MEDICINE

Ficus Carica

Fig. Tree (Anjir)
Use
1.

Tooth ache

apply few drops of milky jtiiice of the
tree by breaking a small branch. This can

be repeated if pain persists

2.

Ring worm

rub the affected area with the milky jdice
twice a day until ring worm disappears

3.

Warts

wash the feet well and. dry. Place few drops
or? the warts and repeat every night until

wart disappears.
4.

Diabetes

figs are considered to have antidiabetic

properties. Few drops of milky juice of
figs in water every morning reduces

the sugar in the blood.

Lilliacease - Aloe vera/lndian aloe (H-Ghikavar)
Use
1.

Psoriasis

split the leaves of an aloe vera plant,
apply the juice directly to psoriasis and
let the juice dry. In a week it should be

healed.
2.

Bald head

fresh juice is to be applied on the scalp.

3.

Constipation

juice is a drastic purgative. Use fresh

juice 1-2 tsf for adults.

2

4. Dandruff

apply fresh juice on the scalp for an hour
and then wash it off. Repeat this daily until
dandruff disappears.

5. Burns

it has been proven a good remedy for

burns, treating effectively even 3rd degree
burns.

6. Halwa can be made out of freshy part of the plant which

is a remedy for indigestion and peptic ulcers.

Boat lilly, Commelinacea
Rhoeo spalhacea - Boat Lilly
Use
1. Whooping cough

leaves and flowers are boiled to make a

hot decoction. An oz. of the liquid is given

3 tiroes a day and whooping cough disappears.

2. Bacillary dysentery : boil the leaves for 10 minutes and use
the decoction 3-4 tiroes a day.

Papiliomacee - Fabaceae, Pongam oil tree - Karanj
9

Use
1. Herpes & scabies

apply the oil extracted from the seed for

3-5 days
2. Rheumatism

The oil massage with Karanj oil is considered
beneficial to those suffering from rheumatism

3. Bronchitis

the powdered seed is used as an expectorant

in bronchitis
4. Leprosy

oil of the seed is used in leprosy by the
tribals.

.... 3

3

Graminae

Lemon Grass
Use

1. cold and cough

widely used in cold ad cough. Tea

is prepared from leaves
2. Fever

it is given es a diaphoretic in fever

also carminative
3» Diuretic

tea made from the leave is diuretic

Euphorbiaceae - Phylanthus IJiruri

Seed underleaf - Egg woman

Use

1. Jaundice

whole plant is used as a remedy
for jaundice

2. Diabetes

the plant is considered to be useful in

W diabetes
3. Dysentry

infusion of the young

shoots are

often used for dysentry

4. Skin ailments

juice is taken from the plant and
rubbed for skin ailments

Reference: 1988 Table Calendar, Holy Family Hospital, Nev? Delhi

THE NATIONAL HEALTHSCENE

A CHALLENGE FOR COMMUNITY H AL TH

Tetanus

In 1981, nearly a quarter million infants died in the
first month of life. The estimated mortality rate from tetanus

is 13.3 per 1000 live births in the rural areas and 3.2 in the
urban areas.

Diphtheria
The reported incidence, which is an under estimate admittedly

is around an verage 25000 cases a year, over 1975-81.
Pertussis
Around 300,000 cases reported annually.

Poliomyelitis
Estimated number of cases ranged from 14-1,000 to 23'., 000 a year.

Annual incidence rate is around 1.5 to 1.8 per 1000 children
0-4 years.
Measles:

Estimated number of cases was 0,96 million in 1977.
The case fatality rate is 1—3 per cent.

Tuberculosis
There are about ten million patients in India, a quarter
of them infectious. Some 500,000 deaths occur annually from

tuberculosis, most of them in children below 15 years. The

of
incidence rate^infection is

0.8 percent in the 0-4 year

age group; 1.1 percent in the 5-9 age group; and two percent
in the 10-14 year age group.
Leprosy
It is estimated in 1981 that there are 3.919 million cases with a

prevalence rate of 5.72 for 1000 population. 20 to 25 percent of all <
cases occur in children nearly one fourth are infectious and another

15 to 20 percent suffer from disabilities. The load of lepro='-

2

in the eastern belt of India comprising Andhra Pradesh,
Tamil Nadu, Orissa and West Bengal with 53 percent of

the case load.

Typhoid

Some 300000 cases are reported annually, the majority

among school children. The number of unreported cases would
be large.
Diarrhoeal diseases

About 10 percent of total infant deaths are due to diarrhoea.
40% of deaths among children under 5 years are diarrhoea-related.

An estimated 1.5 million children under five years die of it.
Acute respiratory infections

Over 17 percent of infant deaths are on this account,
the proportion being next only to premature births. Upto 40 percent
of out door patients and upto 35 percent of indoor patient are

children below five years. The case fatality rate is 10-16
percent.
Malaria
A major problem of resurgence—man-made urban malaria.
Fileriasis

Hundren million people in India living in endemic regions
facing the threat.
Malnutrition

It is estimated that state of malnutrition ranges from 50%
to 65% among the under fives in various places. This is not

protein-calorie malnutrition but total calorie malnutrition

ie., starvation. Results in lowering of resistance to infection.
(poverty line - those who do not have the purchasing power to

provide themselves with 2220 K. cals per day).

3

r

3

India

LDCs

World

27.5

19

9

70

60

20

% new born weighing less than 2.5 kg
2.5 kg

% of anaemia among pregnant
women

Blindness attributable to Vitamin A Deficiency
occurs among 20-30,000 children in India.
Water sup ly and sanitation

Only 31% of the rural population has access to porta
potable 'water and 0.5% enjoys basic sanitation.
Rural

Urban

Protected -water supply

10%

82.5%

Sound excreta disposal

2%

34%

A REPORT FROM KERALA
BASIC HEALTH COMUHITIES
—Fr Edwin MJ*

V.'e read and hear- a lot about community health these
days. But strangely we find that the proponents often fail
to speak about the most im; ortant component of a community

health programme, ie», communities themselves.

It would seem obvious that we need to have communities
to have community health. But unfortunately this is not so.

Building communities is yet to become an integral
part of the mental concept of a good many of our community
health t;orkers.
What is a community?

Or: What are the characteristics

that make a mass of people into a community?

We need to have

consensus of what we mean by community when we speak of

community health. Some of the guiding principles of a
community are:
1.

A community is not a crowd.

It is not a transient aggregation of passersby.

Community has certain amount of permanency.

2.

A community presupposes commitment to one another.

And this commitment is actually the most identifying

factor.
3.

A community has a shared vision.
Consensus on objectives holds the community together.
In this sense a community "works together".

2

♦Director
Xavier Pastoral Centre
PB 17, Nagercoil 629001

2

4.

A community means its members feel with one another.

A community, devoid of feelings, is not yet a community.
It may be just a task force.
Community members "weep with those who weep and

laugh with those who laugh".

5,

A community celebrates together.
It brings imagination* feelings and art to play in
the collective affirmation of persons and events

and mysteries of life.6,

A healing community heals not only by the explicitly
therapeutic programmes but also by its process of

affirmation and the strength of the relationships.
Community is an antidote against alienation,
loneliness, insecurities and the resultant
psychosomatic problems.

7.

A liberating community, conse uently a healing
community is a participating community.
Participation in decision making is what makes a

mass into a people. When people decide together they

become conscious of their dignity as partners in
progress, as subjects and equals and not just

objects and the ruled.
8.

A community that is empowering, hence liberating
and healing, makes its members not only to decide

on the choice of various solutions proposed

but also to see the problems together.
Knowledge is power. A community that has been enabled

3

to identify the problems and constantly to

evaluate them is an empovzered community.
Q

•*

Few will dare to exploit that community.
9.

A community that is effective is necessarily small.

This follows from our earlier principles. A
big community can neither offer powerful relationships

nor scope for participation.
Only a fellow • ith a big voice can make himself

heard in a big village. Small men feel too small
to speak up in bigger structures.
10.

A community that Intends to have wider macro
level im-pact ensures linkage with other similar

communities through representative structures at
various levels. This ensures both the smallness
of the community and the wider level effective

action with effective grass-root participation.
11.

A healing community takes a holistic view of
health that includes the various social, economic,
environmental and other factors affecting health.

Do we have such communities?

Such structures or

infrastructures that would make community health action

more sustained and more participatory at grass-roots?
Until we have such communities whatever we call

community health programme may at the most be a rural
extension programme and not real community health action.

Community health is not just a programme for the

people; it is also something of the people and by the people.

4

4

They say examples speak louder. Let me share with you an

attempt where we try to integrate the community structure
aspect or the infrastructure aspect, into community health

actiono
We.call this project Basic Holistic Health Communities.

BASIC HOLISTIC HEALTH COlftWITIES

Our first step here is to start, organising basic

communities of thirty houses each. We have altogether
170 such basic communities now.

These communities are geogra; hical, ensuring that
nobody is left out. This geographical aspect ensures also

a permanent identity for the communities. As long as
the houses are in a given geographical area the communities

are also there. Even if for some reason or other some communities
or all the communities in a village remain dormant for sometime

the day somebody wakes them up they come alive and ready
to jump into action.

These communities meet once a week or twice a week
or even oftener as the case ma

be. These meetings are

either for prayer, or for celebration, or for nonformal
education or for discussions on problems affecting them and

so on.

Five representatives from each community make the
representative general body of the villa e. One representative
from each community makes the executive body of the village.

Representatives from the villages make the zonal

representative bodies, the general body having a representative

5

5

each from the communities and executive committee having
village representatives at the ratio of one representative

for five communities. What is discussed below that is

at grass root communities, each up to the top through
their representatives at various levels and what is

discussed at the top is reported back to the basic

communities.
Our system of handling finance in one of these villages

called Kodimunai, will make this accountability to the
grass roots clearer. Here the Treasurer is
free to spend on his own discretion upto Rs.50.00 for

emergency expenses. When the President and the Treasurer
decide together they can spend upto Rs.10G.00. The Executive

Committee of the village can spend upto Rs.500.00.

The

representative general body of the village having five

representatives each from the communities can spend upto

Rs.1000.00.

If it is more than Rs.1000.00 the representative

general body of the village makes the decision and sends
it for referendum among the basic communities. The decision

is not carried if more than half the number of the
communities fail to suprort the decision.
This type of two wa> communication helps for sustained
action. It is enough for anybo. y in. any of these 170

communities to remember the problem and the issue will come

alive again.
Once we build these basic communities we use these

communities for nonfonnal education on health concerns.
They become grass root forums for health motivation,

participation through decision-making evaluation and follow up

6

6
Here the care is taken not just to propose solutions

but more especially to make them see the problems themselves
so that through the process of ongoing situational

evaluation they are enabled to remain empowered.
This we do

hrough various processes. One such

programme is our holistic health orientation camps in

basic communities. This willbe a week long programme where
trained volunteers help conduct health discussion

sessions in the basic communities with the help of a few
structured community—discussion exercises. Each community
will be encouraged to do also creative assimilation pro>ramres:

whatever they learn in the discussions in an evening is

translated by the community into cultural programmes
to be staged in the community next evening. The village

level celebration that will take place the last day will
bring to a wider -udicnce the best of the cultural programmes
produced by these com unities. This health camp normally

will include also an exhibition and also half a day or one

day seminars to various categories of people with orwithout

audio visual programmes. Wherever possible we

would include

also house visiting programmes and a health survey of the

village.

In addition we prepare discussion themes and circulate
them among the basic communities. These discussion themes

are structured in such a way that they elicit participation
of the community. Each theme contains an initial activity

related to the theme, questions to elicit participation,
a deepening process through the points given, questions

leading to community decision, and a concihding activity by
way of a song or so.

....7

1

Our next process will be to make these communities
accept responsibility tor their own health care. This we
intend to do by way of promoting a holistic health

insurance scheme run by the people themselves.

Recently we had a survey to find out the average annual
medical expenses incurred by a family. This survey, conducted
in four villages, showed that the average amount was

Rs.4086.00.

We will be able to reduce this to just Rs.500.00

with proper

educational preparation and involvement

by the peo le. For this, we would need to transcend the
allopathic boundaries and include other therapeutic

systems including drugless ones.
Our health insurance programme is expected to consist
of the following components: nonformal education through
basic communities, collection of funds through

basic communities, primary health care through village
level representative body and its appointees, secondary

and other levels of health care through zonal bodies and the
referral centres chosen by them.
Unfortunately, even the example given is not yet a

realised dream. Well, this is the vision. We are not yet

sure how far we will reach. May be in spite of our

optimism we may reach only half way. But we feel even
that would be worth the efforts, as it would be a se

step in the right.direction.

A COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCE INVENTORY

£50 titles ££22_ths_£ndian experience)

The 70s and 80s have seen an ’explosion’ of ’Community Health’
materials on ths Indian scene, with the increasing wealth of
grass-roots field experience.

Most of these materials are

unfortunately still in English and inspite of the presence

of large networks of NGO health initiators these are still

not as widely known or as widely read as they should be,
A Community Health Call, tentative Bibliography has identi­
fied over 150 such materials.

A shorter version with sources

is given here highlighting 50 of them.
Source
A-Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi
1.

Alternative Approaches to Health Care, 1976

2.

Evaluation of Primary Health Care Programmes,

3.

Appropriate Technology for Primary Health Care, 1981

1980

B-Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi
4.

Health Services and Medical Education (Srivastave Report) 1975

5.

Manual for Community Health Worker, 1978

6.

Manual for Health Worker - Female Vol I&II, 1979

7.

Manual for Health Worker - Male

Vol I&II, 1979

B. Manual for Health Assistants (Male & Female) 1980
9.

10.

Primary Health Centre Training Guides I-IV 1980
Handbook for the delivery care to mothers and
children in a community Development Block (Oxford University

C-Medico Friend Circle
11.

Press) 1980

In Search of Diagnosis - Analysis of Present system

of Health Care

1977

12.

Health Care - Which way to go?

1982

13.

Health and Medicine - Under the Lens

1985
....2

2
3- Voluntary Health Association of India, Neu Delhi

14.

Teaching Village Health Workers - a guide to the

1978

process
15.

Manual for child Nutrition in Rural India

16.

Where there is not doctor (revised Indian edition) 1979

17.

The National Health Policy

18.

A Manual of Learning exorcises for use in health

1978

training programmes in India

19.

1983

Better Care Series (8 problems)

£- Indian Social Institute, Neu Delhi
20.

Moving Closer to rural poor

1979

21.

Health & Culture in a South Indian village

1979

22.

People’s Participation in Development -

Approaches to non formal education

23.

1980

Changing health beliefs and practices in rural
Tamilnadu

1981

24.

Learning from the rural poor - experience of MOTT

25.

Development uith people - experiments uith

participation and non formal education
26.

1982

1985

Social activists and people’s movements

1985

F- Lok gaksh, Neu Delhi
27.

Formulating an alternative rural health care
system for India

28.

Poverty class and Health culture in India

29.

Health and Family Planning services in India -

1982

an epidemiological, socio-cultural and political

perspective.
G~ Catholic Hospital Association of India, Secunderabad

30 Health and Pouer to people (medical service special
issue) 1986
31.

Taking sides - the choices before the health uorker 1986

32.

Trainers manual for training community level
uorkers

1987

3

H- Foundation for Research in Community Health, Bombay
33.

Community Haalth Projects in Maharashtra - an

evaluation report

34.

1981

Health Status of the Indian People

I- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore
35.

Manual of Mental Health for Medical Officers

1985

36.

Manual of Mental Health for Multipurpose workers

1985

3- National Institute of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi
37.

Evaluation of CHU Seheme - a collaborative study

38.

Management Training for Primary Health ^are.

K- Indian Council of Social Sciences Research, New Delhi
39.

An Alternate system of health care services in
India - some proposals

1977

L- Centre for Social Action, Bangalore
40.

Health Care in India

1983

41.

Rakku’s Story

1984

M- Institute of Education, Pune
42.

Health for All ~ an alternative strategy

(ICMR/ICSSR Study Group)

1981

N- Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi

43.

The State of India’s Environment - the

second Citizens’ report

1984-85

0- Kerala Sashtra Sahitya Parishad, Tribandrum

44.

Science as Social Action

1984

P- Community Health Cell, Bangalore

45.

Community Health: The search for an alternative
process (Draft report)

1987

9- Ford Foundation, New Delhi

46.

Anubhav Series! Experiences in Community Health
(12 project reports available)

1987

R- Some Foreign Publications (with Indian case studies)

87. Health by the People (WHO, Geneva)

48.

Practising Health for All (Oxford University
Press)

1975

1983

49.

Intersectoral linkages and health Development
(WHO, Geneva)1984

50.

