ANNUAL REPORT 2001-2002

Item

Title
ANNUAL REPORT 2001-2002
extracted text
i/OizOto •

ko_z . m‘c-

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

Annual report
2001 - 2002

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department
M.S. Building, Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi
Bangalore - 560 001

SI.No.

SUBJECT

1
9
J—

INTRODUCTION
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
AREA DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES
SPECIAL ECONOMIC PROGRAMMES
RURAL ENERGY PROGRAMMES
RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND
SANITATION
EXTERNALLY AIDED WATER SUPPLY
SCHEMES
ROADS AND BRIDGES
MINOR IRRIGATION
KARNATAKA PANCHAYAT RAJ SYSTEM
KARNATAKA LAND ARMY
CORPORATION LIMITED
ABDUL NAZIR SAB S TATE INS I RITUTE
OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
ANN EXU RES

Page
No.

3
4
5
6
7

8
9
10
11
12

13

■ ■ » III ■ I—Il-i —a — » ■ — ~rrir

Rural Development &. Panchayat Raj

n ri ■ »•a

Annual Report 2001 -2002

1
4
7
16
19
24

32
35
37
38
40
45

46

1

1. INTRODUCTION

Karnataka has 56,682 rural habitations including 27,066 Revenue villages.
According to 2001 census, about 348 lakhs of its people, out of a total population
of 527 lakhs live in these rural habitations. That constitutes about 66% of the
State’s population and about 62 lakhs households who live in the rural areas
depending mainly on agriculture. The distinguishing features of the State’s rural
society arc the following: -

(a) the existence of a large number of scattered habitations;
(b) dependence on agriculture and related activities;
(c) low share in the state domestic product as compared to its
population, which means that it is characterised by low per capita
incomes;
(d) low levels of infrastructure like roads, electricity, housing and
water supply; and
(e) lower rank than the urban areas of the State in terms of human
development parameters like literacy, health services and skill
endowments.
Development of i ural areas in the State would therefore imply improving
the productivity of agriculture and other economic activities in the rural areas,
improving the coverage and quality of infrastructure, and improving the quality of
services, which contribute directly to upgrading the quality of human resources.
The Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj is implementing
number of schemes for improvement of living conditions of the people, to create
economic and political awareness in rural areas.

1. Improvement of Rural Infrastructure
In order to promote improvement in the quality of life in the rural areas it
is necessary to promote the development of infrastructure including rural
communications, housing, water supply and sanitation, watershed development
and minor irrigation.

a) Development of Rural Roads

The total length of rural roads in the State is 1,04,034 Kms. Out of this
2351 1 Kms. is asphalted. Road length with macadam surface considered as all
weather roads is 38,872 Kms.
Improvement of Roads and their maintenance is the responsibility of the
Zilla Panchayats since 1987. The technical supervision was with the Public
Works Departments till the end of 1999. The same has been transferred to Rural

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

937.^.

Annual Report"2001-2002

z
*
r
Development and Panchayat Raj Department from 01.01.2000. Improvement 01
Roads and their maintenance is being doneythrough the district sector Roads &
Bridges schemes, Employment generation .schemes and Pradhan Manthri Gram
Sadak Yojana etc.,
b) Rural Water Supply

The Department has the responsibility of coordinating the provision of
water supply for domestic purposes in over 56,682 rural habitations in the State in
conformity with national norms for rural water supply. For this purpose, the
Department is implementing the State sponsored Rural Water Supply Schemes,
Centrally sponsored Accelerated Rural Water Supply Programme, Sub-Mission
Projects for Rural habitations with water quality problems under the Rajiv Gandhi
National Drinking Water Mission, and Externally Aided Projects in about 1500
villages with the assistance of the World Bank, Danida and Netherlands.

c) Rural Sanitation
Promotion of Rural Sanitation is being carried out by the department
through the state owned programme Nirmala Grama Yojana and the Central Rural
Sanitation Programme (CRSP). Latrines are being provided to primary schools
with water supply facilities. Swachcha Grama Yojana is being implemented with
the assistance of 11UDCO.

d) Minor Irrigation

There are 36,696 small tanks in the state out of which tanks having an
achcut area of 40 hectares and below come under the jurisdiction of Zilla
Panchayats. There are 33,374 such Minor Irrigation Tanks. Rainwater impounded
in these tanks is only a fraction of total quantity. Dcsilting of these tanks is also
taken up to increase the irrigation potential.
2. Poverty Alleviation

The Department is implementing a number of programmes for poverty
alleviation in the rural areas both through assistance for self-employment
activities, and through wage employment oriented works.
Swarna Jayanthi Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) and Swavalambana
programmed are aimed at assisting the rural households who arc below poverty
line through credit, a subsidy, training facilities and other supporting activities to
enable the rural poor to take up remunerative self employment oriented activities.
On the other hand, programmes like Jawahar Gram Samridhi YojanaJGSY and Employment Assurance Scheme (EAS), aim at providing assured wage

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

AnnualRcport

-

employment to the rural poor by engaging them in the creation of economically
productive and socially beneficial assets like roads, school buildings, irrigation
wells, anganawadi buildings, community halls and land development works,
Indira Awaas Yojana aims at both generation of employment and creation of
housing facilities for the rural poor.

In addition to this water and soil conservation and increasing productivity
are being taken up under the watershed development programmes.
3. Rural Energy Programmes

Promotion of sustainable sources of renewable energy to meet the energy
requirements of rural households is another component of the policy of rural
development pursued in the State.
For this purpose, the Department is
implementing an Integrated Rural Energy Programme, which is a centrally
sponsored scheme. The Department also implements a programme for
popularising improved model cook stoves (Chulhas) through its National
Programme for Improved Chulhas. The development of biogas for meeting
domestic energy requirements is being achieved by the Department through the
National Programme for Biogas (NPBD) and the State’s own Anila Yojane.

4. Democratic Decentralization
One of the major responsibilities of the Department is in the realm of
implementing the provisions of the Karnataka Panchayath Raj Act, 1993 to
achieve democratic decentralization in the governance of the State’s rural areas.
The Department coordinates the pioccss of the establishment of Panchayat Raj
Institutions under the above legislation and monitors their functioning in order to
ensure that Panchayat Raj Institutions in the State function as viable and vibrant
institutions of Local Self Government.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Import 2001-2002

*T

2.

ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE

The Department of Rural development and Panchayat Raj is headed by the
Principal Secretary and the Secretary. The Principal Secretary monitors all the
sections and establishment matters except Panchayat Raj and Rural Energy
Programmes. 1'he Secretary deals these programmes.
The Departmental
functions have been classified in to ten divisions headed by Joint Secretary/
Deputy secretary level officers. The Rural Development Engineering department
headed by the Chief Engineer comes within the administrative purview of the
Department. A brief account of the functions of each division is given below.

2.1 Area Development Programme Wing

This is headed by a Deputy Secretary' designated as Director, Area
Development Programme (ADP) and deals with the implementation &
monitoring of employment generation and area development schemes viz.,
Jawahar Grama Samruddhi Yojana, heads this wing, Indira Awaas Yojana,
Employment Assurance Scheme, Drought Prone Areas Development Programme
and Desert Development Programme, Western Ghats Development Programme
and 1WDP and the administrative matters of Karnataka Land Army Corporation.

2.2 Rural Infrastructure Wing
This wing is headed by a Deputy Secretary designated as Director, Rural
Infrastructure (RI) and deals with Rural Water Supply & Sanitation, Roads &
fridges, Minor Irrigation and Building sectors implemented by the Panchayat Raj
Institutions.

2.3 Karnataka Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency Wing
The Additional Secretary' designated as the Director heads this wing. His
task is to Monitor the implementation of Externally Aided Projects of Rural
Water Supply and Sanitation. This wing is registered has a society and named has
Karnataka Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency during 2001-02.

2.4 Self Employment Programmes Wing
This wing is headed by a Deputy Secretary designated as Director, Self
Employment Programmes (SEP) and deals with Swarna Jayanthi Swarozgar
Yojana and Swavalambana programme etc.,

2.5 Rural Energy Programmes Wing
This wing has the responsibility of monitoring National Projects on
Biogas Development, National Programme for Improved Chula and Integrated

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

5
5

Rural Energy Programme. A Deputy Secretary designated as Director, Rural
Energy Programmes (REP), heads this wing.
2.6

Panchayat Raj Wing

This wing is headed by a Deputy Secretary designated as Director,
Panchayat Raj and deals with ail matters relating to Panchayat Raj Institutions
viz Zilla Panchayat, Taluk Panchayat and Grama Panchayat under Karnataka
Panchayat Raj Act 1993.

2.7

Finance Wing

An Internal Financial Adviser (IFA) of the rank of Deputy Secretary heads
this wing. This wing deals with all financial matters including preparation of
budget estimates, release of funds and audit.

2.8

Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Cell

'This wing is headed by an officer of the rank of Deputy Secretary and is
designated as Joint Director (Plan Monitoring and Evaluation). The cell deals
with formulation of plan schemes monitoring and evaluation of Rural
Development Programmes. The wing also undertakes preparation of various
reports and statements as required by a Department. 1 le is also the Chief Editor of
monthly magazine of the department ‘Karnataka Vikasa’ assisted by the Editor.

2.9

Administration Wing

,

This wing is headed by a Deputy Secretary designated as Deputy
Secretary (Administration) and looks after administrative matters of the
Department, general co-ordination and training.

2.10 Rural Development Engineering Department
The Rural Development Engineering Department headed by the Chief
Engineer shoulders the responsibility for the implementation of Rural Water
Supply & Sanitation, Roads & Bridges, Minor Irrigation, Buildings sectors.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

93? -3.

Annual Report 2001-2002

6

The Administrative Chart of the Department
Development Commissioner

Principal Secretary
Secretary
Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department

v

V

Director
ADP „

V

director
Pt

D.S.(Adm)

ctor
7 l(KMS fy Sfl

![■’A

.JD(M&E)

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Director
y

PR

Director
REP

CE
RD ED

Annual Report 2001-2002

7

73. AREA DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES
The Area Development Programmes can be classified into the following
three broad categories:

1 Wage Employment Programmes (Jawahar Grama Samridhi Yojana and
Employment Assurance Scheme-Sampoorna Grameena Rozjar Yojana).

2 I lousing and habitat development programmes (Indira Awaas YojanaConstruction and Upgradation of houses, PMGY-Grameena Awaas
Yojana, Credit cum Subsidy for Rural Housing Scheme and SWASTHI).
3 Watershed Development Programmes (DPAP, DDP, WGDP and
IWDP).
3.1 Jawahar Grama Samridhi Yojana
The allocation under this programme was fixed at Rs.99.90 crores for the
year 2001 -02. The entire allocation is being released to the Grama Panchayats in
accordance with the revised guidelines These funds were utilized for construction
of school buildings, anganawadi buildings and water harvesting structures etc.,
and also construction of houses, latrines and smokeless chulhas for providing
individual benefits for Scheduled Cast and Scheduled Tribes. The Grama
Panchayats were given full powers to formulate and implement the action plans
with the approval of Grama Sabhas.
i'inanciai and Physical Performance

JGSY has been successful in providing employment to the rural poor and
in the creation of durable community assets. 4333 lakh mandays of wage
employment were generated from the inception of this programme in 1989 till
March 2002. The total expenditure during this period was Rs. 1685.49 crores.
During the year 2001-02, an expenditure of Rs.95.12 crores was incurred and
140.79 lakh mandays of employment were generated till the end of March 2002.
Under Sampoorna Grameena Rozgar Yojana 100.1 1 lakh Mi's of foodgrains of
value Rs. 137.49 lakhs allocated to this scheme during the current year and 51.95
lakh MTs of foodgrains of value Rs.32.47 crores has been utilised.

The Einanctal and Physical progress during the last five years is given below:

i ■ uurnj 1111 -ir -irvrvrj

Rural Development &. Panchayat Raj

ar. j=jr-aa.' ja - i

r

Annual Report 2001-2002

8

Fable 3.1
Financial (Rs in Crores) Physical (Lakh mandays)
Target
Achiex ement
Achievement
Target
125.78
1997-98
130.34
265.91
1 998-99
1 12.89
1 10 48
188.77
225 15
1999-00
101.92
93.83
188.82
175.48
2000-01
87.87
94.22
1 13.98
128 94
I- 99.90
95.1 2
140 79
2001-02 (cash)
129.58
137.49
32.47
Foodgrain value
The district-wise details are shown m Annexure - 3.1

3

A

J

1

Year

3.2 Employment Assurance Scheme
Hitherto, a demand driven scheme, the employment assurance scheme has
metamorphosed in to an allocation-based scheme with cllect from 1/4/1999. The
watershed component, which accounted for a major chunk of funds released
under EAS, has been taken out of EAS. According to the revised guidelines of
EAS, watershed activities of longer duration cannot be attempted. 70% of the
allocation is earmarked for the Taluka Panchayats and 30 % is retained at the
district level for taking up works of emergent nature. 15% of the funds should be
provided for maintenance of the assets created under the said programme. Works
taken up under EAS should be completed within a period oftwo years I’lie State
government has given additional instructions to theZilla Panchayats with a view
to streamline the implementation of the scheme and to ensure the optimum
utilization of resources.
These are as follows:


Not less than 25% of the allocation should be spent for Anganawadi and
primary school buildings.

Minimum 25% of the funds should be earmarked for construction of
ground water recharge structures especially around drinking water sources.
All the 175 blocks of the State are covered under the EAS. The scheme
aims to provide wage employment to the rural poor in addition to the creation of
community assets. Under this scheme, at least 100 days of employment per year
is assured to men and women in the age group of I 8 to 60 years.
Financial and Physical Performance

The total allocation for the scheme was 100.21 crores for the year 20012002. An amount of Rs. 101.55 crores was spent by the end of March 2002 and
142.45 lakh mandays of employment was generated. Under Sampoorna
Gramecna Rozgar Yojana 100.00 lakh MTs of foodgrains of value
Rs. 137.80 lakhs allocated to this scheme during the current year

~

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

ri~. - —b

n <eport 2001 -2002

n. m

<7

The financial and physical progress during the last five years is given below:
___________
_______ Tabic 3.2
Physical
Achievement
Allocation Total funds available
Achievement
Year
(Rs. in Crores)

(I^ikli manilays)

1997-98

180.90

166.28

352.76

1998-99

154.77

134.83

292.42

1999-00

103.59

119.54

100.91

185.96

2000-01

66.32

92.98

72.83

103.57

2001-02
(cash)
Foodgrain
value

100.21

123.79

101.55

142,40

137.80

57.25

32.23

_________
The district-wise details arc shown in Anncxurc - 3.2

The Government of India has released a sum of Rs.9.78 crores separately
for the completion of incomplete watershed development works taken up under
EAS during the previous years.