Disabled Village Children - A guide for community
health workers, rehabilitation workers and
families (Hesperian Foundation, U.S.A)

1987

TRAINING FOR CO:~<UNITY HEALTH CARE

Dara S Amar

(This jbaper highlights some of the attempts made in St John's
Medical College, Bangalore, to orient Health Workers,
including Medical students, towards Community Health Care.

The attempts have provided invaluable insights into this
important goal.

Being a Medical College, St John's aims

at providing the training component in the formation of
health teams)

The Salient features of our present programmes are s

1• Health Team Training
St John’s Medical College is in a unique situation to train
various members of the health team under one roof.

We

are able to create a better understanding among the members
of the team of each other's role.

Medical students. Nursing

students. Community Health Workers, Deacons, School teachers.

Village mothers etc.

are the various health team members

who get their training at the college.

While the ideal objective is health and development, by

virtue of the training and competence of the faculty, the

emphasis has been on training in health.

It is comple­

mented by traaining in development by other organisattions.

Community Participation
One of the main objective of the community health progra­
mme of the college is the development of a participator!'
process wherein the villagers themselves are responsible

for the financing of health care, supply of materials

and manpower.

This is particularly exemplified by the

Mallur Health Co-operative Centre, a project initiated
jointly by the college and the Mallur Milk Copperative
in 1973.

Village Health Committees have been formed at

each of the rural health centres and decisions are
.2

2
participatory in nature.

A large part of the organisation of

speciality rural camps are also done by the villagers.

This

is through their village youth groups and Mahila Mandals.

Even in the training of the health workers including medical

students, the village leaders are drawn in as resource
persons.

Coordination with other agencies
We work in coordination with governmental and non-governmental

health institutions.

Programmes such as the Rural Mobile

Clinics, Universal Immunization Programmes, integrated Child

Development Scheme, National Social Service and Rural
Internship Training are examples of such coordinated efforts.
Our teaching faculty also act as guest faculty for various
sister institutions and organisations involved in health and

development.
Integrated Health Care
Villagers in India often resort to indigenous systems of
medicine.

The training at the college of the health workers

including our medical students, includes training in Herbal

Medicine, Herbo Mineral Medicine, Acupressure, Homeopathy
and Yoga.

Many or our graduate doctors working in remote

rural areas, have substantiated the fact that there is need

for integration with other systems of medicines as is being
attempted at the college.
Health Education_- A priority
After years of experience in training health team members
for the villagers, we feel there is a greater need to pay

attention to training in health education.

In the long

run, it is the health education programme that have paid off

the maximum dividends.

With this in view, health education

receives a top priority in the trailhing programmes conducted

3

3

at the college.

Innovative methodologies such as Child to

child health education, rural mothers motivation programmes

and rural school teachers health education training programmes
are some of the important programmes organised by the college.

The health education methodologies include the development
of local audio-visual a aids in the form of simplified demo­
nstration models using locally available materials rather than

sophisticated charts, photos, films etc. The materials for
most health education sessions are prepared by the village
school children end village school teachers.

Nutrition

education involves teaching the village mothers to use their

own traditional recipes in a nutritionally correct manner.

The

aim here is to strengthen the existing traditional diets which
are often nutritionally far superior to the imported diet from

the urban areas.

Greater stress is laid on the use of local

cereals, pulses etc., along with promotion of breast feeding
as well as local weaning diets for the children.
Sensitisation to the rural milieu.

In order that all the trainees at St John’s, including medical

students and nursing students, must understand the dynamics of
rural life, special training programmes are organised on a

residential basis at our rural health centres.

These rural

residential training programmes stress on understanding the
various factors which govern rural life and in turn the health
of the people.

Areas such as agriculture, animal husbandry,

small scale industry, customs and traditions, housing and
environment, role of women in society, food practices etc., are

all studied through field projects by the various groups of
trainees.

The training programmes are thus oriented to

4

4
senitize the health worker to the various aspects of rural

life and how each of these aspects is related to the total

health of the villagers.
Reachino out
Considering the resources and facilities available for
health care at St John’s it is quite natural to try and reach

out to the underserved areas using' the available resources

for health care.

Rural camps in the field of eye, ear, nose

and throat, skin, teeth, child health and General Surgery
are conducted in the villages.

Methodologies have been

evolved at the village level to ensure asepsis and follow-i&p
for post operative care through the use of trained school
teachers, youth volunteers and traditional healers.

Specialist care, is thus made atailable at the village itself.
In the bargain, the faculty have gained confidence that it

is possible to reach out with even advanced health care to
the villages.

These exercises have also proved, to be an

important force of cohesion, among the various hospital
departments and Community Medicine Department.

The rural

mobile clinics further carry the health care facilities to

over

12 health centres, spread through three Community

Development Blocks covering over 300 villages..

In this

process of rendering services to the unreached, our trainees

(through the participation in such programmes) gain inva­
luable experience^
Understanding health and disease holostlcal1y

In order that our health team trainees do not dichotomise

health care into various compartments, the training programmes
focus on families rather than individuals.

Through programmes

such as the Clinico—social case study and field family

health care projects, the trainees are made to understand
the cause and consequence of disease in terms of multiple

factors rather than only the clinical signs and symptoms
of the disease affected person.

Emphasis is laid on

5

' 5

the planning and management of health care at minimal cost.
Our graduates would also be cost conscious and make their

programmes financially self perpetuating in the village
communities rather than make the people depeddent on

charities.

Serving the urban under-nriyiliged
Urban slums in and around Bangalore, are also served by the

Medical College.

Health programmes such as immunization

Coverage against the major killer dieseases for children,
maternal and child health clinics for expectant mothers
and school health programmes, are some of the urban based
health activities.

In addition, the Medico-Social Unit 9SB

also aids in counselling for alcoholism, drug addiction,

juvenile deliquency etc.

Continuing education
Although basic training in health care is imparted to various

categories of health workers, it is important a follow-up
is done on the utilisation of the knowledge gained at

St John's.

For this purpose, several methods are followed.

At the professional level, doctors can seek elective posting
in selected specialities for further skill ehhancement.

Regional Colloquia are organised for sharing professional

experience among Community Health Workers and Rural doctors.
This provides an opportunity for learning from each other.

Continuing education is also provided by St John’s for
health agencies from afar.

The United Planters Association

of Southern India (UPASI) works in collaboration with the

Department faculty to train their MedicsL Officers, Nurses,
Compounders and even their Estate Managers in the field

of health care and health management.

Periodical newsletters

6

6
also act as a means of networking for graduates and

Community Health Workers working in various parts of the

country.

Development as part of health

Extension training in agriculture, water resources and
veterinary care for village youth, are part of field training

programmes given in rural health centres.

The stress is

on youth motivation and training in these areas, especially

among the rural unemployed youth.

Functional literacy

programmes and vocational guidance are some of the o her

services rendered in the villages.

Our health trainees,

including our medical students, participate in these de­
velopmental programmes under their National Social Service

activities, which is coordinated by the depEEtment faculty.
Conclusion
All the programmes are updated constantly, depending on

the feed back received of their effectiveness and efficiency.
The emphasis is on training and health education rather than
mere provision of multiple services.

This ensures that

whatever have been the programme inputs, the results will

belong, lasting self perpetuating and effective.

Will the NGOs work together to pur pressure on the
’established medical system’ to commit itself to a neu

vision of Health Care?

Will the NGOs work together to put pressure on ’Health
Policy and decision makers’ to move beyond policy statements

and get health oriented programmes and actions of the ground?
Will the NGOs work with the people and their organisations

to enable and empower them to get the means, structures,
opportunities, skills, knowledge and organisations that

make health possible?
All these are unanswered questions.

Micro level experi­

ments have shown that a lot is possible, but macro level
change requires a collective understanding and a colle­

ctive action that is still to errage on our individualistic,

divided,politically sterile national scene.

WILL COMMUNITY HEALTH HAVE A CHANCE?

A MULTITUDE OF QUESTIONS

What do all these statistics and critical introspection mean
to the rural people who have suffered neglect for years?

Save

the post—independence policies made an impact on their lives?
Professor Ashish Bose while reviewing the Family Welfare

programme has this to say!
"There are questions the masses would like to ask.

* Why are doctors not available at the Primary
Health Centres and ANMs not available at the

sub-centres?
* Why are medicines not available to the poor?
* Why is there no follow-dip of acceptors of

sterilisation?

* Why are women brought to the PHCs for
laparoscopic operation?



* Why are the X-ray machines not working in
so many PHCs and hospitals?
* Why is there no facility for oxygen and
blood transfusion even in upgraded PHCs?

* Why are Government doctors so indifferent
to rural patients?
* Why don’t the PHC building have proper water

and electricity facilities?
* Why are the new sub-centres and residential
houses built for AflMs so sub-standard and

located in such forlorn places?
* Why dOi. contractors get away with sub-standard

construction under the so called Foreign-Aided
Area Projects?

nIn this controversy, if there is a fair debate, the masses

....2

I

2

will win and the Government would lose.

The sad fact

is that the infrastructure remains unutilised because
it is by and large not operational."

"Let us turn to the personnel now.

The Block Radical Officers ask:
* Why is there no set policy for transfers

and promotions?
* Why only doctors who can wield political
influence manage good postings, while the
others ’rot’ in villages for years together?

The ANRs ask:
* Why is there no concern for their physical

security when they are asked to work and live
in remote villages?
* Why did the Government insist on getting free

land from the Panchayat which in effect meant

the worst possible location for their quarters,

mostly on the outskirts of villages?
The Village Health Guides (VHGs) ask:
* Why have they not been paid their paltry

honorarium of Rs. 50 per month even after the
Government issued orders not to discontinue the

scheme under which mostly male VHGs have been

recruited?

(It was decided that in future only female VHGs will be
recruited)
Again, if there is a fair debate between the health staff

and the high level administrators, the Health Staff will

win"

In the seventies, the Government of India set up an axpsrt

group on Medical Education and Support Manpower to taka
stock of the situation and suggest proposals for reforms.
This is what the expert committee had to say:

1.”A universal and egalitarian programme of efficient and
effective health services cannot be developed against
the background of a socio-economic structure in which the

largest masses of people still live below the poverty
line.

So long as such stark poverty persists, the

creative energies of the people will not be fully released;

the State will never have adequate resources to finance
even minimum national programmes of education or health;

and benefits of even the meagre investments made in these

services will fail to reach the masses of the people.
Thera is, therefore, no alternative to making a direct,

sustained and vigorous attack on the problem of mass

&

poverty and for creation ef a more egalitarian society.
A nationwide programme of health services should be developed

side by side as it will support this major national eudeavour

and be supported by it in turn.
li

2.

Me have adopted tacitly, and rather uncritically the model

of health services from the industrially advanced and
consumption-oriented societies of the west.

This has its

own inherent fallacies; health gets wrongly defined in

terms of consumption of specific goods and services; the
basic values in life which essentially determine its

quality get distorted; over-professionalization increases
costs and reduces the autonomy of the individual; and

2

2
ultimately there is an adverse effect even an the health and

happiness of the people.

These weaknesses of the system are

now being increasingly realized in theWest and attempts are

afoot to remedy them.

Even if the system were faultless,

the huge cost of the model and its emphasis on over-profe­
ssionalization is obviously unsuited to the socio-economic

conditions of a developing country like ours.

It is therelfljre

a tragddy that we continue to persist with this model even

when those we borrowed it from have begun to have serious
misgivings about its utility and ultimate viability.

It

is, therefore, desirable that we take a conscious and

deliberate decision to abandon this model and strive to
create instead a viable and economic alternative suited to

our own conditions, needs and aspirations.

The new model will

have to place a greater emphasis on human effort (for which
we have a large potential) rather than on monetary inputs
(for which we have severe constraints).


v

3.

In the existing system, the entire programme of health

services has been built up with the metropolitan and capital
citis as centres and it tries to spread itself out ir/;he

rural areas through ibtermediata institutions such as
Regional, District or Rural Hospitals and Primary Health

Centres and its sub-centres.

Very naturally, the quantum

of quality of the services in this model are at their best

in the Centre, gradually diminish in intensity as one moves
away from it, and admittedly fail at what is commonly des­

cribed as the periphery.

Unfortunately, the ’periphery’

comprises about 80 percent of the people of India who should
really be thg^ocus of all the welfare and developmental

3

3
effort of the State.

It is, therefore, urgent that this

process is reversed and the programme of national health
services is built with the community itself as the central

focus.

This implies the creation of the

needed health

services within the community by utilising all local
resources available, and then to supplement them through a

referral service which will gradually rise to the metropolitan
or capital cities for dealing with more and more complicated
V

cases.
u

4.Throughout the last two hundred years, conflicts have arisen

in almost every important aspect of our life, between our

traditional patterns and the corresponding systems of the
In many of these

Uest to which we have been introduced.

aspects, the conflicts are being resolved through the

evolution of a new national pattern suited to our own
genius and conditions.

In medicine and health services

unfortunately, these conflicts are yet largely unresolved

and the old and new continue to exist side by side, often
in functional dishormony.

A sustained effort is, therefore

needed to resolve these conflicts and to evolve a national
system of medicine and health services, in keeping with
V

our life systems, needs and aspirations.
Plany other expert committee reports and policy statments

of the seventies began to make critical observations about
the inadequacies of the present health care model and
exhorted all concerned to search for more relevant alter­

natives and approaches.

ACT") o KJ

Cb wuO'v vwvw fcj l-]c&-t

h p s l

lllOfiHlIlIIIIIIIII HP SI

>
8
i

o

<
b'
(/>

-4

CP
C
o

L£^uk(D

—-------------------------(2. ) C 0>v»/ywnzvvvC£,y //e<xVLW->

z tX A^flzvy

/S/A4 &0\/T- &&&£

s i'

\KOi t% 4?e ^w<.^ CL Ofw ■
(91 PR./MAO/
§£> r§5
U>gaZ

n
A

I

5

$>

H^

o

(T)

t7

Ci

t’ q
? r

5
<\i

/<>

T\
Z)

;5
j>

8

$.
?’ e £>

s

5

uv



<s

p

■L

N
tfkv

>-£>

OJ

\D
OQ
M~7

yr /zd
o c

AVh»:
8

?

SOME COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

7.
8.
9.

10.
11,

Total Health Care Project, Assam
Community Health Project, UP
REHRAR-I-SEHAT programme, Jammu
Social Work and Research Centre,
Rajasthan
SEUA—Rural, Gujarat
Padhar Hospital Community Health
Project, Madhya Praoesh
Comprehensive Rural Health Project,
Maharashtra
Vivekananda Girijana Kaiyana Kendra,
Karnataka
Mini Health Centres Programmes of VHS,
Tamilnadu
AWARE, Andhra Pradesh
CINI, West Bengal

i„

.
!•
\
I
j ■.
J 'Li| . ,L:C

I--?'.."'
;
;

L

Ii
V
i

COMMUNITY HEALTH ACTION CENTRES

I.

Issue Raising

1.
2.
3,
11.

KSSP, Kerala
mfc, Maharashtra
AIDAN, Neu Delhi

Ne two rki ng

A.
B.
C.
D.

ACHAN, Tamilnadu
CHAI, Andhra Pradesh
CMAI, Maharashtra
VHAI , New Delhi

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
d.

7.

RUHSfi, Tamilnadu
Deenabandu, Tamilnadu
Amb^likai, 'Tamilnadu
St John's Medical College, Karnataka
INSft/lNDIfi, Karnataka
Institute of Health Management,
Mah'arashtra
UHftI, New Delhi

CHILD-IN-NEED INSTITUTE, Vill. Daulatpur, PO Pailan
Via Joka 743512
Started in 1974—24 Paraganas, West Bengal

Population covered

: 70,000

Activities

- maternal and child health
- community organisation and
community development

Health care is through
- mahila mandal run clinics
- balwadis

- emergency ward and nutritional

rehabilitation centres
CINI has a multiplier effect with persons trained here
starting new similar projects and weaning off.

Action for Welfare & Awakening in Rural Environment (AWARE)

5-9-24/78 Lake Hill Road, Hyderabad 500463, A.P.

Started in 1975—Telegana, Andhra Pradesh

Activities

Health

— health education;

- environmental sanitation;
- disease control
— maternal and child health
— nutrition

The health philosophy 1JEEVANA SRAVANTHI* which means life's
flow started following natural disasters and led to a

sustained activity.

Services are through - Village Health Workers and Dais
- Paramedical Community Health Workers

An innovation is a floating health centre on boat, catering

to 300 villages along the banks of Godavari.

Mini Health Centres Programme of Voluntary Health Services

M.A.C. Institute of Community Health, Voluntary Health
Services, Adyar, T.T.T.I. Post, Madras 600113

Started in 1977—Chingleput Dist. Tamilnadu
o
Population covered

: 160,000

Activities

- maternity services;
- child welfare and nutrition;
- family welfare;
- minor ailment treatment
- communicable disease control

- data collection and health record
Lay first Aider (LFA)

is grass roots contact.

Multipurpose workers and part time doctors at
mini health centres.

Ayurvedic and indigenous medicines utilized.

A form of medical insurance by prepayment encouraged.

Aim at enlarging the scope of functions of the PHC.

Adopted as a model State-wide.

Vivekananda Girijana Kalyana Kendra,

B R Hills 571313

Via Chamarajanagar, Mysore District,

Karnataka

Working with Soliga tribals.

Activities

- health care;

- community organization;
- education;
- cottage industries including

vocational training;

- adult education

Health services are carried out through

medical officers,

village health workers,

traditional birth attendants,

health

education and use of traditional herbal

medicine.
Sickle cell anaemia research and
screening programme with hospital care

during

'sickle cell crisis'

of their health programme,

is a feature

while innovations

include the introduction of use of acupressure

by village health workers.

Vivekananda Girijana Kalyana Kendra,

8 R Hills 571313

Via Chamarajanagar, Mysore District,

Karnataka

Working with

Activities

Soliga tribals.

- health care;

- community organization;
o
- education;
- cottage industries including
vocational training;

- adult education

Health services are carried out through

medical officers,

village health workers,

traditional birth attendants,

health

education and use of traditional herbal

medic ine.

Sickle cell anaemia research and
screening programme with hospital care
during

'sickle cell crisis'

of their h->alth programme,

is a feature

while innovations

include the introduction of use of acupressure

by village health workers.

Comprehensive Rural Health Project, Jamkhed,
Ahmednagar Dist., Maharashtra
Started in 1970

.Population covered

40,000

Activities

: Maternal and Child Health
o
: Nutrition and immunization
: Family welfare services

: Control of Communicable diseases
: Safe water
: Agricultural development
: Health education

through young farmers clubs and
by village health workers.

Padhar Hospital Community Health Project, Betul Dist.,
Madhya Pradesh

- training of village health workers;

Activities
«

- training of dais;
- health education;
- provision of immunization, minor
medical care and family planning care.

- non-formal education in literacy,


agriculture and hygiene and health

It is an outre^gh programme of a mission hospital.

SEWA—Rural, Jhagadia, Bharuch, Gujarat 393110

Started in 1980—Jhagadia, Gujrat

Population
Activities

o

35,000

:

mainly health through

—community health volunteers

—anganwadi workers

—trained birth attendants
at community level;

—multipurpose workers as intermediarie
—mobile dispensary with

medical officer and MPWs
at middle level;
—fully equipped referral hospital
with consultants and paramedical
staff

at central level

SEWA-Rural has won the WHO's SASAKAWA HEALTH PRIZE for 1985.

Activities in non-health areas--

- gramini takniki kendra;
- tutorial classes for tribal boys & girls

- economic programmes for women

The Social Work and Research Centre (SURC),

Tilonia,

Ajmer District Rajasthan 305812

Started in 1973

Activities

o
- building awareness programme
- dispensary

- school health programme
- incorporation of-health into

the farmer's way of life
The local indigenous medical practitioners

and dais are involved in implementing
the programmes along with village

health workers.

REHEAR-I-SEHAT Programme, Kotbhalwal Block, Jammu & Kashmir

C/o Professor & Head, Department of Preventive and Social
Medicine, Government Medical College, Jammu 180001

A project organized by the Government of Jammu & Kashmir

to train teachers of village schools as primary health
care guides.

Activities

- minor ailment treatment;
- health check up;

- health education
- nutrition supplementation programme
for school children

Community Health Project

C/o The Director of Community Health, Harriet Benson
Memorial Hospital, Lalitpur, UP

Population

Activities

4,74,519

- Maternal and child health
- nutrition

o

- Health Education
- Communicable diseases control

through village health workers from
the c ommun i ty.

Total Health Care Project, Tamulpur Block,

Kamrup Dist,

Assam

Started in 1976—in 204 villa es of the Block.

Activities
o

- basic health services like:

family planning
immunization;

treatment of minor ailments^
control of tuberculosis,

leprosy;

malaria

Mallur Health Co-operative, Mallur, Sidlaghatta Taluk, Kolar Dist.
Karns' aka

Started—1973
Population covered

Activities

- dairy cooperative

- preventive

)

, .
- promotive

x health service with Government
)

. .
- curative

x health centre
)

Dairy cooperative took up health responsibility of the village
which evolved into a health endowment fund to cater to all
health needs.

Integrated Health Services Project

Wanless Hospital, Miraj Medical Centre, Miraj, Maharashtra

Started in________

Miraj Taluk

Population

2,30,329

Activities

- Maternal and child health care

- family planning

- school health
- communicable '-'disease control
- environmental sanitation
- health education

using Basic Health Workers, Dais,
ANMs and Village Health Assistants.

The Rural Health Research Project of

Foundation for Research in Community Health (FRCH),
48A, Abdul Gaffar Khan Road, Worli, Bombay, Maharashtra

Started in 1973—North Alibag and Uran Taluk, Maharashtra
Population covered

: 90,000

Activities

- community organization
- maternal and child health care
- health education
- treatment of minor ailnfents

through village health workers and

with the Primary Health Unit as the
apex of preventive, promotive

and curative health care.

Comprehensive Health Project, Rangabelia,

Rangabelia High School, Rangabelia PO,

24 Pargana, W. Bengal

Started in 1976—Rangabelia

Activities

- maternal and child health care

- communicable disease control
- minor ailment treatment
- family welfare services

- housing, safe drinking water,
sanitation

- health education
in close collaboration with the
health services of the government.

PROJECT POSHAK, Programme Evaluation Organization

27 Alkapuri, Baroda

Population covered

10 tibal + 2 non-tribal Districts
of Madhya Pradesh
12,000 children + 2,700 women

Activities

: Take home food supplements

From 1971 to 1975

: Preventive & curative
health services
: Maternal and Child care educatioi

- by utilising the existing

health and tribal welfare
infrastructure of the
government.

THE KASA MODEL MOTHER-CHILD-HEALTH-NUTRITION PROJECT
C/o Grant Medical College and JJ Group of Hospitals
(Institute of Child Health), Bombay

Started in 1972—Palghar, PHC, Kasa, Thana Dist, Maharashtra
Population

56,364

Activities

- integrated health and nutrition

services to young children and mothers
by using existing primary health centre
services and personnel along with
part time social workers (PTSWs)

serving as link workers and providing

special coverage to the needy at
clinics or at home.

INDO-DUTCH Project for Child Welfare

C/o The Director, Indian Bureau, Indo-Dutch Project
for Child Welfare, 6-3-885 Somajiguda, Hyderabad

Started in 1969
Population

33,756

Activities

- mother and child care—health

education and nutrition

- mahila mandals
- nursery and primary schools
- youth development/adult education

- nutrition demonstration units
- poultry and dairy units
"Gram Svasthikas" are the link between the community
and health services.

INDO-DUTCH Project for Child Welfare

C/o The Director, Indian Bureau, Indo-Dutch Project
for Child Welfare, 6-3-885 Somajiguda, Hyderabad

Started in 1969

Population

33,756

Activities

- mother and child care—health
education and nutrition

- mahila mandals
- nursery and primary schools

- youth development/adult education
- nutrition demonstration units

- poultry and dairy units
"Gram Svasthikas" are the link between the community

and health services.

Comprehensive Health and Development Project, Pachod, Aurangabad
Maharashtra

Started in

Activities

- maternity care;

- health and nutrition education;
- groxvth monitoring and nutritional
surveillance of children;

- environmental programmes through
community health workers.

- training course in management

of small health projects.
The health education materials are locally developed and
are unsophisticated.

appropriate and brief.

BANWASI SEVA ASHRAM, Govindpur, Dist Mirzapur, UP

Started in 1954—Mirzapur District
Population covered

; 3,50,000

Activities

; agriculture
: dairy
: village industries;

: education;

: gram kosh (revolving village fund for

cheap credit)
: social justice programmes
Health and family planning activities through

- swasthya mitra (local volunteers)
- gramin doctors (at village health posts)

- AGRINDUS clinics

Based on Gandhian philosophy of self-sufficiency with

AGRINDUS (Agro Industrial Community Development Centre)

nucleus of its diverse activities.

as the

BODOKHONI

Activities

- adult education

- informal education
taking up health issues for action

- grain bank

- savings scheme
- goat rearing
- non formal school for children

through health animators who believe that
these are as important as disease

treatment and manage common ailments.

They work with -- aramya sangha (men's organization)

- mahila sangha (women's organization)

Rural Unit for Health and Social Action (RUHSA)
Christian Medical College & Hospital, RUHSA Campus PO

N.A. Dist, Tamil Nadu 632209

Started in 1977—K.V. Kuppam Block, Tamilnadu
Population covered

:

Activities

- health and family welfare;

100,000

- adult education;
- vocational training

- community organisation;
- income generation

- agricultural development and agro-support
services

- training procrammes in community health
The health component is by

- family care volunteers (FCVs)
- health aides (HAs) and
- rural community organisers
with close health and non-health

activity linkages.
They believe that Health is both a MEANS and MEASURE of

development.

COMPREHENSIVE LABOUR WELFARE SCHEME (CLWS) OF
UNITED PLANTERS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN INDIA (UPASI),

Glenview, Coonoor 643101, Tamil Nadu

Started in 1971—Plantations in Tamilnadu and Kerala

Population covered

:

Activities
o

- maternal and child health;

250,000 (1984)

- family planning;

- environmental sanitation;
- safe drinking water;

- health education.
Voluntary'LINK WORKERS1form the key element linking the
community to health services.

Has sensitized the management to the idea that employee's

health and welfare is congruent with employer's interests

KEM Hospital Vadu Rural Health Project, Sardar Mudliar Road

Rasta Peth, Pune 411011

Started in 1977—Pune District, Maharashtra

Activities

: maternal and child health;
family planning;

control of communicable diseases;
health education;

environmental sanitation;

mahila mandal, youth clubs—
awareness programmes.
Health activities through

- community health guides of
KEM Rural Health Project;

- multipurpose workers of
government cadre;

- upgraded PHC at Vadu—at secondary

level;
- KEM Hospital—at tertiary level.
Socio economic development programmes are with a closely

linked voluntary organisation—United Socio-economic

Development and Research Programme (UNDARP).

STREEHITAKARINI, Dadar, Bombay

Started in 1974—Slums of Bombay City

Population covered

: 100,000

Activities

: maternal and child health;

family planning services by
volunteer doctors;

o

non-formal education;
female literacy;

income generation programmes for wome
creches for under fives;

small savings scheme (this won the
government campaign award for 1985);

Health activities through
- community health workers;

- utilization of nearest
government hospitals
Stress on creating awareness about health and promoting

utilization of facilities available.

R.A.H.A. - Raigarh Ambikapur Health Association
C/o Bishop's House, PO Kunkuri, Raigarh Dt Madhya Pradesh 496225
Started in

Population covered

Activities

- a network of 3 base hospitals

and 47 rural health centres;

- all aspects of health;
- school health programmes with

voluntary school health guides from
school teachers

- tuberculosis control programme;

innovative medical insurance scheme.

The Nilniri

Adivasi Welfare Association,

Kota Hall Road, Kotaoiri,

Fair GJ on Annexe,

Niloiris 543217

Started in 1958 - Tribals

Activities

- nut rit io n;
- health education;

- adult education
- income generating projects in cooperation

with government,

bank ano voluntary bodies

- rehabilitation of tribals keeping in view
their varied stages of development

survival problems

and

MEDICARE,

Kasturba Medical College,

Manipal,

Karnataka

— a project of the medical college

Activities

- conducting a rural maternity and

child welfare home each in seven

centres at a distance of 3 to 20 miles
from the hospital.
- health education;

- safe water supply and sewage disposal

with the help of Panchayat;
- immunization;

- pest control measures

family welfare programmes

St Xavier's Social

Opp.

Services Organization,

St Xavier's Loyola Hall,

Ahmedabad 380009

Wording in the slums of Ahmeoaoad.

0

Activities

- community organization;

- income generation programmes;
- health activities in the areas o£--

nut rit io n;

antenatal care;

infectious diseases;
family planning;methods

health education.

1 0 APR 1990
Cc r'\ V A '

b

HEALTH CARE SERVICES IN INDIA
Facts Revealing Gross Maldistribution

The health care service planning in India is characterised by its
failure to take into account the holistic picture of the health
care services.
In the mixed economy model the social sector is
planned with a view to provide for the externality and to
redistribute the services in favour of the underprivileged masses.
This is precisely what has not happened in the planning process
simply because the planning commission never has had a holisticpicture of the size, distribution and growth trends in the health
care service.
The single most important reason for the lack of
holistic concept and approach is its failure to take into account
the private sector in health care services.
What follows is a preliminary attempt to estimate the size of and
the growth trends in the private health care sector, and the same
are
compared with the
public health care
sector.
Their
distribution between the rural and the urban areas are also
examined.

The data are presented in the following three sections
A.
Health Humanpower
B.
Health Care Infrastructure
C,
Financing of Health Care Services.

THE FBUNDAT10N FOR RESEARCH
IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

^4-A. R, G, Thadanr Marg. Sea Face Corner
Wodi Bombay-400 018 J N D1 A

Section A : Health Humanpower

a.

Doctors and Nurses : Number Registered (Table A-l).
1.
In 1986, there were 7,63,437 doctors of all systems of
medicine in India.
This comes to one doctor for less
than 1000 population.
2.
Of all doctors, the allopathic doctors constituted only
42% in 1986.
3.
In 1986,
there were 3,92,670 nurses and midwives in
India.
4.
There was only ONE nursing person for TWO doctors in
India in 1986. The situation demands more than reversal
of the ratio i.e. about 4 nurses per doctor.
5.
In addition there were 1,08,511 ANMs,
88,308 MPWs,
18,819
Female
Health
Assistants in
1987
(Total
2,45,369).
Together
with nursing
personnel,
the
paramedical human power was 6,38,039.
This is grossly
inadequate.

b.

Doctors and Nurses : Rural-urban distribution (Table A-2 and
A-3)
1.
In 1981 (census data), only 41% of all doctors and 43%
of all nurses/midwives were located in rural areas,
while 76.3 of the population was rural.
2.
Situation is the worst for allopathic doctors and
nurses.
In 1981 only 27% of allopathic doctors and only
31% of nurses were located in rural areas.
3.
Over last three decades (1961, 1971, 1981 census data)
there is progressive "deruralisation" of doctors and
nurses .

c.

Doctors : Public-Private Sector distribution (Table A-4)
1.
There is an increasing concentration of allopathic
doctors in the private sector (Table A-4 covers mainly
allopathic doctors).
2.
In 1986-87, about 73% of allopathic doctors were working
in the private sector.
3.
When the number of doctors employed in the public sector
is taken as proportion of total doctors of all systems
of medicine, we find that only 13 to 18% are employed
with the government or local bodies, the rest being in
the private sector.
4.
Of all doctors in the private sector 85 to 90% are selfemployed or doing private practice.

Medical
A-6)
1.
2.

3.

4.

and Nursing Education Infrastructure (Tables A-5 and

In 1986, there were 123 allopathic medical colleges in
India, of which 17% were in the private sector.
Between 1974 and 1986,
the proportion of
private
allopathic medical colleges increased from 8.5% to

17.1%.
In 1986 there were 222 medical colleges for other
systems of medicine of which 65% were in the private
sector.
The admission capacity for those colleges was,
10,521 per year, of which 67% admission accounted for by
the private colleges.
As compared to medical colleges,
there were only 8
institutions for B.Sc nursing and 324 for general
nursing education.

Out-turn of Medical and Nursing Personnels (Table A-7)
1.
India produces around 15,000 allopathic and 5,000 to
10,000 non-allopathic doctors per annum.
2.
In
comparison,
about
10,000
nursing
personnel
3.