3.3 SAMPOORNA GRAMEENA ROZGAR YOJANA
By converging Jawahar Grama Samrudhi Yojana (JGSY) and
Employment Assurance Scheme (EAS), a new scheme called “Sampoorna
Graineena Rozgar Yojana” has been launched during 2001-02. This scheme is
being launched with the intention of providing additional wage employment and
food security in rural areas and to create durable community based and economic
assets for infrastructure development in rural areas. The SGRY has two
components viz.,
> 50% of funds sharing 75% and 25% by the Central and the State
Governments respectively and
> 50% in terms of foodgrains from the GOI free of cost.

In the first stream out of the 50% of the allocation 20% is allocated to
Zilla Panchayats and 30% is allocated to Taluk Panchayats. In the second stream
50% of the funds arc allocated to Grama Panchayats.
22.5% of the allocation is separately earmarked for taking up works
benefiting Schedule Casts and Schedule Tribes under first stream. 50% of the
funds are allocated for the development of Schedule Casts and Schedule Tribes
colonies.

The programme is under implementation in all the districts. During the
2001-02 JGSY & EAS will continued separately along with SGRY'until March
2002.
.
J

Rural Development &. Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

________

IO

With the introduction of SGRY, the total current allocation under EAS has
raised from 6947.48 lakhs to 10,020.93 lakhs and one lakh tons of free
foodgrains. The current allocation under JGSY has raised from 8835.94 lakhs to
RS.9989.55 lakhs and one lakh tons of free foodgrains. With the advent of this
scheme in the Stale, the Stale has benefited Rs.4227.06 lakhs in cash and 2.00
lakhs tons of foodgrains in kind as an additionality. Out of this the State
Government has to provide Rs. 1068.76 lakhs as its share of 25% cash and
Rs.900.00 lakhs towards transportation of foodgrains.
3.4 Indira Awaas Yojana

Indira Awaas Yojana is a programme aimed at improving the housing
shortage in rural areas and has been under implementation since 1985, though it is
being implemented as an independent programme only from January 1996. The
beneficiaries under 1AY arc selected for assistance by the Grama Sabhas. The
Taluk Panchayats implement the programme under the overall supervision of the
Zilla Panchayat.

The State Government has fixed a uniform unit cost of Rs.20,000 per
house in the State on par with the unit cost fixed for the State Schemes of Ashraya
and Ambcdkar.Gcncrally the houses are to be constructed by beneficiaries
themselves. The houses arc allotted either to the women or jointly in the names of
both husband and wife.
a. Construction and Upgradation of Houses
The Government of India has divided the construction of houses under
Indira Awaas Yojana into two parts from 1/4/1999. 80% of the allocation of IAY
is used for construction of new houses while 20% is used for the upgradation of
houses.
Financial and Physical Performance

The total allocation for construction of new houses was Rs.65.08 crores
for the year 2001-02. 32,539 houses were targeted to be constructed. As against
the target, Rs.58.88 crores have been spent and 29,096 houses were built. Thus,
the expenditure has been 90% of the allocation for the year. 3,04,658 houses
were built up to end of March 2002 since the inception of this scheme utilizing an
amount of Rs.568.10 crores for the purpose. An allocation of Rs. 1626.90 lakhs
has been earmarked for the upgradation of 16266 kutcha houses to pucca houses.
As against this target, 14,728 houses were upgraded till the end of March 2002 at
an expenditure of Rs. 13.73 crores.
The financial and physical progress under Construction of houses during the last
five years is given below:

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

Year

1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02

Table 3.3a
Achievement

Achievement
Physical
Financial
Target
Target
(1 louses)
(Rs.in Crores)
43522
37652
92.06
75.31
37369
39506
79.41
79.01
36626
31456
75.02
62.91
27785
31456
57.71
62.91
29096
32539
58.88
65.08
The district-wise details arc shown in Anncxurc- 3.3a

The financial and physical progress under Upgradation of houses during the last
three years is given below:
Table 3.3b
Achievement
Physical
Achievement
Year
Financial
Target
Target (Rs.
(Houses)
in Crores)
4996
15728
5.88
1999-00
15.73
14890
15728
15.07
2000-01
15.73
14728
16266
13.73
16.27
2001-02
The district-wise details are shown in Annexure -3.3b

b. Credit cum Subsidy for Rural Housing Scheme

This scheme has been introduced from 1999-2000. The target group
under the Scheme arc the rural households having an annual income up to
Rs.32,000. A maximum loan of Rs.40,000 can be availed from any of the
scheduled commercial banks and Regional rural banks. The selected households
arc eligible for a subsidy amounting to 25% of the loan sanctioned. The maximum
subsidy that can be availed is Rs. 10,000. Government of India and Government of
Karnataka share the subsidy amount in the ratio of 75:25. Rajiv Gandhi Rural
Housing Corporation is the implementing agency.
An allocation of Rs. 1.88 crores has been earmarked for the construction of
1883 houses during 2001-02. 1216 houses were built up to end of March 2002
utilizing an amount of Rs.0.75 crores for the purpose.

3.5 Pradhana Mantri Graunodhaya Yojana- Gramina Awaas Yojana
Gramecna Awaas Yojana is one of the five components of Pradhana
Mantri Gramodhaya Yojana along with Primary Health, Primary Education,
Rural Drinking Water and Nutrition. This scheme was launched during 2000-01
in Karnataka State with an allocation of Rs. 1126.95 lakhs for providing shelter to
the poor in the rural areas. An expenditure of Rs.589.51 likhs has been incurred
up to 31.03.2002. The object of the scheme is to reduce the shortage of houses
especially lor BPL families in the rural areas and also to facilitate a healthy

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

1/2

development of the habitats in these areas.23S1 houses have been constructed and
upgradation during 2001-02 as against the target of 6084 and the rest under
various stages of the constructions.
An allocation of Rs. 1500.00 lakhs is earmarked for the year 2001-02 of
which Rs.750.00 lakhs is released to the slate as 1st installment of funds.

3.6 Watershed Development Programmes
The Watershed Development Programmes like DDP, DPAP and
Integrated Wasteland Development Programme (IWDP) are implemented by the
Zilla Panchayats through Watershed associations. A Project Implementing
Agency, which may be a Government Department or NGO, is assigned about 10
micro-watersheds, each micro watershed covering about 500 hectares. The PIA
forms a watershed development team that interacts with the watershed association
and provides technical assistance to the watershed association in the planning and
implementation of the watershed programme. The residents, of the area covered
by the watersheds, are also organized into self-help groups and user groups.

This approach, which was initiated in 1995 was in marked contrast to the
earlier approach wherein the watershed development programmes were
implemented by the line departments without the involvement of the community,
Soil erosion, dc-forcstation and land degradation reduce the productivity of the
soil and have an impact on the rainfall pattern. The ground water table also comes
down leading to shortage of drinking water. These problems concern and affect
the community and therefore, involvement of the community in planning and
implementation of the watershed development programmes is the key to the
success of the programme. The process of creation of awareness among the
community has taken some time and therefore the performance in watershed
development programmes has been affected to some extent during the initial
years. The GO1 has issued revised watershed guidelines with effect from 1.1.2000
onwards.
1 .A cost norm has been enhanced from Rs.4000 to 6000 per hectare.
2.
The
implementation of Watershed duration has been extended to five
Years.
3.Criteria for selection of Watersheds primary remain predominance of
non-forest lands, to forestlands forming part of such Watershed may
also be treated simultaneously.
4.Funding pattern has been changed.
5.Stress has been given to monitoring and review of programme.
a)

Drought Prone Areas Programme

This programme is implemented in 81 blocks of 15 Revenue districts (list
of districts given in Annexure 3.4). 406 watersheds have been taken up for

... '
Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001 -2002
1

I

development under this programme in the first phase. The allocation lor the
programme is shared in the ratio of 75:25 between the Centre and State. During
1999-2000, 313 watersheds, 2000-01, 201 watersheds and 2001-02, 245 new
watersheds have been sanctioned.
Financial Performance
Rs.24.47 crores was spent by the end of March 2002. An expenditure of
R.s.308.09 crores has been inclined up to March 2002 since the inception of the
programme.

1 he details of the progress during the last five years are given below:
Table 3.4
(Rs.in crores)
Achievement
Year
Target
1997-98
22.65
16.30
17.48
22.65
1998-99
15.72
19.64
1999-2000
14.50
15.01
2000-2001
24.47
26.46
2001-02
The district-wise details arc shown in Annexure - 3.5

b) Desert Development Programme

The DDP is implemented in 22 blocks of 6 districts (list furnished in
Annexure 3.6). The allocation is shared in the ratio of 75:25 between the Centre
and the State. 51 and 226 watersheds have been sanctioned during 1999-2000 and
2000-01 respectively. 160 new watersheds have been sanctioned during 2001-02
by the GDI.

Financial Performance
During 2001-02 an expenditure of Rs 1 1.26 crores was spent by the end of
March 2002. The details of the progress during the last five years are given
below:
Table 3.5
(Rs.in Crores)
Year
Achievement
Target
7.32
6.25
1997-98
1998-99
12.95
7.1 I
1999-00
9.17
4.77
2000-01
7.89
3.67
2001-02
12.18
11.26
The district-wise details are shown in Annexure - 3.7

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

■s ■

Annual Report 2001-2002

►-4

c) Western Ghats Development Programme
i

Western Ghats Development Programme is implemented in 40 taluks of
11 districts in the State (list of districts given in Annexure 3.8). The main
objective of the Western Ghats Development Programme is the development of
the Western Ghats region in harmony with the environment and the conservation
of its fragile eco-system. Till 1998-99, the WGDP programme has not been
implemented on a watershed basis. Lack of such an approach affected balanced
and co-ordinate development of Western Ghat Region, necessitating a shift to the
watershed approach. This programme is now being implemented on an integrated
watershed approach to improve the management of land and water involving
various departments like agriculture, horticulture, animal husbandry, forest,
fisheries, minor irrigation, engineering, sericulture and industries. The monitoring
and supervision of the programme is done by the Ziila Panchayats.
Financial Performance

The allocation for the year 2001- 2 is Rs. 16.79 crores, out of which the
expenditure at the end of March 2002 was Rs 15.15 crores. During 2001-02, two
new special projects have been sanctioned namely 1) Special project for Joida
taluk and Pilot project for H.D.Kote taluk of Mysore district, both at a total cost
of Rs.41.13 lakhsand Rs.81.35 lakhs respectively.

The details of progress under WGDP for the last 5 years is given below:
Table 3.6

Year

Tai gel

(Rs.in crores)
Achievement

1997-98
11.22
10.07
12.78
1998-99
14.48
1999-2000
16.84
15.68
16.69
2000-2001
13.80
15.15
2001-02
16.79
The district-wise details are shown in Annexure - 3.9

d) Integrated Wasteland Development Programme

The Integrated Wasteland Development Programme is in operation since
1989-90. It aims at checking land degradation, putting wastelands to sustainable
use and increasing the biomass availability, specially fuel, wood and fodder. It
also aims at rural employment besides enhancing people's participation in
Wasteland Development Programmes at all stages.
During 2001-02, ten new projects were sanctioned. Namely
1. Mandya-Agalaya and Nagaragalta watershed of K.R.Pcl taluk
Rural Development & Panchayal Raj

AnnuaTReport 2001 -2002

15
2

3
4
5
6
7
8

i

Mysore-Kapila Watershed of Nanjangud taluk
Chitraduiga- Vcdavathi Watershed of Hiriyur taluk
Haveri- Lakmapura Watershed ofHanagal taluk
Hassan- Sakaleshpur & Alurtalulks
Shomoga- IWDP-i- Begurhaila Watershed, Shikaripura taluk
Raichui -I WDP-2-Badihalla Watershed
Davangere-2 projects- Channagiri taluk and Honnali taluk
Kolar-I WDP-3-Vedaiveni Watershed of Gowribidanur taluk

Financial S’erfos'inance
During 2001-02 an expenditure of Rs 7.55 crores was spent by the end of
March 2002.

3.7 Swasthi Grama Yojana
Swasthi Grama Yojana, which was a new programme introduced during
the year 1997-98, continued in 2001-02. The programme aims to develop model
villages with the help of Corporate/donors. The State Government contributes
50% of the project cost while the donor is expected to contribute 40% of the
project cost. The remaining 10% would be the contribution from the community.
There is no separate allocation for the SWASTHI programme. The Zilla
Panchayals are expected to pool funds from various schemes for activities
identified by the community.
30 villages of 16 districts have been identified as 'Swasthi Gramas’.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

10

IG

4. SPECIAL ECONOMIC PROGRAMMES
The Special Economic Programmes aim to alleviate rural poverty by
creating self-employment opportunities for the rural poor. A lot of stress is also
laid on the creation of self-employment opportunities for women through these
programmes.

4.1

Swarna Jayanlhi Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY)

Despite efforts made over the past few' decades, rural poverty in India
continues to be significant. To redress the situation, Govt, of India has launched a
new programme called Swarna Jayanlhi Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) by
merging several self-employment programmes like IRDP, DWCRA, TRYSEM,
S1TRA, Ganga Kalyana Yojane and Million Wells Scheme from 1.4.99. SGSY is
a holistic programme covering all aspects of self-employment like organisation of
the poor into self-help groups, Training, Credit, Technology, Infrastructure, and
Marketing.

The Centre and State fund SGSY in the ratio of 75:25.
objective under SGSY.

Quality is the

It aims to bring assisted poor families above the poverty line in 3 years
and targeted aim is to cover 30% of the poor in each block in the next five years
through an efficient programme. The aim is to ensure that the beneficiary
families are assured of a monthly net income of at least Rs. 2000.
The emphasis under SGSY is on cluster approach. Four to five key
activities have to be identified and these activities are to be selected with the
approval of Taluk Panchayat at Taluk Level and by Zilla Panchayat at District
Level. 75% of the allocation should be allotted to cluster activities. The banks
and other financial institutions will be closely associated and involved in
preparing project reports for each key activity so as to avoid delays in sanctioning
loans and to ensure adequacy of financing.

SGSY will seek to promote multiple credit rather than one time credit
injection.
Training will be imparted to the selected swarozgarics about the
programme and also in marketing strategies through well-designed training
courses before providing assistance.
Subsidy will be uniform at 30% of the project cost to a maximum of Rs.
7500, for SC/ST 50% of the project cost subject to maximum of Rs. 10,000. For
group swarozgarics, the subsidy would be at least 50% of the project cost with a
ceiling of Rs. 1.25 lakhs. There is no monetary limit for irrigation projects. At
least 50% of the swarozgarics should be SC/ST, 40% should be women and 3% is
set apart for the disabled.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-20oT"

r^f-

15% of the funds under SGSY will be set apart at the National level for
projects having a far reaching significance and which can also act as indicators of
possible alternative strategics to be taken up in conjunction with other
Departments of Semi-Government or International Organisations. This would
include initiatives to be taken in individual Districts or across Districts.

Training / Workshops have been conducted to sensitise all levels of
officers and officials.