(nurses/midwives) are trained per annum.
About 15 to 20% of allopathic doctors produced
year, migrate to some other country.

every

Table Al: MEDICAL AND NURSING HUMANPOWER IN INDIA (1952-87)

1952
1956
1961
1966
1969
1971
1974
1979
1981
1984
1985
1986
1987

SOURCE

65370
76904
83756
103184
128584
151129
190838
249752
268712
297228
306966
319254
330755

.

doctors_____________

HOMOEO­
PATHS

AYURVEDS

SIDHA

UNANI

TOTAL

NA
NA
27468
NA
110514
NA
145434
112638
115710
123852
123852
131091
NA

NA
NA
73382
NA
155828
NA
223109
225477
233824
251071
251071
272800
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
18128
18093
18357
11352
11352
11581
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA
24530
NA
30400
25988
28737
28382
28382
28711
NA

184606
419456
607909
631948
665340
711885
721623
763437
-

DENTISTS _____ PARAMEDICS____
MIDWIVES
NURSES

TOTAL

17989
24724
35584
57621
69937
80620
98403
139825
154230
170888
197735
207430
NA

86778
160779
198957
270207
299050
339381
369325
392670
-

3291
3003
3582
4374
5182
5512
6647
7518
8648
8725
9598
9725
9750

Health Statistics of India, CBHI, GOI relevant years.

NA
NA
51194$
NA
NA
80159
'100554
130382
144820
168493
171590
185240
NA

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

REFERENCE
YEARS
ALLOPATHS

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

Table

A2 : RURAL-URBAN DISTRIBUTION OF MEDICAL HUMANPOWER IN INDIA

REFERENCE
YEARS

1961

R

U
T

1971

R

U
T

1981

R
U

T

TOTAL

ALLOPATHS

HOMOEO­
PATHS

AYURVEDS

80484
(48.7)
84787
(51.3)
165271
(100.0)

19187
(29.5)
45837
(70.5)
65024
(100.0)

16185
(52.4)
11075
(40.6)
27260
(100.0)

45112
(61.8)
27875
(38.2)
72987
(100.0)

114354
(49.4)
117154
(50.6)
231508
(100.0)

49846
(39.4)
76507
(60.6)
126353
(100.0)

23527
(61.2)
14917
(38.8)
38444
(100.0)

36871
(62.6)
21994
(37.4)
58865
(100.0)

4110
(52.4)
3736
(47.6)
7846
(100.0)

124426
(39.2)
192643
(60.8)
317069
(100.0)

53407
(27.2)
143147
(72.8)
196554
(100.0)

31916
(63.7)
18188
(36.3)
50104
(100.0)

36503
(57.3)
27211
(42.7)
63714
(100.0)

2600
(38.8)
4097
(61.2)
6697
(100.0)

Source :

Census 1961, 1971, 1981, GOI.

Notes :

;
T = Total
R = Rural ;;
U = Urban
Figures in parentheses are percentages.

UNANI

-

-

Unani practitioners were not covered separately by the
1961 Census.
Sidha medical practitioners were not
covered by the census.

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

Table A3

: RURAL-URBAN DISTRIBUTION OF NURSES AND OTHER
PARAMEDICAL HUMANPOWER IN INDIA :

REFERENCE
YEARS

1961

R

U
T

1971

R
U
T

1981

R

U
T

TOTAL

NURSES

MIDWIVES &
HEALTH
VISITORS

63078
(49.5)
64325
(50.5)
127403
(100.0)

29098
(38.2)
47111
(61.8)
76209
(100.0)

33980
(66.4)
17214
(33.6)
51194
(100.0)

55425
(39.6)
84505
(60.4)
139930
(100.0)

31711
(30.6)
71899
(69.4)
103610
(100.0)

23714
(65.3)
12606
(34.7)
36320
(100.0)

81980
(37.8)
134787
(62.2)
216767
(100.0)

52275
(31.3)
114913
(68.7)
167188
(100.0)

29705
(59.9)
19874
(40.1)
49579
(100.0)

Source : Census 1961, 1971, 1981, GOI.
Notes

: R = Rural ; U = Urban ; T = Total.
Figures in parentheses are percentages.

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

Table A4:

Year

1942-43
1963-64
1978-79
1984-85
1986-87

SECTORAL EMPLOYMENT OF ALLOPATHIC DOCTORS IN INDIA

Government
Service
13000
39687
69137
81030
88105

(27.4) .
(39.6)
(29.3)
(27.4)
(26.6)

Private
Sector
34400
60502
166494
214799
242650

(72.6)
(60.4)
(70.6)
(72.6)
(73.4)

Total

47400a
100189b
235631c
295829c
330755c

(100.0)
(100.0)
(100.0)
(100.0)
(100.0)

Sources:

a) Report of the Health Survey and Development
Committee (Bhore Committee), 1943, Vol.I, pg. 13.
b) IAMR-NIHAE "Stock of Allopathic doctors in India",
1966, pg. 71-72.
c) Health Statistics of India - 1979, CBHI, GOI.
Health Information of India - 1985, 1988, CBHI, GOI.

Notes :

Figures in parentheses are percentages.

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

Table A5.

REFERENCE
YEARS

1950
1951
1952
1956
1961
1966
1969
1974
1979
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987

: MEDICAL EDUCATION INFRASTRUCTURE IN ^NDIA
(Allopathic doctors, Dentists and Nurses)

MEDICAL COLLEGES
NO. % PRIVATE

28
30
30
46
68
89
95
105
107
111
116
121
123
125

3.57
6.66
6.66
6.52
4.41
8.98
9.47
8.57
9.34
10.81
14.65
15.70
17.07
NA

(1950-86)

DENTAL
COLLEGES

NURSING
B.Sc.

INSTITUTIONS
GENERAL

4
4
5
7
12
14
15
15
17
25
25
29
36
40

2
2
2
2
6
8
8
8
8
8
NA
NA
NA
NA

227
246
235
239
202
246
251
262
275
324
344
374
386
NA

SOURCE : Health Statistics of India, CBHI, GOI relevant years.
Medical Education in India, CBHI, GOI, 1987 .
Handbook of Medical Education in India , Association of
Indian Universities, 1987.

Notes

: NA = Not Available

TABLE A6 : MEDICAL EDUCATION INFRASTRUCTURE=AS ON APRIL 1, 1986.
(Doctors of Indian Systems of Medicine and Homeopathy)*

Ayurveda
Unani

Siddha
Homeopathy

Source

ADMISSION CAPACITY
PRIVATE
TOTAL
GOVERNMENT

1813

4595
(77.7)

3882
(100.0)
576
(100.0)
150
(100.0)
5913
(100.0)

7181
(67.3)

10521
(100.0)

3970

1716
(44.2)
256
(44.4)
150
(100.0)
1318
(22.3)

2166
(55.8)
420
(55.6)
-

79
(75.2)

98
(100.0)
17
(100.0)
2
(100.0)
105
(100.0)

144
(64.9)

222
(100.0)

3440
(32.7)

44
(45.0)
6
(35.3)
2
(100.0)
26
(24.8)

54
(55.0)
11
(64.7)
-

78
(35.1)

OUTTURN. (19851
TOTAL

539
49

1769

: Compiled from "Indian Systems of Medicine and Homeopathy in India ■ 1986"
published by Planning and Evaulation cell of the Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare, New Delhi.

* The data are^complete due to non-reporting by many states and
institutions.

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

MEDICAL COLLEGES
PRIVATE
TOTAL
GOVERNMENT

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

Table A7 : OUTTURN OF ALLOPATHIC MEDICAL AND NURSING PERSONNEL
IN INDIA (1950-1987).

REFERENCE
YEARS

ALLOPATHS

DENTISTS

1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987

1557
2743
3387
5387
10407
11962
13783
12190*
13083
12170*
12197*
11992*
10511
10469*
9177*
NA
NA

14
31
140
294
478
499
449
466
515
501
488
541
603
662
567
677
660

POST GRADUATES
(ALLOPATHS &
DENTISTS)

88
110
397
791
1396
2265
3694
3699
3562
3759
3833
3940
4161
4909
5121
5427
5791

NURSES
B.Sc. GENERAL

14
21
25
67
101
184
190
240
219
263
214
240
315
NA
NA
NA
NA

1282
1962
2562
4255
6257
5506
5892
6788
6503
7256
8144
7351
7750
8533
8956
8208
NA

SOURCE : Health Information of India, CBHI, GOI, various years.
Notes

:*

Data on the outturn of allopaths was not received from
2 medical colleges in 1975-76, 1 in 1976-77, 2 in
1977-78, 6 in 1981-82, 7 in 1982-83, 14 in 1983-84, 15
in 1984-85 and 25 in 1985-86. Thus, the data is
grossly underrated.
NA = Not Available.

Section B : Health Care Infrastructure

a.

Number
1.

b.

In 1988 there were 9381 hospitals, 27495 dispensaries,
14,145 PHCs and 5,85,889 hospital beds in the country.

Rural-Urban Distribution (Table B-l)
1.

2.

In 1988, 31.5% of hospitals, 47.3% of dispensaries and
15.8% of hospital beds were located in the rural areas.
In 1988 there was one hospital bed for 363 persons in
the urban area and for 1034 persons in the rural area.

c.

Public-Private Sector Distribution of Hospitals and Hospital
Beds (Tables B-2 and B-3)
1.
In 1988, 56% of hospitals and 30% of hospital beds were
located in the private sector.
2.
However, since 1974, the growth of the private sector in
hospitals and hospital beds has been phenomenal, about 8
to 10 times that in the public sector.

d.

Public-Private
Sector Distribution of
Dispensaries and
Dispensary Beds (Tables B-4 and B-6)
1.
In 1988, 49.4% of dispensaries and 9.2% of dispensary
beds were located in the private sector.
2.
However,
the
growth
of private
dispensaries is
phenomenal.
The proportion of private dispensaries
increased from 13.8% in 1981 to 49.4% in 1988.
The
annual growth rate of private dispensaries between 198184 was 68% and between 84-88 it was 28%.
3.
The absolute number of dispensary beds have declined in
both the sectors.

Table Bl :

HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE IN INDIA : RURAL-URBAN DISTRIBUTION (1951-88)

Hospital Beds
(Excl. PHC.)

Hospitals

Dispensaries

1951
1956
1961
1966
1969
1974
1979
1983
1988

2694
3307
3054
3971
4023
4014
5766
6901
9381

6587
7194
9406
10231
10440
10200
15968
17455
27495

Source:

Health Statistics of India, CBHI, GOI, various years.
Statistical Abstract 1984, CSO, GOI, 1985.
Directory of Hospitals in India, CBHI, GOI, 1981.

Notes :

Figures in parentheses are percent rural.
NK = Not Known
*
includes Subsidiary Health Centres also.
**
Data relates to the year 1986 when total number of
555264.

(NK)
(39.3)
(32.8)
(32.5)
(30.7)
(25.2)
(25.6)
(26.4)
(31.5)

(79.4)
(84.1)
(53.1)
(78.9)
(79.1)
(71.6)
(69.8)
(68.6)
(47.3)

0
725
2565
4631
4919
5283
5423
5954
14145*

117000
145297
229634
306518
328323
341064
446605
486805
585889

(NK)
(23.0)
(15.8)
(18.0)
(21.0)
(11.2)
(13.1)
(13.5)
(15.8)

Poon. per bed
Urban
Rural

487
343
306
310
358
338
369
363**

2272
1589
1308
1295
1424
1139
1109
1034**

hospital beds was

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

PHCs
(only Rural)

Ref.
Years

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

TABLE B2 : OWNERSHIP STATUS OF HOSPITALS AND HOSPITAL BEDS

Ref.
Years

_______ HOSPITALS________
Govern­
Private Total
ment

1974

2832
(81.4)
3735
(64.7)
3747
(56.2)
3925
(54.6)
4093
(54.7)
4215
(54.3)
4334
(44.1)

1979

1981
1984
1986
1987
1988

644
(18.6)
2031
(35.3)
2923
(43.8)
3256
(45.4)
3381
(45.3)
3549
(45.7)
5497
(55.9)

3476
(100.0)
5766
(100.0)
6670
(100.0)
7181
(100.0)
7474
(100.0)
7764
(100.0)
9831
(100.0)

_
______ HOSPITAL BEDS
GovernPrivate
Total
ment
211335
(78.5)
331233
(74.2)
334049
(71.5)
362966
(72.5)
394553
(73.9)
411255
(74.1)
410772
(70.1)

57550
(21.5)
115372
(25.8)
132628
(28.4)
137662
(27.5)
141182
(26.1)
144009
(25.9)
175117
(29.9)

268885
(100.0)
446605
(100.0)
466677
(100.0)
500628
(100.0)
533735
(100.0)
555264
(100.0)
585889
(100.0)

Source : Health Information of India, CBHI, GOI, various years.
Directory of Hospitals in India, CBHI, DGHS, GOI, 1981.

Notes

: Figures in parentheses denote percentages
Government figures include ownership by local bodies.
Data on the number and ownership status of hospitals and
beds were not reported by 6 states in 1974, 5 in 1979, 1
in 1981, 1984, 1986, 1987 and 1988.
Madhya Pradesh has not reported its data since 1979.

____

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

TABLE B3 : RATE OF GROWTH OF HOSPITALS AND HOSPITAL BEDS (BY
OWNERSHIP)

Reference
Years
1974-79
1979-84
1984-88

______ Hospitals______
Government
Private

6.37
1.02
2.61

43.07
12.06
17.21

Source : Same as Table B2.
Notes
: Figures are in percentages.

_____ Hospital Beds
Government
Private

11 . 35
1.92
3.29

20.09
3.86
6.81

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

TABLE B4 : OWNERSHIP STATUS OF DISPENSARIES AND DISPENSARY BEDS

DISPENSARY BEDS

DISPENSARY

Ref.

Years

Govern­
ment

Private

Total

Govern­
ment

Private

Total

1981

13205
(86.2)
14694
(69.5)
13916
(50.6)

2115
(13.8)
6438
(30.5)
13579
(49.4)

15968 a
(100.0)
21780 a
(100.0)
27495
(100.0)

26231
(95.2)
30251
(85.1)
21659
(90.8)

1314
(4.8)
5306
(14.9)
2187
(9.2)

277306 b
(100.0)
35742 b
(100.0)
23846
(100.0)

1984

1988

Source : Same as Table B2.
Notes

: Government figures include ownership by local bodies.
a) Ownership details for 648 dispensaries was not
available.
b) Ownership details for 185 dispensary beds was not
available.

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

TABLE B5 : RATE OF GROWTH OF DISPENSARIES AND BEDS (BY OWNERSHIP)

Ref.
Year

1981-84
1984-88

.
_ DISPENSARY______
Government
Private

0.26
-1.32

68.13
27.73

DISPENSARY BEDS
Government
Private
5.11
-7.11

101.26
-14.69

Source : Same as Table B2.
Notes

: Government figures include ownership by local bodies.

Section C : Financing of Health Care Services

Source of Financing
1.
2.
3.
4.

5.
6.
7.
8.

State : General health services
State : Special health services (eg. Railways, Defense etc).
State Insurance : ESIS/CGHS
Local Bodies : Municipal Cooperations, Municipalities, Zilla
Parishads and Panchayat Samitis
Private Insurance : Mediclaim, group insurance, etc, through
public insurance companies.
Private Prepayment schemes : Select hospitals etc.
Private Corporate Sector :
Health benefits - contributory/
non-contributory given to employees.
Households
: Out of pocket expenditure by families mainly
financing private practice.

Estimates of Financing by different source
The only definite figure of health care finance is the one for
general health services by the State (Central,
State & Union
Territory governments).
This includes Medical Services, Medical
Education & Research, health services administration, expenditure
on
non-allopathic
systems,
communicable disease
programs,
watersupply,
sanitation & sewerage,
education & training of
paramedics,
MCH services and the family planning program.
This
data is compiled in the "Combined Finance and Revenue Accounts" by
the Comptroller & Auditor General of India.
Tables C-l and C-2 give a brief outline of this source of health
financing.
Table C-l gives data for select years (every five
years since 1951) and Table C-2 gives the complete data from Plan
one to Plan six (partly, because of non-availability of source
material)
as five year data and annual averages for
the
respective plan period.

These tables reveal that state expenditure of health care services
is a very negligible contribution for people's welfare. During
the First Plan period this was only 0.39% of GNP and at present it
is less than 1.4% of GNP.
Even as a proportion of its own total
expenditure the government has been spending only between 3 and 4%
on health services, which as indicated above includes not only
medical services but also family planning and water supply.
For a
country that proclaims socialist or a mixed economy this is a very
poor proformance.

The major demand and need of the population is curative services
and this is the least provided by the state sector.
What little
is provided as curative care is mainly in urban areas.
Sections A
& B have already dealt with''this disparity.
This need for curative services is met by a large and expanding
private health sector.
There is no definite data of the financing
of the private health sector.
What is known is that 73% of
allopathic doctors work in the private sector and of this 88% are
in private practice.