Rs.5147.38 lakhs have been spent under SGSY as against the target of
Rs.3089.34 lakhs during the year 2001-02. The Local NGOs are actively
involved in the formation of the Self-Help Groups. The total number of Self Help
Groups formed (SHGs) during the year 2001-02 is 5592 of which 4603 SHGs are
provided with revolving fund. The total Swarozgaries assisted are 42944 of
which individual swarozgaries are 13092 and 29852 Swarozgaries are from 2289
SHGs utilising subsidy of Rs.361 1.50 lakhs. Number of Swarozgaries trained is
134968. The Project reports have been prepared by appointing the Technical
Consultants, Economists from the Universities and the line departments. The Key
activities identified in the state are Dairy, Sheep rearing, Readymade Garments,
Agro food processing, Flower cultivation, Agarbathi, Sericulture, Carpentry,
Handicrafts, Leather products, Bamboo products, Weaving, Brick manufacturing
etc. The leading institutions like University of Agricultural Science, RUDSETI's,
KJEONICS and ATDC will also be strengthened under Infrastructure and utilised
for training the Swarozgaries.
Progress achieved under-Swarna Jayanthi Gram Swarozgar Yojana is given
below.

Year

1999-00
2000-01
2001-02

Financial (Rs.in lakhs)
Target
Achieve %
-merit

Physical
No. of Swarozgaries
assisted
Target
Ach
Target
Ach
%
6262.20 3969.52
63
2256
6534
33275
19004
57
4706.77 4212.40
89
1695
5771
25025 26942
108
3089.34 5147.38
167
1112
5592
16420 42944 262
District wise information is given in Anncxure-4.1.

Groups formed

4.2 Swavalambana
Government of Karnataka with the main intention of providing selfemployment opportunities to educated young men from rural areas launched
"Swavalainbana" during 1996-97. The objective is to be achieved by providing
definite syllabus oriented, skill development training through reputed Institutions,
followed by financial assistance from Banking Institutions for setting up self
employment units. Training under Swavalambana covers both skill development
and managerial aspects of the activity concerned. The scheme also provides for

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

43? .6 .

Annual Report 2001-2002

18

18
personality development to cover aspects like self assessment, positive thinking,
awareness on healthy living habits, developing confidence, improving intellectual
ability, awareness of social and moral issues and responsibility towards
community and society.
Swavalainbana involves co-opcration of several
Government Departments, Training Institutions, Credit Agencies and non
Government Organisations.
Main features of the scheme arc:

1.

Trainees arc to be of the age group of 18-35 years.

2. Minimum qualification insisted is SSLC.
3. Aller successful completion of training, the trained candidates are to be
given assistance from financial institutions for setting up self-employment
units. Financial assistance is to include a portion of subsidy also, duration
of the training depending on the trade and is normally for a period of two
to six months. 50% of the trainees have to belong to the BPL families and
the remaining 50% should be from families with a total annual income of
less than Rs. 24,000. Priority is to be given to SC/ST and women.

4. Project Director exclusively appointed under the scheme is to ensure that
the trainees get proper advice on availing of loan and setting up of selfemployment units. Follow up visits are also planned.
During 2001-02 it was proposed to extend the scheme in other districts of
the state. During the current year the progress is nil.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001 -2002

f<7

5. RURAL ENERGY PROGRAMMES

Abundantly available, perennial and environmentally sound, renewable
energy available, they oiler an equitable distribution of resources, being a tropical
country, India is blessed with bountiful resources of significant potential from
solar, biogas and biomass sources. Karnataka is implementing three Rural
Energy Programmes namely,
1 National Project on Biogas Development (NPBD)
2. Integrated Rural Energy Programme (IREP),
3. National Programme on Improved Chulhas (NP1C)
5.1. National Project on Biogas Development (NPBD)

Biogas is a clean, non-polluting, smoke and soot-free fuel, containing
inflammable methane gas. It is produced from cattle dung, human waste and
other organic matter in a biogas plant, through a process called “anaerobic
digestion”. The Indian biogas system mainly comprises of collection and
processing of cattle dung, production and delivery of biogas and handling &
application of digested slurry in agricultural fields.
The Government of India have initiated this scheme as one among the
component of 20-point programme. The scheme is in operation with effect from
1982-83 onwards.
Recognising the significance and the numerous benefits of this scheme,
the State Government introduced the State Biogas Scheme in 1992-93 called
“Anila Yojane”. Under this scheme, the State Government has popularised by
extending additional financial aid for setting up biogas plants, which is in addition
to the subsidy provided by the Central Government.

Objectives of NPBD
a
H
D
"


D
n

To provide easy and safe cooking gas for the rural families.
To prevent pollution and forest degradation.
To protect the health of women and children by creating a
Smoke-free kitchen.
To help rural women devote this saving in time to more
Productive pursuits
To utilise the manure procured from the biogas plant for agricultural
purposes.
To create additional employment by setting up of biogas plants.
In the ultimate analysis, to create a clean, healthy and enterprising village.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

Progress under National Project on Biogas Development during last five years is
given below:
Tables. I

Year

1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02

Physical (Nos.)

Financial (Rs. in lakhs)

Achievement
Target
%
Target
Achievement
1030.53
104
994.00
25000
20005
754.00
946.13
125
14500
20642
740.00
1297.21
175
21000
23282
679.00
229
1556.06
30000
29250
1639.14
1575.00
104
33000
30403
District wise information is given in Annexure-5.1.

%
80
142
11 1
98
92

During the year 2001-02 a sum of Rs.915.00 lakhs from the Central sector
and Rs.700 lakhs from the State sector have been provided against the target of
100 biogas plants including 3000 biogas plants to KV1C 30403 biogas plants
have been constructed utilising Rs. 1639.14 lakhs up to the end ofMarch 2002,.

5.2 In’..6rated Rural Energy Programme (IREP)

Renewable solar energy is recognised by people as being in harmony with
their cultural traditions, because of its peaceful and environment-friendly nature.
By reuniting science and culture, and by making effective use of what might be
termed as “the culture tools of technology" sustainable solar energy seems poised
to become the principal energy source of the future.
This is a Centrally Sponsored Scheme and the Central Government
extends financial assistance towards administrative expenses, training and
extension.

As part of the programme, usage of solar energy devices like waler
heaters, cookers, street lighting systems, lanterns and water lifting pumps are
propagated. Windmills are encouraged wherever suitable sites arc available.
Improved kerosene stoves and pressure cookers are popularised among the
rural women. The State Government does this expenditure. The main
objectives of this programme that is spread over 48 taluks of Karnataka arc:

Objectives


Impetus to development and usage of nonrconventional sources of energy.

• Scientific and efficient method of using fuel wood and adaptation of proper
implements.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

° To create an awareness among the end users about the various fuel saving
devices and to popularise such devices.
° Conservation of traditional sources of energy and prevention of ecological
destruction particularly in forests.
° To provide loan facilities and subsidy towards purchase of fuel saving devices
and also implements that use non-conventional sources of energy.

1'his programme is implemented by Zilla Panchayats and Taluk
Panchayats. Each selected I REP Block Office is headed by a Project Officer,
with technical staff'to assist him.

The Physical and Financial Progress under the Scheme during the last
five years is given below:
Table 5.2

Year
1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02

Financial (Rs.in lakhs)
Physical (Nos.)
T arget
Achievement %
Target Achievement %
390.50
360.57 92
25563
17907
70
384.30
314.61
82
26315
14275
54
486.10
419.66
86
22816
10450
46
422.60
334.01
79
7365
4841
66
397.60
413.69 104
5381
5776
107
District wise information is given in Annexurc-5.2.

5.3 National Programme for Improved Chulhas (NPIC)
Indigenously developed improved chulhas, having a higher thermal
efficiency of 20-30% compared to 6-8% in traditional ones, have potential to
conserve firewood, thereby saving forests. Besides, these chulhas eliminate
indoor air pollution, resulting in improving the health of women and girl children.
Thus, an improved Chula is a boon to rural women, as it saves about 300 kg of
fuel wood equivalent per year, besides reducing drudgery.

The National Programme on Improved Chulhas has been in operation in
Karnataka since 1983-84. Under this scheme, the beneficiaries arc provided
training for the construction of improved stoves and arc also extended subsidy to
the various organisations by the Government of India for the materials of
construction. I he State Government is also extending additional financial support
from 1993-94 and implementing this scheme successfully with the following
objectives.
Financial Assistance available under NP1C Programme from 01.10.2000
having a durability of Five years following is the subsidy pattern.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

Model of Chulha

Fixed type with chimney
Portable Model only for SC/ST

Subsidy (Rs.)
State
23.00
23.00

Central
80.00
50.00

Total
103.00
73.00

Objectives of N PIC

> Construction of indigenously developed improved chulhas having a higher
thermal efficiency of 20-30% instead of 6-8% in traditional once.
> Checking deforestation and environmental pollution
> To protect health of women and children by providing clean and smokeless
kitchen.
> Removal problems of women in collecting firewood so that they can utilise
the time of productive works.
> Employment opportunity to the rural poor.

Table 5.3
Physical (Nos.)

Financial (Rs. in lakhs)

Year

Target

Achieve
merit

%

Target

Achievement

1997-98
1998-99

80.00
80.00

65.97
51.00

82
64

88953
52668

101
132

1999-00

49.24

30.10

61

88000
40000
80000

69707

87

2000-01

135.00

38.18

28

60000

62935

105

2001-02

134.50

91.43

68

65000

65211

100

%

District wise information is given in Annexurc-5.3.
5.4
Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Rural Energy and development,
Bangalore.
The planning commission has emphasized the need for developing
organizational and institutional mechanisms to achieve qualitively better
implementation of the IREP programme. The Planning commission has also set
up a National Institute for IREP at Delhi. It has also proposed to set up four
regional institutes for Integrated Rural Energy Planning in different parts of the
country. There arc:
[1] Lucknow {UP}
[2] Bangalore {Karnataka,
[3J Baroda {Gujarat}
[4] Shillong {Megalaya}

M

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

i

■■ -n—r.-.— ~—- — ■—■——1------------------------

Annual Report 2001-2002

z23

The Regional Institute are being set up in collaboration with the State
Governments where these institutes are to be located. The Regional Institute for
Southern region is being set up at Bangalore with the following objectives.

I .To conduct Orientation and training programmes for villagers, NGO’s and
officials from Karnataka and other stale/ U.T.’s, in the Southern region for
1REP programme, along with the Rural Development & Panchayat Raj
activities.
2.To undertake applied research in the field of rural energy.
3.To conduct survey to generate data base on rural energy demand and supply
for different regions and sub regions.
4.To establish facilities for documentation and dissemination of information
in the area of rural energy.
5.To earn,' out demonstrations and field extension activities in the area of rural
energy.
6.To provide consultancy services and generate funds to become a selfsustaining institute.

The Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Rural Energy and Development,
Bangalore is spread is an area of 20 Acres at Jakkur, Bangalore has stated its
activities from 1999-2000. During the year 2001-02, 52 No. of training
programmes arc conducted for Adhyakshas & Secretaries of Gram Panchayats,
Junior Engineers of I REP Blocks, and the Officers from Zilla Panchayats and
Taluk Panchayats covering a total of 2026 people.
The details conducted Training Programmes conducted during 2001-02.
Caption
of
the Nature
of No.of
No.of
SI.
Trainees
Participants
Trainings
No. Programme
conducted attended
One day formal training Deputy Secretary 01
1
05
in 1REP Programmes for of Zilla Panchayat
District and Block level and
Executive
Officers at Taluk
Officers.
Training Programme on Junior Engineers of 01
27
2
Renewable Energy for 1REP Blocks
Rural application
Training Programme for Deputy Secretary 02
61
3
District and Taluk level of Zilla Panchayat
implementing Officers on and
Executive
Rural Energy for Rural Officers at Taluk.
application
Training Programme on Gram Panchayat, 48
4
1933
Renewable Energy for Swachcha
Gram
Rural
Application- Panchayat
Village
level
field presidents
and
Secretaries.
functionaries.
2026
52
Total

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

van*

6. RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION

Availability of sale drinking water in sufficient quantity to rural areas is
given utmost importance in order to improve the LIVING STANDARDS of the
rural masses. Potable drinking water is supplied to rural areas through three types
of programmes. They are:
1.
2.
3.

Borcwclls with hand pumps
Mini Water Supply Schemes
Piped Water Supply Schemes

The Rural Water Supply Programme is implemented through Ziila
Panchayat Engineering Divisions. Priority is given to identify problematic
villages. The type of Water Supply Scheme to be taken up is decided on the basis
of the total population of the village/ habitation. Villages/ habitations with a
population of 1000 and above arc provided with one Piped Water Supply
Schemes. Villages/ Habitations with a population between 500 to 1000 arc
provided with one Mini Water Supply Schemes. The other villages/ habitations
with less than 500 population are provided with borewells fitted with hand
pumps. 1 he above criteria arc relaxed in deserving cases where villages/
habitations lie in hard-core areas and having problems of high fluoride content
and other problems.
The Rural population of the State spread over 27,066 main revenue
villages with 29,616 hamlets, tandas, Janatha Housing Colonies etc., The total
number of habitations 56,682.
The details of habitations having different service levels and nature of
sources at the end of March 2002 are as follows:

Service levels of water
0 LPCD
1-10 LPCD
11-55 LPCD
Above 55 LPCD
Total

No. of habitations
0
71 1
19784
36187
56682

Sources available for drinking water as at the end of March 2002 are as
follows:
1,75,645
Borcwclls with Hand pumps
18,148
Mini Water Supply Schemes
15,035
Piped Water Supply Schemes
2,69,098
Total

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

25

-

6.1

Eore wells With Hand Pifinps

Bore wells filled with hand pumps are the major source of potable drinking
water in rural areas. Since the inception of the programme to the end of March
2002 more than 1.76 lakh bore wells with hand pumps have been provided in the
Stale. During 2001-02 it was programmed to install 5703 bore wells with hand
pumps at a cost of Rs. 2680.44 lakhs under all sectors. To the end of March 2002
no. of borewclls 3920 have been installed at a cost of Rs. 1248.66 lakhs have been
installed The financial and physical progress achieved during the last five years
•is shown below:
Table 6.1
Y ear

Physical (Nos.)

Financial (Rs.in lakhs)

Target
Achievement
Achievement
Target
6684
6922
3183.27
1997-98
3598.45
7052
5611
2540.38
1998-99
3202.89
7086
4373
2832.53
1840.40
1999-2000
2824
5785
1400.12
2622.23
2000-2001
5703
3920
2680.44
1248.66
2001-02
Districtwise details arc given in Annexure 6.1.

6.2 Mini Waler Supply Scheme
In this scheme, waler is pumped to a small tank (cistern) fitted with 3-4 taps, from
where water can be collected by households. Since the inception of this
programme to the end of March 2002, 18418 Mini Water Supply Schemes have
been completed and commissioned. During 2001-2002 it was programmed to
take up 920 Mini Water Supply Schemes both under State and Central Sectors at
a cost of Rs.3737.461akhs. 1'he achievement till the end of March 2002 is 1396
units at a cost of Rs. 3289.51 lakhs. Statement showing the financial and physical
targets and achievements during the last five years is given in table below:
Table 6.2
Financial (Rs.in lakhs)

Year

Target

Physical (Nos.)

Achievement Target

Achievement

1997-98
3611.66
1684
3307.38
1586
1998-99
361 1.84
3601.87
1190
1351
3933.07
1999-00
3492.20
1 164
1569
3547.99
3174.96
1220
2000-01
1016
2001-02
3737.46
3289.51
920
1396
District wise details have been given in Annexure 6.2

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

^8

AnnualReport 2001-2002

6.3 Piped Waler Supply Scheme
Under this programme, since inception to the end of March 2002, 15035
schemes were completed and commissioned both under State and Central Sectors.
During 2001-02 it has been programmed to commission 782 Piped Water Supply
Schemes at a cost of Rs.6393.19 lakhs. So far 940 Piped Water Supply schemes
have been completed and commissioned to the end of March 2002 at a cost of
Rs.5317.34 lakhs.

Statement showing the Financial and physical target and achievements for
the last five years is given in Table below:
I able 6.3

Year

Financial (Rs.in lakhs)

Physical (Nos.)

Target
Ac1' ievement
'la: get
Achievement
1997-98
6354.94
( '.37.86
912
1 101
1998-99
5759.42
5487.44
940
904
5915.50
1999-00
6465.69
986
827
2000-01
5953.19
4534.00
721
665
6393.19
2001-02
5317.34
782
940
.District wise details have been given in Anncxurc 6.3

6.4 Nirniala Grama Yojana
It is essentially required for the people/ community to provide minimum
needs for Social and Economic Development by providing good sanitation. In
addition to this, providing good sanitation will avoid, to a larger extent, spreading
of diseases through water sources and other human communicable diseases. To
expedite this programme, Government of Karnataka has started a big movement
in the name of “N1RMALA GRAMA YOJANA” on 2nd October 1995 with the
co-operation of Non Governmental Organisations and Panchayat Raj Institutions.

This programme will be implemented through Grama Panchayats by the
implementing committee comprising of Grama Panchayat members, headmasters,
nominated teachers of near by primary and high schools, health workers, and
Anganwadi workers. In the budget a provision of 10% has been earmarked for
I.E.C. activities Rs. 25/- will be paid to the stimulating person after completion of
each unit. Two masons in each Grama Panchayat plays the main roll in choosing
a beneficiary. The funds will only be available whether the family is below the
poverty line or not. For the construction of every individual latrine unit 80% of
the amount or Rs.2000/-(Rs. 1000 from State and Rs. 1000 from Central) per unit
will be given to the family belongs to below poverty line and Rs. 1200/- will be
given to families beyond poverty line.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

Rural sanitation scheme is most probably the highest creosotic Rural
sanitation programme in the Nation, 9.10 lakh sanitary latrines have been
constructed since 1995-96 upto the end ol" March 2002.
The progress during the last five years is given below:

Year

1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02

______________ fable 6.6
f inancial (Rs.in lakhs)

Physical (Nos.)

Achievement
Achievement
Target
Tai get
149056
2026.57
278005
4431 53
155148
3660.00
2298.59
225824
127637
2884.00
1942.00
154500
2643.59
94104
1622.95
142139
83639
88330
1562.20
1 194.75
District wise details have been given in Annexure 6.4

6.5 Swachcha Grama Yojana
The Government of Karnataka lias launched an innovative scheme called
“Swachcha Grama” for over all improvement of villages by adopting an Integral
Strategy consisting of 5 important elements covering 1300 villages in the state at
an estimated cost of Rs.260.00 crores. Vide Government Order No.
RD!’/146/1/2000 Bangalore dated 20lh October 2000 and it is decided on
18.3.2002.

Swachcha Grama Yojana have the following 5 components with the average cost
of different item of works per village arc as below:
(Rs. In lakhs)
SI.No.
Item of Works
Amount proposed
1
Paving of internal roads and streets of the village
10.00
construction of efficient sullage and storm water
drainage
2
Provision of community compost yards and
1.25
removal of manure pits from the dwelling areas
of the village
3
Provision of smokeless Chulhas for all the house
0.75
holds
4
Construction of household
Latrines and
6.00
community latrines to cover the entire rural
population.
5
Construction of toilets in school
2.00
Total
20.00

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

The KLAC has been appointed as the Nodal Agencv for the
implementation of “Swachcha Grama" Yojana in 1000 villages with an estimated
cost of Rs.200 crores vide G.O.No.RDP/146/RS\V( I 12000 dated:25.10.2000 and
additional 300 villages on 18.3.2002.
It is proposed to meet the capital cost for 1300 villages in the State are as below:
(Rs.in croresj
Funds
Balance
to
Funds
Proposal
of
Capital
cost
Sl.No.
released I
Released
be
Capital cost
to District ,
released

1
2
3

Loan from
HUDCO
State Govt.share
Community
contribution
Total

208.00(80%)

60.00

148.00

60.00

26.00(10%)
26.00(10%)

10.00
12.18

16.00
,3.82

10.00
12.18

260.00

S2.1S

1-7.82 _

82.13

The detailed guidelines have been given by the Government on
27.12.2002 regarding implementation of the Swachcha Grama Yojana. 1295
villages have contributed Rs. 1.00 lakh and constituted the Swachcha grama
committees. This committee will select the works to be taken up in the village and
will fix up the agency for implementing of scheme and will oversee the workmen
ship, thereby the quality of work improves. A separate account has been opened
in the respective banks to implement the scheme As the estimates have been
prepared on the basis of actual cost, the cost of the works have reduced

Implementation of Swachcha Grama Yojana:
Already the government have selected 1296 villages in 27 districts. Out of
it 1295 villages have been constituted the Swachcha grama committees as per
Pancha Sootra and prepared the estimates Rs. 1 00 lakh per village have been
collected from the 1291 villagers as contribution. The administrative approval has
been accorded fori 008 villages by the Zilla Panchayats. Out of 1295 villages, it
has been decided to allot 413 villages for KLAC, 785 for Zilla Panchayat
Engineering Divisions and 97 for Nirmiti Kendras to implement the work. The
work of 640 villages arc in full swing with an expenditure of 36.50 crores. The
balance. 655 village's works are being started shortly.

In Swachcha Grama works have become a first and out standing unique
scheme in the nation. The scheme is being implemented successfully by people’s
participation. The government has put all the efforts for implementation of the
work for over the development of 1300 villages and has become a ambitious
scheme.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001 -2002

District wise details are given below:
Table 6.5
No.of villages as
Sl.No. Name of district
approved

1

3

7
_________________ r________________

No.of
works
started
4

Exp.in lakhs

5

BANGALORE ZONE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27

Bangalore (U)
Bangalore®
Chitradurga
Davangere
Kolar
Shimoga
Tunikur
Sub Total
MYSORE ZONE
Mysore
\
Chamarajnagar
Chikkainagalur
Dhakshina Kannada
Hassan
Kodagu
Mandya
Udupi
Sub Total
BELGAUM ZONE

Belagum
Bagalkot
Bijapur
Dharwad
Gadag
I laveri
Uttara Kannada
Sub Total
GULBARGAZONE
Raichur
Bellary
Bidar
Gulbarga
Yadgir
Koppal
Sub Total
GRAND TOTAL

m-r-I-r-n-.-r.-.-.—i

-rw ■■ -

2
0
28
39
7
28
22
126

14.00
0.00
38.00
250.00
20.00
400.00
185.00
907.00

53
23
40
39
56
18
60
38
327

0
22
11
14
35
0
1
24
107

0.00
51.00
21.00
0.00
124.00
0.00
1.00
46.00
243.00

126
34
82
21
32
50
79
424

16
27
39
11
32
50
40
215

85.00
2.00
74.00
90.00
178.00
314.00
450.00
1193.00

41
59
30
27
49
32
238
1296

41
59
12
28
20
32
192
640

84.00
572.00
60.00
210.00
81.00
300.00
1307.00
3650.00

y-,-—.r

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

■ <? •

20
87
35
51
49
28
37
307

Annual Report 2001-2002

so

6.6 Water Technology iusssien

Karnataka Government has formulated the Water Technology Mission for
drinking water supply and sanitation for rural and urban habitants . 1 ion’bie Chief
Minister is 'die president for tire highest committee of this mission. Other than this
empowered committee at the state level and mission committees for rural waler
supply and Human recourses Development Programmes are constituted at the
district level.
6.7 Sub-M:ssien Projects

Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission has sub-mission approach
for tackling the problem of excess fluoride, excess brackishness, excess iron and
other chemicals in drinking waler. The states are provided with Central grants to
the extent of 75% of the cost of the project and the remaining 25% is to be borne
by the slate.

Under ARWSP as per the Central Government, there is a provision to
utilise at the maximum of 20% of the annual allotment for the implementation of
the sub mission projects. Since 1994-95 up to end of 2001-02, the following
schemes have been approved under state sub mission projects in the state.

Tablc_6.7
No. of
No. of
villages
Schemes
9
45

Cost
(Rs in Lakhs)
1825.50

SI.
No
1.

Name of
District
Bellary

2.

Belgaum

25

120

6393.34

3.

Raichur

2

17

427.00

4.

Dharwad

2

8

205.21

5.

Davanagcre

1

1

70.00

6.

I laveri

1

2

99.95

7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

Bjjapur
Gadag
Uttar Kannada
Chiiradurga
Koppal
Gulbarga
Tumkur
Kolar
Deilouradation
plants
TOTAL

1
3
3
2
1
8
2
3
1

1
21
19
21
39
64
8
379
100

120.00
744.92
1453.00
556.00
814.50
1.580.55
531.00
4682.24
700.00

64

845

20203.21

■ ..■■■————=r——----- -—~r~

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Armual Report 200 i-2002

Out of 64 schemes 3 schemes have been completed and 19 schemes arc
under various stages of progress.

6.S The Waler Quality Testing
All the drinking water sources in rural.areas are tested. It is known by the
survey that 21008 habitations are affected by the drinking water quality problems,
out of these 5838 habitations with excess fluoride, 6633 with excess iron, and
4077 with excess nitrate and 4460 habitations with hard water problems. Under
this sub-mission programme safe drinking water will be supplied to these
habitations.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002


-I

-

7. EXTERNALLY AIDED WATER SUPPLY SCHEMES

The State Government has taken up three important projects for providing
potable water and sanitation facilities in the rural areas. They are:
a) World Bank Assisted Schemes
b) Netherlands Assisted Schemes
c) DAN1DA Assisted Schemes

7.1 Karnataka Integrated Rural Water Supply & Environmental Sanitation
Project with World Bank Assistance

The Government of Karnataka has taken up an Integrated Rural Water
Supply and Environmental Sanitation Project with the assistance of World Bank
in 1104 villages of 16 districts of Bangalore (R), Tumkur, Shimoga, Davanagerc,
Mysore, Chamrajanagar, Mandya, Hassan, Dakshina Kannada, Udupi, Belgauin,
Bidar, Gulbarga, Raichur, Koppal, and Bcllary.
247 villages including 10 pilot villages under Phase-1 and 857 villages
under Phase-11 have been taken up for implementation. The total estimated cost of
the project was US $ 117.00 millions, which was equivalent of Rs. 447.20 crores
as per Staff Appraisal Report (SAR) of the World Bank. The revised project cost
is Rs.542.00 crores.

The expenditure incurred towards Water Supply works is to be borne fully
by the government. In case of Environmental Sanitation, 70% of the total
estimated cost of works is borne by the Government. Beneficiaries have to share
the remaining 30% of cost of Environmental Sanitation works as community
contribution. The Operation and Maintenance is the responsibility of the village
Water Supply and Sanitation Committees.
An expenditure of Rs.521.53 crores has been incurred on the project since
inception to the end of March 2002. During the year 2001-02, the expenditure
incurred up to the end of March 2002 is Rs.26.96 crores.
The credit closing date for the project was 31.3.2002. So far Water Supply
works in 1034 villages have been completed. 918 schemes have been handed over
to the village Water Supply and Sanitation Committees for Operation and
Maintenance.

Some of the difficulties faced in completion and handing over of the schemes
are:

1. Problem in handing over of the completed schemes to the VWSC
2. O&M cost recovery is still to gain momentum

Rural Developmen t & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

3. Delays in energisation of schemes by KPTCL
4. Frequent transfer of Staff
5. Dwingling I failure of borcwell sources dining and after completion of the
schemes.
'flic spill over works arc scheduled for completion and handing over to
VWSC progressivlcy by September 2002.

7.2 Integrated Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project under the
Netherlands Assistci! Programme
The Integrated Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project under the
Netherlands Assistance has been implemented in the State of Karnataka covering
about 201 problematic villages in five Districts viz. Dharwad, Haveri, Ga,dag,
Bijapur and. Bagalkot at a revised project cost of Rs. 88.71 crores. The villages
mainly suffer from scarcity, high brackishness and excess fluoride. The project
aims at providing safe drinking water and environmental sanitation aiming to
improve general health condition in the rural areas. The project has been
completed.

1. Water Supply Works
Water Supply works in all 201 villages have been completed as per project
design.

2. Environmental Sanitation

Environmental Sanitation works in all project villages have been
completed as per provision in plan of operations.
3. Angamvadi Buildings
163 Anganwadi Buildings have also been constructed under the project.
4. Expenditure

The expenditure incurred to the end of March 2002 is Rs.88.26 crores
since inception.

7.3 The Danilin Assisted Rural Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation
Project in Karnataka

flic DANIDA Assisted Rural Drinking Waler Supply & Sanitation Project
is under implementation in the districts of Kolar, Bijapur, Bagalkot and
Chitradurga. The project agreement was signed on 1-10-96 and the project
became effective from 1-10-96. The project duration was four years with an

Rural Development

Panchaya; Raj

AanuaTii.cpoii 2001-2002

outlay of Rs.51.00 croics.
The project is expected to cover 105 Grama
Panchayats in four project districts. (31 Grama Panchayats in Kolar, 35 Grama
Panchayats in Cliitiadurga and 39 Grama Panchayats in Bijapur and Bagalkot
districts). The project activities have so far been taken up for implementation in
Bangarpcl, Gudibande and Mulbagiiu taluks of Kolar District, Hosadurga,
Hiriyur, Molakalmur and Challekere taluks of Chitradurga District, Bagalkot and
Jamakandi taluks in Bagalkot District Muddcbihal and Basavana Bagcwadi taluks
of Bijapur District. The project cost is shared between DAN1DA and the
Government of Karnataka at the cost of Rs.39.93 crores and Rs. 11.07 crores
respectively. In addition to the above, the entire cost of establishment charges
amounting to Rs.3.62 crores will be borne by the Government of Karnataka.

The component-wise outlay of the project is given below:
______________________________________________ (Rs. in crores)
Component
Total Outlay Revised total
Outlay
Waler Supply and Water Point Development
25.77
34.10

Household and Institutional Latrines

7.52

8.59

Hygiene Education and Local Participation

1.14

1.14

Supplies and Equipment

3.96

0.90

Project Support

7.95

12.22

Contingencies

4.66
51.00
3.62
54.62

3.06
60.01
3.62
63.63

Total
Establishment Expense
Grand Total



The project period is extended upto 3 1.3.2002.
Physical Progress

Ail the 105 planned Gram Panchayats have been registered. Planned water
supply schemes are 726 in number. Out of which 12 water supply scheme, civil
works are under progress 714 water supply schemes are commissioned of which
705 schemes have been handed over to Rural Water Supply and Sanitation
Committee up to end of March 2002

Financial Progress:
A sum of Rs.47.06 crores including Rs.9.77 crores towards Project
support is spent till March 2002.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

35

S.