The private health sector is financed directly by households - in
case of about half the organised sector some subsidies in the
forms of employer or insurance health benefits exist (which in
fact is nothing but social wages).
No organised data about the
volume of such financing is available.
On the eve of the First Five Year Plan the National Sample Survey
recorded private health expenditure (by households) as Rs.
5.77
per capita per annum in 1951.
This was 6 times of what the State
sector was spening at that time.
Again in 1973-74 the NSS
recorded private health expenditure as Rs. 14.05 per capita per
annum which was three times greater than the state health
expenditure in the same year.
Besides this some scattered data based on small studies exists.
Of these the most organised study was in Narangwal by R.L. Parker
which showed that private health expenditure varied between 3 and
6 times of state health expenditure in the late sixties and early
seventies.

A study by FRCH in 1987 in Jalgaon district in Maharashtra showed
that households were spending out of pocket Rs. 174.99 per capita
per year obtaining health care services - this was 5.75% of their
income.
This expenditure was 6.7 times over and above the state
health expenditure of Rs. 26.09 per capita (0.85% of income)
in
Jalgaon (see Table 0-3).
As a contrast even in capitalist USA the
state account for as much as 40% of all health expenditure.
Besides such data no ther data is available for this source of
financing of health services which is the most important because
of its sheer magnitude.
Data on other private sources like
corporate financing,
private insurance etc.
suffers the same
fate.
Local body financing of health care services constitutes
another important public source of funding.
This data is not well
organised but it is possible to organised it if the state is

willing to compile it,
Table C-4).

like in the

case of State

Finances (see

Similarly corporate sector health benefits to employees can be
obtained if the state insists that all companies issuing Annual
Reports should show this item of expenditure separately.

Table C-l : State Health Expenditure in India : 1951-1989.
(Rupees Millions)

3 *
Family
Welfare

7
6
Per capita Col.4 as
of Col.4
% of govt.
Expenditure
(Rs.)

4
Health
(1+2+3)

5 **
% Plan Health
Expenditure
Col. 4

221.41

No Plan

0.61

2.31

0.22

5.08

5.30.36

43.17

1.32

3.54
(10.65)

0.45
(20.91)

423.69

16.00

1032.82

52.38

2.35

3.74
(1.13)

0.65
(8.89)

1011.88

731.58

49.80

1793.26

39.76

3.63

2.79
(-5.08)

0.65
(0.0)

1971

1378.00

1612.40

556.00

3546.40

60.48

6.47

3.45
(4.73)

0.82
(5.23)

1976

4445.31

2684.79

822.40

7952.50

58.95

12.88

.3.76
(1.80)

0.99
(4.15)

1981

8769.18

7350.95

1464.02

17584.15

41.47

25.66

4.05
(1.54)

10.10
(2.22)

1983

11931.62

10486.59

2946.17

25364.38

57.83

35.46

4.37
(2.63)

1.43
(10.00)

(FW Year book 87-88)
1986

5365.00

39865.00

51.77

1.37
(-1.40)

(Estd.)
1989

7100.00

52000.00

64.45

1.34
(-0.73)

2
Public
Health

1951

149.19

72.22

1956

305.88

219.40

1961

593.13

1966

*
**

8
Col.4 as
% of GNP

F.P. figures
from 1956-71 are average of Plan Period. Prior to 1974 FP was part of
"Medical". Hence for those years we have deducted this average figure from "Medical".
Based on average of plan period. Figures in brackets are growth rate per year over the
previous year.

Sources : 1.

2.

Combined Finance and Revenue Accounts, Comptroller & Auditor General of India,
GOI, respective years.
Report or Currency & Finance; 1988 Vol.II, RBI, 1989.

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

1
Financial
Year End
March
Medical

Table C-2 : State Health Expenditure 1951-52 to 1982-83 : Plan + Non-Plan
(Figures in parentheses are annual averages)
(Rupees Millions)
1
Medical

2
Public
Health

Plan One
1951-52 to 55-56

1246.45
(249.29)

725.10
(145.02)

Plan Two
1956-57 to 60-61

2306.30
(461.26)

Plan Three
1961-62 to 65-66

3889.40
(777.88)

3
Family
Welfare

4
Health
(1+2+3)

5
% Plan
of Col.
4 Expd.

1.45
(0.29)

197.3.00
(394.60)

50.48
outlay

60728.55 3.25
(12145.71)

1.04

0.39

1609.10
(321.82)

22.00
(4.4)

3937.40
(787.48)

69.59
outlay

115266.75 3.42
(23053.35)

1.88

0.59

2985.45
(597.09)

249.00
(49.80)

7123.85
(1424.77)

50.05

251871.95 2.83
(50374.39)

3.07

0.71

Plan Holiday
1966-67 to 68-69

3403.35
3127.50
(1134.45) (1042.50)

705.00
(235.00)

7235.85
(2411.95)

43.30

235365.03 3.07
(78455.01)

4.76

0.78

Plan Four
1969-70 to 73-74

11065.10
8495.55
(2213.02) (1699.11)

2824.15
(564.83)

22384.80
(4476.96)

47.91

598754.80' 3.74
(119750.96)

8.22

0.83

Plan Five
1974-75 to 78-79

25639.70 16350.95
5292.55
(5127.94) (3270.19) (1058.51)

47283.20
(9456.64)

49.58

1194988.35 3.96
(238997.67)

15.25

1.18

Part Plan Six
1979-80 to 82-83
(4 yrs.)

38510.80 32553.72
7551.24
(9627.70) (8138.43) (1887.81)

78615.76
(19653.94)

52.15
(est)

1862023.72 4.22
(465505.93)

28.60

1.40

Sources : as Table C-l.

6
Total
Govt.
Expnd.

7
8
9
% Col. per
Col.4
4 of
Capita as %
Col.6 of col. of GNP
4 (Rs)

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

Plan Period

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

Table C-3

:

Classwise Distributicn of Health Expenditure and Other Selected Variables in
Jalgaon District - 1987.
GLASS

Variable

Poorest

Lower
middle

Middle

Upper
middle

Richest

All
classes

a) Mean cost per episode (Rupees)

’ 32.01

90.02

130.44

207.01

102.81

102.14

i.

Practitioner Fees & Medicine

28.21

63.46

87.04

167.44

90.26

69.97

ii.

Diagnostic Tests

0.16

6.43

8.95

5.73

0.00

5.13

0.43

10.14

17.47

19.76

0.00

11.10

iii. Hospitalisation and surgery

iv.

Transport

2.14

7.86

10.89

6.86

0.96

7.43

v.

Rituals

0.19

0.76

3.00

1.00

8.42

1.48

vi.

Others____________________

0.88

1.37

3.08

6.22

3.17

2.23

vii. Non-users of any service (%)

13.77

8.45

6.28

4.05

5.00

7.70

b) Mean cost per contact (Rs.)

13.06

31.92

43.05

62.17

51.15

36.09

c) Mean Health Expenditure per
capita per year (Rs.)

50.77

151.07

256.49

417.04

367.48

182.49

43.51

88.03

156.71

235.80

109.92

116.31

17.69

32.85

55.77

76.81

61.41

43.24

iii. Per capita Per year

69.00

147.73

308.14

475.04

392.91

207.80

iv.

Private users (%}

72.19

75.38

80.27

85.13

95.00

77.09

e) Health Expenditure as a percent
of Income

6.50

10.50

10.20

10.20

5.60

9.80

f) Disease Prevalence Rate - per
1000 population per month.

132.15

139.85

163.86

167.88

297.87

148.89

g) Total population in survey

681

1566

891

274

47

3459

h) Total no. of patient's (monthly
average).

90.

219

146

46

14

515

d) Mean cost for use of private
services (Rs.)
i.
Per episode

ii.

Sources

Per contact

"Cost of Health Care : A Household Survey in an Indian District" by Ravi Duggal
with Suchetha Amin.

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

Oonplled by Ravi Duggal - November 1989

Table C-4 : MUNICIPAL HEALTH FINANCE - (Medical + Public Health + Water Supply & Sanitation)
(All India)
Year

Rs. million
Municipal Bodies

Rs. million
District Board

Source

Remarks

1951-52

121.52 (30% of Income)

21.45(6.3% of)
Income)

GOI, Health
Stats of India

Incomplete information
population not known

1952-53

161.74 (31.8%

)

13.79 (4.0%)

••

••

1953-54

89.00 (30.5%

)

11.00 (4.9%)

••

••

1954-55

146.71 (32.7%

)

11.31 (2.0%)

••

••

1955-56

156.02 (29.4%

)

4.09 (2.6%)

1956-57

111.93 (32.0%

)

NA

1957-58

93.35 (32.7%

)

NA

••

1959-60

355.23 (50.9%

)

16.24 (6.63%)

••

1960-61

263.71 (53.64%

)

9.20 (6.11%)

1970-71

530.97 (35.0% of
total expnd.)

1974-75

2155.89 (40.2%



'■

1976-77

1294.33 (37.8%

"

1979-80

1986-87

"

••

••

••

NA

NCAER

Rs.24.68 per capita
(sample 21.5 million
population in 12
Municipal Corporation
and 27 Municipalities)

)

NA

NIUA-1983

Rs.26.71 per capita
(sample 1533 municipal
bodies covering 80.7
million population)

"

)

NA

NCAER

Rs.48.08 per capita
(sample 26.9 million
population in 12
Municipal Corporation
and 27 Municipalities)

3791.84 (37.8.3% "

"

)

NA

NIUA-1983

Rs. 33.47 per capita
(Sample 1533 Municipal
bodies with 113.27
million population)

2270.00 (38%

"

)

NA

NIUA-1989

Rs.55 per capita (sample
41.2 million papulation
of 157 Class I municipal
bodies)

Sources

GOI - Health Statistics of India, Various years DGHS, MOHFW, Delhi.
NCAER - A Study of Resource of Municipal Bodies, 1980, New Delid.
NIUA - 1983 - A Study of Financial Resources of Urban Local Bodies in India and the Level
of Services Provided, New Delhi.
4. NIUA - 1989 - Upgrading Municipal Services : Norins and Financial Implications, NIUA
Research Studies Series Number 38, New Delhi.

1.
2.
3.

STATE HEALTH EXPENDITURE BY SUBSECTORS

H13V3H AJ-INnwWOD Nl HOHV3S33 303 NOIlVONnOJ 3H1

STATE HEALTH EXPENDITURE BY SUBSECTORS
1976

1971

PUBLIC
HEALTH
1981

FAMILY
WELFARE

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

a MEDICAL

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

PERCENT GROWTH RATE OF MEDICAL
INSTITUTIONS

PERCENT GROWTH RATE OF HOSPITAL/DISP.
BEDS

YEAR

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

GROWTH IN STATE HEALTH EXPENDITURE AS
PERCENT OF ALL GOUT.EXPENDITURE

GROWTH RATE

VEAR

PERCENT GROWTH RATE OF PHC's
60T

1956-61 1961-66 1966-71 1971-76 1976-81 1981-86
YEAR

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

RATE OF REDUCTION IN POPULATION SERVED
PER DOCTOR

ANNUAL RED.RATE

YEAR

ANNUAL RED.RATE

195156

195661

196166

196671
¥EAR

197176

197681

198186

THE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN COMMUNITY HEALTH

GROWTH IN

STATE HEALTH EXPENDITURE AS
PERCENT OF GNP

GROWTH RATE
(PERCENT)

GROWTH RATE 1.50

1.00
0.50-

0.00-------------- 1--------------------- 1--------------------- 1--------------------- 1--------------------- 1--------------------- (
1951- 1956- 1961- 1966- 1971- 1976- 198156
61
66
71
76
81
86
VEAR

PRIVATE HEALTH SECTOR

Regulation and Control

Prevailing situation
The private health sector consisting of general practitioners,
nursing home and hospital employ two thirds of the medical
manpower and are responsible for two thirds of the
total
expenditure on health in this country.
Despite this there is
hardly any regulation of the practice of this sector of health.

This is indeed surprising because such activity cannot be carried
out without registration.
The medical professional has to be
registered with the Medical Council which is a statutory body that
last set the standards of medical practice,
"discipline" the
professionals,
monitor
their
activities
and
check
any
malpractices.
The doctors who decide to set up their own clinics,
as well as hospitals, nursing homes, polyclinics etc. have to
register with the respective local body.
above is that the controlling bodies are
The reason for this is not only lack of
interest but also weak provisions in the various Acts.
They are
also heavily influenced by the private health sector.

The

problem

with the

virtually non-functional.

Another agent in the private health sector which needs to be
regulated further is the pharmaceutical industry.
As a chemical
industry this agent is regulated to some extent but as a
participant
in
the
health sector
it
operates virtually
unregulated.

In view of the existing health situation and health practices
regulation of those who provide the nation's health care is an
urgent necessity.
Regulation exists in other sectors; so why not
in health; especially as consumer resistance is at its lowest in
this field' and lends easily to malpractice.

How to regulate?

a.

Medical
registered

Practitioners
with

the

;
Each
respective

medical practitioner is
state
Medical Council.

Presently, beyond this registeration the Medical Council does
not concern itself with the practitioner,
unless
some
cornplaint is made and a prima-facie case established.
The
Medical Council, and other related bodies in consultation
with the health ministry must regulate the following areas of
medical practice ■ (This is only a selective list)
i.
Monitoring that only registered practitioners practice
medicine.
ii.
Assuring that clinics have minimum standards of quality
by setting standards for the same (This should include
X-ray, CT Scan & pathology laboratories).
iii. Making maintenance of patient records compulsory and
accessible to the patients.
iv.
Auditing of prescriptions of the doctors in relation to
diagnosis.
v.
Determining a fixed tariff of charges that patients pay
to doctors.
vi.
Providing continuing medical education to all those who
practice medicine.
For instance a
"summer" refresher
course every three to five years should be compulsory
for all practitioners and their license renewal should
be dependent on this.
vii. Regulation of geographical distribution of setting up
practice to correct the urban-rural disparities (we feel
that as of present there is adequate medical humanpower
in the country and it only needs redistribution).
viii.Annual return of patients treated - some minimum data to
be maintained and filed to an appropriate authority.

b.

Nursing Homes and Hospitals : Similar to the practitioner,
regulations need to be made for setting up and running of
hospitals and nursing homes.
Minimum quality standards,
nurse : doctors ratio, patient : nurse ratio, proper location
of premises,
geographical distribution,
fixed reasonable
tarrif charges, proper medical records,
maintenance, filing
of minimum data returns,
properly qualified and adequately
trained personnel for jobs assigned,
prescription auditing,
medical auditing etc.

c.

Pharmaceutical Industry :
i.
The
pharmaceutical
industry
must be
allowed to
manufacture only rational drugs in required amounts with
clear priorities in favour of essential drugs.
All
irrational,
non-essential and dangerous drugs must be
banned.

ii.
Branding of drugs must be prohibited.
iii. There is every reason for a progressive nationalisation
of the pharmaceutical industry.
iv,
The regulating body for the pharmaceutical industry must
be the Health Ministry and not the Chemicals Ministry.
v.
The practice of canvassing drugs through pharmaceutical
(Medical) representatives should be banned.
vi. A National Formulary should be evolved and with generic
drug names must become the basis of
prescription
writing.
vii. Continuing pharmacological education of doctors should
be through MMC or other such statutory body.

d.

General regulation :
i.
To
prevent
unnecessary
concentration
in
urban,
especially metropolitan areas;
state subsidies,
soft
loans etc. must not be given to those willing to set up
practice or hospitals and nursing homes in these areas.
Such loans etc. should be restricted to rural areas and
taluka towns.
ii. A tax on private medical practice and private hospitals
and nursing homes must be levied. This tax should be
the highest in metropolitan areas and lowest in rural
areas.
Private Hospitals should not be allowed to be
operated as Trusts or societies which give them cover
for tax relief.
They should be treated as corporate
bodies.
Hospitals operating 'research centres' must be
audited and their tax reliefs questioned.
iii. A social audit of the health sector must be an ongoing
activity of a statutory body which should be created for
this purpose.
iv.
A tax on international migration of doctors.
v.
Embargo on private practice of those receiving State
Financed Medical Education or high fees/tax for those
who want to practice privately.
vi. Decentralising Medical Education by part training at
civil/rural hospitals and PHCs.
This should be combined
with a long term change of relocating medical colleges
at the district centres.

PREFACE
Collection of data and its analysis to provide necessary evidence for assessing the extent of development of national health

systems and their performance at national and/or sub-national levels has been the major role of any health information system. To
provide timely feedback and appropriate data to programme managers for action has been a challenging task for the health

information team at all levels of the health system. Health intelligence, and not merely health data/information as such, is

increasingly being seen as the lifeblood of any health system by health plannersand policymakers. There is thus a growing demand

for this health information. It is with this in mind that the Regional Office for South-East Asia has taken the initiative to
disseminate Quantitative evidence through this brochure on basic health indicators. Data on health and health-related indicators
of the UN Millennium Development Goals have also been provided.

The data provided in the brochure have been compiled from several sources, including national health information bulletins

and other national publications as well as official publications of WHO and other UN agencies. Data provided by technical units
in the Regional Office have also been used. These data have been verified and validated by concerned focal points in the health
ministries of the Member countries. All efforts have been made to collect and present comparable data from Member countries

for each specified time period.
Wherever possible, the latest available information for individual countries (as of 2000 and 2001) has been presented. Since

these data are subject to many limitations, including fragmentation, non-comparability due to difference in definitions, concepts
and measurement units, as well as inconsistency, caution should be exercised when using the data for trend analysis or intercountry
comparisons. Caution in the use of maternal health indicators is especially important since these data often have varying
definitions, are based on limited survey findings, or are subject to other limitations.
Footnotes for data in the tables are indicated by a superscript alphabetic character either following the indicator title or

following the data value of the indicator for a particular country. The footnotes include explanatory notes regarding major

discrepancies with other official sources, where referenceyears differ from theyear or period shown, where definitions differ, how
data values were calculated, or where other primary sources of data have been cited. The list of footnotes is provided below the

data tables. Sources for the data in the tables are indicated by a superscript number either following the indicator title or
following the data value of the indicator for a particular country. A reference list of data sources and

definitions for the

indicators are also provided below and at the end of the tables. Where data are not available "n/a" has been indicated.

This brochure provides Quantitative evidence. For in-depth epidemiological analysis, assessment of time trends and cross­
comparison of data, readers may refer to the WHO/SEARO publication — Health Situation in the South-East Asia Region.
It is hoped that the brochure would help in sensitizing and prompting health functionaries at all levels to collect, analyze and
disseminate timely and consistently reliable health information for all those who need it.

Dr Uton Muchtar Rafei
F.j ;?nal Director

Demographic indicators

Socioeconomic Indicators



Indicator

Year

Bangla
-desh

Bhutan

DPR
Korea

Total population
(thousands)'*

2002

143,364

805*"

22,586

Surface area
(thousands of sq km)2

2000

144

47

121

piMion density
(perse, km)'"

2002

Population growth
rate (%)'■“

2000-2005

Crude birth rate
(per 1000 population)'"

2000-2005

Crude death rate (per 1000
population)'"

2000-2005

Urban population
(%)’
Average annual growth
rate of the urban
population (%)3"

17

996

2.09

2.55'2"

34.0912-b

29.9

8.64,2-b

8.7

Indo­
nesia

Mal­
dives

Myan­
mar

Nepal

Sri
Lanka

Thailand

TimorLeste

370

640

n/ah

460

680

2,040

n/ah

250

830

1,970

478"*

2000-2001

3.3

4.0

n/a

2.7

1.8

4.5

n/a

3.4

1.0

0.9

n/a

2000-2001

1.1

n/a

n/a

3.7

11.5

0.6

21.1

2.8

14.2

1.7

n/a

Human Development Index (HDI)5

2001

0.502

0.511

n/a

0.590

0.682

0.751

0.549

0.499

0.730

0.768

n/a

Dependency
ratio'*

Total
Old-age(65+)
Young (0-14)

2000
2000
2000

72
5
67

89
8
81

48
9
39

62
8
54

55
7
48

89
7
83

61
7
53

81
7
74

48
9
39

47
8
39

84

Adult literacy rate
(%)•■'

Total
Male
Female

2000
2000
2000

40.0
49.4
30.2

47.3’
61.17
33.6’

100»-k
W
100»*

57.2
68.4
45.4

86.8
91.8
81.9

96.9
97.0
96.8

84.7
88.9
80.5

41.7
59.4
24.0

91.6
94.4
89.0

95.5
97.1
93.9

n/a
n/a
n/a

Gross primary
school enrolment
ratio (%)9

Total
Male
Female

1999/2000 106.11'
1999/2000 107.57*
1999/2000 104.57*

n/a
100.93
n/a
82.00Wp 108.00*°-" 108.88
62.00*°" 101.00’°" 92.39

107.89
109.71
106.00

133.71
133.22
134.23

90.95
91.39
90.51

126.38
140.00
111.74

105.91*
107.39*
104.38*

93.50
95.72
91.24

n/a
n/a
n/a

Gross secondary
school enrolment
ratio (%)9

Total
Male
Female

1999/2000
1999/2000
1999/2000

49.92

54.88
56.23
53.50

42.75
41.36
44.17

34.87*

53.90
62.26
44.86

72.12*
69.85*
74.47*

78.95

n/a
n/a
n/a

Nepal

Sri
Lanka

Thailand

TimorLeste

Indicator

Year

1,041,144 217,534

309

48,956

24,153

19,287

64,344

850"'

Gross national income (GNI)
per capita (USS)*

2001

0.3

677

147

66

513

15

Gross domestic product (GDP)
per capita growth rate (%)*
Average annual change in
consumer price index (%)5

187

0.68

16.7

3,287

317

1.52

23.8

9.9

8.4

24.5

14.512-9

60.2

2000-2005

3.98

5.95

1.62

2.81

j

India

Myan­
mar

2000

g
h
i

DPR
Korea

Mal­
dives

28.4

FOOTNOTES FOR DATA TABLES
a Medium variant projection of the
population for mid-year 2001
b Data for 2000
c Calculated from total population for 2001
and surface area for 1999 provided in the
source documents
d Medium variant projection of annual
average rate during the period
e Data for 1995-2000
f Data for 2002

Bangla­ Bhutan
desh

Indo­
nesia

India

1,905

114

1.21

20.0

1,030

1.96,3e

20.0’3b

1.16

23.2

164

2.32

34.0

292

0.94

17.3

125

1.14

17.8

58"*

3.93

4.0,3b

11.6

9.9

6.3

6.2

13.2

40.9

27.413 b

27.7

11.9

23.6

21.6

15.0"*

3.57

3.52

2.86

5.07

2.84

2.67

2.21

n

o

Footnote in the source indicates that data
refer to years or period other than 19951999, differ from the standard definition, or
refer to only part of the country
Data for 1999

p
q

Data lor 1995
Data for 1998

r

91.1% (single dose) 4.6% (two doses)
during 1998
Percentage of total government budget
for 2002

s

5
79

25.4

7.1

Data for 1997
Estimated to be low income (S745 or less)
Due to rounding of decimal point, child
plus elderly dependency ratios may not
add up to Total Dependency Ratio
Calculated from adult illiteracy rates
provided in the source document

k Data for 1996
I Data for 1998/1999
m Data for 1995-1999

72

Coverage by NIDS during 2002
As reported by country for 1999
Figures not endorsed by country as
V
official statistics
w Data for 1994-1998
X As reported by country for both male and
female combined for 1999
y For urban/rural areas for 1998
z Data for 2001
aa Data for 1994-1999

t
u

53.73
51.70
55.90

n/a
7.00*°"
2.0010-n

n/a
n/a
n/a

58.91
40.22

ab Computed from data provided in the source
documents for life expectancy by sex

ac Ratio expressed in percentage
ad Data as of 8 March 2002
ae Data based on previous election
af Data refer to latest year available during the
period 1991-2000
ag Data for 1991
ah Data for 1998 children less than 7 years of age
ai Data for 1992

34.92
34.81'

78.06
79.85

aj Data for 1999 for children < 3 years of age
ak Data for 1994
al Data for 1993
am Data for 1989
an For urban/rurai areas for 1990
ao For 1999 (MMR = 23 from VRS,
MMR = 59.6 from surveillance system)
ap Data for 1987

Primary Health Care Coverage Indicators

Health Resources Indicators
Indicator

Year

Bangla­
desh

Bhutan

DPR
Korea

India

Indo­
nesia

Mal­
dives

Myan­
mar

Nepal

Sri
Lanka

Thailand

TimorLeste

Indicator

Total expenditure
on health
(as % of GDP)'*

2000

3.8

4.1

2.1

4.9

2.7

7.6

2.2

5.4

3.6

3.7

9.41'8

Infants
immunized (%)”

P'ilic share to
Aw health
expenditure (%)'*

2000

Per capita total health
expenditure
(international dollars)'4

2000

Physicians
per 10,000
population15

2001

Hospital beds
per 10,000
population'5

36.4

90.6

77.3

17.8

23.7

83.4

17.1

29.3

49.0

57.4

Year

Bangla­
desh

2001
2001
2001
2001

70.2"
69.1"
90.0"
62.1°

2001

Pregnant
women”
Deliveries”

DPT3

OPV3
BCG
Measles

2001

2.51

3.36

64

1.6"

16.0"

33

29.7P

136.1"

CES OF DATA
1 UN, World Population Prospects, The 2000 Revision, Volume I:
Comprehensive Tables, New York, 2001
2 UN, 2000 Demographic Yearbook, New York, 2002
3 UN, World Urbanization Prospects, The 1999 Revision, New York, 2001
4 World Bank, World Development Report 2003, Oxford University Press,
New York, 2003
5 UNDP, Human Development Report 2003, Oxford University Press,
New York, 2003
6 UNESCO, htlp://www.unesco.org, July 2002 assessment
7 UNESCO, Statistical Yearbook 1999
8 WHO, Regional Office for South-East Asia, Routine and ad hoc reports from
countries to the EHP Unit, New Delhi, 2000
9 UNESCO, http://www.unesco.org, October 2002
10 UNICEF, The State of the World's Children 2003, Oxford University
Press, New York, 2003

71

84

5.25

6.9=

1.1’

6.03°

254

8.4’

17.4"

24

3.0"

6.3"

66

0.54

1.5

120

4.1’

29’

237

3.0"

22.3"

India

Indo­
nesia

Mal­
dives

Myan­
mar

95.0°
88.4°

89.0°
93.0s
95.0°
90.0’

Sri
Lanka

Nepal

Thailand

TimorLeste
58.0”1
84.01 ”

95.0
75.0

88.0°
100.0°
81.0=

94.6°
94.8°
100.0°
88.1°

77.0°

24.2

90.0=

76.3°

93.0

60.1’

35.0°

98.0=

83.4*

n/a

62.3°

97.0

77.5’

13.5°

97.0’

94.5°

n/a

48.2’

66.4’

42.0=

55.1”

38.9s’

71.0°

72.2

n/a

99.9°
n/a
n/a

77.9°
92.6°
72.3’

n/a
88.2°
71.9°

76.5
n/a
n/a

71.5°
89.2’
65.8’

59.0*
61.0'

75.4’

92.7°

96.0°
74.6’

n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a
n/a

99.2°

36.0’
80.7’
18.9’

n/a
86.9°
54.2°

85
n/a
n/a

63.1°
83.6’

23.0*
74.018.0*

72.6’
87.0’

97.7°

37.4°

52.1’

93.0°
79.0°

76.5’
63.9’
34.4’

59.2’
69.1’
41.7°

93.1’
86.8’

98.0=
98.0’
99.5°
99.0°

63.7"

73.0°

4.6'

66.8°

73.4°

94.0°

2001

33.7"

72.0’

100.0°

65.1’

71.9’

2001

21.8°

23.7°

98.6°

42.3’

2001

53.8°

30.7°

67.0’

97.3°
99.2°
96.7°

77.8’
97.5’
73.2"

54.1°

88.0’
n/a
n/a

88.0°
89.0°

88.0°

80.0
80.0

n/a
n/a

n/a
Pregnant women
immunized with
tetanus toxoid (%)15

47

DPR
Korea

Bhutan

n/a

n/a

n/a

Attended
by trained
personnel:
(% of live births)

Women of child
bearing age using
contraceptives (%)”
Population with
access to safe
water (%)'5

Total
Urban
Rural

2001
2001
2001

Population with
access to
adequate
sanitation (%)15

Total
Urban
Rural

2001
2001
2001

74.6°
49.3°

n/a
n/a

56.5°

59.0*

68.3=

n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a
n/a

11 Timor-Leste, Health Profile, Dili, 26 August 2002
12 Bhutan, Ministry of Health and Education, Report on National Health
Survey 2000

13 Maldives, Statistical Yearbook of Maldives 2001
14 WHO Geneva, The World Health Report 2002, Geneva, 2002
15 WHO, Regional Office for South-East Asia, Health Situation in the SouthEast Asia Region 1998-2000, New Delhi, 2002

17 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, FAO estimates (3690), July 2003
18 World Bank, http://wwvr.developmentgoals.com, World Development
Indicators Database, April 2002

21 http.7/millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, UNICEF [29998], July 2003
22 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, UNICEF [29997], July 2003
23 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd , WHO [29982], April 2003
24 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, WHO [30002], April 2003
25 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd , WHO [29983], July 2003
26 http://millenniummdicators.un.org/unsd. WHO-UNICEF [27910], April 2003
27 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, WHO-UNICEF [27920], April 2003
28 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, WHO estimates [29986], July 2003

19 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, WHO [29996], July 2003
20 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, WHO [30001], July 2003

29 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd , WHO [30026], July 2003
30 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, WHO [30020], April 2003

16 WHO, Regional Office for South-East Asia, country reported HFA data
set 1997

31 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, UNAIDS (30008], April 2003

32 http://millenniummdicators.un.org/unsd, UNAIDS [30017], April 2003

33 http://millenniummdicators.un org/unsd, UNAIDS [29987], April 2003
34 WHO Geneva, The World Health Report 2003 (draft) Annex tables and
MDG data set (draft), June 2003
35 Myanmar, Health in Myanmar 2002
36 Nepal, Demographic and Health Survey 2001
37 Country Presentations at the Consultative Meeting on MDG Dataset. June
2003, WHO/SEARO, New Delhi
38 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd. UNAIDS [30008], July 2003
39 WHO Geneva, Global Tuberculosis Control, WHO Report 2003

Gender Equity Indicators

Health Status Indicators
Indicator

Life expectancy at
birth (years)34:

Healthy life
c £tancy (HALE)
aWn (years)34:

Total
Male
Female

Total
Male
Female

Infant mortality rate
(per 1000 live births)15
Under-five mortality
rate (per 1000 live
births)34:

Year

Bangla­
desh

Bhutan

2002
2002
2002

62.6
62.6
62.6

61.3
60.2
62.4

DPR
Korea

65.8
64.4
67.1

India

61.0
60.1
62.0

Indo­
nesia

Mal­
dives

Myan­
mar

66.4

64.6
64.5

62.3’3"
60.7’51

65.0

63.9’5-1

64.9
67.9

60.1
59.9
60.2

70.3
67.2
74.3

100.8

105.3

98.8

111.3

109.9

n/a

Gender-related development
index (GDI)5

2001

0.495

n/a

n/a

0.574

0.677

n/a

n/a

0.479

0.726

0.766

n/a

21.5

70-95”-’

Ratio of earned income
(females as % of males)5-4"

2001

56

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

50

61

n/a

9.3

8.0

6.0

n/a

7.9“

4.4

9.6

n/a

20
16

32

2.0

n/a

81
87

Seats held in parliament
(% women)5ad

9.3

78’5>
78’5->

142

2001

38
43

26

108

Professional and technical
workers (% women)5-41

2001

25

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

40

n/a

n/a

49

55

n/a

Adult literacy ratio
(females as a % of males)541

2000

61.1

55.0

100.0

66.4

89.2

99.8

90.6

40.4

94.3

96.7

n/a

Primary school
enrolment ratio (females
as a % of males)9-4'’

1999/2000

97.2

75.6

93.5

84.9

96.6

100.8

99.0

79.8

97.2

95.3

n/a

Secondary school
enrolment ratio (females
as a % of males)9-41

1999/2000

108.1

28.6

n/a

68.3

95.1

106.8

99.7

72.1

106.6

102.3

n/a

2001

Maternal mortality ratio
(per 100,000 live births)15

2000

Low birth weight
newborns (%)’s

2000

19.5

15.1°

9.0s

23.0P

7.7s

17.6'

15.0

23.23

16.7

2000

47.7“

18.7’

60.6n

47.0°

20.3"

30.0-

35.5

47.1°

29.4

5.5

100

g

Data for 1997

h
i

Estimated to be low income (S745 or less)
Due to rounding of decimal point, child
plus elderly dependency ratios may not
add up to Total Dependency Ratio

j

m Data for 1995-1999

104.7

15.4°

Total fertility rate
(per woman)14

Data for 2002

102.8

64.2

45
36

f

106.7

59.8"