ROADS AND BRIDGES

Karnataka has a total rural road length of 1,04,034 kins.
connect 56,682 rural habitations including 27,017 revenue villages.
The details of rural roads is as folio ws:-

Black Topped roads

23,511 kms

Water Bound Maccadum roads

38,872 kms

Earthen roads

41,651 kms.

Total road length

These reads

1,04,034 kms.

The development and maintenance of rural roads has been the
responsibility of the Zilla Panchayats in the Slate since 1987. However, the
technical supervision of this function was vested with the Public Works
Department till the end of 1999. With effect from 1st January 2000 this
responsibility has been transferred to the Department of Rural Development and
Panchayat Raj.

Rural connectivity has long been recognized for its importance in
promoting economic and social development of rural areas the development of
rural roads lias not been adequately supported for several years. Therefore, it is
necessary to provide adequate funds for maintenance and development of rural
roads. State Government has taken up bold steps in this direction.
2.5 RURAL COMMUNICATION ROAD NETWORK PROGRAMME :
Up gradation of roads is one of the main programme of the Government
for the overall development of the State. A Special programme lias been prepared
to upgrade about 20 to 30 kms of rural roads in each of the 175 taluks with an
outlay of about Rs.60 to Rs. 100 lakhs per taluk. This has resulted in 2,647 road
works taken up by the Zilla Panchayaths all over the Stale at a cost of about
Rs. 139 crores to upgrade 4956 kms. of rural roads, of which 3340 kms of road
length is being asphalted and the programme is in completion stage. There is no
example of launching such a massive rural roadwork programme in the history of
State out of its own resources.

3.2 PRADilANA MANTRi GRAM SADAK YOJANA :
The Government of India have launched Pradhana Mantri Gram Sadak
Yojana with the objective of connecting within 2003, every village that has a
population of more than 1000 and every village of more than 500 persons through
fine all-weather roads by the year 2007 as earmarked in the Tenth Plan.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2U0G2002-

3G

Under this project for the year 2000-01 envisages 414 works with an
estimated cost of Rs. 103.57 crores to upgrade 1612 kins, of rural roads to all
weather roads. The Karnataka Land Army Corporation and the Zilla Panchayath
Engineering divisions have been designated as the implementation agencies for
executing these works. The expenditure incurred up to the end of March 2002
Rs.6413.64 lakhs. The dislrictwise progress achieved for the year 2001-02 is
furnished in the annexurc 8.1.

Under Pradhana Mantri Grama Sadak Yojana a large scale project has
been prepared with an estimated cost of Rs.203.35 crores to provide at least one
all weather road to all the habitations which are having population of 1000 and
more during 2001-02 & 2002-03. 3222 Kins, of road length will be converted to
ail weather road. Central Government has already approved this scheme.
Rs. 108.37 crores have been released to ail the Zilla Panchayats during March
2002.

The project proposal for Rs. 20335.03 lakhs under Pradhana Mantri
Grama Sadak Yojana for the year 2001-02 and 2002-03 has been approved by
Government of India under this project action has been taken to cover every
village in the stale that has a population of more than 1000 with, at least one good
All-weather road. 938 works have been cleared to be taken up during the year.
This project has been approved by Government of India to upgrade 3222 kins of
road io all weather roads. Rs. 108.37 crores lias been released to all Zilla
Panchayats during March 2002.

8.3 PLAN AND NON PLAN SCHEMES :
An allocation of Rs.45.00 crores has been provided to Zilla Panchayaths
to improve Rural Roads and construction of Bridges under plan budget head and
the works of under progress.
Rs.80 crores has been earmarked under Mon Plan to maintain the Rural
Roads in the State. Rs.64.93 crores has been spent to the end of March 2002.
Action has been taken for proper maintenance of Rural Roads.

8.4 OTHER SCHEMES :
The Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department has taken up 366
road works under RIDE under NAB ARD assistance to improve 1528 kms length
of rural roads to all weather roads at a cost of Rs.90.39 crores.
The Department of Rural Development & Panchayat Raj attaches highest
importance to the development of rural infrastructure including rural roads. For
the development of rural roads, the district rural road plan and core network of
rural roads has been prepared and complete network of rural roads will be
scientifically mapped.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

9.

Ml?; GT IRRIGATION

Karnataka a unique state with seven-river systems viz., Krishna, Cauvery,
Gddavaiy, West blowing liveis, is also having highest waste or fallow land next
only to Rajashtan. Though the state is having an average rainfall of 1 139mm,
which is fairly good, yet its distribution is erratic. The annual rainfall varies
widely from 562 mm in Bagalkot to 4! 19 mm in Udupi District. 81 blocks of the
state arc prone to drought at least once in three to four years and rainfall is scanty
in these areas These taluks arc covered under DPAP. As per the latest Ground
Water assessment 22 blocks I taluks have been categorized under the ‘Dark Area’
and 21 blocks under ‘Grey area’. Water is the most precious natural resource
next only to air. Rainfall is the main source for both surface and ground water.
Tb.e rainwater is stored in ponds, tanks, reservoirs and underground aquifers.
There are 36,696 minor irrigation tanks in tiic state. Out of these tanks
having Achkuts upto 40 hectares in the state come under the purview of Ziila
Panchayats. There arc 33,374 such Ml tanks. Out of the total rainwater only a
fraction is impounded in these tanks. Even these tanks arc not able to impopnd
the water to its capacity because of si Ration. Some of these tanks arc used for
drinking water purposes in addition to irrigation and also as percolation tanks.

The Main Objectives
1.
Increase tb.e recharge of underground aquifers.
2
Prevent silting up of major dams.
3. Enable the people to get drinking water for themselves and their cattle.
4. To provide, irrigation facilities to improve the economy of the villages.

Finauci::! Performance
During 2001-02 to protect and augment the Minor Irrigation tanks and
other works coming under the Ziila Panchayats Rs. 833.43 lakhs under plan
schemes and Rs 1422.92 lakhs under non-plan schemes were allotted. Upto end of
March 2002 Rs.615.90 lakhs under plan schemes and Rs.772.11 lakhs under non­
plan schemes have spent during the financial year.
Allocation under Eleventh Finance Commission

Eleventh finance Commission has made a total allocation of Rs.30.50
crores for Rural Development and Panchayal Raj Department to be utilized over a
period of five years from 2000-01 to 2004-05 for rejuvenation, augmentation and
dcsiltation of tanks. During 2001-02 Rs. 1226.71 lakhs have been released in two
instalments to implement this scheme in 13 districts.

Rural Development & Panchayal Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

10.

3?
KARNATAKA PANCHAYAT RAJ SYSTEM

Karnataka has the distinction of enacting a comprehensive Panchayath Raj
Act, which incorporates all the essential features of the 73rd constitution
Amendment. The Act came into force from May 10, 1993 within a few days of
the 73rd Constitution Amendment being adopted. The Karnataka Panchayat Raj
Act 1993 provides for an elected three-tier system at the Village (Grama
Panchayat), Taluk (Taluk Panchayat), and District (Zilla Panchayat) levels. The
salient features of the Act are:
1.

2.
3.
4.

5.
6.

7.

Establishment of three tier elected Panchayat Raj Institutions at Grama,
Taluk and District level.
Holding of Grama Sabhas in each village.
Reservation of seats for SCs, STs, BCs and Women in Panchayat Raj
Institutions.
Reservation of Adhyakshas and Upadhyakshas to SCs, STs, BCs and
Women.
Constitution of Stale Election Commission to conduct election to
Panchayat Raj Institutions.
Constitution of State finance Commission once in every live years to
review the financial position of Panchayaihs and to make suitable
recommendations io the State on the distribution of funds between the
State and local bodies.
Constitution of the District Planning Committees in each district to
prepare plan for integrated development.

Under this Act, 5659 Grama Panchayaihs have been established and on an
average, each Grama Panchayat lias a population of 5300.
There are 27 Zilla Panchayaihs and 175 Taluk Panchayaihs in the Slate.
For which officers of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Taluk Panchayath and
Zilla Panchayath has been reserved for the second term in accordance with
Karnataka Panchayath Raj (Rcscrvalion of officers of Adhyaksha and
Upadhyaksha ofZilla Panchayath) Rules 1995 and as per Sec. 177 (2) and 138 (2)
of KPR Act 1993, vide Notification No. PJ)P 43 ZPS 2002 and RDP 28 TPS
2002.
See. 58-/\ has been inserted alter Sec.58 of KPR Act .1993 (14 of
Karnataka Act 1993) by making obligatory on the part of Grama Panchayath to
report regarding Bonded labourers by amending Karnataka Panchayath Raj (3"
Amendment) Act 2000 (No.30 of Karnataka Act 2001 dated: 12.9.2001).

Rule 3 of KPR (Sitting fee and other allowances to members of Taluk
Panchayath and Zilla Panchayath) Rules 1994 has been amended and the Sitting
fee has been enhanced from Rs.25/- to Rs.50/- and from Rs.30/- to Rs.60/respectivcly. (Notification No:RDP 94.GPS.99 dt:25.4.2001).
Rule 8 of KPR (Salary and allowances of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of
Zilla Panchayath) Rules 1995 has been amended and the sumptuary allowance

3>9

lias been enhanced from Rs.800/- to Rs. 1,000/- and Rs.600/- to Rs.800/respcctivcly. (Notification No:RDP 394 ZPS 2000 dt l6.10.2001).
GRAMA SABIIA:
It is a body consisting of persons registered in the electoral rolls relating to
a village comprised within the area of Grama Panchayat. To conduct
Gramasabhas 4 times in a year and also to make Gramasabhas more effective and
meaningful, new guidelines has been issued vide No. RDP 220 GPA 2001
dt: 10.10.2001. The Gramasabha is a very important form in which the Annual
statements of accounts, report of administration and the developmental works
undertaken by the Government are reviewed. It also considers the developmental
programmes proposed by the Grama Panchayaths for the current year, it is
responsible for identifying beneficiaries under poverty alleviation and various
developmental programmes.

PANCHAYATH JAMA3ANDH! :
For the first time in the State the Panchayath Jamabandlii has been
introduced with effect from 2000-2001. Panchayath Jamabandhi is an annual
public inspection of the accounts and registers of the Grama Panchayath u ler
inspection of selected works undertaken by the Grama Panchayath durir
he
previous year. An official team in the presence of the members of the Pan
; h
and the general public conducts the inspection publicly.
Main objective of the Grama Panchayath Jamabandi is to ensure greater
transparency in the implementation of programmes and schemes. A detailed
guideline has also been issued in this behalf.

TEE ELEVENTH FINANCE COMMISSION :
The Eleventh Finance Commission has provided grant of Rs.394.09 crores
for a period of five years starting from 2000-01. This grant is provided to
strengthen finances of Panchayath Raj Institutions to ensure maintenance of basic
essential services. An allocation of Rs.78.82 crores is provided for 2001-02 to
utilize grants of Eleventh Finance Commission. The same has been released to the
Zilla Panchayaths vide Order No.RDP 224 ZPS 2001 dt:22.10.2001.

CONSTITUTION OF WORKING GROUP:
State Government alter examining the functioning of Panchayath Raj
Institutions has decided to accord greater priority for these Institutions. In order
that these Institutions function effectively, it is felt that three is a greater need for
decentralization of administrative and financial powers to Panchayath Raj
Institutions. Accordingly, to examine all these aspects in its entirely, a working
group comprising of 10 members has been constituted under the Chairmanship of
Addl. Chief Secretary and Development Commissioner. The working Group has
submitted its report on 14.03.2002 and after examining the report, suitable action
will be taken.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

40

!1. KARNATAKA LAND ARMY CORPORATION LIMITED
The Karnataka Land Army Corporation Limited was established as an
undertaking of the State Kiuvcrnment on 9" August 197-1.
The aim of the
Corp-oration is to undertake development works in rural areas including
employment oriented works entrusted by the State Government Departments,
Public Sector Undertakings, Statutory Boards and Local Seif Governments under
various schemes and programmes. The works are executed directly at
Government scheduled rales (PWD scheduled rales) without expecting any profit
and avoiding middiemen (contractors). The Corporation has built inf'estructurc
in order to take up any kind of work of any magnitude anywhere in the State. The
Corporation has been declared as a designated agency of the State Government
for the purpose of departmental execution of works.

Administration
The Corporation works under the control of Rural Development and
Panchayat Raj department and the activities of the Corporation are controlled and
managed by a Board of Directors nominated by the State Government The head
quarters of the Corporation is situated at Bangalore and there are 4 Zona! Offices,
19 divisions and 47 sub divisions.

important events which took place during 2001-02 are enumerated here
under:
1. KLAC was awarded the Prestigious “Snrvaniangala” National award by
the Association of consulting Civil Engineers (India) for its excellent
performance in completion of Rural Water Supply systems under 1RWS
Scheme in five districts ofGadag, Itaveri, Dharwad, Bijapur and Bagalkot
in a record time.
2. To improve the functioning and profitability of the Corporation, in the
years to come, the Board of Directors have given its consent to make a
study on Corporate Planning and vision for KLAC. This study will be
undertaken by one of the leading consultants on the subject in India.
3. To bring in more awareness amongst tile people of Karnataka, particularly
in rural people, regarding the role and objectives of KLAC, the Board lias
given its approval to Kb'lDC, Bangalore to make a short film on the
activities of KLAC and to relay the same on Doordarshan.
4. A two days training programme on project management was organised by
experts in each of the four zones of KLAC in which maximum number of
Engineers and Ministerial staff participated.
5. KLAC donated a sum of Rs.50.00 lakhs towards Chief Ministers relief
fund keeping in line with its commitments to the welfare of rural poor
population in particular and people of Karnataka in general.
6. KLAC Celebrated its 29lh raising day on 9lh August 2001.

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

XI

A system of compulsory inspection of works of Karnataka Land Army
Corporation by senior officers of KLAC 1 lead quarters has been pul into practice.
As part of this, four Joint Directors and four Deputy Directors arc on compulsory
monthly inspection to monitor the works and related issues in iespect of the
districts attached to them. The third party inspection by the local Technical
Institution have also been introduced, by this a lot of improvement is achieved
regarding quality of works.
in order to increase the efficiency in execution of works several modern &.
research techniques are introduced. They are:Increase i;i t echnical Sanction power from Rs.5.00 Lakhs to 15 Lakhs io
Deputy Directors, and from Its.20.00 Lakhs to Rs.50.00 Lakhs to Joint
Directors.
2. Establishment of full pledged Design and Architect Section, Consultancy
Services for execution of quality work in proportion to the expenditure.
3 In order to increase the Technical knowledge and efficiency in KLAC,
expert technical advises are being obtained from outsiders by forming
Technical Committees: These Committees arc:1. flunk Tank Committee,
2. Technical Committee;
3. Quality Assurance Committee;

1.

District Level Quality Assurance Councillor’s Committees have been set
up in almost all the Districts with the respective Deputy Commissioners as
the acting Chairmen, the Chief Executive Officers ofZiila Panchayats as the
Co-Chairmen and one of the external technical resource persons as the
member The District Level quality assurance councillors Committees arc
empowered to review monitor and visit all works of KLAC. They play the
rote of facilitators to enhance the capabilities and standards of Karnataka
Land Army Corporation.
1'he establishment of District Level Quality
Assurance Councillors Committees has dramatically improved the quality and
image of Karnataka Land Army Corporation.
'Types d’work:
I. As per the Government Orders in Memory of Late Prime Minister Shri
Morarji Desai, the SV. D has entrusted 8 Residential Schools for SC/STs,
5 Residential Schools for Backward Classes and 8 Residential Schools
for Education Department. The estimated cost of each Residential
School is around Rs. 10.00 Crores, each accommodating around 300
students. All the works have been completed with an expenditure of
Rs. 10.00 crores.
11. During .the year 2001-2002, 117 pre/post metric SC/ST hostels and to
construct schools for the boys and girls at a total estimated cost of

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Report 2001-2002

42

Rs.30.00 crores have been received and the works are under various
stages of construction. An expenditure of Rs.20.00 crores have been
incurred.
111. BCM Department lias entrusted 35 hostels at an estimated cost of
Rs.4.62 crores. Progress of Rs. 1.50 crores have been achieved and the
works are under various stages of construction.
IV. Under Ashraya Yojana, Dr.Ambedkar Yojana construction of 25066
houses have been ent! listed, in the Districts of Gulbarga, Bidar, Raichur,
Beltary, Beigaum and Koppal. During 2001-02 Construction of 18000
houses has been completed and the remaining are at various stages of
progress.
V. To take up Rehabilitation work cf UKP at Bagalkote to complete
urgently with quality, a Division office has been opened. 06 works have
been completed successfully at a cost of Rs.2.GO crores during 2091-02.
VI. Kudalasangama Development Authority has entrusted 70 works of
around Rs.40.50 crores. A new sub division has been opened for tills
purpose. lOworks completed and remaining 60 works are at various
stages. A progress of Rs.30.00 crores has been achieved so far.
Vil. Karnataka Police Academy has entrusted works costing Rs.40.00 crores
during 2001-02 at Mysore, Gulbarga and Bangalore. The works have
been stalled and are in various stages. Rs. 18.00 crores expenditure has
been incuircd.
VIII. Tourism department has entrusted 36 works during the year 2001-2002
amounting io Rs.9.75 crores at various places of Karnataka. An amount
of Rs.7.20 crores have already been spent by the KLAC and 21 works
have been completed and remaining 15 works are at various stages.
IX. KPTCL has entrusted civil works at different places at an estimated cost
of Rs. 12.00 crores. Out of 41 works allotted to KLAC, 9 v/orks have
been completed and remaining 32 works arc in various stages. At
present progress of nearly Rs.8.00 crores have been achieved.
X. Director, Treasury, Bangalore has entrusted a work worth Rs.3.70 crores
for compulei izalion. Ail v/oiks aie in finishing stages. An expenditure
of Rs.3.40 crores have been achieved.
XL Under DPEP scheme, construction of Block Resources Centre, Cluster
Resource Centre and Classrooms etc., in the District of Gulbarga,
Bcliary, Mysore, Bijapur & Dharwad have been entrusted to KLAC at
an estimated cost of Rs. 10.00 crores. All works arc in finishing stages.
An expenditure of Rs.7.00 crores have been achieved.
XII. The corporation has been entrusted with Prime Minister Grama Sadak
Yojane of 207 works with an estimated cost of Rs.53.90 crores in
various places of Karnataka. 204 works have been started. Rs.45.50
crores have been released. An expenditure of Rs.4 1.00 crores have been
incurred. And 65 works has been completed and remaining 139 v/orks
are nearing completion.
XIII. The Government of Karnataka has launched a unique programme called
Swachcha Grama Yojane for coveiing 1296 villages in the State. The

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

Annual Kcpoii 2001-2002

43

KLAC has been appointed as “XG'JAL AGENCY” fur implementation
of this scheme. 413 village works lias been entrusted at an estimate cost
of Rs.82.60 crores to KLAC under Swachcha Grama Yojanc. The
estimate cost of each village will be about Rs.20.00 lakhs per village.
Works in 348 villages have been stalled and are at various stages.
Rs.36.50 crores expenditure have been incurred by the KLAC.
XIV. Slum Clearance Board has entrusted the work of constructing 2055
houses during 2001-02 at an estimated cost of Rs.8.86 crores. An
amount of Rs.63.CO lakhs has been realised recently and on the work
have been started.
In this way, the KLAC is being executing the work under various schemes
and KLAC has emerged as a popular Institution.
Rivisionv.ise Target ar.d progress achieved during 2601-2332 upto March
2332 is as'f;;’tcv.s under various prc-grarnmcs:
si.rta.

Sivisicss

Progress in ir.tdrs
(upto March 2002)

«5;'.ng:;’;;re Zc::e

1
2
3
4
5

900.00

Bangalore
Tmnkur
Kolar
Shinioga
Chitradurga

850.00
700.00
3232.00
•150.00

Total
Mysore Zone

n.

i
2
3

6132.(10

1450.00

Mysore
Mandya
I l.issan

722.00

1450.00

Total

3622.00

Belgatnn Zone

in.
i
2
3
4
5

Bclgamn
Dlianvad
Kanvar
Bagalkot
Bijaptir

1632.00
2220.00

750.00
2160.00

514.00

Total

IV.

7276.00

Raichur Zone

1
2
3
4
5
6

Raichur
Koppal
Bellary
Bidar
Gulbarga
Yadagiri

Total
Grand Total

Rural Development & Panchayat Raj

1700.00
1400.00
3200.00
870.00

1800.00
2200.00
1 1170.00

23200.00

Annexure-3.1

Progress under Jawahar Gram Samrldhi Yojana (SGRY) during 2001-2002.

Target

SI.N:

Total available funds

Cumulative Expenditure

Physic Il T.ttkil Mantos)
% to Annua

% to available

Total

Targe

funds

Target

District

Cash Value of fg @

Total

Cash

Rs6.25/kg

Value of fg

Total

Cash

Value of fg

Acnove

S j to Annual

fnrgrt

@Rs6.25.'kg

@Rs6.25/kg

1

Bagalkot

310

194

503

385

178

563

298

125

423

84

75

4.02

3.67

2

Bangalore(R)

425

266

691

473

239

712

408

63

471

68

66

5.51

5.29

95

3

BangalorefU)

330

206

536

352

179

531

328

111

439

82

83

4.28

4 37

102

4

Belgaum

394

247

641

495

222

717

416

153

569

89

79

5.1t

2.63

5

Bellary

406

254

661

459

229

687

433

124

558

84

81

5.27 ____

6

Bldar

411

258

669

443

223

655

377

103

450

72

72

5.34

7

3ijapur

363

228

591

382

208

590

333

169

502

85

53

471

8

C.R.Nagar

244

153

395

271

133

404

223

51

274

69

68

3.16

g

Ohickmagalur

313

195

509

352

176

528

313

144

457

90

67

4X3

91

50
104
99

-

6.94

147

6.43

15$

142

83

10

Chitradurga

432

302

784

549

271

820

483

117

605

77

74

6.20

11

D.Kannada

218

137

355

250

123

373

207

58

264

74

71

2 83

4 02

12

Davanagere

456

286

741

518

257

775

478

235

7I4

95

92

5.91

6 30

107

13

Dharwad

220

138

358

225

129

354

213

101

314

83

89

2.83

3.70

133

1C

Gadag

235

148

333

264

133

397

220

60

280

73

70

3.05

15

Gulbarga

830

519

1349

953

465

1419

809

130

939

70

6-3

10.7.3

16

Hassan

413

259

672

455

233

689

287

158

444

65

65

5.v>6

5 4'■

17

Heveri

292

183

475

332

164

497

291

164

455

95

92

3.73

4 43

118

18

I.Kodogu

300

183

487

314

166

479

280

97

377

77

79

3.09

5 -•/»

140

co

144

-.2 73

10':

19

1 Kolar

747

463

1215

787

405

1192

724

207

931

77

78

9.69

4 'J

125

20

Koppal

274

172

445

305

154

460

224

125

349

78

76

3.53

2.92

64

21

Mandya

238

149

386

261

135

396

200

61

261

63

65

3.03

2.30

84

22

Mysore

335

211

547

337

191

528

293

102

400

73

76

4.33

3.37

89

23

Ralchur

360

225

535

428

203

631

376

163

539

92

85

4.07

4.74

102

24

IShimoga

248

155

403

249

134

333

240

134

375

93

95

3.21

3 29

102

25

Tumkur

640

401

1042

705

360

1065

623

110

738

71

63

831

7 11

8G

26

U.Kannada

324

203

527

365

183

548

254

127

381

72

70

4.20

- sr.

132

27

Udupi

1

181

113

294

200

104

304

167

53

220

75

72

2.34

2.50

107

9990

6257

16246

11112

5596

16708

S512

3247

12759

79

76

129.591

140.77

109

Annexure-3.2
Progress under Employment Assurance Scheme (SGRY) during 2001-2092.
(Fin : Rs in Lakhs)
Allocation

Total available funds

Cumulative Expenditure

Physical
Value of fg

@
SI. No

District

Cash

Value of fg

Valua of fg

Rs6.25'kg

Total

Cash

@Rs6.25/kg

Total

%to

%to

Annual

available

Cash

@Rs6.25/kg

Total

Target

funds

Achievent

(Lakh

Mondays)

1

Bagalkot

311

194

505

536

179

714

474

90

564

112

79

7.1

2

Eangalore(R)

426

265

692

545

245

790

536

54

590

85

75

6.S5

3

Bangalore(U)

331

207

538

324

189

513

221

144

365

G8

71

4.78

4

Selgaum

502

314

816

581

282

863

623

185

813

100

94

11.231

5

Bellary

301

188

469

549

173

722

490

76

565

116

78

6.35

6

Bidar

413

253

671

419

238

656

297

95

391

58

60

3.-9

7

Bijapur

364

228

591

433

209

641

330

119

499

84

73

6.47

8

C.R.Nagar

345

216

550

424

198

622

300

53

353

63

57

3.6c

9

Chickmagalur

213

133

347

231

123

355

205

100

305

88

£6

3 63

10

Chitradurga

484

303

787

566

278

844

330

54

384

49

45

6.74

11

D. Kannada

218

136

355

226

126

352

159

38

197

55

56

2.66

12

Davanacere

457

286

743

521

262

783

459

136

594

80

76

5.95

13

Dharwad

220

138

353

274

127

401

211

124

335

93

83

4.29

14

Gadag

237

148

334

257

136

393

166

64

230

60

59

3.56
8.85

15

Gulbaroa

833

521

1353

1235

478

1713

1067

178

1246

92

73

16

Hassan

415

259

674

482

238

720

381

119

501

74

70

4 9

17

Haveri

293

183

476

386

169

555

274

169

443

93

SO

3.55

18

Kodagu

200

125

325

204

115

319

164

84

248

76

78

4.82

19

Kolar

750

469

1218

912

431

1342

837

381

1218

100

91

10.85

20

Koppal

276

173

448

315

158

473

258

71

328

73

69

2.55

21

Mandya

289

181

469

308

166

474

232

43

274

58

58

3

22

Mysore

388

243

630

465

223

688

474

116

589

94

65

6.15

23

Ralchur

351

226

586

402

208

609

317

160

477

81

78

4.67

24

Shimoga

249

156

404

312

143

455

260

143

403

100

88

4.01

25

Tumkur

642

401

1044

734

369

1103

587

221

807

77

73

2.92

26

U. Kannada

325

203

528

404

104

508

233

132

415

79

82

5.75

27

Udupi

181

113

295

185

186

372

167

78

244

83

66

3.27

10021

6264

16285

12229

5752

17981

10155

3223

13377

82

74

142.39

_
_____ Annexure 3,3a
Prograss under Indira AwaasYojana - Construction of Houses during 2001-2002.

Physical (Houses)

Financial (Rs. in lakhs)

SI No..

District

Target for
2001-2002

Total available
funds

Cumulative
Expenditure

1

Bagalkote

170.60

105.29

78.40

2

Bangalore (R)
Bangalore (U)

200.42

221.06

204.74

151.39

Belgaum

316.96
567.35

165.38
318.49

3
4

5
6
7

Bellary
feidar

204.37

Bjjapur
C.R.Nagar

187.85
137.18

10

Chickamagalur
Chitradurga

11

D. Kannada

301.14
332.67
201.10

12
13

Davanagere
Dharwad

255.14
238.11

14
15
16

Gadag
Gulbarga
Hassan
Haveri

95.70

8
9

17
18

19

20
21
22
23

24
25
26
27

Kodagu
Kolar
Koppal
Mandy a
Mysore
Raichur
Shirnoga
Tumkur

U. Kannada
Udupi

Total

322.17
143.04
156.72
134.43
276.95
140.41
127.44
370.07
285.60
454.82
369.78
267.54

98.65
6507.60

622.11
210.39
209.02

139.76
312.28
556.08
170.27
168.50
275.74
56.08
367.28
179.01
146.25

145.10
300.81
119.81
142.35
300.47
776.29

491.97
428.23
282.20
43.35
7253.57

74.02

%to
% to Annual
available Target
Achievement
Target
funds
83|
366
305
74
46
97
969
93
1C02
102
74
45
757
560
49

%to
Annual
Target

247.43
491.96

78

183.05
195.60

90

79
87

104

94

133.59
282.04

281.27
124.70
152.44
216.87
49.38
325.75
154.63
139.76
123.90
256.50
73.43
112.03
257.57
722.55
378.11
431.20
144.21
52.63
5887.76