87
95

Data for 1998/1999

103.6

21.0=

56
54

I

99.7

S

93
92

k

2001

0.457

71

e

Life expectancy at birth ratio
(females as a % of males)’4-41

0.272

2002
2002

Medium variant projection of annual
average rate during the penod
Data for 1995-2000

57.5
54.8
60.5

n/a

3.0

100/180/

4.6

415'

for-age (%)15

d

TimorLeste

n/a

41.4°

Calculated from adult illiteracy rates
provided in the source document
Data for 1996

Thailand

n/a

68.0*

FOOTNOTES FOR DATA TABLES
a Medium variant projection of the
population for mid-year 2001
b Data for 2000
c Calculated from total population for 2001
and surface area for 1999 provided in the
source documents

Sri
Lanka

n/a

21.8°

iil^en with low weight-

Nepal

n/a

60.5b

373"

Myan­
mar

n/a

51.01

407°

Mal­
dives

n/a

2001

105“

Indo­
nesia

0.218

56.3

258

India

2001

51.6'
49.9'

230

DPR
Korea

Gender empowerment
measure (GEM)5

56.8
57.4

2.4

Bhutan

47.9
51.8

58.2
57.4
58.9

3.1

Bangla­
desh

53.5-

53.3
53.6

2.1

Year

49.7

53.4

5.2

Indicator

57.7
62.5

58.9
58.0
59.7

3.6

69.3
66.0
72.7

TimorLeste

60.0

52.9
52.9
52.9

51.8

Thailand

61.3
59.2
64.0

54.3
55.3
53.3

73

Sri
Lanka

52.5
51.1

2002
2002
2002

Male
Female

Nepal

2.1

59.6"

2.0

13.2

8.1"

11.3’

n/a

800”-’

n/a

45.0”-1

o

Footnote in the source indicates that data
refer to years or period other than 19951999, differ from the standard definition, or
refer to only part of the country
Data for 1999

p
q

Data for 1995
Data for 1998

r

91.1% (single dose) 4.6% (two doses)
during 1998
Percentage of total government budget
for 2002

n

s

t
u
v

Coverage by NIDS during 2002
As reported by country for 1999
Figures not endorsed by country as
official statistics
w Data for 1994-1998
x As reported by country for both male and
female combined for 1999
y For urban/rural areas for 1998
z Data for 2001
aa Data for 1994-1999

w
ab Computed from data provided in the
source documents for life expectancy by
sex
ac Ratio expressed in percentage
ad Data as of 8 March 2002
ae Data based on previous election
af Data refer to latest year available during
the period 1991-2000
ag Data for 1991
ah Data for 1998 children less than 7 years
of age

ai

Data for 1992

aj Data for 1999 for children < 3 years of age
ak Data for 1994
al Data for 1993
am Data for 1989
an For urban/rural areas for 1990
ao For 1999 (MMR = 23 from VRS,
MMR = 59.6 from surveillance system)
ap Data for 1987

Health-Related Millennium Development Goals

Health-Related Millennium Development Goals
Indicator

Year

Bangla­
desh

Bhutan

DPR

Korea

Indo.
nesia

, ..
ncia

Mai..
dives

Myan3
mar

.
Nepal
r

Sri
Lanka

Thailand

TimorLeste

Indicator

Year

Bangla­
desh

Bhutan

DPR
Korea

Goal (G) Target (T) Indicator (I)

Goal 6 : COMBAT HIV/AIOS, MALARIA AND OTHER DISEASES

Goal 1 : ERADICATE EXTREME POV ERTY AND HUNGER

Target 7: Have halted by 2015, and begun to reverse, the spread of HIV/AIDS

Target 2: Halve, between 1990 a:id 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger

G6.T7.I18 —HIV prevalence
among young people

G1.T2.I4 —Prevalence of
underweight children
(under-five years of age)
■ W.T2.I5 — Proportion (%)
of population below
minimum level of dietary
energy consumption (w-5*

199O’B
2001’5

54.0’9

47.7°

39.7‘
18.7°

5.027.9*

53.4»
47.0*

41.7*
24,6*=

n/a
30.0

32.4
35.5b

46.9’
48.3*

37.6”
29.4b

20.8’9
11.39

n/a
45.0" =

199117
1999’7

35
35

n/a
n/a

18
34

25
- 24

9
6

n/a
n/a

10
6

19
19

29
23

28
18

n/a
n/a

G4.T5.I14 — Infant mortality rate

G4.T5.I15 — Proportion (%)
of 1 year-old children
immunized for measles

1990’5
2002*

1990’6

136.0’8

72.3

96.9*
84.0’5b

23.0'
90.0’3

112.0’3
90.9

84.0*
51.4W»

48.0
30.0

130.0’8
78.0°

165.0
91.01

22.6ao
18.3

42.0’9
31.4°

92.0’9
51.0

70.7*

14.1“

80.0"

60.0*

34.0

100.0"

102.0

19.3

2000’5

60.5

21.8

68.0"-

40.9"

21.0

59.8”

64.2'

15.4<»

32.8’9
21.5’

199015
2001*

53.0*9
76.0

69.0«r
76.0

99.7P

32.7*

90.3=

85.0

71.0*

65.0’s

86.0*

58.1am

34.0

56.0

93.9"

99.0

73.0

71.0

99.0

94.0

n/a
125.0" =

Mal­
dives

Myan­
mar

Nepal

Sri
Lanka

t
Thailand

TimorLeste

n/a
n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a
n/a

n/a
0.17
0.18

n/a
0.02
0 03

n/a
0.88
1.32

n/a

n/a
0.01
0.01

n/a
n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a
n/a

n/a
0.22

0.46

n/a
0.05
0.05

15-49 years age group

200138

<0.1

<0.1

0.3*'

0.8

0.1

0.1

1.3"/

0.5

<0.1

1.7"/

n/a

G6.T7.I19 — Condom use in
high risk population<='Drr19>

1990
200132 (M)

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a
n/a

n/a

51.2

n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a

n/a
44.49

n/a

39.8

n/a
n/a

n/a

200132 (F)

n/a
n/a
n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a
n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a
n/a

1990
200133

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

18,000

n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a

n/a
13.000

n/a
2,000

n/a
290,000

n/a

n/a

n/a
n/a

n/a

2,100

Target 5: Reduce by two-thirds, tsetween 1990 and 2015, the under-five mortality rate
G4.T5.I13 — Under-five mortality
rate (probability of dying
between birth and age 5)

Indo­
nesia

1990
200131 (M)
200131 (F)

15-24 years age grouptw8'

Goal 4 : REDUCE CHILD MORTALITY

India

G6.T7.I20 — Ratio of children
orphaned/non-orphaned
in schools<”“val>

Target 8: Have halted by 2015, and begun to reverse the incidence of malaria and other major diseases

n/a
n/a

G6.T8.I21,-Malaria death rate
per 100,000 in children
(0-4 years of age)

1990
200020

n/a
1

n/a

G6.T8.l21b-Malaria death rate
per 100,000 (all ages)

1990
2002"

n/a

G6.T8.l21c—Malaria prevalence
rate per 100,000 Irw3")

1990
2002"

n/a
34

7.5

n/a
0

n/a
6

n/a
0

n/a

n/a
3

n/a
11

n/a
4

n/a

n/a

n/a

9

n/a

n/a
11.4

n/a

n/a
2.9

n/a

n/a
14.6

n/a
17.7

n/a

n/a

3.2

n/a
n/a

n/a

0.0

5.5

6.4

n/a

n/a
19

n/a
14

n/a
n/a

n/a
22

n/a
78

n/a

n/a

57

49

8

Wwget 6: Reduce by three-quarters», between 1990 and 2015, the maternal mortality ratio

G5.T6.I17 — Proportion (%)
of births attended by
skilled health personnel

1990"

470^

380*'

n/a

420=

425*

500

100/190*

850*1

42’9

36.0

n/a

2001"

230b

255"

105"

407"

373’

100=

255150

415

59.6’°

13.2=

800'"

1990"

14.0*

21.8=

15.1*
23.7b

n/a
98.6=

89/36*
42.3"

31.7*
64.8"

95.0’
97.0

n/a
77.5=

9.0>
10.9*

85.2“
97.0=

84.8

2001"

94.5°

n/a
n/a

6

UNESCO, http://www.unesco.org, July 2002 assessment

7

UNESCO, Statisticaf Yearbook 1999

8

SOURCES OF DATA
1

UN, World Population Prospects. Tihe 2000 Revision, Volume 1:
Comprehensive Tables, New York, 2001

4

World Bank, World Development Report 2003, Oxford University Press,
New York, 2003

2

UN, 2000 Demographic Yearbook, IMew York, 2002
UN, World Urbanization Prospects, The 1999 Revision, New York. 2001

5

UNDP, Human Development Report 2003, Oxford University Press.
New York, 2003

3

n/a

n/a
70-95"'

>^al 5 : IMPROVE MATERNAL HEALTI

G5.T6.I16 — Maternal
mortality ratio

n/a

44

WHO, Regional Office for South-East Asia, Routine and ad hoc reports
from countries Io lhe EHP Unit, New Delhi, 2000
9 UNESCO, http:// www.unesco.org, October 2002
10 UNICEF, The State of the World's Children 2003, Oxford University
Press, New York, 2003
11 Timor-Leste, Health Profile, Dili, 26 August 2002

n/a

15

e
n/a
22

12 Bhutan, Ministry of Health and Education. Report on National Health
Survey 2000
13 Maldives, Statisticaf Yearbook of Maldives 2001
14 WHO Geneva. The World Health Report 2002. Geneva. 2002

15 WHO. Regional Office for South-East Asia, Health Situation in the SouthEast As t Repdn 1999-2300. New Delhi, 2002
16 WHO .
set 199.

data

Health-Related Millennium Development Goals
hdicator

Year

Bangla. \
desh

D, ,
Bhutan

DPR
Korea

.
India

Indonesia

Ma ..
dives

Myan1
mar

Nepal

Health-Related Millennium Development Goals
Sri
Lanka

Thailand

TimorLeste

Target 8 (continued)

G6.T8.I22S — Proportion
(%) of population under
age 5 in malaria risk
areas using insecticidetreated bed nets

1990

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

20002’

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

0.1

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1990

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

200022

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

4

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

G6.T8.l23a — Tuberculosis
death rate per 100,000

1990
2002*

G6.T8.l24a-Proportion
(%) of Smear Positive
Pulmonary Tuberculosis
cases detected and put
under directly observed
treatment short course
(DOTS) «™<r-s«i
G6.T8.l24b—Proportion
-^^) of Smear-Positive
^Ilmonary Tuberculosis
cases detected cured
under directly observed
treatment short course
(DOTS) ip*v*y-2-ao>

v
Year

Bangladesh

D. .
Bhutan

DPR
Korea

India

Indo­
nesia

Maidives

Myanmar

r

Sri
Lanka

Tha||and

TimorLeste

Goal 7 : ENSURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

(cJB.I22b— Proportion
V°) of population
under age 5 with
fever being treated
with antimalarial drugs

G6.T8.l23t> - Tuberculosis
prevalence rate per
100,000

Indicator

n/a
54.4

n/a
23.0

n'a
31.8

n/a
40.4

n/a
66.1

n/a

3.5

n/a
33.2

n/a
26.4

n/a
11.4

n/a
18.5

n/a
54.6

1990

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

200255

471

215

343

426

739

48

268

300

116

241

779

1990

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

200129 39

26.3

25.8

56.3

22 7

20.7

88.1

58,6

59.7

74.3

75.1

n/a

1990
20002539

n/a
83

n/a

90

n/a

91

17 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, FAO estimates (3690), July 2003
18 World Bank, http://wwvr.developmentgoals.com , World Development
Indicators Database, April 2002
19 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, WHO [29996], July 2003

20 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, WHO (30001), July 2003
21 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd , UNICEF (29998), July 2003
22 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd , UNICEF [29997], July 2003
23 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, WHO [29982], April 2003

n/a
84

n/a

87

n/a
95

n/a
82

n/a
86

n/a

77

n/a

69

n/a
n/a

Target 9: Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes and reverse the loss of environmental resources
G7.T9.I29 — Proportion
(%) of population using
biomass fuels

1990

n/a

2000M

969

n/a
n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

8TN

63p

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1009

979

89

729

n/a



Target 10: Halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water
G7.T10.l30a - Proportion
{%) of population with
sustainable access
to an improved water
source, rural (p10^)

G7.T1O.I3Ob—Proportion
(%) of population with
sustainable access
to an improved water
source, urban (p^^306*

n/a

61

62

n/a

n/a

64

62

78

n/a

60

100

79

69

100

66

87

70

81

n/a

99

n/a

n/a

88

92

n/a

n/a

93

91

87

n/a

99

86

100

95

90

100

89

94

98

95

n/a

199CP6^

93

200026-^

97

199026-3*

200026-34

n/a

Target 11: By 2020 to have achieved a significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers
G7.T11.131 — Proportion
(%) of urban population
with access to
improved sanitation

199027-3*

81

n/a

n/a

44

66

n/a

n/a

69

94

95

n/a

200027-34

71

65

99

61

69

100

84

73

97

96

n/a

Goal 8 : DEVELOP GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP FOR DEVELOPMENT

Target 17 : In cooperation with pharmaceutical companies, provide access to affordable, essential drugs in developing countries
G8.T17.I46 — Proportion
(%) of population
with access to
affordable essential
drugs on a sustainable
basis ip'0^'*6)

1990

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

199728

80

80

50

80

80

80

50

50

95

80

n/a

24 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd , WHO [30002], April 2003

25 http://millenmumindicators.un.org/unsd , WHO [29983), July 2003
26 http://millenniumindicalors.un.org/unsd, WHO-UNICEF [27910], April 2003

31 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd , UNAIDS [30008], April 2003

36 Nepal, Demographic and Health Survey 2001

27 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd. WHO-UNICEF [27920], April 2003

32 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd , UNAIDS [30017], April 2003

28 http://millenniumindicators.un org/unsd, WHO estimates [29986], July 2003

33 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, UNAIDS [29987], April 2003

37 Country Presentarions at the Consultative Meeting on MDG Dataset, June
2003, WHO/SEARO, New Delhi

29 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, WHO [30026], July 2003
30 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd , WHO [30020], April 2003

34 WHO Geneva, The World Health Report 2003 (draft) Annex tables and MDG
data set (draft), June 2003
35 Myanmar, Health in Myanmar 2002

38 http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd, UNAIDS [30008], July 2003
39 WHO Geneva, Global Tuberculosis Control, WHO Report 2003

Definitions for Indicators
Adult literacy rate (%): is the percentage of persons aged 15 years and above
who can read and write. The application of this definition is subject to qualifiers
in each country and at each census. (UN, 2000 Demographic Yearbook). Adult
literacy ratio (females as a % of males): is the ratio of adult literacy of females
to that of males, expressed as a percentage. Average annual change in
consumer price index (%): it reflects changes in the cost to the average
consumer of acquiring a basket of goods and services that may be fixed or
changed at specified intervals. (UNDP, Human Development Report 2002).
Average annual growth rate of the urban population (%): is the average
annual rate of change in the percentage of the urban population computed from the
increase in the urban population over five year periods, based on the
odology of the Population Division of the United Nations. (UN, World
Urbanization Prospects, the 1999 Revision). Children with low weight-for­
age (%): is the number of children with low weight-for-age as a percentage of the
children weighed. Children whose nutritional status (weight-for-age) is low are
those whose status falls below 80% of the median weight of reference value or
below 2 standard deviations of the national or international reference populations.
such as growth charts of the US National Center for Health Statistics. (UNICEF,
The State of World's Children, 2000). Crude birth rate (per 1000 population):
is the annual number of live births occurring per thousand mid-year population.
(UN, 1993 Demographic Yearbook). Crude death rate (per 1000 population):
is the annual number of deaths occurring per thousand mid-year population. (UN,
2000 Demographic Yearbook). Deliveries attended by trained personnel (%
of live births): is the number of deliveries attended by trained personnel per 100
live births. (WHO, Implementation of Strategies for Health for All by the Year
2000, Third Monitoring of Progress, Common Framework). Gender
Empowerment Measure (GEM): is an index which focuses on three variables
that reflect women's participation in political decision making, their access to
professional opportunities, and lheir earning power (UNDP, Human Development
Report 2003). Gender-related Development Index (GDI): is an adjustment of
®^-luman Development Index (HDI) for gender equity in life expectancy,