87

78

1585
2837

1022
1041

925

81
91

1088

105

1161
1549

282
103
44
791

97

96

411

94
85
62

90

1506

51

2614
798

92
93
52
88
70
253
83

73
90
79
88
89
86
96
85
85
61
79
86
93
77

117
54

101
51

2274
1849
1338

53
SO

121
81

175
32539

60
91
52
101
108
89

85

1345
2287

748
1332
203
1611
715
364

672
1385
354
637
1390
3553

1145
628
852
1006
165
2032
612
485
436
837
353
446
1153

3973
1628
2156
638
362
29096

114
76
81
126
88
133
65
60
100
70
83

112
72
117
48
207
89

OP

Annexure 3.3b

Progress under Indira AwaasYojana - Upgradation of Houses during 2001-2002.
Physical (Houses)
Financial (Rs. in lakhs)
%
to
%to
Total
SI No.
District
% to Annual
Target for
Cumulative
Achievement
Annual
available
Target
available
Target
Expenditure
2001-2002
funds
funds
Target
“731
92
169
183
1
80
EJagalkote
13 39
18.31
16.79
2
114
573
501
Bangalore (R)
48.20
96
94
50.10
51.42
56
212
378
3
Bangalore (U)
19.15
77
37.85
24.95
51
84
664
792
■ 4
89
78
Belgaum
79.24
90.17
70.19
631
890
1418
68
64
5
96.57
Bellary
141.84
149.79
83
425
511
82
6
84
Bidar
42.85
51.09
52.04
78
407
520
58
32.30
62
7
Bijapur
52.03
55.92
150
307
205
88
107
8
C.R.Nagar
21.96
20.54
25.04
146
1103
753
78
85
63.71
9
Chickamagalur
75.28
81.91
51
661
1307
5--52
71.20
137.96
10 Chitradurga
130.68
105
417
86
399
90
41.98
36.06
39.92
11 D. Kannada
384
103
374
70
47.79
33.66
90
37.42
12 Davanagere
83
550
87
666
57.43
86
66.15
13 Dharwad
66.62
85
87
55
102
18.73
101
10.31
10.17
14 Gadag
579
72
805
61
57
49.40
80.54
87.41
15 Gulbarga
136
487
125
358
85
35.76
52.33
44.62
16 Hassan
121
220
182
115
90
20.98
18.18
23.44
17 Haveri
100
335
336
95’
34.93
99
33.61
33.35
18 Kodagu
113
785
692
80
74
69.24
75.00
55.13
19 Kolar
216

122
62
177
17.72
53.61
33.19
187
20 Koppal
2< Mandya
85
270
319
68
37.96
81
31.87
25.78
22
23

24
25
26
27

Mysore
Raichur
Shimoga
Tumkur
U.Kannada
Udupi

Total

69.49

75.81

177.64

179.17
119.33

113.71
92.44

66.88
8.73
1026.90

97.40
71.93
9.17

1778.13

77.25
174.75

111
98

102
98

99.69
81.05
49.80

88
88
74

84
83
69

695
1776
1137
924
669

11.47
1373.44

131
84

125
77

87
16233

917
1560
1114
811
472
113

14728

132
88
98
88
71
130
SI

50

i

Gadag

Kolar

h

f')

H



G
T



i



7



!

i

1 Athcul!
2 Gokak
3 Ramadurga
!
4 Soundaihi
I 5 Bailhongal
6 Belgaum
7 Hukkeri
1 Chailakeri
2 Chilradurga
3 Hosadurga
4 Molakalmur
5 Holaikeri
1 Jagalur
1 Kundagol
2 Hubli
3 Khalghatgi
4 Dharwad
1 Haveri
2 Hirekerur
3 Ranibennur
4 Byedgi
5 Savanur
6 Shiggaon
1 Gadag
2 Mundargi
3 Shirahatti
4 Ron
1 Bancarpet

i

O ’)

7

CJ

6

Cw

iiavszi

3

b

5

u.

CM

Davangsre
Dharwad

o

I

i

3
4

,('l

Total Blocks



r

i

2,1

h


<
0

(/>

w-

p



<)

fl

2

n..

.

.

f
• ~ •
z k . . - - .• . K-

O

'

« <■'

' •' • , 71 •
t C, 1

<• e>

« • r- *• r-

f—

P:~ti 'Oi

4



G

...

ro
I

I

o_

o>

CD

M

C
M

m

3 Gudibande
4 Chintamani
5 Kolar
6 Mulbagal
7 Srinivaspur
3 Shidlaghatta
9 Malur

”9

6\

Ov - I 6 <3

• 07524

Annoxur® 3.5
Progress undsr Drought Prono Areas Prog •cr/r/na during 2001-2002.
Financial (Rs.in lakhs)

SI No. District

1
2
3
. 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Target for 2001- Total available
2002
funds

Cumulative
Expenditure

% to
Annual
Target

% to
available
funds

Bangalore(R)
Belgaum
Bidar
C.R.Nagar
Chickmagalur
Chitradurga
Davanagore
Dharwad
Gadag
Gulbarga
Hassan
Haver!
Kolar
Mysore
Turnkur

410.00
252.00
138.00
28.00
132.00
140.00
28.00
91.00
120.00
208.00
72.00
91.00
376.00
144.00
416.00

259.25
303.56
184.59
60.51
323.63
335.26
136.37
82.19
103.68
205.46
’ 175.24
213.93
600.34
195.51
414.55

208.90
104.07
178.18
46.97
292.60
190.87
110.57
14.64
71.08
209.17
107.00
192.18
345.84
102.35
272.77

51
41
129
168
222
136
395
16
59
101
149
211
92
71
66

31
34
97
73
90
57
81
18
69
102
61
89
58
52
66

Total

2648.00

3600.07

2447.19

92

63

«3>

Ann,exure 3.6
List of Taluks com' ng under Desert Development Programme
SI No. District
s otal Blocks
Name of the Taluk
1 BagakiOt
1 Bag a I Kot
2 Badami
3 Bilgi •
4 Jamakhandi
5 Hungund
6 Mudhol
6
2 Bijapw
1 Basavana Bagewadi
J k
2 Bijapur
........... .....
.....
— - --3 Indi
- •
- —.... 4 Muddebihal
5 Sindagi
^5
3 Bellary
1 Hoovinahadagaii
2 Hagari Bommanahalli
3 Kudligi
4 Sandur
4
4 □avengers
1 Harappanahaili
5 Koppal
1 Koppai
2 Kushtagi
3 Yelburga
3
6 Raichur
1 Deodurga
... — — .
2 Lingasugur
3 Raichur
3
Total Blocks
22

— -

----------



-

- -

.

...

Annexure 3.7
Progress under Desert Development Programme during 2001-2002.

SI No.

District

Target for
2001-2002

Financial (Rs.in lakhs)
Total
Cumulative % to Annual
available
Target
Expenditure
funds

%to
available
funds

1

Bagalkot

216.00

548.88

246.27

114

45

2

Bellary

479.92

415.78

190.10

40

46

3

Bijapur

225.00

669.44

202.83

90

30

4

Davanagere

81.00

104.68

70.02

86

67

5

Koppal

108.00

480.93

228.10

211

47

6

Raichur

108.00

274.45

188.28

174

69

Total

1217.92

2494.16

1125.60

92

45

55
Annexure 3.8
List of Taluks coming under Western Ghats Development Programme
S! Nc District
Total Blocks
Name of the Taiuk
1 Belgaum
1 Khanapur

I

co

I

2 Chickmagalur

Dharwad
□.Kannada

CO

3

Q>

cn

6

£M

5 Udupi

I

I


XI

11 U.Kannada

Total Blocks

1

3

4

o') v-

Mysore
C.R.Nagar
Shimoga

5

i

o co co

7 Kodagu

2 Hukkeri
3 Belgaum
4 Bailhongal
5 Soundatti
1 Koppa
2 Mudigere
3 Sringeri
4 Chickmagalur
5 Narasimharajapura
1 Dhan/i/ad
1 Puttur
2 Sulya
3 Belthangadi
1 Udupi
2 Kundapura
3 Karkala
»
1 Sakleshpur
2 Alur
3 Belur
4 Hassan
1 Madikeri
2 Somwarpet
3 Virajpet
1 H D Kote
1 Gundlupet
1 Hosanagar
2 Thirthahalli
3 Sagara
4 Shimoga
5 Shikaripura
1 An koi a
2 Bhatkal
3 Honnawar
4 Kumta
5 Karwar
6 Siddapura
7 Sirsi
8 Supa
9 Yellapura
e

1

5

9
40

Annexure 3.9
Progress under Western Ghats Development Programme during 2001-2002.

Financial (Rs.in lakhs)

SI No.

District

Target for
2001-2002

Total
available

funds
190.00

1 Belgaum
2 C.R.Nagar
3 Chickmagalur

190.00
39.00'

4 D.Kannada
5 Dharwad
6 Hassan

114.00
39.00
151.00

114.00

7 Kodagu
8 Mysore

116.00

190.00

38.57
190.00

39.00
190.00

Cumulative

Expenditure
188.91
39.00

%to

% to

Annual

available

Target

funds
99

99

100
94

100

98

98
100
97

94

39.00

179.21
111.46
38.99

151.00

146.75

100
971

116.00
38.57
190.00

115.74

100

100

38.57
174.90

100

100

92
90

9 Shimoga
10 U.Kannada

401.13

11 Udupi
12 Special Scheme

114.00
86.78

401.13
114.00
86.78

360.03
113.98
0.00

100
0

92
90
100
0

13 WGDP Cell/Training

10.00
1679.43

10.00
1679.43

7.15
1514.69

72
90

72
90

Total

O'

(ft

Annexure 4.1

SI.

District

No.

1 Bangalore (U)

Physical (S.H.G.)
formed
Achieveme nt
Target

Physical (Swarozgaries assisted)

Financial (Rs.in lakhs)
Cumulative
Total
Target for
available Expenditure
2001-02
funds
“Fl 105
120.39
50 35

% to
Annua!
Target

available
funds

225

94

~ 22

I6l

16

229

264.04

212

80

45

I3l

72

919

664

321
2661

124.64

2 Bangalore(R)

328.85

% to

3 Bagalkot

89.83

99.85

76.86

86

77

4 Belgaum

239.65

644.74

588.01

245

91

125.77

132

89
95

6 Bidar

SS.72

132.40

7 Bijapur

111.47

247.43

235.47

211

8 Chamarajnagar

67.20

178.51

163.42

243

134.27

9 Chickmagalur

203.17

178.26

94

128

118.2.0
117 37

92.33

5 Bellary

133

oS

10 Chitradurga

98.52

213.39

198.85

202

11 Davangere

123.72

251.03

208.77

169|

93
S3

12 D.Kannada

114.13

137.75

121

81

13 Dharwad

68.39

169.35
91.70

91.69

134

100

86

Groups
Members
Nos.

Total
Target

Achievement

% to
Total
Target

491

136!

147
2051

_739

157

334

71

33

447

470

989

241

3032

1394

4481

__1450
853

174

68

928

545

32

100

39

645

514

41

506

80

1223

583

24

I4l

68

H27

357

1661
------350;
2039
3881
1386

HO

1800

654

1920

294

1752
1366 _____ 554
671 __ 2023
1534
1197
573
758

__3L6

33

49

164

35

HO

HO

45

202

H8

41 __ IM
154
25

66

140

975

1421

666
__146l

_1783

240|

688
346

_130

1653

438
308

80

960

14 Gadag

47.99

124.09

128.28

267

103

18

146

15 Gulbarga

202 47

168.18

166.58

82

99

73

84

20.'

_612

28
144’

407

301

16 Hassan

130.63

280.89

192.46

147

69

47

H2
258

17 Haveri

82.44

132.61

100.58

122

76

30

160

36

1260 ____ 743
52S|
516

18 Kodagu

77.92

165.71

79.79

102

48

24

34

20

208

19 Kolar

154.57

498.00

389.42

252

78

56

189

189

2500

886;

279

303

3501 —• — ---- 16-1

_640

20 Koppal

77.16

120.30

76.04

99

63

27

75

25

444

395

21 Mandya

124.64

151.88

108.75

87

72

45

0

SIO

659 I__ 1CHJ2

184

81
184

2759

694 L

404

476

1362

745

842 ___ 177
250
1864

1798

928

2959 _ 319

609
154
J_4_
. • • •■ . — .
TV>O I
-fO'.xQl

447|

878

196

601’
i/nnl

127-1
j-O'.tl

v.'»!

130.57

22 Mysore

291.92

197.94

152

68

47

23 Raichur

93.04

98.54

- 100.80

108

1-02

33

75

35

24 Shimoga

145.51

361.72

255.79

176

71

52

623

H9
i so’

25 Tumkur

179.80

509.50

506.31

282

99

64

532

?6 Udupi

8S.33

107.56

93

32

69

151.05
r\ r\ » 1

336.77
T------------ .■
r* 1 —

113
100.12
252.7ft
167
- « ih -»n I”..... T74 1

75

54

118

n / 1

1 t 1 "1 r

27 U.Kannada

—... .. .

49

I

154|
__J45

KV1C
TctaS

333.02
104.71
33.97
23.55
4.79
74.43
62.20
12.76
117.51
92.71
5.19
44.93
1S39.14
0.00
1333.14

CT

Ci

CO

CO

CH

p
CO

on
co

20.09
33.83
26.29
6.41
co

6.91
18.09
333.88
104.71
43.99
22.23
8.73
50.45
61.42
16.95
120.97
95.52
8.16
42.60
1’339.91
80.74
1770.55

21.29)
109.48
21.86
331.84
19.28
1.36
11.50
23.81



i O1?;*

21.97
70.25
40.62
331.70
19.91
24.17
10.00
23.69
70.31
26.71
20.47
63.98

C
O

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

17.63
50.38
25.19
226.70!
40.301
50.38
37.73
15.11
60.45
35.27
25.19
60.45
30.23
12.59
12.59
251.89
75.57
30.23
30.23
12.59
50.33
125.95
20.15
75.57
75.57
12.59
50.38
1511.34
63.64
1574.98

Physical (In Nos.)
j
% to
I Target Achieve m % lo
|
ent
Annual I
available |
Target i
funds i
I
121!
345
350s
99|
97|
156l
1089
10001
109|
217
____ sd
54
500
344
87
170]
146
7643
100} 4500
401
48
316
97!
800
Hi
6
1000
111
3
30
115
115
750
1o
370
123
101
300
117
1079
90
ICO
1200
65
87
7G0
565
81
80
500
332
98
53
521
43
1200
Z'.zl
87
600
264
51
S3
40
250
100
68
47
250
281
112
132
100
5000
5136
103
100
1500
139
1577
105
7"7
112
600
685
114
65
103
600
388
78
250
89
36
38
55
148
1000
1152
115
148
2500
37
101
921
49
53
400
63
75
211
123
1500
1844
97
155
99
1500
1491
97
123
35
64
250
87
41
63
105
1000
663
89
92
97 30800 2771S
103
89
3000
2684
0
0
S2
S3 33090 30403
104
1.0
V

Baqalkote
Bangalore ®
Banqalore(U)
Beigaum
Bellary
Bidar
Bijapur
C.R.Naqar
Chickmagak.-r
Chitradurcja
□.Kannada
Davanagsra
Dharv/ad
Gagad
Gulbarga
Hassan
Haven
Kodagu
Kc’ar
Kcppai
Mandya
Mysore
Raichur
Shimoga
Tumkur
Udupi
U. Kannada

C
M

1
2
3
4

p

District

Financial (Rs.in lakhs)
Cumulative % lo
Total
available
Expenditure Annuel
Target
funds

CO

SI.No.

i argot for
2001-2002

Progress under Integrated Rural
Physical ( In ?
F* inc nciai (Rs.in lakhs)
O'
% io;
.Achieve
I arget
Total
/0
% to
Cumulative
for SV3il30’iS Expenditure Annua! svsilsol© Target
ment .Annual!
-r
•>
2001- funds
Target funds
i a.rSS£l
2QQ2
771
133
51
177
Bagalkote
13.00
9.31
72
13.42
QQ|
65
Bangalore ®
13.50
9.54
112
72
8.52
71
229 i
969
30.00
19.16
112
423
Bangaiore(U)
21.49
72
150j
Belgaurn
15.00
14.69
97
146
241
362
3.99
981
Bellary
20.00
18.16
19 99
100
110
251
245
951
163
155
Bidar
15.00
9.SO
12.84
83
130
99J
Bijapur
20.00
13.12
14.27
71
436
109
441
1311
10.00
C.R.Magar
30.50
305
102
159
209
199
Chickrr.agalur 15.00
9 54
11.08
74
116
161
81
Chiiradurga
10.00
12.64
14.59
1 15
133
72
541
146
100j
D. Kannada
10.00
10.00
117
110
100
110
Davanagere
25.00
18.86
21.13
85
223
198
112
10.00
Dharwad
22.37
23.19
232
104
105
172
164!
Gagad
20.00
12 S9
71
110
14.26
211
109
52
16.13
Gulbarga
21.00
21.97
105
136
493
374
75;
Hassan
20.00
12.53
12.98
65
135
51
104
38
Haveri
10.00
18.47
19.33
193
105
184
192
104
Kodagu
13.50
10.53
13.35
99
127
347
424
122
Kolar
13.50
12.90
14.29
106
84
96
111
114
7.50
5.05
5.20
69
Koppal
103
33
33
100
27.60
10.00
276
Mandya
26.65
104
198
247
125
Mysore
15.00
72
9.62
10.83
113
348
304
87
Raichur
10.00
6.70
8.90
89
133
109
70
64
Shimoga
9.00
17.G5
18.35
204
104
59
118
200
Tumkur
10.00
7.90
10.69
107
135
119
149
125
7.20
Udupi
10.00
6.35
72
113
187
184
98
U. Kannada
21.60
13.63
75
119
16.23
174
78
135
Total
337.G9
413.39
1 10
376.33
164
577S
1 37

>
SI. No District

5
d

co

r.h

C
O

tn

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

C
O

5
6
7
8
9

Cd

4

Ci

1
2
o

<30

3
1
5
5
7

3
I)
0
1
2
3
•4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4

5
6
7

Baoalkole
Bangalore ®
Banga!cre('J)
Belgaum
Bellarv
Bidar
Bijapur
C.R.Nagar
Chickmapalur
Chitradurca
□.Kannada
Davanagere
Dharv/ad
Gagad
Gulbarga
Hassan
Haveri
Kodagu
Kolar
Koppal
Mandya
Mysore
Raichur
Shimoga
Tumkur
Udupi
U.Kannada

Target for
2001-02

2.20
13.14;
6.581
3.28
9.33
3.23
2.20
2.20
2.20
8.76
2.20
8.76
2.20
2.2.0
2.20
4.33 i
4.38
2.20
6.56 j

2.211
0.00
-1.15
8.53
1.12
7.97
5.55
3.05
3.98
-0.68
0.00
5 03
2.99
0.41
8.56
0.61
-1.94
3.01
1.90

2.20
4.38 1
10.93 i
2.20
9.83 '

0.00
5.24

0501
5.51’
4.5Si
5 44

1.33
C j)

No Disii id

Physical (in Nos.)
% to% io Target! Achievem;
ent! Annual;
available
Target'.
fends!
i
1030!
350 ____ 35,
23
42 i
3354 ____ 64,
6000
3206
107
3000
70
-398
3805
254
166
0
1500
4500
3821
65
54
475
953
1500
64
41
0
“oi
4170
417
1000
271
1071 1000
2285
229
149
51
1000
2366
237
92
-203
4000
933
24
15
1030
200
20
13 ________ 0
4000
2500
63
41
70
120
58
1200
78
1000
330
33
115
1000
21
206
2056
34
1000
134
75
2000
1490
349
49
3543 ___ 1ZL
2000
-281
113
68
1000
681
32
44
109
3277
232
3000
67
50
500
1000
33 !
0
44
870
2000
24
28
128
6393
83
378
5000
162
1618
1000
0
105
58
38
2600
4500
0
190
4746
2500
0
124
0
0
2500
0
0
23
234
1000
8
15
97
58011
G2
111 C v •«' G 0
144
7200
5000
0
r? r -n ■.' f
G521 ____ - u
i
GS ;

Financial (Rs.in laXhs)
Totr.lf
1b tO
Cumulative!
Expenditure; Annuai
available
Target
iundSj

co!

. ........

pi

* • -<

i Ole;!

5.48
5.48
2.20 :
o i .53 I

2.42
3.21
3 39 I
3.30 |

3.27
2.0.2
1 33
0.29
3.58
1.72
0.47
2 94
2.13
5.07
0.97
4.40
0.72
1.24
9.14 i
2.31 i
3 72 1
6.79

0.54
3.89
73-1s i

0.00
0.33
81.13

KVIC
Tots?

3.08 i
|
'1

0.00
73.19

10.30
£1.43

6I

Progress under BoreweHs with Hand Pumps during 2B01-2G02

SI.No.

% to
Annual
Target Achievement
Target
125l
147
85,
257
264
192
33
52
81

v~

148
93
177
229
47
86
172
237
123
103
113
138
147
159
134
102
313
97
110
3920

91
73
73
18
34
50
C
O

C
O

283
362!
263
182
155
161
144
177
331
378
145
56
56
247
393
155
164
254
136
93
163
144
232
328
153
338
5703

x~

1 Bagalkote
2 Bangalore (R)
3 Bangalore (U)
4 Belgaum
5 Bellary
6 Bider
7 Bijapur
8 C.R.Nagar
9 Chickamagalur
10|Chitradurga
11 D.Kannada
12|Davanagere
13 Dharwad
14 Gadag
15 Gulbarga
16 Hassan
17 Haveri
18 Kodagu
19 Kolar
20 Koppal
21 ■Mandya
22 Mysore
23 Raichur
24 Shimoga
25 Tumkur
26 U. Kannada
27 Udupi
Total

Physical (Nos)

co



District

Financial (Rs.in lakhs)
Target for Cumulative
% to
2000-2001 Expenditure Annual
Target
r* r- r65 85
ob.35
84
140.40
133.53
99
*j0
162.82
49.00
119.00
75.30
63
43.42
6.90
16
70.00
13.23
26
71.30
52
37.48
24
73.47
13.54
79.30
125.74
159
162.50
30
48.90
170.50
87.83|
52
126.60
57.49
45
25.50
14.91
53
25.40
7.14
28
117.45
59.60
51
176.50
33.75
19
70.35
29.00
41
104.00
20.42
20
115.00
49.48
43
61.80
55
34.19
41.30
45.33
110
69.00
29.69
43
67.79
37.04
55
105.00
26.95
26
184.00
50.06
27
61.19
22.40
37
165.50
69.41
42
2580.44
1240.03
47

84
26
47
158
84
154
70
60
79
63
44
101
158
98
93
44
95
62
301
b'J

Annexure-3.2

r-'rogress under LI ini ITator Supply Scheme curing 2031-2302

SI.No.

District

1 Bagaikcte
2 Bangalore (R)
3 Bangalore (U)
4 Belgaum
5 Bellary •
6 Bidar
7 Bijapur
8 C.R.Nagar
9 Chickamagalur
10 Chitradurga
11 D. Kannada
12 Davanagere
13 Dharwad
14 Gadag
15 Gulbarga
16 Hassan
17 Haveri
18 Kodagu
19 Kolar
20 Koppal
21 Mandya
22 Mysore
23 Raichur
24 Shimoga
25 Tumkur
26 (J. Kannada
27 Udupi
Total

Financial (Rs.in lakhs)
% to
Target
Cumulaltive
for 2000- Expenditure Annua!
2001
Target

85.09
174.90
147.00
235.00
221.42
111.00
128.72
74.79
168.04
202.60
111.56
198.00
81.50
37.00
160.00
164.50
67.36
84.50
205.00
77.00
118.25
126.00
74.46
108.00
431.00
69.77
75.00
3737.46

65.71
153.14
90.11
199.38
117.34
30.15
73.10
58.55
227.49
115.97
200.60
164.41
87.94
54.77
165.61
129.33
89 11
79.75
171.20
82.21
167.431

109.31
160.22
67.72
291.10
79.12
58.74
3289.51

77
88
31
85
53
27
57
78
• 135
57
180
83
103
148
104
79
132
94
84
107
142
87
215
63
63
113
78
88

Physical (Nos

Target
21
43
36
58
72
27
32
18
47
41
28
31
20
9
39
41
17
21
60
9
24
32
23
27
109
17
18
920

% to
Achievement Annual
Target
28
49
50
53
52
38
32
38
83
63
53
92
48
21
55
90
29
29
107
56
59
48
19
25
88
26
65
1396



133
114
139
91
72
141
100
211
177
154
189
297
240
233
141
220
171
138
178
622
246
150
83
93
81
153
361
152

63

Progress under Piped Water Supply Scheme During 2301-2802

co

Lx

315.00
154.90
299.00
co

1 Bagalkote
2 Bangalore (R)
3 Bangalore (U)
4 Beigaum
5 Bellary
6 Bidar
7 Bijapur
8 C.R.Nagar
9 Chickamagalur
10 Chitradurga
11 D. Kannada
12 Davanagere
13 Dharwad
14 Gadag
15 Gulbarga
16 Hassan
17 Haveri
18 Kodagu
19 Kolar
20 Koppal
21 Mandya
22 Mysore
23 Raichur
24 Shimoga
25 Tumkur
26 U.Kannada
27 Udupi
i OtsS

w

District

ow

SI.No.

Financial (Rs.iHTIakhs)
Physical (Nos)
Target for Cumulaltive
% to Annual
% to
Target Achievement
2001-2002 Expenditure Annual
Target
Target
173.73
21
95
137.51
79
22
163.78
348
439.47
73
268
21
235.00
251.28
130
107
30
39
355.00
381.39
107
118
44
52
238.44
135.70
57
50
128
39
275.00
179.37
65
34
29
85
178.75
201.86
113
22
145
32
171.00
154.08
24
90
22
109
200.45
181.09
90
25
42
168
901
181.67
164.31
23
34
148
299.00
180.32
60
37
33
89
362.00
151.30
42
16
288
40
24
227.00
210.99
93
28 I86
105.00
82.02
78
13
o
1151
275.00
215.68
34
78
42
124
253.00
173.68
69
33
421
127
182.20
162.14
89
22
18
82
70.00
65.24
93
9
10
111
245.00
135.05
55
40
32
80
130.52
96.24
74
6
12
200
342.50
243.16
71
43
64
149
460.00
354.59
77
65
57
114
265.25
99
263.81
33
23
70
131'
235.00
148.14
63
29
38
198.55
180.63
229.74
5317.34

63
117
77
83

48
19
33
782

29
27
24
940

60
142
73
120

6^

Progress under KRmaia Grama Vejana during 2001-2302

<
7
1

53.56
71.42
26.78
89.27
62.50
44.63
44.63
35.71
62.45
53.56
44.53
U)

1 Bagaikote
2 Bangalore (R)
3 Bangalore (U)
4 Belgaum
5 Bellary
6 Bidar
7 Bijapur
8 C.R. Hagar
g Chickamagaiur
10 Chitradurga
11 D. Kannada
12 Davanagere
13 Dhan.vad
14 Gadag
15 Gulbarga
16 Hassan
17 Haver;
18 Kodagu
19 Kolar
20 Kopps!
21 Mandya
22 Mysore
23 Raichur
24 Shimoga
25 Turnkur
26 Udupi
27 U. Kannada
Total

w

District

cn

SI.No.

Financial (Rs.in la khs)
Target Cumulaltive
% to
for 2001- ! Expediture Annual
"T
2002

53 56
44.63
89.27
71.42
53.56
26.78
98.21
35.71
62.49
62.49
4-4.63
62.48
89.27
26.78
98.21
-1562.18

56.16
28.35
10.70
46.63
60.35
21.09
54.85
18.11
53.00
48.38
53 04
61.53
27.63
35.48
18.94
56.62
33.25
34.81
154.90
20.54
17.99
72.01
17.87
29.74
92.43'
39.83
30.49
1194.75

105
40
40
52
97
47
123
51
35
90
119
115
52
80
21
79
62
130
158
58
29
115
40
48
104
149j
31
76

Physical (Nos)

% to
T arget

Achievement

2869
3825
1435
4/83
3347
2391
2391
1913
3347
2869
2391
2869
2869
2391
4783
3825
2869
1435
5262
1913
3347
3347
2391
3347
4733
1435
5262
33-33^.

3264
1399
645
8963
2917
1282
3332
1103
3495
3117
4453
3733
1582
2347
1360
8324
2683
2350
8645
1764
1135
4364
1150l
2604
5891
3608
2270
88330

Annual
Target

114
50
45
187
87
54
141
58
104
109
186
130*
55
98
28
218
94
164
164
92
34
130
48
78
123
251
43
106

SI.
No.

Name of District

1 Bagaiket
2 Bangalaorc®
3 Bangalorc(U)
4 Beigaum
5 Bellary
6 Bidar
7 Bijapur
8 Chamarajanagar
9 Chickmagalur
10 Chi trad urga
1 1 D.Kannada
12 Davangcrc
13 Dharwad
14 Gadag
15 Gulbarga
16 Hassan
17 Haveri
18 Kodagu
19 Kolar
20 Koppal
21 Mandya
22 Mysore
23 Raichur
24 Shimoga
25 Tumkur
26 Udupi
27 U. Kannada
Toted

i .englh of l oads in
Kms.being tackled

Sanctioned Expenditure
Amount by to the end of
Government
March 2002
New
Upgradalio
(Rs.in
lakhs)
of
India
Connectivity
n
371.79
1 50
63.45
170.00
O.CO
458.17
266.26
75.00
0.00
130.00
23.00
141.47
2.85
95.20
655.92
404.00
6.00
53.3 1
408.76
320.00
55.30
215.00
0.00
353.72
0.00
41.40
254.58
145.00
0.00
42.70
261.01
102.13
0.00
61.10
375.92
266.53
4.00
53.10
297.67
180.00
8.59
26.31
249.28
138.37
0.00
61.97
380.21
220.00
0.00
40.25
310.44
212.00
0.00
43.55
333.02
245.81
3.00
94.45
682.97
361.26
34.32
59.05
481.95
310.90
0.00
69.10
444.40
350.34
3.00
23.65
158 16
100.68
6.70
97.00
575.44
340.00
0.00
34.04
249.13
180.00
0.00
62.85
387.81
165.00
O.CO
67.90
409.38
267.34
0.00
64.70
326.50
182.34
3.10
444.49
70.03
271.18
O.CO
89.05
545.49
301 40
0.00
19.00
154.72
133.30
0.00
88.87
639.81
434.80
on
5557.6!
30352.2!
6423.64

Achieve­
ment
%
46
58
92
62
78
61
57
39
71
60
56
58
68
74
53
65
79
64
59
72
43
65
56
61
55
86
68
62

Media
7524.pdf

Position: 154 (23 views)