3

educational attainment and income. (UNDP, Human Development Report 2003).
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita growth rate (%): is based on
GDP measured in constant prices. Growth in GDP is considered a broad measure
of the growth of an economy. GDP in constant prices can be estimated by
measuring the total quantity of goods and services produced in a period, valuing
prices, and subtracting the cost of intermediate inputs, also in constant prices.
(World Bank, World Development Report 2002). Gross National Income (GNI)
per capita (USS): Formerly Gross National Product or GNP, the broadest measure
of national income, measures total value added from domestic and foreign sources
claimed by residents. GNI comprises Gross Domeslic Product (GDP) plus net
receipts of primary income from foreign sources. Dala are convened from national
currency to current US Dollars using the World Bank Alias Method. This involves
using a 3-year average of exchange rales. (World Bank. World Development
Report 2002). Gross primary school enrolment ratio (%): is the total enrolment
in first-level education, regardless of age, divided by the population of the age-

group which officially corresponds to primary schooling. (UNESCO, World
Education Report 1995). Gross secondary school enrolment ratio (%): is
the total enrolment in second-level education, regardless of age, divided by the
population of the age-group which officially corresponds to secondary schooling.
(UNESCO, World Education Report 1995). Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE)
at birth (years): is the full health life expeclancy al birth. It is the number of years
a newborn child is expected to live in full health during his/her life time subject to
health risks prevailing for a cross section of the population at the lime of his/her
birth. In other words, it is the life expectancy at birth minus the total time expected
to be lost being in ill health. (WHO, The World Health Report 2002). Hospital
beds per 10,000 population: is the ratio of total number of hospital beds
available in the country to the total population, expressed per 10,000 population.
Human Development Index (HDI): is a composite of three indicators which
reflect important dimensions of human development: longevity as measured by
life expectancy at birth; educational attainment as measured by a combination of
adult literacy (two-thirds weight) and combined primary, secondary and tertiary
enrolment ratios (one-third weight), and standard of living as measured by real
GDP per capita (in purchasing power parity dollars). (UNDP. Human Development
Report 2003). Infant mortality rate (per 1000 live births): is the number of
deaths under one year of age per 1000 live births. (WHO, International Statistical
Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems). Infants immunized
with BCG (%): is the percentage of infants reaching their first birthday that have
been fully immunized (one dose) against tuberculosis. (WHO, Implementation
of Strategies for Health for All by the Year 2000, Third Monitoring of Progress,
Common Framework) Infants immunized with DPT3 (%): is the percentage
of infants reaching their first birthday that have been fully immunized (three doses
according to the immunization scheme adopted in the country) against diphtheria,
tetanus, and whooping cough. (WHO, Implementation of Strategies for Health
for All by the Year 2000, Third Monitoring of Progress. Common Framework).
Infants immunized with measles vaccine (%): is the percentage of infants
reaching their first birthday fully immunized against measles (one dose). (WHO,
Implementation of Strategies for Health for All by the Year 2000, Third Monitoring
of Progress, Common Framework) Infants immunized with OPV3 (%): is the
percentage of infants reaching their first birthday that have been fully immunized
against poliomyelitis (three doses). (WHO, Implementation of Strategies for
Health for All by the Year 2000, Third Monitoring of Progress, Common
Framework). Life expectancy at birth (years): is the number of years newborn
children would live if subject to the mortality risks prevailing for a cross-section
of the population at the time of their birth. (UNICEF, The State of the World's
Children 2003). Life expectancy at birth ratio (females as a % of males): is
the ratio of the life expectancy at birth of females to that of males, expressed as
a percentage. Low birth weight newborns (%): is the number of liveborn
babies with birth weight less than 2500 grams as a percentage of the total number
of liveborn babies weighed, with the measurement being laken preferably within
the first hours of life, before significant postnatal weight loss has occurred. (WHO,
Implementation of Strategies for Health for All by the Year 2000, Third Monitoring

of Progress, Common Framework). Maternal mortality ratio (per 100,000
live births): is fhe number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births; may also
be expressed per 1000 or 10,000 live births. A maternal death is the death of a
woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, from any
cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management, but not from
accidental or incidental causes. (WHO, International Statistical Classification of
Diseases and Related Health Problems). Old-age dependency ratio: is the
ratio of persons 65 years and above to those in the "economically productive”
age group (15-64 years), i.e. the number of persons 65 years and above per 100
persons between 15 and 64 years. Per capita total health expenditure
(international dollars): is the average amount in international dollars spent per
person on health in the country. Physicians per 10,000 population: is the ratio
of total number of physicians working in the country to the total population,
expressed per 10,000 population. Population density (per sq km): is the
number of persons in the total population for a given year per square kilometer of
total surface area (UN, 2000 Demographic Yearbook) Population growth
rate (%): is computed by taking into account the crude birth rate, the crude death
rate, and the net international migration rate of a country for a given year. (Rates
have been computed as average annual rates of population growth over periods
of five years). It is an algebraic sum of the natural growth rate (crude birth rate
minus crude death rate) and the net international migration rate, expressed as a
percentage. (UN, World Population Prospects, The 2000 Revision). Population
with access to adequate sanitation (%): is the percentage of fhe population
with adequate excreta-disposal facilities that can effectively prevent human,
animal and insect contact with excreta. (WHO, The World Health Report 1996).
Population with access to safe water (%): is the percentage of the population
with safe drinking-water available in the home or with reasonable access to
treated surface waters and untreated but uncontaminated water such as that from
protected boreholes, springs and sanitary wells. (WHO, The World Health Report
1996). Pregnant women attended by trained personnel (% of live births):
is the number cf pregnant women cared for during pregnancy by personnel
trained for pregnancy and childbirth per 100 live births. (WHO, Implementation of
Strategies for Health for All by the Year 2000, Third Monitoring of Progress.
Common Framework). Pregnant women immunized with tetanus toxoid
(%): is the number of pregnant women immunized with two or more doses of
tetanus toxoid per 100 live births. (WHO, Implementation of Strategies for Health
for All by the Year 2000, Third Monitoring of Progress, Common Framework).
Primary school enrolment ratio (females as a % of males): is the ratio of the
primary school enrolment ratio of females to the primary school enrolment ratio of
males, expressed as a percentage Professional and technical workers (%
women): women's share ol positions defined according to the International
Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-88) to include physical, mathematical
and engineering science professionals (and associate professionals), life science
and health professionals (and associate professionals), teaching professionals
(and associate professionals) and other professionals and associate professionals.
(UNDP, Human Development Report 2002). Public share to total health
expenditure (%): is the proportion of government expenditure on health to the
total health expenditure. Ratio of earned income (females as % of males): is

the ratio of estimated female earned income to estimated male earned income,
expressed as a percentage (UNDP. Human Development Report 2002). Seats
held in parliament (% women): is the proportion of parliament seats held by
women to those held by men. Secondary school enrolment ratio (females
as a % of males): is the ratio of the secondary school enrolment ratio of females
to the secondary school enrolment ratio of males, expressed as a percentage.
Surface area (thousands of sq km): refers to the total surface area, comprising
land area and inland waters (assumed to consist of major rivers and lakes) and
excluding only polar regions and uninhabited islands. (UN, 2000 Demographic
Yearbook). Total dependency ratio: is the ratio of persons in the "dependent"
ages (under 15 years plus 65 years and above) to those in the ■economically
productive" age group (15-64 years), i.e. the number of persons under 15 years
plus those 65 years and above per 100 persons between 15 and 64 years, A)
expenditure on health (as % of GDP): is the ratio of total expenditure on health
from all sources to the gross domestic product of the country, expressed in
percentage. Total fertility rate (per woman): represents the number of children
that would be bom Io a woman if she were to live to the end of her childbearing
years and bear children at each age in accordance with prevailing age-specific
fertility rates. (UNICEF. The State of the World's Children 1996). Total population
(thousands): is the mid-year estimate of the total population of a country or area
as prepared by the Population Division of the United Nations based on their
methodology for estimations and projections to provide a consistent senes of
demographic parameters for every country of the world. (UN, World Population
Prospects, The 1994 Revision). Under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live
births): is the number of deaths of children under five years of age per 1000 live
births. (WHO. The World Health Report 1996). Urban population (%): is the
percentage of persons living in urban areas. Urban is defined according to
national census definitions The definitions for countnes of the South-East Asia
Region are presented below. Bangladesh: Places having a municipality
(pourashava), a town committee (shahar committee) or a cantonment board.
India: Towns (places with municipal corporation, municipal area committee.
town committee, notified area committee or cantonment board); also, all plj£
having 5000 or more inhabitants, a density of not less than 1000 persons^?'
square mile or 390 per square kilometer, pronounced urban characteristics and
at least three-fourths of the adult male population employed in pursuits other than
agriculture. Indonesia: Municipalities, regency capitals and other places with
urban characteristics Maldives. Male, the capital. Nepat Localities of 9000 or
more inhabitants. Sri Lanka: Municipalities, urban councils and towns. Thailand.
Municipal areas. For Bhutan. DPR Korea, and Myanmar. no definition of "urban"
is available. (UN, Demographic Yearbook, 1988 and 1993). Women of
childbearing age using contraceptives (%): is the number of women of
childbearing age (defined as ages 15-49 years) using contraceptives per 100
women of this age group. (WHO, Implementation of Strategies for Health for Ail
by the Year 2000, Third Monitoring ol Progress, Common Framework). Young
dependency ratio: is the ratio of children under 15 years to those in the
“economically productive" age group (15-64 years), i.e. the number of persons
under 15 years per 100 persons between 15 and 64 years.

MDG Indicators: Concepts and Definitions1
Prevalence of Underweight Children (under-five years of age) (G1.T2.I4):
Proportion of Children of under-five years with low weight-for-age as measured
by percentage of children in moderate and severe malnutrition - those falling
below 80% of the median weight for reference value or below 2 standard
deviations of national or international reference populations, such as growth
charts of the US National Center for Health Statistics. (UNICEF). Proportion (%)
of population below minimum level of dietary energy consumption
(G1.T2.l5f Since there is no specific data available, proxy indicator ‘Proportion
of population undernourished' is used. It is the proportion in percentage of
persons whose food intake falls below the minimum requirement or food intake
that is insufficient to meet dietary energy requirements continuously. (FAO).
Under-five mortality rate (G4.T5.I13): Probability of dying between birth and
exactly live years of age, expressed per 1.000 live births (WHO). Infant
m'^ty rate (G4.T5.I14): Probability of dying between birth and exactly one
yearoi age expressed per 1.000 live births. (WHO. 1CD-10). Proportion (%) of

1 year old children immunized for measles (G4.T5.I15): The percentage of
infants reaching their first birthday fully immunized against measles (1 dose).
(WHO) Maternal mortality ratio (G5.T6.I16): Annual number of maternal
deaths per 100.000 live-births A maternal death is the death of a woman while
pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, from any cause related
to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management, but not from accidental or
incidental causes. (WHO, ICD-10). Proportion (%) of births attended by
skilled health persons: (G5.T6.I17): The proportion in percentage of births
attended by skilled personnel per 100 live-births. Skilled health personnel refer
exclusively to those health personnel (for example, doctors, nurses, midwives)
who have been trained to proficiency in the skills necessary to manage normal
deliveries and diagnose or refer obsletnc complications. Traditional birth attendants
trained or untrained are not included in this category. (WHO). HIV prevalence
among young people (G6.T7.I18): Since the relevant data is not available, the
proxy indicator as proposed by UNAIDS/WHO is used. The proxy indicator is
’HIV prevalence among 15-24 years old by sex" which is the estimated
number ol young people (15-24 years old) living with HIV/AIDS as per proportion
of the same population and sex. These country-specific estimates are expressed
as a range generated by regional modeling (UNAIDS). The other proxy indicator
is ’HIV prevalence rate among population 15-49 years of age". Condom
u:^ high-risk population (G6.T7.I19)-. Since the data is not available, it has
be^roposed to use ‘condom-use among 15-24 years old by sex ". This is
the percentage of young men and women of age 15-24 years, who said that they
used a condom the last time they had sex with a non-marital, non-cohabiting
partner, ol those who have had sex with such a partner in the last 12 months
(UNICEF/UNAIDS). Raffo of children orphaned/non-orphaned in schools
(G6.T7.I2O): Since the data is not available, proxy indicator is used as ‘AIDS
orphans currently living’which is the estimated number of children (0-14) in
a given year, having lost their mother or both parents to AIDS. (UNAIDS)
Malaria death rate per 100,000 in children (0-4 years of age) (G6.T8.I21.):
Proportion of children (0-4 years of age) died due to malaria in a given year.
(WHO). Malaria death rate per 100,000 In all age groups (G6.T8.l2h,)'
Proportion of people of all age groups died due to malaria in a given year (WHO).
It is malaria crude death rate. Malaria prevalence rate per 100,000 population
(G6.T8.l2h): Proportion of notified or reported cases of malaria per 100,000
population in a given year (WHO). It is malaria crude prevalence rate. Proportion
(*>) of population under age 5 in malaria risk areas using insecticide
treated bed nets (G6.T8.I22,) The percentage of children under-five years of
age who are using insecticide-treated bed nets among the same population living

in malaria risk area, in a given year. (UNICEF/WHO). Proportion (%) of
population under age 5 with fever being treated with anti-malarial drugs
(G6.T8.I22J: The percentage of children under-five years of age who are with
fever being treated with anti-malarial drugs among the same population living in
malaria risk area, in a given year. (UNICEF/WHO). Tuberculosis death rate
per 100,000 (G6.T8.I23,): Proportion of people of all age- groups died due to
tuberculosis in a given year. (WHO). Tuberculosis prevalence rate per 100,000
(G6.T8.I23,,): Proportion of tuberculosis cases of all age-groups per 100,000
population in a given year (WHO). Proportion (%) of smear-positive pulmonary
tuberculosis cases detected and put under directly observed treatment
short-course (DOTS) (G6.T8.I24,): Since the baseline data is not available
WHO proposed to use ‘DOTS detection rate" (WHO). Proportion (%) of smear­
positive pulmonary tuberculosis cases detected cured under directly
observed treatment short-course (DOTS) (G6.T8.l24b): Since the baseline
data is not available WHO proposed to use ‘DOTS cure rate" which implies
treatment success rate that is treatment completion rate and cure rate (WHO).
Proportion (%) of population using bio-mass fuel (G7.T9.I29): Bio-mass
fuel is any matenal, derived from plants or animals, deliberately burnt by human,
for example, wood, animal dung, crop residues, and coal. Since the baseline
data is not available the proxy indicator is proposed as “percentage of
populations using solid fuels'. (WHO/UNICEF). Proportion (%) of
population with sustainable access to an improved water source, rural
(G7.T10.I30,): Since the baseline data are not available, the proxy indicator
‘percentage of population with access to improved drinking water sources,
rural' is used, 'improved' water sources mean household connection, public
standpipe, borehole, protected dug well, protected spring, rainwater collection.
'Access' means the availability of at least 20 litres per person per day from a
source within one kilometre of the user’s dwelling. (WHO). Proportion (%) of
population with sustainable access to an improved water source, urban
(G7.T1O.I3Ol:: Since the baseline data are not available, the proxy indicator
percentage of population with access to improved drinking water sources,
urban' is used. “Improved’ water sources mean household connection, public
standpipe, borehole, protected dug well, protected spring, rainwater collection.
"Access" means the availability ol at least 20 litres per person per day from a
source within one kilometre of the user’s dwelling. (WHO) Proportion (%) of
urban population with access to improved sanitation (G7.T11.I31):
“Improved" sanitation means: connection to a public sewer, connection to septic
system, pour-flush latrine, simple pit latrine, or ventilated improved pit latrine. The
excreta disposal system is considered adequate if it is private or shared (but not
public) and il hygienically separates human excreta from human conlact. (WHO).
Proportion (%) of population with access to affordable essential drugs
on a sustainable basis (G8.T17.I46): Since the baseline data is not available,
the proxy indicator ‘percentage of population with access to essential
drugs', which WHO routinely reports for international comparison, is used.
Every year, in order to estimate the level of access to essenlial drugs, WHO
Global Aclion Programme on Essential Drugs interviews relevant experts in each
country about the pharmaceutical situation. The interviewees could choose from
four levels of access by the population to essential drugs: less than 50%;
between 50-80%: 80-95%; and above 95%. They indicate which category is
most appropriate for their country. Essential drugs are those drugs that satisfy the
health care needs of the majority of the population. (WHO).
’ The concepts and definitions reproduced from the original sources (in bracket at
end of each definition).

Health Situation
in South-East Asia

INDICATORS

^2oo;

Includes
Progress Towards
Achieving
Health-Related
United Nations
Millennium
Development
Goals

For more information please contact:

EHP Unit, WHO/SEARO, New Delhi
httpVwww.whosea.org
e-mail: frica@whosea.org
singhn@whosea.org

Position: 1766 (3 views)